/sci/ - Science & Math

I can confirm that at FAO they do have gala dinners against world hunger

>>14883330
>given that the overwhelming majority of global warming activists are low iq people who can't do math (greta never graduated high school, in part because of her inability to pass math classes), does that mean that the crisis is fake and only idiots are dumb enough to believe in it?
She quit high school because she was raped in a bathroom by a muzzie and became extremely racist. Then her mom essentially browbeat her into becoming a climate schizo because that's a more acceptable outlet for her trauma than getting the muslims deported.

Are you trying to tell us that Greta hates niggers?

>>14883330
>given that the overwhelming majority of [...] activists are low iq people who can't do math
Fixe that for you anon. Activists of any kind be it ecological, nationalist, communist, fascist are almost always bottom rung people because they see it as a way to elevate themselves via their cause.

>>14883330
Greta Thunberg's personal proficiency at math changes nothing about the objective data proving that global warming is real and caused by humans.

>>14883562
Regardless of the real problem, it's only ever spoken about in apocalyptic terms, and at a point that can't be reversed. What the fuck do you expect regular people do about that? It's fucking over, if that's the case.
In practice, it's only something for governments and activists to beat regular citizens over, entrap them in tax schemes, and never end any of the corporate violators who are far more responsible.

>>14883487
She was raped by one, so yes.

>>14883330
>given that the overwhelming majority of global warming activists are low iq people who can't do math
That's why math is racist now though.

>>14883491
>>14883562
>objective data
"Math" is still the reason why I interpret all those graphs as really indicating that CO2 rises with temperature and not the other way around. They can't comprehend that quantification doesn't elaborate the cause because they're materialists. They then take this cherry picked data and apply more math/algorithms/equations on top of it, as if that's ever going to explain the cause.

>>14883584
>Regardless of the real problem
They would just love you to disregard the cause of the real problem which is why they keep getting away with their phony pipedream bullshit. You (the moron populous) react more to fear and fear porn because you don't have a private jet and millions in capital to just whoosh yourself away when shit gets real. It gets you polarized and perturbed more than repeating statistics like a broken record. Math isn't going to get you angry, but telling you your planet is doomed will get you angry enough to do anything.

>What the fuck do you expect regular people do about that?
To be the carbon they want to remove. They just want to kill you with their kindness is all. How can you not understand this? They have the degrees and education and groupthink that says they're right after all so how could they be wrong?

>>14883600
proofs?

>>14883330
Activists opinions on climate change don't make it real or fake. The data is provable and easy to understand. Anybody who doesn't accept man made climate change at this point is being willfully stupid.

https://www.ipcc.ch/
Everything you need to know is right there.

>>14883631
The Johnathon Swift is strong with this one.

>>14883631

>>14883623
>"Math" is still the reason why I interpret all those graphs as really indicating that CO2 rises with temperature and not the other way around.
So do you deny that the greenhouse effect exists at all?
If yes, how is the world not a giant ball of ice?
If no, why do you think putting additional greenhouse gases into the atmosphere won't make the greenhouse effect stronger?

>>14883631
I'm trying to increase my own carbon footprint. I am carnivore. I don't give a fuck about your climate cult.

Of course there is greenhouse effect and anthropogenic climate change is true. However, I don't give a fuck about it. I don't care animals, nature, temperatures, wildfires etc.

>>14883629
It's in her mom's book that she wrote.

>>14883330
silly peasant...
cutting back and conserving is for you not them

>>14883978
>carnivore
Check out this dipshit kek

>>14883764
Yo, not that anon, but can you refute this argument I heard someone make about greenhouse effect, it sounds reasonable to someone who never researched the topic(myself):
>Since greenhouse gasses are not some kind of a one-way mirror, they reflect BOTH the solar radiation coming from the Sun and the one being reflected back from the planet's surface. I.e their concentration doesn't matter because for them to reflect back 30% of radiation coming from Earth's surface, they first have to proportionaly cut the radiation coming down from the Sun. And since it's impossible for us to get more heat than the Sun itself sent to us (that would be free energy out of nowhere) the entire system will remain stable whether greenhouse gasses reflect 5% of radiation or 90%.

It all seems simple and logical, but probably too simple.

>>14883978
Söybeans consume more water and emit more CO2 than most livestock