[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 739 KB, 960x712, 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009813 No.15009813 [Reply] [Original]

>Infinity's not a number! It's a concept!
All numbers are concepts you fucking goof.

>No! You can't just say 0/0 equals one, then you could prove that 1 = 2!
So what? You could also use the square root of four to prove that 2 = -2.

>No!! 1/0 is not infinity because there's an asymptote!
How about you asymptote this fat ass? Just define asymptotes as infinity you dummy.

>No!!! 0^0 is not equal to one because it's discoutinuous on the other side!
Plenty of functions are discontinuous and we call them numbers, for the instance... the natural fucking numbers???

>No!!!! One is not prime because muh fundamental theorem of arithmetic!!!
Your fundamental theorem of arithmetic can chortle my balls. Just modify it to accomadate for one, the the true mother of all numbers. Holy fucking shit.

Pic unrelated

>> No.15009818

>>15009813
L∞l, Lam∞ even.

>> No.15009827

>>15009813
>You could also use the square root of four to prove that 2 = -2.
wrong

>> No.15009828

>>15009827
√4=±2

>> No.15009839

>>15009828
Now prove that 2 = -2

>> No.15009841

>>15009839
I can only do that on a balance sheet.

>> No.15009842

>>15009841
>>15009828
for the record, you haven't proved shit. [math]\sqrt{x^2}=|x|[/math], now look up the definition of the absolute value

>> No.15009843

Why are there so many retards on /sci/? This board isn't supposed to be this bad

>> No.15009844

>>15009842
>>15009839
Ohh, btw. I'm not OP, just some tourist from /k/ about to take a physics class in December. My highest level of math is college algebra.

>> No.15009846

>>15009841
Let x^2 = 4. x = 2. x = -2. x=x.
>Verification not required.

>> No.15009849

>>15009846
see >>15009842
you have [math]|x|=2[/math], for [math]x\geq 0[/math] and [math]|x|=-2[/math] for [math]x<0[/math]

>> No.15009850

>>15009849
The only one who cares about abs(x) is you, retard.

>> No.15009851

>>15009850
Wrong again, my retarded, underage friend. It's literally how [math]\sqrt{x^2][/math] is defined and real analysis is based on it. You don't get to change that with your confused rambling about what you think math is, son.

>> No.15009852

>>15009849
>>15009850
By the way. Your absolute value function is defective. |x| ≥ 0 for x≥0 and |x| ≤ 0 for x ≤ 0. It's discontinuous whereas x^2 is continuous. Eat my ass, nigger.

>> No.15009853

>>15009852
>x| ≥ 0 for x≥0 and |x| ≤ 0 for x ≤ 0
see >>15009849
you literally can't even read, kek

>> No.15009856

>>15009813
retarded and arrogant, a terrible combination

>> No.15009858

>>15009853
>0 ≠ 0
Kek. You the kind of guy who writes +0 and -0

>> No.15009861
File: 32 KB, 409x662, images - 2021-04-16T065057.859.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009861

>>15009843
>Why are there so many retards on /sci/?
Because you people cant tell the difference between savant and charlatans; the ultimate mid-wit red flag.

>> No.15009862

>>15009861
You only need one color for that: copper.

>> No.15009863
File: 3.58 MB, 2245x2257, E8hyperbolics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009863

>>15009856
Yet humble geniuses are gatekept by midwits.

Curious...I wonder which one you are...

>> No.15009865

>>15009863
>Theory of everything
Midwit flag if ever I saw one.

>> No.15009875
File: 93 KB, 863x810, CKMfitter2019.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009875

>>15009865
>He doesnt have a TOE and consumes other's in his passtime.
Yeah, haha, Penrose and Weinstein are mental midgets haha....YOU on the otherhand are a GOD to these mere mortals.

Haha, yeah man, haha...

>> No.15009877

>>15009875
>Mental midget
>Low end of the bell curve
Anon your problem is you've confused midwit with dimwit. Yes, those two gentlemen are midwits.

>> No.15009880
File: 130 KB, 846x1024, penrosecones.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009880

>>15009877
>those two gentlemen are midwits.
Cool, you should be able to shred GU with ease then.

And Penrose? Geometric tiling and all that nonsese...sic'em boy!

>youre fucking retarded, post your field so I can school you in it

>> No.15009884

>>15009880
Look man. Maybe you should make sure a GUT has been verified before masturbating over someone's TOE.

>> No.15009896

>>15009858
It's got nothing to do with that, my low IQ friend. [math]|x|=+x[/math], for [math]x\geq 0[/math], [math]|x|=-x[/math], for [math]x<0[/math]. Have some humility and maybe you could learn something new.

>> No.15009901

>>15009896
Explain how that's different from x ≥ 0 and x ≤ 0 case
>Hurr durr because it just is, ok???
Not an argument. Justify why your way is correct and why you think mine is incorrect.

>> No.15009903
File: 470 KB, 719x694, 2022-10-20_01.50.12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009903

>>15009884
>make sure a GUT has been verified
THATS MY JOB DUMBASS!

YOU LOOK TO ORHER MEN TO VALIDATE REALITY FOR YOU?!??!?¿¿€¿

GAAAAAY YOU ARE GAAAAAY!!!!!!!!

MOD-FUCKING-WIT-COPE GOOD LORD!!!

>PS: Dont tell me your field of study...I will DESTROY you in it, son.

>> No.15009905

>>15009903
>>make sure a GUT has been verified
>THATS MY JOB DUMBASS!
Then you deserve to be fired. You've clearly not done your job very well. As a matter of fact, you've not done your job at all.

>> No.15009910

>>15009901
Shouldn't be necessary. I've told you to look up the definition of the absolute value of real numbers already. It's your job to prove equivalence between those two assertions.

>> No.15009911
File: 84 KB, 640x708, amplituhedron-drawing_web.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009911

>>15009905
Only One is true, meaning they are all fake except one. I do it for FUN. I read books on mathematics for FUN. I attend lectures FOR FUN. FUCK YOUR J-O-B.

Validated or not is irrelevant to me BECAUSE IM NOT HERE TO SERVE YOU MY LABOR FUCKFACE. IM HERE TO LEARN NOVEL MATHEMATICS.

>POST FIELD: BE DESTROYED.

>> No.15009914

>>15009910
Already did. Or are you incapable of plugging in zero? Kek.

>> No.15009918

>>15009914
Wrong again. You claimed those two assertions are equivalent. Now prove it, underage.

>> No.15009922

>>15009918
Already did. 0=0. QED.

>> No.15009923

>>15009922
Wrong again. You claimed those two assertions are equivalent. Now prove it, underage.

>> No.15009930

>>15009852
>x^2 is continuous
so is [math]|x|^2[/math]

>> No.15009931
File: 942 KB, 300x225, tumblr_9a617ed12da21aac13d3f7b40c5d97fe_e45c59ee_400.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009931

>> No.15009934

>>15009923
*taps mix* hello? Is this thing on? Are we speaking the same language? Do you think I'm writing oxygen bonds or something? To clarify, it's the number zero equal to the number zero. This isn't an oxygen bond. Hopefully that clears up your confusion.

>> No.15009941

>>15009934
Taking 0=0 as a premise does not prove equivalence of these assertions. In any case, the definition is as in >>15009896. Prove it if you've got any integrity. I only forgot an extra [math]-[/math] before. We are done here.

>> No.15009945

>>15009941
>the definition is
How predictable. Do you even remember our conversation? Let me remind you.
>>15009901
It's almost like I knew you'd mindlessly fall back on
>hurr durr my heckin definitionerino!
Yet you're totally incapable of explaining WHY that definition is used and not the one I provided you. Pseud.

>> No.15009955

>>15009945
Son, you've once again misunderstood my post.
I have provided you with a definition of the modulus in >>15009896. Show that the psychotic nonsense you came up with is equivalent to it. You claimed so, now prove it.
What's next?

>> No.15009957

>>15009955
x= x for x = 0. Or 0=0. What are you not understanding?

>> No.15009961

>>15009957
look at the definition in >>15009896
prove that [math]|x|=\begin{cases} x, &x\geq 0 \\ -x, &x<0\end{cases} \Leftrightarrow (\forall x\geq 0)( |x| \geq 0)\land (\forall x\leq 0) (|x|\leq 0)[/math]
(note: you can't, since it doesn't make any sense)

>> No.15009966

>>15009961
Sure it does. Simply plug in -x = 0 and your function is unchanged. Use all the fancy jargon you want. You're still not providing an explanation for why you think it's wrong.

>> No.15009967
File: 432 KB, 600x530, 1638653264180.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009967

>>15009966
Yeah, I'm done playing with you. Clearly, you're too braindead to figure it out.
Let me throw you a bone, son: what does [math]-x[/math] equal, if [math]x<0[/math].

>> No.15009969

>>15009967
if f(0) = 0 and if -x = 0 at x = 0 then the function f(x) = |x| is unmodified by extending the domain of x < 0 to x ≤ 0.

Seriously, people like you are braindead. You're so ensnared in your formal definitions that you never stop to ask about the motivations behind the definitions. Which is why mathfags like you will never contribute anything meaningful to science.

>> No.15009970
File: 6 KB, 268x284, 1640245899442.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009970

>>15009969
I threw you a bone and you still don't get it. Christ almighty.

>> No.15009975

>>15009970
See this is what I'm talking about. You're incapable of understanding what I'm saying. Obviously in YOUR definition zero is outside the domain. What I'm saying is that in MY definition I extend the domain. These both give the same results of abs(x).

The fact you're incapable of seeing this is the point of my previous post. You're so stuck on the definition you provided youre totally blind to understanding how anyone can say any different from you. If someone says differently, cite your definition (cf. Bible), and ergo the other person must be wrong.

Meanwhile you completely miss the point that definitions are arbitrary. So, for the umpteenth time stupid nigger: can you justify WHY you're using that definition and not a different one?

>> No.15009980
File: 54 KB, 499x695, 1643329838188.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009980

>>15009975
No, I know what your confused babbling is about. I'm simply noting that this is not what my hint was about at all.
You're genuinely too retarded to understand what "[math]-x[/math], if [math]x<0[/math]" means.

>> No.15009983

>>15009980
The fact you you persist in citing your definition ad nauseum, without providing a justification for using that definition and not another indicates that you DO NOT understand what I'm telling you. I'm done with you, maybe someone with more patience can deal with your autism. Fwiw, I think you have the potential to be a fine mathematician, and no it's not a compliment in any way.

>> No.15009990
File: 16 KB, 157x219, 1646641013135.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15009990

>>15009983
It shouldn't take any mathematical maturity to recognize the issue with the statement in >>15009961. I have said everything I need to say, son. It's ridiculous that you still do not understand the issue, yet keep on repeating the same old non-sense that ultimately has nothing to do with it.

>> No.15010158

"lol" said Anon "lmao"

https://youtube.com/shorts/zZ40pI4T308?feature=share

>> No.15010169
File: 3.29 MB, 540x561, 0e66c036c9c6d1e7c38ef4268221798e.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010169

>>15009813
are you replying to https://youtu.be/XOVVnSLNRUE

>All numbers are concepts you fucking goof.
That's the point. A mathematical structure of concepts does not necessarily translate to truth, even if it may be internally consistent and practical.
>use the square root of four to prove that 2 = -2
I don't want to be rude, but this is a dumb statement. Such deductive logic from square root only proves -2 and 2 are included within the same set of solution.
>define asymptotes as infinity
The point is, this isn't a number and shouldn't be treated as such.
>Just modify it to accomadate fo
Sure, but this is forever.

>> No.15010171

>adult schizos arguing over middle school algebra
This is a big failure of the educational system

>> No.15010173

>>15010171
>npc post template #48376243287

>> No.15010177
File: 27 KB, 370x438, 32e421b1f42e8383fbd27f907e4052c9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010177

>>15010171
>middle school algebra
Redefining base mathematics is so far beyond your concept of Math you literally confused it for middle school lessons.

Bro....leave the thread, you outed yourself as midwit.

>> No.15010178

>>15010173
It's okay anon, it's not embarrassing for adult schizos like you to argue over this. This is the right website for people like you

>> No.15010186
File: 2.11 MB, 1550x2171, 2022-11-24_21.00.15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010186

>>15010178
Mathematicians argues like this for millenia. You dont know shit about math or the invention of numbers/maths.

Go away, midwit.

>> No.15010188

Infinity doesn't mean forever "with no end".

It is cyclic - it means forever in cycle.

0/0 isn't 1. 0/0 = 0.9999...0

You're a American brainwashed retard op go watch the football your team is shit and UK men dominate you all intellectually you're actually slaves of greater minds.

>> No.15010190

>>15010186
Spamming irrelevant images and retarded posts does not make you a mathematician :)

>> No.15010194
File: 19 KB, 366x380, 1669210675412818.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010194

>>15010190
>irrelevant images
>topic is NUMBER THEORY (Zero)

MID-WIT-GO-AWAY! Pseud! Retards.....fuck......
MODSSS!!!

>> No.15010196

>>15010188
How do you register something that seemingly has no end as infinity if by your knowledge it COULD end then it's just a guess. Infinity is truthfully a cycle thus.

>> No.15010205

>>15010169
OP doesn't get that people used to (many still do since it's intuitive) think of things in exactly those vague terms of infinitesimals, did arithmetic with "infinitely small/large" quantities, etc. and only stopped once they failed to rigorously formalize this.
Getting mad over university math not appealing to middle school misconceptions is retarded but honestly something I wonder if we could even fix. I think teaching basic propositional logic and some set theory early on could help with that.

>> No.15010234
File: 6 KB, 199x253, images - 2022-10-01T030929.614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010234

>>15010188
>You're a American brainwashed retard op
Aight...Imma step in here and go ahead and call you out as psued. Number Theory is my strong suit. Youre making the same mistake these two fighters are making in holding your definitions over others not realizing that mathematcis itself has some errors in the deepest levels.

This is why Number Theory debates are shit because each just holds their definitions over the other and neither "learns" because niether of them are full on Number Theorist.

>See Normal Wildberger
I made the same discoveries when I tried to reinvent arithmatic and algebra and all numbers, making my own base systems, and seeing how base systems differ from each other.

Weak definitions and abitrary definitions (social constructs) makes for bad math.

Go.....back to POLY-TIC board.

>> No.15010243

>>15010234
Or, instead of positing conflicting systems, we all just agree to ground mathematics in set theory?

>> No.15010246
File: 31 KB, 300x169, profile-thumbnail-w300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010246

>>15010243
>instead of positing conflicting systems
Thats for the peons in the field and masters of coin use.

WE are supposed to be above such things in the lofty clouds of PURE MATHEMATICS.

So I say to you, good sir, are ye peon or nobleman or a God?....Speak now or forever hold your peace!

>> No.15010248

>>15010194
>NUMBER THEORY (Zero)
Funny schizo. Don't forget to take your meds

>> No.15010250

>>15010243
......but yes, I do like me some set theory.
:3

>> No.15010253

>>15009828
RETARD ALERT

>> No.15010261
File: 639 KB, 2448x3264, IMG_20171118_150341755.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010261

>>15010248
lmfao....another 1st year student correcting the professor because...
>"Bro.....E aint no number" the dunce says to Einstein.

Thats what you sound like. Exactly like that.

Go back to class, child.

>> No.15010268
File: 1.92 MB, 237x178, 1666235793541.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010268

>>15009828
The stupidity of some of the people here never fails to astound me.
Genuinely how can you make such a vague connection just to claim something this fucking ridiculous? So the expression [math]x^2=4[/math] has a solution set consisting out of two numbers. Thus, those two numbers are equal???? DO YOU EVEN THINK, RETARD?!?

>> No.15010269

ITS UP; https://youtu.be/ndmwB8F2kxA

>> No.15010290

>>15010250
Same. Only pseuds hate on set theory.

>> No.15010296

>>15010234
problem is, there might be a trade-off between vagueness and expressivness. set theory seems more practical than category theory or constructivism, but it exposes itself to self-referential paradoxes, and sometimes, the imprecision of linguistical ideas intertwined into conceptual structures affecting its ability to be programmatically formally verified.
it's often hard to talk about fundamental topics because mathematic is undeniably too useful. nevertheless proper philosophical understandings of the exponential meta-conceptualization capability can help math transcend itself rather than undermining it.

>> No.15010304
File: 25 KB, 1200x1200, Mathemeticians Hate Him!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010304

>>15009813
>All numbers are concepts you fucking goof.
And the concept of "number" entails what?
>So what? You could also use the square root of four to prove that 2 = -2.
What's the square root of two?
>How about you asymptote this fat ass? Just define asymptotes as infinity you dummy.
Lets just redefine math as we go along and shit on it and destroy it's original meaning/intention. Sounds great.
>Plenty of functions are discontinuous and we call them numbers, for the instance... the natural fucking numbers???
You call it number but is it "of number"?
>Just modify it to accomadate for one, the the true mother of all numbers.
>He thinks the principle is number

>>15009880
>geometry
>math
Again "square root of two" please.

>> No.15010317
File: 20 KB, 540x204, 1666366935226398.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010317

>>15010304
THIS idiot!
>Again "square root of two" please.
You constructed it in your picture, what is your question, my son?

"Side length 1" is the first number before all base systems to which all numbers are derived.

I CAN GO DEEPER THAN YOU, SON.

>> No.15010323

>>15010317
>You constructed it in your picture, what is your question, my son?
"SQUARE ROOT OF TWO". SECOND TIME I ASKED K THX. It's contructed, I get that it's geometry. Now quantify it you fucking mathematician you.
>"Side length 1" is the first number before all base systems to which all numbers are derived.
Which makes it "not a number". It's the principle that makes the numbers.

>> No.15010337
File: 2.92 MB, 3492x4656, 0727182050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010337

>>15010323
>Now quantify it
In base square root of two it equals 1. You are so used to base 10 you cannot see reality outside of it. I, on the otherhand, use many, MANY, base systems and change them depending on applications. Youre a NUMBERCEL, BASECEL.

YOU FAIL TO UNDERSTAND NUMBER THEORY.

NOW I SEE WHERE YOU KNOWLEDGE AND INTELLIGENCE FAILS.

STOP STUDY MODERN MATH, IT HAS FAILED YOU.

>> No.15010341

>>15010323
>Which makes it "not a number"
What is a 1 made of? 10 .1s.

Cool....cool.....what makes up a .1? 10 .01s.

Cool.....cool.....you dont get it, do you?

>> No.15010346

>>15010337
>In base square root of two it equals 1.
In base what? (protip: it's not gonna matter what).

>You are so used to base 10 you cannot see reality outside of it.
If you think you're going to quantify it with any other base system then I've got some bad news for you, Hippasus. Start walkin' the plank.

>Youre a NUMBERCEL, BASECEL.
>number
Protip: the answer isn't gonna be a number either.

>>15010341
>What is a 1 made of? 10 .1s.
>I just used the principle of 1 to create the number 10 because by necessity there was 1 before 10.
Yes. Hence "principle of number".
>Cool.....cool.....you dont get it, do you?
Do you?

>> No.15010350

>>15010337
I personally prefer Collatz's book when it comes to numerical analysis

>> No.15010356
File: 814 KB, 380x307, 1666378360978698.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010356

>>15010346
>In base what?
In Base-Cel.

Son. You present a probelm thats literally 101 tier shit for me thats a total non-problem what so ever (AKA SOLVED).

Its a problem FOR THEM. NOT ME.
See; >>15010254
>muh modern maths

Youre using THEIR definitions which are WRONG. Arbitrary and Socially Constructed like the order of operations.

>Hippasus
Because you are basing FROM SIDE LENGTH ONE (1).
>Which makes it "not a number".

>the rest of your post is bullshit because you lost

Im glad we hashed this out, now I will assault you every time I see you BECAUSE NOW I KNOW YOUR WEAKNESS.

DONT WALK. RUN.

>> No.15010368
File: 237 KB, 587x629, 2022-11-10_20.30.24.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010368

>Measures 1/3rd in base 10

RUH ROH.....ITS NOT REEEEAL!!!! EEEEEE MY AUTISM!

>> No.15010373
File: 84 KB, 850x400, quote-he-is-unworthy-of-the-name-of-man-who-is-ignorant-of-the-fact-that-the-diagonal-of-a-plato-66-81-01[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010373

>>15010356
>>15010368
>Thinking you'll derive an incommensurable magnitude using any base system

>> No.15010379
File: 248 KB, 865x400, 1619546101097.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010379

>>15010373
Youre just stuck in a mental trap on square root of two as some reality breaking problem. I have a box full of those as paradoxes of maths. Get more than one, newfag.

Begone, acolyte, you have no business with me.

>> No.15010386
File: 1.28 MB, 200x150, 200w (1).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010386

>Pi cant be measured and only approximated! MATH BROKEN!

Autism. You have what is known as high functioning autism.

>> No.15010388

>>15009844
>college algebra
This is US nomenclature right? What is this, quadratic equations and stuff, or groups and stuff?

>> No.15010389
File: 7 KB, 235x215, srspepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010389

>>15010379
>I have a box full of those as paradoxes of maths
Yes yes I'm sure you can go on and on listing irrational after irrational and calling the products "math". But that would be retarded, and not actually math (because it's not a quantity).

>Begone, acolyte, you have no business with me.
I think the problem is that you think math and geometry are the same thing. They aren't and this specific reason is why.

>> No.15010392

>>15010379
I have won.

>> No.15010393

>>15010388
linear and quadratic equations. Some stuff with systems of equations, that's all

>> No.15010395
File: 1.97 MB, 250x220, 1620841591895.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010395

>>15010392
Which makes it "not a number".

>>15010389
>Yes yes I'm sure you can go on and on listing irrational after irrational
Thats you. THATS LITERALLY WHAT YOU DO WHEN YOU POST THAT PICTURE.

YOU. NO U R.

>> No.15010400

>>15010392
Go to class.

https://youtu.be/8d15H-ote-0

>> No.15010408
File: 129 KB, 513x770, 1651744586185.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010408

>The introduction of the cipher 0 or the group concept was general nonsense too, and mathematics was more or less stagnating for thousands of years because nobody was around to take such childish steps ...

>> No.15010415

>Steps into a math lecture at a university.
"Quantify Pi or you're not a Mathematician!"

...and professor stepped out of the room and everyone clapped.

>> No.15010430

>>15009813
The thing is that math doesn't perfectly describe reality and probably never will. So both of you are equally right, or equally wrong, and in the end one of each of your described features has to be chosen so I guess it's just whoever whinges the most wins. I guess the fact that people are still whinging over some of these features thousands of years later shows how truly unrealistic math actually is

>> No.15010436
File: 547 KB, 400x215, b1b4ffca-1a69-454c-9a75-893db84b904b_text.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010436

>>15010430
Your concession is accepted, with reservations.

>> No.15010459

This is such a shit thread, my god.

>> No.15010464

>>15009828
kek

>> No.15010474
File: 711 KB, 220x220, a13eda5124688dfe3913ae4ecddcf752.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010474

>>15010459
Non-engagement is tantamount to concession, *with reservations*, private.

Either fling shit or get out!

>> No.15010521
File: 210 KB, 400x400, 1650112522919.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010521

>>15010395
Fuck you and your ad hominem, you stinking cunt.

>> No.15010552
File: 1.64 MB, 670x658, spin.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010552

>>15010521
>quotes are ad hominem
Youre not a real schizophrenic, youre just manic.

>> No.15010599

>>15009813
OP, is your pic assuming that sex is a concept as well?

>> No.15010610

>>15010599
Sex or gender? Be specific and scientific, please.

>> No.15010716
File: 846 KB, 2048x1786, 1639966488165.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010716

>>15010337
Exactly. The only requirement for a base is that it's a real number larger than 1.
Zorich even constructed a positional q-ary system of writing real numbers using just the principle of Archimedes

>> No.15010927

>>15010716
>that it's a real number
nope
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quater-imaginary_base

>> No.15010939

>>15010927
>Every complex number (every number of the form a+bi) has a quater-imaginary representation.

Hrmmm.....

>> No.15010996
File: 305 KB, 1147x744, gabriel-numbers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010996

i find this a good breakdown

>> No.15010997
File: 268 KB, 570x358, sqrt-2-gabriel.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15010997

>>15010304
based sqrt(2) poster

>> No.15011013
File: 2.49 MB, 1852x1147, MMP-Title.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011013

>>15009813
>All numbers are concepts you fucking goof.
Clearly they are not all of the same type. Modern maths approach of brute forcing all the edge cases with handwavy definitions and appeals to authority perhaps masks alternative useful models of the continuum.

Infinity in MMP, for example is the expression of no precision at endless digit length. One cannot say where it ends, but one can define a behaviour, that no matter how many digits of precision they obtain, they'll never find a fixed value. This inverse relationship makes this number mystical.

>> No.15011022
File: 129 KB, 1236x814, The-MMP-number-system.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011022

>>15011013
zero, on the other hand, is its dual opposite. Perfect precision at no length. These 'concepts' than rest within a coherent model that clearly defines the type one is dealing with.

>> No.15011029
File: 18 KB, 532x145, illumanti-operator.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011029

>>15011022
It is this union of opposites, two dualities, a quaternary paradox that is represented combined in the 'illuminati operator' which births the infinite nothingness, the primordial ether of the precision and length entangle with one another, two ideas of intangibility, birthing the intangible

>> No.15011038
File: 3.73 MB, 1852x1147, MMP-2-compressed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011038

>>15011029
birthing the tangible*

from this perspective it is rather easy to see how the idea of 1/0 equalling anything is a type error in the physical field, but may have a representation in the metaphysical field 1/ 0 = 0 eye inf / 0 = eye inf which if 1/0 = inf than eye inf = inf so eye = {}

>> No.15011043

>>15011013
>>15011022
>>15011029
Gnostics go on >>>/reddit/

>> No.15011059
File: 122 KB, 448x699, MMP-wormtongue-reals.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011059

>>15011043
reddit has embraced modernism's weakly defined notion of the axiom, and is poorly structured to be in-resonant to appeals to authority.

MMP reminds the user to take more than one sip from the well of science

>> No.15011062

>>15011022
>zero, on the other hand, is its dual opposite. Perfect precision at no length.
Literally if no length is 0 then its opposite is any lenght 1

>> No.15011063

>>15011059
The well of science quote is about God btw, not your gnostic BS.

>> No.15011069
File: 3.90 MB, 1852x1147, MMP-3-compressed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011069

>>15011062
0 is endless precision at no length
infinity is no precision at endless length

we see 1 is not the opposite of 0 but infinity is.

MMP postulates its the union of these paradoxes that births the continuum by manifesting the holographic unity

>> No.15011073
File: 1002 KB, 1611x1784, hermeticism-christianity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011073

>>15011063
perhaps not that relevant, but what do you think informed the intellectual basis of the biblical texts?

surely not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMAtkjy_YK4&t=11820s

>> No.15011075
File: 38 KB, 600x257, nazgul-mmp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011075

>>15011073
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMAtkjy_YK4&t=11820

i believe needs the s removed for particular part

>> No.15011118

>>15011069
Lets do it your way then
1 precision of lenght
0 precision of no lenght

>> No.15011121

>>15009828
Decent (You) farm material

>> No.15011148

>>15010395
>Thats you.
No I'm asking you to quantify the square root of two as a coy way of illustrating that by *doing that* you're just negating mathmatics lol. But keep on equating these irrationals to "math" if you must.
>THATS LITERALLY WHAT YOU DO WHEN YOU POST THAT PICTURE.
But when you go and do the same and call it "math" it's somehow acceptable? Are you just trying to save the thread from being deleated?

>>15010415
>quantify "pi"
>calling words math
If everyone were smart they would have stepped out of the room too.

>> No.15011156
File: 75 KB, 843x843, 1667622451005374.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011156

>>15011148
>Which makes it "not a number".

>> No.15011178
File: 12 KB, 302x300, Feature_yinyang-cc0[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011178

>>15011156
>posts a random symbol
>"Behold, A number!

>> No.15011623
File: 257 KB, 800x840, 800px-Riemann_surface_sqrt.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15011623

>>15011178
>random
They said that to the man that invented written numbers. You....are not very good at this.