[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 7 KB, 1024x529, isoc_tri_095_37027_lg.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14882931 No.14882931 [Reply] [Original]

is this symbol the simplest fractal made form

>> No.14884717

>>14882931

Was this supposed to be a gif?

>> No.14884722
File: 4 KB, 342x210, Golden-Triangles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14884722

>>14882931

>> No.14884913

>>14882931

Oh... I see, you're trying to figure out the source code of the Universe. Good thinking! You're thinking triangles, because of the polygons in video games, right?

Hint: research the packing problem... that could help you understand a better shape.

>> No.14884920
File: 259 KB, 992x762, 1532788678963.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14884920

>>14884913
>because of the polygons in video games

Not him but no....because of irreducable structures of atoms and subatomic particles. Even electromagnetic waves and gravity has shape.

>the packing problem
Some normie tier trash for midwits. Begone with you.

You have any idea how intelligent you have to be to measure geometric proportions of a magnetic field?!

>> No.14884927

>>14884920

Whatever you say, Ken lol.

>> No.14884931

>>14884927
At least I can see his insight, even though much of my personal research runs counter to his, as in I believe in "the atom".

And his descriptions of terms like "speed of light" actually being the rate of inductions? Wow, shit blew my mind, thats some multidimensional perspective right therw.

>> No.14884935

>>14884920
>You have any idea how intelligent you have to be to measure geometric proportions of a magnetic field?!

You're very intelligent, Ken. Hoping for your continued and lasting success

>> No.14884942

>>14884931
>as in I believe in "the atom".

Well. You're wrong on that one. Ken is essentially correct about all that. And. Yeah, c is just the universes "clock speed" rate of induction is a way to put it I suppose

>> No.14884944
File: 3.90 MB, 2438x4156, 1648507002906.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14884944

>>14884935
Study the works, not the man.

You study the man...because you are looking for a father figure as a full grown adult....

>> No.14884949

>>14884942
>Well. You're wrong on that one.

Yeah, as a field theorist I still see the individual, seperate, entity of 1. Youre blinded and deluded.

Post works, son.

Its not enought to "Bend the knee to your leader", refute some of his works! Einstein, Tesla, Newton....ALL OF THEM.

Bring forth what you refute of Ken's. Now.

>> No.14884958
File: 1 KB, 400x400, WolframRule18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14884958

>>14882931
No. The simplest of them is elementary cellular automaton 18, rule 18 for short.

>> No.14884962
File: 129 KB, 400x400, 1664453223579.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14884962

The simplest fractal is a straight line.

>> No.14884975

>>14884962
>.5D fractal
YOU CHEATED.

>> No.14885091

>>14884958

Good rule!

>> No.14885099

>>14884949
>Yeah, as a field theorist I still see the individual, seperate, entity of 1. Youre blinded and deluded.

1/2

Whoops! Didn't mean to divide your individual number there! Sorry about that!

>> No.14885102

>>14884717
You know those infinitely zooming fractal animations? That's what's going on here.

>> No.14885103

>>14884949
>Bring forth what you refute of Ken's. Now.

I'm not refuting Ken. He's essentially on the right path

>> No.14885109

>>14885102

Huh. The gif is not playing for me. I only see a blank triangle...