/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15040730
So what do you think made him turn schizo? Was he always that way, or was it just him getting too old?

>>15040730
Daily reminder that the Lead Pill is the only cure for schizophrenia.

>>15040732
>>15040737
you LITERALLY can't prove him wrong, brainlet

>>15040768
You literally can prove him right, brain 404

>>15040768
Prove what wrong? It's schizobabble.

>>15040730
>write thousands of words dedicated to self-aggrandizement about a subject in which no new discovery or prediction is made
idk seems like masturbation to me

>>15040730
why did he drew an innie vagina??

This dude is actually full schizo now?

>>15040890
He has been for years.

>>15040730
I hate solving problems based on the 2nd law
How do I get good?

>>15040730
You can do both.

has this nigga ever made a prediction with his schizo model that differed from mainstream physics and turned out to be true?

I have no idea what the 2nd law is, or the 1st or 3rd for that matter. Giving numbers to laws is fucking retarded.

>>15040730
>my pixels prove it
retard can't even make a gif or webm of his pseudo garbage

>>15041334
If only, but no he hasn't.

>>15040730
Is that the mathematical version of Nikocado?

>>15041991
kek I see it

Second law of thermodynamics?
Do NOT talk about thermodynamics.

>>15040730
>understanding the 2nd law of thermodynamics
>started 50 years ago, hasn't finished
He must be really fucking dumb to take this long to understand it

>>15041991
Well, I do see the resemblance.

>>15040730
what am I looking at?

>>15042121
Unmedicated schizophrenia.

>>15042122
How does one distinguishes between a schizo and a genius lacking the sikill of communication?

Jokes on you Stephen. I was masturbating to your research.

>>15042137
Whether what he's proposing is useful and testable or just nonsense.

>>15042137
you can't

>>15042148
And how do you recognize something which is way above your level (by definition of genius) for what it is (before it went through engineering and marketing departments and came to you as a product)
>>15042162
> you can't
Then I hope an Ai will be allowed to audit the asilums (and keep total surveilance of every public facility)

>>15042179
>And how do you recognize something which is way above your level (by definition of genius) for what it is (before it went through engineering and marketing departments and came to you as a product)
By being above midwit-level and understanding what's being discussed.

>>15042181
So do you understand what that wolfram man is doing? what is that cellular automata and what does it have to do with thermodynamics?

>>15042185
My impression is that he's attempting to use cellular automata as a form of data visualization for the process of entropy (probably a heat transfer model) as an example of the 2nd Law.

>>15042189
Are you the same guy? What is wrong about that idea? (other than entropy being a mystification and that he's working in 2d and the processes are in 3d)

>>15040730
Based.

>>15040936
Is that why he didn't respond to my comment on his stream about simulating magnetic fields in a cellular automata to represent a holographic field of consciousness? He didn't want to discredit himself by responding to an obvious schizo like myself?

>>15041381
so what should they be called then?

>>15042137
nothing until this theory comes up with a testable hypothesis

>>15041334
if his model fully agrees with mainstream physics and is internally consistent that's essentially an independent verification of mainstream physics. why do people act like replication isn't valuable? do they just put faith in some 'memorized trivia' idea of 'science' without understanding basic epistemology?

>>15042278
how is inventing another model that makes exactly the same predictions any relevant to "replicability"?
if the current state of maths can be represented by a set of axioms then there is an infinite amount of equivalent models. so why the fuck would a new one matter?

no link, 40 one line bot tier responses sounding like bickering teenagers who don't know the basics of mathematics or physics. Why is sci like this? Some say something of intelligence please!

>>15042350
This isn't a scientific thread about a scientific topic. Stephen Wolfram is a computer scientist who got too big-headed about his intelligence and thinks he can solve physics.

>>15042350
>oh lordy please someboy say something intelligent!
>'cept me of course!

>>15042352
>Stephen Wolfram is a computer scientist
He literally finished his PhD in particle physics when he was 20.

>>15040768
https://archive.vn/Xdhbq

>>15042418
https://archive.vn/Xdhbq
“There’s a tradition of scientists approaching senility to come up with grand, improbable theories,” the late physicist Freeman Dyson told Newsweek back in 2002. “Wolfram is unusual in that he’s doing this in his 40s.”

>>15042426
>appeal to authority
I thought /sci/ was supposed to be the smart board?

>>15040730
ITT: glowniggers afraid wolfram getting too close to the truth

>>15042432
The pinnacle of argumentative power is insulting your enemy with difficult truths.

>>15042314
A foundation on cellular automata is more novel than anything cucked academia could come up with

>>15042438
>caring about power instead of truth
Kek just proving me right in a different way; materialist redditors with a 120iq are just psychopaths who should be treated like vampires or demons. I’m starting to understand why marxists killed the intellectuals.

>>15042444
You missed the part where the argument only has power because it's true. Not surprising for a schizophrenic though.

>>15042444
>who should be treated like vampires or demons
wrong
those have greater capacity for humanity

>>15042451
But your definition of “true” Is circular. It’s true because authority says it. It’s true because you believe you can bully others by ganging up on them and asserting it. You believe in nothing more than heleglian sophistry.

>>15042540
It's true because it's a factual claim that he's doing the exact same thing every big-headed senile scientist does, with the same lack of testable hypotheses.

>>15042278
all the more important if significant differences appear later. imagine the secret to cracking quantum gravity being a 50 year CA side quest.

>>15042426
>“Wolfram is unusual in that he’s doing this in his 40s.”
the point you've missed is that these wisened great men die before completion of the task. wolfram, especially now that he has help, is young enough to actually pull it off. kek

>>15042546
>testable hypotheses
>first they ignore you
>then they laugh at you
>then they fight you
(you are here)independent theoretical confirmation
>then you win

anyone get the feeling the wolfram's work and the amplituhedron will somehow touch one another?

>>15042278
"with four parameters I can fit an elephant, with five I can make him wiggle his trunk"

I like the pictures he makes. all his plots, graphs, charts, etc always look excellent.

>>15042546
>lack of testable hypotheses.
isnt it the case that we are moreso bound by the energetic limits of experimentally accessible regimes, eg plank length?