/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14815192
>today it's the Big Bang that's fake, or whatever
Oooh, post link, that should be hilarious.
>In other words, why hasn't it been replicated?
Well there's the Miller-Urey experiment, in which amino acids formed spontaneously in an inorganic soup. That's considered a pretty big deal. The PROBLEM is getting from amino acids to proteins. Nobody knows how that happened (or if, dun dun dun).

>>14815192
This is brigading and meta, neither of which are welcome here.

Life is really scary when you no longer trust science and you don't believe in schizo theories or religion either.
Makes you think how truly in the dark we are.

>>14815192
https://archive.macleans.ca/article/2005/5/30/the-star-trek-connection
>THE STAR TREK CONNECTION
>A surprising number of child sex abusers appear to be Trekkies. Trying to figure out what that means, however, shows how little we really know about pedophiles

>>14815202
>Oooh, post link, that should be hilarious.
Being impartial, it is still just a theory.

>>14815192
>How does a scientist accept the "primordial soup" explanation of the creation of life? It seems to me to be more of a science fiction meme at this point and doesn't seem like a "working" theory that a scientist would like.
Science does not know how the origin of life occurred. There are numerous hypothesizes for how it might have occurred, but anybody who tells you they know for sure is simply lying.

>>14815215
They're not groomers, it's an epidemic of narcissistic personality disorder. Which used to be kept under control by social pressure to follow a good moral standard of behaviour.
Narcissists are pure evil, they should be removed from the gene pool as if you would someone with downs syndrome.

>>14815490
>epidemic of narcissistic personality disorder.
A socially transmissible mental disorder, in the afflicted groom mentally feeble and vulnerable people (broken men, and children) into joining them.

>>14815495
*in which

>>14815495
I don't think broken men join, I think the drop out of civilisation because the system is so broken and corrupted they don't think they can bring about any change.
I need to read Walden Two.

>>14815522
We're talking about trannies and other sexual deviants, right? It's broken men recruiting broken men into a socially transmissible mental disorder.

Frankenstein will never be real.
Life is bigger than physics or the world.
/sci/ will cope and seethe

>>14815524
>trannies and other sexual deviants
We all make a choice at some point in our lives to be good or bad.
Broken people don't suddenly chose to be bad. They were born rotten, and the environment society has become simply allows their behaviour to go unchallenged.

>>14815533
In fact broken people are more likely to become broken because they were too good for this world.
Because evil people hate and destroy anything pure. Evil thrives off the destruction of good.

>>14815533
>environment society has become simply allows their behaviour to go unchallenged.
Unchallenged? Strange way to say encouraged. They might be born broken but they aren't born trannies; they are indoctrinated into these perversions.

Do you think there is a gene that encodes "I'm attracted to dragons having sex with cars"? Your genes don't know what a car is, humans did not evolve alongside cars. This proves that perversions are at least in part socially defined, and socially transmissible

We KNOW trannies indoctrinate weak people (particularly children and broken men). Why are you pretending otherwise?

>>14815561
I think everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. Life is full of choices, they know its wrong yet the choose to do it.
I think no matter how broken someone is, nothing would make them choose to do something like that.
All it means is they're born evil.

>>14815561
They are pretending otherwise because that's what groomers do.

>>14815588
Yes, seems that way. He's doubling down on "trannies were born this way" with the "concession" that trannies are evil (not actually a concession because trannies and other leftoid freaks relish in being perceived as evil.)

>>14815192
the guy who came up with the bing bang shit was a priest from the vatican

>>14815592
If someone can be manipluated into becoming a pedophile, all it means is that they were capable of it from the beginning.
Trash dna and needs to go from my pool. POOLS CLOSED!.

>>14815839
>lets his child get groomed by a deranged tranny public school teacher
>"It's okay my child was born this way so no harm was done."
You're not fooling anybody, troon.

>>14815847
I'm not saying it's ok, this is a danger of saying they were born that way.
Genetic screening or bring back religion and moral values to prevent it.

>>14815853
>and moral values to prevent it.
If you mean removing groomers from society so they can't spread their mental disease to others, then yes.

>>14815856
>If you mean removing groomers from society so they can't spread their mental disease to others, then yes.
Thats what I mean, genetic screening.

>>14815864
Such genetic screening does not presently exist, and alone would not be adequate even if it did. There needs to be a mechanism by which corrupt adults are identified by their degenerate behavior and removed from society. Particularly, homosexuality is transmissible from adult to child by way of sexual abuse. Genetic screening won't stop this, you need to actually figure out who the faggots are and remove them from society.

Genetic screening is no substitute for physical removal of trannies/etc from society.

>>14815490
>narcissistic personality disorder
AKA groomers

>>14815192
>(today it's the Big Bang that's fake, or whatever
Explanations for the creation of the universe have tended to have religious ideas permeate their theories. Big bang theories support certain religious ideas so I think it is fair to scrutinize them intensively to make sure that the science that is being claimed is actually verifiable and not just ideological agenda pushing.