[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 943 KB, 1x1, TIMESAND___FractionalDistance.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957775 No.14957775 [Reply] [Original]

The Reimann hypothesis is false due to Euclidean geometry.

>> No.14957778
File: 3.19 MB, 3689x2457, TIMESAND___ZetaMedium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957778

RH is is negated here as well but not starting from Euclid.

>> No.14957783 [DELETED] 
File: 1.25 MB, 3400x3044, TIMESAND___QDRH762aFF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957783

The Time Travel Interpretation of the Bible
>https://vixra.org/abs/2104.0068
We describe the Biblical work of ages as a time travel program for saving humanity from extinction. God's existence is proven as a consequence of the existence of time travel, which is supposed. We present the case that Abraham's grandson Jacob, also called Israel, is Satan. We make the case that the Israelites are described as God's chosen people in the Bible despite their identity as the children of Satan because God's Messiah is descended from Abraham through Satan. They are chosen as the ancestors of the Messiah rather than as Satan's children. We propose an interpretation in which God commanded Abraham to kill his son Isaac to prevent Isaac from becoming the father of Satan. We suggest that God stayed Abraham's hand above Isaac because preventing the existence of Satan would also prevent the existence of Satan's descendant the Messiah. The history of the Israelites is summarized through Jesus and Paul. This paper is written so that the number of believers in the world will increase.

>>14957775
>>14957778

>> No.14957786
File: 215 KB, 1444x1244, squiggles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957786

>>14957775
How would you go about trying to find the reverse of pi?
I feel like you're one of the few people I know who might have an idea on how to approach that.

>> No.14957787
File: 1.25 MB, 3400x3044, TIMESAND___QDRH762aFF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957787

Here I "quickly" lay out the analytical program showing that RH is false due to an unproven proposition. Prop 1.8 is shown to be valid and sound (true) in these longer papers:
>>14957775
>>14957778

>> No.14957794

>>14957786
The infinite decimal representation of real numbers (due to Stevin around the 16th century) is not such that you can find the reverse value. Even the rationals have infinite trailing zeros.

>> No.14957796
File: 353 KB, 1042x1258, TIMESAND___VERYquickRH.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957796

Ultra quick version good enough for a physicist but not mathematically "rigorous."

>> No.14957806

>>14957796
Have you ever heard any official response from the people who are in charge of the RH stuff?

>> No.14957807

>>14957794
You don't believe it to be possible to find some formulaic relation that could produce numbers backwards?

Imagine if you had a program that draws a circle.
Would it not be possible to have it draw the circle in reverse?

>> No.14957840

>>14957806
No. My rapists keep me in their slave hole in Antarctica in part to ensure that I can never communicate with those people and there will never be anything other than my voice disputing their claims that I am a tarded schizo.

>> No.14957841

>>14957807
Programs don't draw circles. Programs plot finite numbers of points.

>> No.14957847

>>14957840
Are you sure you're in Antarctica?
What if that's just what they want you to think?
I can't remember, but is it your sister Helene who is responsible for your captivity?

>>14957841
>Programs don't draw circles. Programs plot finite numbers of points.
Yes, but the programs decide where those plot points go.

>> No.14957849
File: 245 KB, 1540x916, TIMESAND___arXivRemoved4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957849

And, let me say that submitting some of manuscripts to mathematical journals is the number one thing on my to-do list if I ever get to some ace that doesn't seem like Antarctica.
>tfw ur paper has no scholarly content bc ur in Antarctica and arXiv never got ur PDF

>> No.14957855
File: 1.64 MB, 1275x9900, TIMESAND___66+001-006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957855

NO

>> No.14957857
File: 1.71 MB, 1275x9900, TIMESAND___66+007-012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957857

ORIGINAL

>> No.14957858
File: 25 KB, 1200x1200, Mathemeticians Hate Him!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957858

>>14957775
>The Reimann hypothesis is false due to Euclidean geometry.
I mean, so is the majority of math and physics but you don't see me publishing 2000+ year old discoveries.

>>14957778
>RH is is negated here as well but not starting from Euclid.
Euclid negated himself with his 4th postulate. Embrace hyperbolic geometry and stop whinging and coping.

>>14957807
>>14957786
>You don't believe it to be possible to find some formulaic relation that could produce numbers backwards?
You would have to give me a number to start with. Pi is not a number and it never will be. How do you suppose I should approach it with math when it's not a quantity? Should I just make up a symbol/expression as a placeholder for the number/equation you're looking for? You want to think yourself further into the box you thought yourself into?

>>14957847
>Yes, but the programs decide where those plot points go.
A computer cannot be held responsible, therefore a computer must never make a management decision.

>> No.14957859
File: 1.38 MB, 1275x9900, TIMESAND___66+013-018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957859

OR

>> No.14957860
File: 1.68 MB, 1275x9900, TIMESAND___66+019-024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957860

SUBSTANTIVE SCHOLARLY

>> No.14957861
File: 1.66 MB, 1275x9900, TIMESAND___66+025-030.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957861

CONTENT

>> No.14957867
File: 1.34 MB, 1275x9900, TIMESAND___66+Refs1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957867

Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v2-20220726.pdf
Authors: Jonathan W. Tooker
The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

>> No.14957868

The riemann zeta function has an essential singularity at infinity lmao. So it is not 0 even at infinity.

>> No.14957869
File: 170 KB, 538x338, TIMESAND___Detractors2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957869

>>14957858
>Pi is not a number
This person's opinion on math is worthless.

>> No.14957871
File: 236 KB, 1000x2349, quantifier.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957871

>>14957869
Tell me what number it is, I dare you.

>> No.14957880
File: 544 KB, 1384x1154, TIMESAND____FamilyTree7++.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957880

>>14957847
I am not sure I am in Antarctica now. I assume I am. However, I am sure that there is no amount of evidence which might make me more sure than I already am that I did those pendulum experiments in the southern hemisphere.

I am not sure what you mean "responsible." My opinion is that Helene is the Whore of Babylon (I am the King of Babylon btw) and the things involved in the kigs if the earth growing drunk on the maddening wine of her excessive fornications involve me being held as a slave in the Antarctica facility of which I am the rightful owner and HNIC.

>> No.14957884

>>14957871
A number is an element of an ordered set (and a set is an abstract collection of possibly abstract objects.)

>> No.14957887

>>14957880
"The Kings of the earth," as in Rev 17 and Rev 18.

>> No.14957900
File: 81 KB, 896x896, lookatye.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957900

>>14957884
And non of what you said tells me what the number "pi" is.

>> No.14957907

>>14957900
Going back to Euclid's definitions (Elements Book 5 I think), pi is the number whose ratio to the unit number is equal to the ratio of the magnitudes of a circle's circumference to its diameter, not that you had asked which number was pi.

Helene and her friends need to keep me in their slave hole because their extensive libelous slanders against me would be expeditiously belied by an ordinary person's second opinion.

>> No.14957913

>>14957849
dam, was that from a few years ago?

>> No.14957916

>>14957858
>You would have to give me a number to start with. Pi is not a number and it never will be. How do you suppose I should approach it with math when it's not a quantity? Should I just make up a symbol/expression as a placeholder for the number/equation you're looking for? You want to think yourself further into the box you thought yourself into?
>A computer cannot be held responsible, therefore a computer must never make a management decision.
I'm honestly not quite sure I understand what you're saying.

>>14957867
Did you have any paper relating to Angular Momentum?
I know Mandlbaur did, but I can't remember if I read one by you as well.

>> No.14957923

>>14957907
>Going back to Euclid's definitions
The number. What is the number you numbskull?

>pi is the number whose ratio to the unit number is equal to the ratio of the magnitudes of a circle's circumference to its diameter,
No, "number". Not "incomplete comparison of known numbers". What happens when I make the circumference this "number pi"? The diameter? Would be helpful to actually know this "number" is it that I will be plugging into this equation though.

>not that you had asked which number was pi.
That is what I asked. 3 times now. Do you have dyslexia or something?

>>14957916
>I'm honestly not quite sure I understand what you're saying.
I'm honestly not quite sure I understand what you're saying. You're asking for the reverse of an irrational/undefined. How do I reverse what I don't even know?

>> No.14957924

>>14957775
Why does anybody care about this?
>muh prime numbers pattern
>can encrypt something with slightly bigger prime number for a couple of years until quantum computers render encryption with prime factorization useless
Is that really it. It's as worthless as a discovery in women's studies.

>> No.14957974
File: 1.82 MB, 2452x2784, TIMESAND___SCP-001a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957974

>>14957913
Yes, that was from a few years ago and it had already been going on for almost 10 years by then. The basis of what is now called Russiagate is when I wrote a paper on a long layover in Moscow in 2009 and then "arXiv rejected it" for some reason related to a $1M payment to Paul "Manna Fort" Manafort routed through Cyprus in October 2009. That paper is called SCP-001 now, btw.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/manafort-linked-accounts-cyprus-raised-red-flag-n739156
I'd say it's highly likely that the guy I farted on in line at JFK is the same one pictured at the top of this article.

>> No.14957983
File: 177 KB, 760x507, TIMESAND___EgyeTfui6280cwyU3232d6456.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957983

>>14957974
>the guy I farted on in line at JFK

>> No.14957986

>>14957916
I used a "ball on a string" to disprove that location I was in allegedly being in the northern hemisphere.

>> No.14957997
File: 42 KB, 680x684, TIMESAND___24w69SjtI62jfyihQePup731S9Gotg94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14957997

>>14957923
Euclid says a number is something that has a ratio to another number and that its ratios are unique. You seem to be elevating Stevin's medieval infinite decimal form of a real number over the traditional (and based) definition from Euclid, if I am understanding your non-acceptance of the unique ratio I specified as the definition of the number. If so, perhaps you can say why you prefer Stevin of Euclid?

>> No.14958004

>>14957986
You're the schizo who thinks he's being held in a Truman Show base in Antarctica?

>> No.14958008

>>14957923
>What happens when I make the circumference this "number pi"?
What happens is that the diameter is consequently made into this other so-called $$NUMBER$$ that the Russians call "odin" but which is called different things in different places. In Spain, I think they call it "uno," if you can believe it!!!

>> No.14958019

>>14957924
I think the security of the prime number factorization encryption algorithms used by things like the SWIFT banking network depend on there being no way to compute primes without a sieve but if RH is false, then it leaves the door open to such computations through the prime number theorem (which is related to RH in a way that I have not yet taken the time to fully appreciate.)

>> No.14958026

>tooker thread
I'll be completely honest, I respect the hell out of you for putting your theories out there. Not because I agree with them, but because they allow me to test my own knowledge by understanding why they're wrong

Godspeed you beautiful bastard

>> No.14958035
File: 360 KB, 2224x788, TRINITY___GOD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14958035

>>14958004
I'm the man in excellent mental health but an unhealthy environment who knows the difference between speculations and knowledge. I know the pendulum precesses in the CW direction in the north but my experiments showed CCW precession inconsistent with the north. I conclude, therefore, that I was not in the north when I did those experiments. I speculate that I was in a mockup of the USA in Antarctica at that time and I further speculate that I am in a mockup of Moscow in Antarctica at the present time.

>> No.14958087
File: 2.14 MB, 267x199, 1660327280279366.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14958087

>>14957997
>Euclid says a number is something that has a ratio to another number and that its ratios are unique.
And this one is an incommensurable ratio. Which means it's never going to be a "number".
>If so, perhaps you can say why you prefer Stevin of Euclid?
You realize that shit exists because retards keep trying to commensurate incommensurable magnitudes right? Well that and interest rates. It's another symptom of the psychosis of believing "undefined" is a number, or of number.


>>14958008
>What happens is that the diameter is consequently made into this other so-called $$NUMBER$$ that the Russians call "odin" but which is called different things in different places. In Spain, I think they call it "uno," if you can believe it!!!

Boy there sure are quite a few names for this "pi", just as there are quite a few names for "god". And do any of them come in the form of an actual number? A quantity?

You won't post the number, because you can't.

>> No.14958098

>>14958087
I think I'm realizing that you think Stevin's infinite decimals are superior to Euclid's magnitudes. A shortcoming of the Stevin program is that you can't even write down numbers like pi which is given easily as "C over D" in the Euclid program. You're not saying, "Stevin is the best! I love Stevin," but you're shitting on my opinion that Euclid is the best. Your refusal to commit overtly to any one program as the good one is botlike and childish. I know you don't like Euclid. Do you like Stevin whose system cannot even express ancient numbers of fundamental import such as pi?

How to express "one third" in the Stevin system? Do your arguments about pi not being a number leave one third as a number or not?

>> No.14958100
File: 310 KB, 595x496, TIMESAND___FractalWrongness.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14958100

>>14958087
>You won't post the number, because you can't.
Fucktard, you post the number "one third" in a form that you think is ok. You can't post the infinite decimal. If you post something with "dot dot dot" in it, I have a continued fraction form of pi. If you post "one over three" then I refer back to pi as "C over D."

There are ways to make the make point you're trying to make without being stupid but you aren't doing that.

>> No.14958838

>>14958098
>>14958100
9 hours. It has been 9 hours and you still have not bothered to post a quantity. You cannot even be bothered to just leave the answer as "undefined" or a simple "I don't know" All you can do is cope and seethe and quote me number systems when I told you the magnitude is incommensurate and doesn't matter which number system you use. Put it in base 4, put it in base 11. It still isn't going to yield you an actual answer because it doesn't pass proof of contradiction. Every time you call it a number, you basically just taking a shit on mathematics.

>How to express "one third" in the Stevin system?
I am glad you have figured out that some comparison of commensurable magnitudes can't actually be quantified.

>How to express
>Do your arguments about pi not being a number leave one third as a number or not?
No. It's the comparison of actual number. No irrational is "of number".

>>14958100
>you post the number "one third"
You're posting the comparison of two numbers. Not a "number".

>I have a continued fraction form of pi.
Now what is the quantity form of pi?

>There are ways to make the make point you're trying to make without being stupid but you aren't doing that.
Because you're equating irrationals with rationals. There's no possible way I can have a rational discussion with you (literally).

>> No.14959233

>>14958838
"C over D" is a quantity. I think you're intentionally failing to distinguish between a quantity and the infinite decimal representation of a quantity.

>> No.14959370
File: 116 KB, 674x691, q1[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14959370

>>14959233
>"C over D" is a quantity.
>letter placeholders are quantities
>irrational is a quantity
Okay, sit there and shit on mathematics. Doesn't affect me.

>I think you're intentionally failing to distinguish between a quantity and the infinite decimal representation of a quantity.
Yes. Because it's "undefined". What you're talking about isn't an actual quantity. Do you want me to just make shit up as I go along?
I think you're intentionally deriding the fact you can't provide the actual quantity by proping up another boogeyman number system that you...fear/fell is somehow wrong? As if any number system you could ever conjure would solve the problem. No matter what it's never going to be an actual number with a property.

>> No.14959789

>>14957775
He uses "we" for "I" when it should only ever be used for "you and I". One of the marks of a pseudoacademic.

>> No.14959794

>>14957775
The RH is True because of something something something identities.