/sci/ - Science & Math

This presumes that women are more attractive in person than on the internet. Is this true?

Before you incels celebrate this means white females will lose more standing to less intelligent non-white females who receive higher grades for affirmative action type reasons.

>>14974325

new fag alert. There are no girls on the internet, hence tits or GTFO

>>14974325
Are you familiar with the phrase "There are no girls on the internet"?

>>14974312
Makes sense.
There is no chance to get a blowjob from one, so why bother?

>>14974312
Everyone knows about the advantages of female attractiveness.
It's the fucking ugly male copers we need to gas for preventing the similar acknowledgement with regard to male looks -- all the fucking little /fit/ powershitters, the PUA grifters, the confidence bros, the evo-psych spergs, the boomers married to slampigs who dispense advice assuming that everyone wants a slampig, the femoid white knights, etc.
Not a single fucking study has been done on the phenomenon of using Chad pics on social-media/dating sites and immediately getting swamped with thot messages, no matter how bad one's profile is otherwise.

>>14974327
Fine with me.
White women need to be knocked down a peg or 15.
>>14974433
You don't need a study to realize that attractive people get more positive attention and preferential treatment, regardless of gender. You sound like an idiot.
Everyone likes attractive people. Even a heterosexual male would rather associate with an attractive male than an ugly one, because there's a higher chance of meeting women and various other doors opening up by virtue of association with the attractive male.

>>14974327
Ok and? If they fail or drop out they can become housewives. Let ethnic women ruin their eggs on a career.

I bet boys get a little grade boost too. Gendered grading bias is real.

>>14974517
Highly achieving attractive women in my experience are more likely to be favorable to racist ideas. By knocking them down they're being steered to coping more.

>>14974357
>>14974394
Yadda yadda. I was referring to myspace angles, zoom filters, etc. The study implies that women are more attractive in person, yet there are less opportunities to cheat reality in person. So I'll ask again, are women more attractive in person than on the internet?

>>14974591
In my opinion they are. It might be autism though.

>>14974327
What's the problem? Stop putting these bitches on a pedestal.

>>14974599
Stop putting women of your own race on a pedestal
I think I will faggot

>>14974312

The liberal feminist progressives are insisting that instructors MUST take into account the gender, race, sexual orientation of the students.

>>14974591
While this may be different in the states, It seems that a potato webcam which is only turned on when absolutely necessary does not have a positive effect on percieved attractiveness.

>>14974477
>hurr durr, studies have no social ramifications beyond their epistemic value
You sound like a fucking socially clueless sperg.

>>14974599
>Stop putting women of your own race on a pedestal
I think I will faggot

>>14974477
>You don't need a study to realize
it's obviously for culture-war parity with the feminazi studies, you stupid, 70-iq, oblivious fuck

>>14974613
but will they put you? (spoiler: no)

>>14974312
Wow, lonely, lifelong academics are lonely, and try to give good grades to girls to feel like they have a 'shot' while all the chads in class who play video games on their laptoips during lectures and copy homework from the internet are fucking all the hot girls at parties over the weekend while the professor is sitting in his tiny apartment alone with his books full of dead people no one cares about.

>>14974591
You can't improve perfection. It means the ugly women are more attractive on the internet, therefore they score more similarly now.

>>14974623
Why wouldn't they?

>>14974594
>In my opinion they are.
I agree with you, but I have never run the online dating gauntlet. I wonder if we're in the minority.
>>14974606
>a potato webcam which is only turned on when absolutely necessary does not have a positive effect on perceived attractiveness
This is fair, too. Could be proximity is key for some reason. Or women are perhaps less likely to bother cheating reality in virtual classrooms. (Til they read this study.)
>>14974633
It means the ugly women are more attractive on the internet, therefore they score more similarly now.
This didn't occur to me. It seems logical.

>>14974702
>This is fair, too. Could be proximity is key for some reason. Or women are perhaps less likely to bother cheating reality in virtual classrooms. (Til they read this study.)
There's a known effect of pheromones on attractiveness. A fertile, genetically ideal woman earns more tips than a woman on birth control or outside her ovulation phase.

>>14974327
Affirmative action doesn't give you higher grades, if anything affirmative action people in college are likely to get worse grades due to having less high standards to get in.

>>14974591
no girls on the internet fa.m

>>14974591
>I was referring to myspace angles, zoom filters, etc.
I can only imagine an oral exam over webcam where the chick has a constant duckface and a cat ear filter

>>14974327
Sounds like a fair trade considering white females have been the primary vector of Feminism in colleges.

>>14974613
>It's okay to simp for these particular women because (excuses excuses excuses)

>>14974702
They probably didn't have class times over Zoom, or professors were so jaded by having to switch to online only instruction that they couldn't give a damn about pretty moving pictures in their classrooms on camera. Plus, there's generally a shit ton of students in a class and it's probably a pain in the ass to try to find one to focus on.

>>14974591
I think a lot of the time people aren't really looking, they're tabbed over looking at their slides or whatever they're talking about.

>>14974717
>affirmative action type reasons.
AKA marking up retards because of their skin color

>>14974804
>simp
Idiotic buzzword with no actual meaning

>>14974312
>be woman
>have high quality genes that make you attractive
>same genes also make you intelligent
>being attractive makes you highly social
>covid comes
>no more socializing
>life in shambles
>academic performance suffers
Prove this hypothesis wrong.

>>14974327
>implying attractive white females got to where they are off intelligence

>>14976333
it happened to me
I used to be active and talk to the lecturers since I had to be in the class thanks to the holy covid I could do actually interesting things instead of listening to this shit.
Also "researchers" took pics from social media to rate when it's not about looks but the photoshop and the angles.

>>14976333
>d-d-disprove my mental gymnastics wrong
No one needs to prove anything to you. Mentally sane people will easily figure out what's going on. Your narrative is slipping in every way. Better beg your handlers to start censoring harder.

>>14976333
>have high quality genes that make you attractive
>same genes also make you intelligent
lammo

>>14974327
>this means white females will lose more standing
Hahahahahaha
>less intelligent non-white females
Pfft AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>who receive higher grades
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>affirmative action type reasons.
>Amerimutt spotted
>white females
>American
>"""white"""
OH NO NO NO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
this is too good

>>14977681
Quintessentially reddit post

>>14977683
>reddit boogeyman
>STILL trying to defend his holy "white" roasties
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
The absolute state of you.

>>14977683
>Quintessentially
>no actual quints
>not even dubs
What did he mean by this?

>>14977689
You're the type of newfag that should just be permabanned

>>14974591
It's hard to suck dick over zoom call.

I thought attractive people are more intelligent in general, thats why you wanna stick your dick in them.
I remember incels posting studies about this.

>>14977703
>I remember incels posting studies about this.
Incels don't post those studies. They don't like them. They're pretty invested in the idea that Chad is a dumb thug.

>Beth Ellwood
I bet 1000 euros she looks like this and shes just a bitter woman who never got some.

>>14977495
I think that professors being biased towards attractive females is the most likely cause, but the hypothesis I propose hasn't been ruled out.

>>14977666
Strong body, strong mind. Real life isn't an RPG where you spec into either STR or INT but can't be good at both.

>>14977748
The genes that control brain function are not necessarily connected to the genes which control your facial shape.
Or if you get a burn and look hideous that doesn't change what your intelligence is, or if you get brain damage from a disease with no visible mark you become less intelligent without changing your appearance

>>14978045
>The genes that control brain function are not necessarily connected to the genes which control your facial shape.
Good genes correlate with good genes.

>burned face
Irrelevant edge case. Just how many facially disfigured burn victim women have you ever met in college?

>>14974611
They do in your imagination.
>>14974621
Yeah I'm oblivious to your bullshit culture wars. Sounds like a good position to be in.
You realize people with actual lives don't waste time plotting on how to conduct studies that state the obvious?
Then again if you were capable of adding actual value to the world you wouldn't be seething on /sci/.

>>14977708
this is one of my most hated stalkers doing the cunt face gang's gang sign

>>14977748
Strong body, strong mind.
You'll find that attractive females have neither.

>Real life isn't an RPG where you spec into either STR or INT but can't be good at both.
Yeah. Society makes those decision for you based on CHA.

>>14976333
>Be woman
>have high quality genes that make you attractive
>same genes also make you intelligent
False hypothesis