/sci/ - Science & Math

https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

>>14842718
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/10/the-ultimate-skeptical-science-cherry-pick/

global warming is fake

>>14842702
not enough funding

>>14842702
How can there be any "compelling evidence" on it, from the point of view of a layman? You either troost the experts or you don't. It's not like you can validate anything they tell you beyond surface-level plausibility.

>>14842702
'Compelling' doesn't need to mean scientifically bulletproof. There are more than enough idiots on the planet who find a ranting swedish teenager 'compelling', and that's much cheaper and easier to get than science.

>>14842954
When he said "compelling scientific evidence", he probably means "rationally compelling" in mind.

>>14842962
how compelling is this?
how come one bit of supposedly compelling evidence confirms that global warming is real, but 9001 bits of evidence which confirm that global warming is a big swindle don't mean anything?

>>14842966
>how compelling is this?
You mean rationally compelling? Not at all.

>>14842702
Why can't climate deniers breath through their noses?

>>14842992
>why can't we kill the heckin' climate heretics?!?!?!

>>14842992
*breathe

>>14843001
they can't kill the climate heretics because they're afraid to try to. if god were on their side they would have no fear.

>>14842906
Stop posting this. The scale of the image is such that an 8" sea level change would require you to notice a half-pixel difference in the high-water mark. You'd also need to account for the difference in scale of the two images.

To be a compelling image, you'd need to resize one image to match the other, zoom in on the wall, and align both images to make the comparison clear.

>>14843339
>Stop posting this.
NOOOO STOP HECKIN POSTERINOOO!!! MOOODS MODS!!!!

BUMP

>>14842702
Ha ha funny monkey

I have no idea but until nuclear is universally demanded I don't believe anyone about it being too serious.

>>14842906
https://www.sealevels.org
Click and drag in the plot area to zoom in

>>14842966
curry:
She agreed that the Earth is warming, largely due to human-generated greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, and that the plausible worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic

>>14843350
stop shitting the couch, retard

>>14842702

>>14842718
>https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
That fucking webpage looks more schizo than a flat-earther's. Ridiculously charged.

>>14846999
>i can't read
yeah we know

>>14847008
There is literally nothing to read once you get past the spiteful and misanthropic language.

>shit's getting warmer
>???
>therefore it's human-caused

climate alarmists are a joke. if anything its getting colder.

>>14842702
Well the changes are obvious, why are personal observations and gut feelings not enough in the case of climate change when that's apparently all you need to know the truth about things like vaccines or the moon landings ?
Compelling scientific evidences wouldn't change the mind of climate change deniers.

>>14847063
There is good scientific evidence that vaccines are harmful. There is no scientific evidence that climate change is man made in a meaningful way.

>>14847071
sure bud
https://skepticalscience.com/its-not-us-advanced.htm

>>14847050

>>14847158
Its such a complex process that it's basically uncontrolled. Therefore climate policies are not there to actually "fix" the climate

>>14843339
>a trivial sea level rise is just as trivial in an image as it is in reality

>>14847167
>source: my ass

>>14842718
>https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
It is hard to tell if it is an honest attempt or a hilarious parody of warmeristas as the new supreme priests of doom, DOOM I tell you!

>>14842702
>Women the moment they turn 18

>>14847617
>reading is hard
lol idiot

Hysterical is the climate deniers that shit on City dwelling all the time and talk about muh (((corporations))) the best way to reverse the climate change would be to execute all the oil baron shekelstiens and get rid of traffic.

>>14847707
kek

>>14842702
Don't care about this thread, but that gorilla is bad ass.

>>14842923
>It's not like you can validate anything they tell you beyond surface-level plausibility.
Actually, it is, through observation. Either it gets warmer or it doesn't.
My grandma e.g. was mountaineering back in her youth and there was tons of snow and glaciers in the alps. Nowadays all of it is gone.
Pretty sure one could also talk to farmers about fertility over the decades, or look into the amount of water in a river to get an overall picture.
Not that it should matter, since most things done to "combat climate change" are retarded anyways, but meh.

>>14847042
>>14847008

>>14847042
True. Climate alarmists do themselves and their ridiculous theory no favors.

>>14847775
>oil baron shekelstiens
Most oil barons are white. Shekelsteins are the ones trying to bankrupt productive industries.

>>14847158
>>14847150
I suggest you zoom out say a few hundred million years.

>>14842702
>>14842962
For me it's an issue of politics. It's fine if we need to "make radical changes to fight climate change." But why does fighting climate change turn a blind eye to overpopulation? Europeans are a shrinking demographic, yet libtards and democrats insist on more and more immigration. From where? From the places with the HIGHEST birthrates. So they support policies that will exacerbate overpopulation everywhere else (mexico doesn't give a shit they can just keep dumping their poor onto the USA) while trying to make me feel bad if I can't afford an EV. Of course I can't afford an EV, you fuckers have suppressed labor wages through your immigration policies!

TLDR: don't piss down my back and tell me it's el nino

>>14850401
>I suggest you zoom out say a few hundred million years.
NTA but did you mean the good correlation between CO2 and temperatures once one accounts for a weaker Sun?

>Atmospheric CO2 is positively correlated with globally averaged surface temperatures for most of the Phanerozoic.
>The two longest-lived Phanerozoic glaciations during the Permo-Carboniferous and late Cenozoic are the only Phanerozoic intervals associated with consistently low levels of CO 2 (<500 ppm).
>The message of this study is not that atmospheric CO2 is always the dominant forcing (see Section 3.7 for an early Paleogene example). Instead, given the variety of factors that can influence global temperatures, it is striking that such a consistent pattern between CO2 and temperature emerges for many intervals of the Phanerozoic. This correspondence suggests that CO2 can explain in part the patterns of globally averaged temperatures during the Phanerozoic.
>>Royer et al., 2006

>>14850599
Colder temps allow nature to sequester more CO2. Warmer temps release it. It's a lagging not a leading indicator.

>>14850599
>>14850599
There is no correlation. Furthermore correlation is not causation. Furthermore mankind has not been proven to release significant volumes of co2, especially when compared to natural sources.

>>14851316
>>14847150