/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15202239
It's ok, anon. Hopefully this will cheer you up.

>>15202242
hope you're on a proxy, roasties have made possession of videos like that a jailable crime. your porno collection is as illegal as CP

I call bullshit that the squares have to be specifically arranged like that. Look at the two rightmost squares on the top row, for example. There's free space to move them to the right.

>>15202272
it's the best known way, not proven to be the best.
Also you can move a bunch of squares around, but the size of the large outside square is what you're trying to minimze.

>>15202239
that's hilarious

>>15202239
I hate this

>>15202242
That's a man, right?

>>15202239
ya plakayushi, trahai eto gomoseksualnoe govno

>>15202239
thank you for sharing, my students will lost their shit when they see this.

>>15202250
>videos like that
nbd but what the fuck did he post

They should sell this as a puzzle. Actually, this would be laughably easy to produce, you just need the frame and squares.

>>15202239
Your mom can fit more in less space

>>15202666
>>/sci/thread/15202239

>>15202239
Is he going to finish the sentence?

>>15202719
I thought about this, but wouldn't it have to be really really precise? Otherwise some other solutions would work

>>15202239
What can you really expect from a number like 17?

>>15203029
pretty sure that's well within the precision of modern cnc, laser, die cutter, etc. Consider the tolerances on something like a usb-c connector or even just an electric shaver.

>>15202239
AHHH I CANT TAKE IT IM GOING TO KILL MYSELF IF THIS IS UNSOLVED BY TOMORROW I CANT STAND THAT MESS AHHHHHHHH

>>15203075
sir, it's already solved.

>>15202904
yes, she is very good at packing things like luggage into her car or frozen food into the freezer and I love her very much.

>>15203089
NO, THIS ISNT THE SOLUTION, MATH IS BEAUTIFUL, THIS IS NOT FUCKING BEAUTIFUL

>>15202911
cute

>>15203093
um sweety, beauty is subjective.

>>15202288
Oh, now that I got some reference for what optimal solutions are "supposed" to look like (pic related), I kinda understand what's going on here.

The solution is near optimal (but not optimal), that's why it looks funny like that. Anyway that is my intuition now.

>>15203097
NO, THAT SHIT IS AS BEAUTIFUL AS A FAT NIGGER

>>15202239

This makes me mad

>>15202272
he should have an "an optimal" way

>>15203029
With modern machining tools you can make it "really really precise." And the puzzle blocks could be titanium or steel or something to make sure that the pieces don't deform.

>>15203458
love this gif, thanks anon

>>15203029
With modern machining tools you can make it "really really precise." And the puzzle blocks could be titanium or steel or something to make sure that the pieces don't deform when you try to cram them into place.

>>15203108
your intuition sucks

>>15202239
I mean it makes sense that it would be fucked like that. Sometimes ordering things makes boxes nice and full, but have you ever moved? Those moving boxes are pretty chaotic, but filled to the brim pretty effectively.

>>15203474
We should email these guys to make out /sci/ puzzle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd1W_8ZuI4Y

>>15203474
We should email these guys to make our /sci/ puzzle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd1W_8ZuI4Y

>>15202239
a microsecond of critical thought of this image indicates there is not a unique solution. the top right square can be moved left or right without changing the shape of the enclosing square.

>>15203752
>a unique solution
no one said it was. He says "optimal known." Optimal does not mean zero degrees of freedom at peak, it means you can't do better.

>>15203752
It is a unique solution if you think of the solution as the size of the minimized square, not as the exact arrangement of the squares.

>>15203899
That's not what unique means.

bump

>>15202239
It's an ugly solution, but that's to be expected because 17 is an ugly number.
FUCK SEVENTEEN

>>15202239
That packing really rustles my jimmies.

>>15202239
Isn't that just an irregular shape?
How do you preserve the outershape of the square?

>>15206340
I guess, if you're talking about a container this makes sense provided all of the boxes are the same size

>>15202250
When?

>>15202250
>hope you're on a proxy, roasties have made possession of videos like that a jailable crime. your porno collection is as illegal as CP
I love seeing scrotes squirm.

>>15202239
We don’t need OCD spergs like you in math, fuck off

>they've never heard about the sausage catastrophe
Stop posting here

>>15202239
Claims 'the'. Its not the. There are multiple solutions, and it also depends on the initial paramters.

This is a charade understanding of math

>>15202239
Have you tried a swastika man

>>15207201
Hitler?

>>15202250
uhh, when? under what category?

>>15202239
hotdog avalanche or whatever

>>15207479
>>15206446
Pretty sure that's bullshit when it's a top category on m*less and IIRC like ten subreddits

>>15202659
it's nauka, smiris' ili umri

>>15207830
strannaya nauka
weeeeeir
moya kreatsia tse realnosto moya kreatsia
weeeeir
naannanaannaa

>>15202239
fixed

>>15209302
aesthetic

>>15209302

>>15209302
Fake and gay. You can move some of those squares around without changing the bounding square, so it's not "the" optimal known packing.

>>15202719
but if the frame is a fixed object, you're already giving away part of the solution.
not knowing whether your attempt truly produced THE smallest possible square area, and then having to come up with a way to prove it is part of the fun.

>>15209319
Yeah, exactly like in OP you dummy.

>>15202239
The optimal known packing. Who cares what humans "know"?

>>15203321
He brown