/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14972366
>>n-n-no it cant be glaringly obvious they were constructed with the same method of measuring

>>14972375
>afro-egyptians
Holy kek are you one of those kangz people?

>>14972366
I think that happens from forcing their heads up it so far

>>14972366
>this makes /sci/'s ass bleed.
so, different civilizations copied a pattern they saw in the sky, their leaders probably derived legitimacy from those monuments, what's the point of this low iq post?

>>14972366
nothing /x/ about this

these were built like this purposely and encoded with vast amounts of information. This is the part that make the soifags on /sci/ seethe.

Yes, soibois, your mainstream view of history is a lie. Now defend your masters for my amusement

/sci/ is full of IQ denialists who can't into pattern recognition.

>>14972389
B-b-but muh take meds!

>>14972366
I know reality is fake but i have bills to pay

>>14972377
I still cant find a single pharonic bust from the old kingdom that looks white. Different story in the middle and new kingdoms however

>>14972438
There are no pharaonic busts that look African except during the period of Akhenaten, who was so hated by ethnic Egyptians that they basically made sure his entire family was killed so they would never have to deal with niggardry again.

>>14972445
for king tuts white genetics
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-tutankhamun-dna-idUSTRE7704PB20110801


But for real, i've gone over every one of these,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Dynasty_of_Egypt

the large lips, wide set nose, skull geometry, they do not look white until after the first intermediate period.

Almost like a mini bronze age collapse happened before the official one, which saw hoardes of caucasio-semetic peoples from Europe see crop failure and turn to the river of the stars

>>14972366
>this makes /sci/'s ass bleed.

Just be a clown and ask a simple question. They can't stand it, it's like kryptonite to them

>>14972438

>>14972496
>1400BC to 400AD
aye, though I'm still bereft of 2700BC-2104BC

>>14972366
You're not special kid, most of this board use /x/ and are the ones posting the good threads there. Go back to your generals.

>>14972510
you arent either, neither sci nor x would anything about any of this if I handnt shit it directly into your head for almost a decade. All any of you did is piggy back off my 20 years of research that was spoonfed to you so leave OP alone to do his thing

They aren't even close to the orions belt lol. You'd think if they can travel the ocean they could create precise measurements of the stars
>>14972375
The Egyptians didn't bring their religion or language? Only their ability to move big rocks and construct buildings? They never talked about this journey in any of their writings? This is retarded. The building don't even look similar or even the same style.

>>14972620
You know what the Egyptians and South Americans do talk about in their writings? White gods bringing them civilization.

>>14972628
Yet any detail other then something something gods bringing civilization is lost or some other shit happened like X thing in their religion is kind of similar to Y thing egyptian thing. Interesting isn't it. You'd think the Egyptians would bring their language or religion. Even the meaning behind constructing the pyramids is different. The teotihuacan pyramids aren't tombs. Yet they still build them in the same arrangement of orions belt? You ever think about anything before trying to shill it?

>>14972620
>The Egyptians didn't bring their religion or language?
I mean the olmec had a hieroglyphic script, they seemed to take from familiar things from the natural environment, which are different animals depending on region. They brought the rules, not the explicit cypher. Also I believe ancient Chinese did the cartouche thing

>>14972644
All written language is derived from cute drawings. Cuneiform started as hieroglyphics

>>14972670
Both cultures had a regular script for day to day,

hieroglyphs were for when you had a lot of time, and you wanted to say something very important

>>14972641
That's the point anon. The same seed culture (whites) introduced the idea to both successor cultures, but they re-used what they were given in different ways.

>>14972465
*some

>>14972366
actually not a bad alignment, I wonder if it has anything to do with almost all cultures worshipping/valuing the stars

>>14973466
>actually not a bad alignment,
Thats terrible! Ive officially lost all respect of all elders of all kind.

Old people are stupid!

>>14973466
>I wonder if it has anything to do with almost all cultures worshipping/valuing the stars
No it's obviously ayylmaos

>>14972459
is this a joke?
Most blacks are cretins and only a few left Africa and turned into abos, negritos, indians

>>14972438
They look Egyptian...modern Egyptians still live there. They tested the genetics of Pharoes and it matches that of modern day Egyptian peasants.

Why are you Kangs still coping about this? White Egypt doesn't refer to pyramid building ancient Egyptians, it refers to Ptolemic Egypt based in Alexandria, 2000 years later.

>>14972366
This proves that ayys landed and told these civs to line up the pyramids that way. We know some kind of ayys came down at least in the western hemisphere because of the nazca lines.

>>14973504
>is this a joke?
nope, it was global seafaring civilisation that was multi ethnic. But until after the first intermediate period there is not a single caucasoidal pharaoh to be had

https://www.thehistoryville.com/imhotep-father-medicine/

>>14973510
dude these guys almost all look like morpheus in the matrix.

The only genetics you've seen are from the 1700-900 bc era, you havent had any from 1000 years prior (long time)

>>14973707
>In 2018, the 4000-year-old mummified head of Djehutynakht, a governor in the Middle Kingdom of the 11th or 12th dynasty, was analyzed for mitochondrial DNA. The sequence of the mummy most closely resembles a U5a lineage from sample JK2903,
>A wide range of mtDNA haplogroups were found including clades of J, U, H, HV, M, R0, R2, K, T, L, I, N, X, W. The authors of the study noted that the mummies at Abusir el-Meleq have 6–15% maternal sub-Saharan DNA while modern Egyptians have a little more sub-Saharan ancestry, 15% to 20%, suggesting some degree of influx after the end of the empire.[200] Other genetic studies show greater levels of sub-Saharan African ancestry in modern southern Egyptian populations[201] and anticipate that mummies from southern Egypt would show greater levels of sub-Saharan African ancestry.


Egypt was basically multiracial and most closely resembles modern Egyptians, the further back in time you go the whiter they get. That's why we've stopped gene testing because we all hate We Wuz'ing fags and would rather focus on what we IS.

>>14973747
>a governor in the Middle Kingdom
we need old kingdom
(reference cause behavioural economists say we scrunch dates far away)
Old Kingdom - 2700–2200 BC.
Middle Kingdom - 2040 to 1782 BC
New Kingdom - 1600 BC to 1100 BC

as described in Bodhi's post >>14972496 extraction from old mummies is quite difficult, so It may be expected to assume that there is less data available on the older ones (if they can even be found, I dont believe Kafre was ever located inside the pyramid attributed to him)

>That's why we've stopped gene testing because we all hate We Wuz'ing fags and would rather focus on what we IS.

What is the shimtu of DNA? is everything happening everywhere all at once, separated only by the illusion of time? or is the past more dead more dead than a buried corpse?

>>14973774
Even if it was possible I doubt anyone who did it will find the balls to publish it. Based on the trends we already know what it will look like barring some magical Atlantean-Sumerian-Hyperborean superrace discovery.

>>14972366
Well no, people like you are either schizo, dumb or both. I don't know why someone's ass would bleed because of that.
There's nothing mysterious or hard to understand about this alignment. They had eyes to see the stars and a brain to imagine things.

>>14973812
isn't the official narrative that these civvies had no contact with each other and arose independently?

they had eyes to see stars, buts whats the probability they choose those same 3 specific stars?

>>14973874
I, too, enjoyed Stargate SG1, but all of these cultured built pyramids not aligned with the stars too.

>>14973956

>>14972366
not actually true at all, something you'd know if you had the scientific mindset of trying to actually disprove false claims before promulgating them as fact because you saw a image misrepresenting the truth

>>14972366
does this mean the allyums will come back and clean up this mess?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5_w8Qh-7crE

>>14972517
>Messiah complex namefag
You really need to be told you're not special

>>14973968
>"experts"
>Continually try to write off the astrological obsession of ancient peoples.
Archeology is a mess.

>>14972872
those are depictions of plasma formations in the sky. Everyone on the planet saw them and then were slaughtered by those events

you retards that are looking for religious symbology in this stuff are beyond lost.

>>14974317
interesting interpretation indeed.

Some say that in sacred script (heiroglyphica greek) that one idea can contain 100 different levels of meaning.

for myself in initial impression on the one on the right was two minds (eye of horus) meeting under the Ra to being the process of creation (scarab)
The middle impression is the child gestating in the womb, represented by the milky way being hoisted on to was scepters (meaning resonance, perhaps yachim and boaz prototype) the sun being imprinted in the third eye, I'm not sure why the symettry is broken with the half semi circle and the bar

the third one represents the born human, whose ka emanaginted from the flora beat back the two animal spirits from consuming the third eye

>>14974036
except for the fact that what I said is an easily proven fact using the archives mouth breathing hick