/sci/ - Science & Math

Any math that can only exist in a virtual realm is meaningless

>>15077850
thanks OP, once again wildberger does it again, only 1 minute in but has already provided earth shattering insight to my own MMP number theory, that defines the empty set not as pure 0 but as the [math]0 \text{illuminati} \infty = [][/math] an almost oroborus like tug of war between the nothingness and the infinite

[math]\alpha \equiv [ 1 ] [/math]
[math]\alpha \equiv [ [0] ] [/math]
[math]\alpha \equiv [ [ [] ] ] [/math]

Is Norman a jew?

>>15077776
meds

>>15077776
so this nigga literally just recycled the set theoretic way to define numbers but made it look more like a programming language?
wow, you fags are really easy to impress

>>15078263
>are really easy to impress

>“Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.” -Einstein

Let the philosophers divine the continuum, for in all your estranged notation, have you not forgotten the central problem in mathematics?

>>15078482
You couldn't come up with a problem regarding the set-theoretic presentation of the continuum if your life depended on it. You only dogmatically deny the axiom of infinity, that is all.

>>15079064
you have literally no reason to believe that the set-theoretic presentation of the continuum has anything to do with the continuum.

>>15079064
You continue to build up, not dig to uncover the foundations of the ancients

I have in fact rooted the notion of the multiset simultaneously in both infinite and zero through the infinite nothingness

undoubtedly this knowledge is ahead of its time, but when it is seen by the academics, if they find this post just know the Nobel goes to Wildberger and my contribution shall be labeled as Anonymous from 4chan

>>15079102
indeed, set theory is, indeed, on trail

>>15079064
>You only dogmatically deny the axiom of infinity,
infinity? what number is that?

>>15079106
interesting

>>15079064
Don't bother with these guys, believe me you can't convince a schizo, especially whose education is based upon Wikipedia

>>15079123
I have much work ahead yet, though ultimately it is upon the observation that 0 and infinity are inverses of the same thing. Zero has perfect precision, it is where it is, yet there is no length, no digits to the number. while Infinity has no precision at all, you cant stick it anywhere on the numberline without it just moving on more step up, no matter how much endless precision you give it.

I think I'll change the 'illuminati operator' to the 'oroboros operator' that describes the combination of nothingness and the infinite, weaving in a tug of war in the primordial void, ultimately manifesting in the notion of the (not empty) but primordial multiset []. the algebra than follows the same rules in video related, like holofractially warping the infinite nothingness around itself into shape, form and structure