[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 488 KB, 840x560, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15087921 No.15087921 [Reply] [Original]

>And potentially, beyond. Human babies are among the most helpless and underdeveloped in the animal kingdom. Why can't we pop out of the womb and take our wobbly first steps five minutes later, like a calf does? It's because our brains are too big for the human female hip gap; we're born undercooked, with soft, pliable skulls, several months behind other animals developmentally. But in an EctoLife EZ-Womb, there's no such biological limit. You could experiment with much longer gestational periods, the results might be terrific

This idiot knows that overgestation can fuck up babies, right? We aren't elephants that can be in the womb for nearly two years.

The absolute state of "scientific minds".

>> No.15090273

>>15087921
What went wrong?

>> No.15090287

>>15087921
Imagine all the relentless globohomo indoctrination you can cram into millions of these artificially born people from day one.

Like in the future you could immediately tell if someone was vat-born and raised by a corporation/socialist government by their NPC-like canned woke responses.

>> No.15090290
File: 1 KB, 113x120, 4125.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15090290

>>15090287
My golems will be fitter, happier and more productive than you, chud.

>> No.15090307

>>15090290
>2070
>at work at the bugpaste factory
>water-cooler talk with Mark-2316 Amazon and Jacob-5615 Tesla
>they both agree that it's a great day for LGBTQIFP-rights that violent child-rape is finally decriminalized if it's committed by a person identifying as MAP
>carefully suggest that perhaps it might be taking it too far
>they both look at you with smug contempt
>"Oh sorry, we forgot you were one of those "nattys". You guys tend to be kinda reactionary due to your old-fashioned upbringing."
>"H-heheh, y-yeah."

>> No.15090311

>>15090307
Why is that bad?