[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 820 KB, 851x1049, blSGvy5nPXi4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076339 No.15076339 [Reply] [Original]

>Coldest Christmas weather since the 1940s

>> No.15076358

it happened because the north atlantic was extra warm

>> No.15076361
File: 204 KB, 849x412, cc_bomb cyclone.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076361

>>15076358

>> No.15076362
File: 83 KB, 896x896, D10FE040-6C17-488D-B7B4-BE2A5C1C2915.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076362

>>15076339
whatever happens, you know it's your fault. THERE IS NO ESCAPE FROM THE STRUGGLE SESSION!!!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mptNDINqYnQ

>> No.15076364
File: 137 KB, 800x774, bombcyclone.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076364

>>15076358
.

>> No.15076376
File: 161 KB, 923x1550, 1669697314936823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076376

>>15076362
>greg thunderburp

>> No.15076378

>>15076364
>climate change institute
what an unbiased source of information you choose to get you information from.

>> No.15076399

>>15076378
>i have no argument
lol, you thinking numbers like that are a secret is hilarious
tin foil hat level crazy

>> No.15076406

>>15076364
Do you even know how those numbers were sampled? Also how confident are you that 1979 represents an accurate and unbiased start date when that was one of the coldest decades ever?

>> No.15076411

>>15076406
>>1979 coldest decades ever
>source: my ass

>> No.15076417

>>15076411
In the history of our ability to record the temperature accurately, it ranks as the coldest decade. In the history of our written records of coldest winters it ranks in the top 5.

>> No.15076418

>>15076358
Waiting for this post to be peer reviewed

>> No.15076420

>>15076417
nice source, bud

>> No.15076421

>>15076418
As the resident peer reviewer I declare it misleading and kick it back to the poster for further edits.

>> No.15076423

>>15076418
https://cfs.ncep.noaa.gov/cfsr/downloads/

>> No.15076424

>>15076420
All you have to do is look at raw temperature data and you'll see it's true. This is basic stuff man, I don't need to lead you to water if you won't drink it. In the 70s they genuinely thought the Earth was headed for a destructive ice age because global temperatures plummeted from the 30s-50s average.

>> No.15076425

>>15076424
>>15076420

>> No.15076426

>>15076425
If you don't know how to scrape NOAA data for your research then you're not smart enough for this thread. Trust the experts.

>> No.15076427
File: 418 KB, 1520x1230, CC_trends_anthro.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076427

>> No.15076430

>>15076427
Of course, without interpolation and adjustments the observations match the natural forcing chart more than the models. That's why data has to be nudged into place just a tad.

>> No.15076431

>>15076427
nothing special about the '70s globally
As usual with idiots like you, you think USA is the whole world

>> No.15076433

greta is so pure. she's saving herself for me

>> No.15076434

>>15076433
That's a man, baby.

>> No.15076436

>>15076339
You can't be this retarded

>> No.15076448

>>15076378
what would happen to
>the climate change institute
if they accidentally did some unbiased science and found that co2 isn't a "greenhouse gas"?
would the just shut the doors and close down that day?
i bet they'd all be ecstatic to find out that the world isn't coming to an end.
maybe they'd just paint a new institutional moniker on the building
>the alice chang institute
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun-Yung_Alice_Chang

>> No.15076453

>>15076364
Benis:-DDDD

>> No.15076455

>>15076448
>what if fapfapfap
your public fantasy masturbating is making your tin foil hat fall off

>> No.15076461

Notice how everything started calling it climate change instead of global warming

>> No.15076462

>>15076448
kek. If only people's careers were dependent on real science and not justifying their jobs for another 20 years.

>> No.15076465
File: 105 KB, 768x1024, cc_1912.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15076465

>>15076448
>unbiased science
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunice_Newton_Foote#%22Circumstances_Affecting_the_Heat_of_the_Sun's_Rays%22

>> No.15076471

>>15076461
GW is global (duh) which means that the Average Global temperature is rising.
Climate change is a more a local thing, and means that more and more often weather records are broken, this shows up in the news as once-in-a-generation drought/flood/heatwave/winter storm etc,
"local thing" can be quite big here, like north america - but not global

>> No.15076503

>>15076471
>the news
almost completely fake, the only parts that aren't fake are the ones nobody has imagined faking yet

>> No.15076508

>>15076503
meds, now

>> No.15076516

>>15076503
>the news
>almost completely fake
what-everrr you say, Mister Trump

>> No.15076518

it's only 53 where I am and this winter will be the driest on record for my city

high of 75 tomorrow

>> No.15076527

>>15076339
>Coldest Christmas weather
...in parts of USA.
64°F today in Las Vegas, forecast 66°F tomorrow

>> No.15076528

>>15076503
Sure bud, try telling the insurance companies nothing is happening.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/global-warming-no-hoax-to-insurance-companies

>> No.15076529

>>15076339
probably because of the carbon emissions caused by the war, just like back in the 40s

>> No.15076536

this thread is full of retards holy shit

>> No.15076605

>>15076434
It's just a swede, anon. Keep your faggot desires to other boards, please.

>> No.15076617

>>15076339
Think of the weather as a pendulum. The harder it swings to one side, in summer, the harder it will swing to the other in the winter. Climate is how hard it swings, and humans, we are telling the climate to keep swinging it harder

>> No.15076641

>>15076617
That's nice. Have you been taking your meds?

>> No.15076644 [DELETED] 

>>15076339
The polar vortex failed, which means that winds can blow across the pole, so that lower latitudes get either very warm or very cold, depending if they are downwind or upwind from the pole.

>> No.15076648

>>15076339
The polar vortex failed, which means that winds can blow across the pole, so that lower latitudes get either very warm or very cold, depending if they are upwind or downwind from the pole.