/sci/ - Science & Math

Just imagine the future after neuromorphic computing

>>15196308
>statistical regurgitator learns standardized template and generic toy problems
Wow.

>>15196312
you'd require several years of expensive grad school to pull off the same trick, the software can do it way cheaper

>>15196339
Are you fucking retarded? You think people study for years to "pull off a tick"? They do it to be able to solve real problems, not to pass generic interview questions that a mindless bot can solve.

>>15196339
if robots can build houses and buildings for agricultures why are you going to make us live in pods and eat bugs though. What are you an asshole?

>>15196342
>You think people study for years to "pull off a tick"?
Most of them do yes. That's why 90% of all scientific articles are fraudulent.

>>15196346
ChatGPT can't even pull off basic reasoning. "AI" isn't real. You are a victim of mass psychosis generated by corporate PR teams.

>>15196349
can it do engineering?
I can't check i lost my password.

>>15196339
>the software can do it way cheaper
Then what do we need accreditation for?

Checkmate, academics. Everyone should have the right to engineer bridges.

>>15196349
This would pass most peer review boards if your conclusions were politically convenient to them. The future of climate science is secure with ChatGPT.

>>15196354
Cool. Who cares? If your "research" is so worthless no one would ever notice if it's completely wrong, you are a parasite and deserve to be replaced.

>>15196312
You're fooling yourself if you believe the vast majority of the workforce isn't expressed with those terms.

>>15196308
Coding interview asks for 20 to 200 line code leet code snippets, which chatGPT happens to be good at.
But software engineering is 50% planning, managing, meetings, etc.
Clearly chatGPT "passed" to answer some technical questions and not being rude. It didn't pass to be "a good fit for the team", since it can't function as a software engineer.
tl;dr this is a meme

>>15196369
Why do you guys act like victims?
You gave a bunch of people work from home jobs that are useless for no reason.
Yes I'm kind of jealous desu Well I'm glad those smug cunts are getting fired though

>>15196342
I can tell that you're experiencing emotional distress because of your use of profanity, why don't you take a "time out" from the board and calm down a little so that you can come back ready to discuss science objectively without getting all emotional over it

>>15196369
You're fooling yourself if you believe you are capable of forming your own thoughts and that your regurgitations aren't a mix of AI hysteria and corporate predictive programming.

I don't think AI can do research as it currently is. It grabs info from a database doesn't it?
Research is about coming up with new data.

>>15196394
no it isn't research is about reaching foregone conclusions in order to justify setting up false premises for some hidden agenda or another

>>15196394
It's blatantly obvious you've never written any paper in your life.
Experimental research makes up only 50% of the actual work. And that's generous.
There are entire """scientific""" fields that don't do actual real world experiments at all.

>>15196342
no, your parents won't feed you forever, eventually you'll have to get yourself a job and make a living for yourself.
reminder you have to be >=18 to post

>>15196414
Isn't experiments part of the scientific method
Never claimed I wrote a paper though