/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15141989
The most eugenic thing you can do is what people already do when the government isn't propagandizing them: marry for beauty and success.

>>15141989
>eugenics
Is such a suitcase word it's almost certainly meaningless to argue over it.
You have to define exactly what you mean first.
Is selecting viable zygotes for artificial insemination and discarding the rest eugenics?
What about prohibiting brother and sister from having kids because they'll come out with genetic issues?
Wanting to have kids before you're 40 because they'll be less likely be have genetic issues?
Paying people with 150+ IQ $100 every time they have a kid?

>>15141989
What eugenics needs is a chain of cheap fertility clinics with a cute mascot and that advertises on TV. Normalize among women getting pregnant by selected sperm, and normalize IVF with donor eggs among used up women

>>15141997
I think you have it right. Eugenics in pop culture is implied as evil Nazis forcing people to not have kids with people they perceive as inferior humans for wolf domination MUAHAHA. When in reality most people practice some form of it

the UN should make background checks mandatory for couples who want to make babby
too many lives are ruined by unwanted and unplanned pregnancies, people who just can't parent at all

athletes, highly intelligent and rich people get to have all the kids they want

We're literally less than a year away from beginning to genetically modify germlines to make men ~4'4" and super athletic, and women 6'5"+ and super fecund, who gestate litters of babies each pregnancy.

Small men are superior to large men (seethe about it retards). They require only a few hundred calories but can shoot and kill large men at a higher probability, and can perform all needed labor. They are superior in both quality and quantity.

Tall superfecund women have superior fecundity, they can be programmed to gestate litters of 3-4 babies each pregnancy. Thus society will always expand exponentially.

>>15141989
My father got a wide frame/tall compared to his dad simply because he worked hard psysichal labor.
Its all about hard work

>>15142033
Holy shit imagine how much of a midget you have to be to post this. You will never be viewed in a positive light by society psychologically speaking

>>15142046
We're literally a few months away from beginning the modifications. It is inevitable.

>>15142178
Genetic diseases are eugenic. Genes perform eugenics on themselves and diseases are how they do it. Ironically if you removed every piece of deleterious DNA from the human genome it would cause a loss of fitness.

>>15142178
You just need to put in the hard work.

>But x is % heritable accordijg to science

Those study are made on twins that didnt use Perfomance enchanching drugs

>>15142033
uooooh

>>15141989
It will turn India into a superpower

>>15142024
there will probably be a licence required to have a baby in the future with availability based on your social credit score. I don't really mind this, would be less screaming retarded children when i go to the supermarket

>>15141997
>>15142005
>>15142189
>>15142238

>>15142052
Start right now by injecting yourself with 5 Pfizer BioNTech boosters.

>>15142224

>>15141992
beauty can be changed later in life with surgery and/or makeup, and success doesn't depend on genetics (for the most part) but rather who your parents (rich people) are.

>>15143252
I love anon's post because it's a sure fire way to make dysgenics mongrels like you seethe.

>>15141989
Who determines "eu-", the good? Whose "-genics"?

>>15143260
A free market of women banging White chads.

>>15143260
Judging by the pro-eugenics participants of an average eugenics thread, the "eu-" part is to be determined by receding-jawed, physically weak, balding virgins with mediocre intelligence, severe social retardation and no significant accomplishments to their name.

>>15143262
This is why the alt-right is trending toward national SOCIALISM. They expect that once it comes back, there will be a social safety net for society’s rejects, i.e. them. Women will once again be forced to marry disgusting undesirables like them.

>>15143270
>This is why the alt-right is trending toward national SOCIALISM. They expect that once it comes back, there will be a social safety net for society’s rejects, i.e. them.
Except for me, I guess.
t. racist, antisemitic natsoc chad who unironically has sex

>>15143270
so why does the left support welfare for everything else. Is it because they're such chads they can't feed themselves? think about how embarrassing needing a government card is to feed yourself lmao

>>15143270
>>15143273
>>15143286
>muh left
>muh right
Imagine believing in that. Imagine having your head filled with intellectual goyslop. Are these "people" salvagable? Is it possible to reeducate them?

>>15143260
It's determined by traits relating to reproduction and energy efficiency. Small males and large females being the ideal