/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15035206
But |1/x| is monotonically decreasing anon

f is not decreasing on R∖{0}. It is decreasing on R+∖{0} and on R−∖{0}. The implication between the sign of the derivative and the monotony of the function is true only on intervals https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3809222/is-frac1x-a-monotonic-decreasing-function

>>15035206
seems very based anon

6 ÷ 3 = 2 // 1 ÷ 0 = £
3 = 6 ÷ 2 // 0 = 1 ÷ £
6 = 3 × 2 // 1 = 0 × £
2 = 6 ÷ 3 // £ = 1 ÷ 0

>>15035304
Not quite my style, it's logical to instead order the inequalities properly

should I keep going?

>>15035206
It's contextual. For fields, zero has no reciprocal. In a protectively extended real line the reciprocal or zero is infinity.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectively_extended_real_line

This is also true on a Riemann Sphere.

The problem of multiple operations having the same solution, which is normally given as a canned response against 1/0 = ∞, doesn't hold much weight. The cubed root of 1 has three answers: 1, w, w2, positive numbers have two square roots, etc.

>>15035388
>The cubed root of 1 has three answers: 1, w, w2,
refer to this image >>15035331 Assume the reciprocal of Mass is a Negative Volume of Time

>>15035206
>>>/x/

http://www.goodmath.org/blog/2013/03/21/genius-continuum-crackpottery/

1. The identity of the Absolute is not contained within itself. It is its own process of coming into being: A ≠ A

This is the trickiest one so I will add a bit. We normally think of identity relationships as reflexive, symmetric and transitive, the equivalence relationship satisfying ∀F(Fx Fy) x=y.

Or, for first order analysis ∀F(Fx Fy) x=y x ≡ x x = x

This cannot be for being is constantly changing and isn't identical with itself, hence the Eleatic Paradoxes being paradoxes at all and all the myriad problems with identity in logic and philosophy more generally.


2. Unquantifiable, pure being qua being: ∞/1

3. Pure being, with no distinction is simply pure abstraction— contentless— and so is no different from nothing. It is a contentless unity, a whole with no parts: ∞/1 = 1/0

4. We have a unity of opposites, sublation. Being passes into non-being and non-being into being in endless reflective relationships, resulting in the higher level of Becoming: O |– A

5. The Absolute, which is infinite, all possibility (the Pleroma) only becomes itself through the movements of Being coming to recognize Its self as Being through all of its possible moments. The truth is the whole: 1/0 = ∞ 2/0 = ∞ 3/0 = ∞... 0 × ∞ = 1 0 × ∞ = 2 0 × ∞ = 3...

† ∀(a) A ≠ A Ã = A
à = 0 = 1/∞ = Å

I give up on this phone keyboard... you get the idea.

>>15035708
Ey, what the fuck happened to half my damn notation.

Lame.

>>15035714 I like guys
so what do you make of the full C3 paper? if we have the continuum we can have the creative fun now.

>>15037414

>>15035708
Sublation shows a way around the contradictions of n/0 = ∞.

Having it be non-defined is fine for practical purposes though. Although it is also pragmatic to have it be infinite, which is why many calculators and software programs still show this.

>>15037483
Yes friend.

>>15035388
what do you make of this? Higgs two decay channels YY & ZZ