/sci/ - Science & Math

>DNA
>Neroscience
>Neroscience
>Climate Change Robot
>DNA
>Space
>Long Covid
>Long Covid
>Long Covid
>Long Covid
>Space

>>15010226 ...and your criticism is?

The sources are at https://mailchi.mp/4345cd0237c2/orapfn1bn4 now

>>15011125
They are useless informations.

>>15012133
Why? They're probably useful to reduce suffering and death from diseases and/or substantially increase knowledge about the nature of humans.

There are more good reasons. I asked about which ones you'd remove or add, so which do you think is missing here? I don't see any constructive criticism there so far.

>>15010226
Fuckin geologists

>>15010218
>Neuroscientists report experimental MRI results that appear to imply proton spins in brain water were entangled, suggesting functions in brains that operate non-classically. This may support hypotheses that suggest quantum mechanisms are involved in animal consciousness as the signal pattern declined when human participants fell asleep
I don't believe this... Is Orch-OR actually correct???
I just do not believe that we have a quantum computer in our heads

>>15010218
>Neuroscientist study
So basically, the activity in brain is detected only when the brain is receiving stimulus from the sense, but not in deep sleep?

Is there a science on why we feel the same sensory feeling in dreams (fear, anger, hunger etc. depending on the dream) like we feel when we are awake? I notice my hands sweating after waking from a nightmare.

>>15012327
All of climate change, COVID-19 stuff.

>>15012367 It needs further research that clarifies and checks various things, and even if their results as well as their conclusions are correct, this doesn't mean it's like quantum computing or that it plays a role or a major role in conciousness, rather than e.g. just being a side-effect for example.

>>15010218
Why everytime I see these infographics they never have the DOIs attached?

I'm totally paying for the papers btw

>>15014093 The problem with that is that it takes too long to type it out from the image even *if* you're on desktop, not mobile.

What I thought about are:
- adding QR codes to each item (looks shit, most wouldn't use it, probably doesn't fit next to the small items)

- a new image format where you can expand the short items as well as open the study with a click (even if I learn where to best propose this and somebody actually codes it and image editors like gimp allowed creating these, then image-sharing sites probably still wouldn't allow posting this filetype)

Let me know if you have any thoughts on these two ideas or have another idea.

As for the sources/DOIs: they're all at the page with the sources that I linked here >>15011806

>>15012873
I read the paper and if it's correct then it is that quantum entanglement is being used by the brain to process information and in neuron function. Pretty cool stuff

>>15014129
Yeah QR codes do seem like a bad or niche idea, I mostly want to write the doi and get straight acces to the paper, not pull out my phone and check it.

/sci/ does allow to post pdfs directly, why not try that solution? PDFs do allow for what you want and you can put as many links inside as you want or simply put a <dot> somewhere if links are that prohibitive, in /tg/ they have been doing it for years with in the trove.

>>15010226
back to /pol/

>>15012367
Yeah, like, I know nothing about neuroscience and only a bit about quantum mechanics and quantum computers, but this is ridonculous. What 'mechanism' would bring out a quantum computer in our brain?

>>15014282 Evolution.

Also who ever said quantum computer? Read the summary and/or the paper and refer to that not other things...the study found nothing less but also nothing more than that (for example no conclusions about how much of a role it plays or whether it only seems like that or truly is like that).

They write:
>we may have witnessed entanglement mediated by consciousness-related brain functions.
Here they go too far:
>Those brain functions must then operate non-classically, which would mean that consciousness is non-classical.
Because it's written in a misleading way that suggest that it would play a main role in conciousness, instead of only being involved in some way / to some extent.

b