/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14806279
Don’t blacks get enough tax money as it is?

>>14806279

all I can think about

as a white man i have no problem with this. sending women places just proves that we can do shit. honestly if we put a man on there he might be capable of fixing our mistakes using the controls we gave to him.

but sending up a woman takes real skill. you just can’t depend on them to take any executive action. it all needs to come from the preprogramming or otherwise ground control.

the fact that we can send women into space is a huge achievement for men. we can literally do our usual protection of women and caretaking of women even from millions of miles away using robots. because we are smart and we can do our masculine duties even from afar

>>14806279
>NASA will land the first woman and first person of color on the Moon.
So they grab a black woman, simply because of the color of her skin, and stick her in a rocket to shoot into space just to say "Look what we did, just because she is black!"

Sounds kinda racist there NASA.

>>14806307
>but sending up a woman takes real skill. you just can’t depend on them to take any executive action. it all needs to come from the preprogramming or otherwise ground control.
>the fact that we can send women into space is a huge achievement for men. we can literally do our usual protection of women and caretaking of women even from millions of miles away using robots. because we are smart and we can do our masculine duties even from afar
based AF in reality

>>14806281
Imagine the smell of those unwashed vagenes in a recycled air tightly spaced environment. barrrrrrrf!

>>14806292
>>14806292
>>14806296
>>14806307
>>14806308
>>14806310
>>14806313

She outranks all of you.

NASA Distinguished Service Medal (2009, 2011)
NASA Space Flight Medal (2006, 2007, 2010)
Honorary Doctorate of Science from Williams College (2011)
Harvard College Women's Professional Achievement Award (2008)
Harvard Foundation Scientist of the Year Award (2008)
Young Outstanding Texas Exes Award (2005)
Johnson Space Center Innovation Group Achievement Award (2013)
Johnson Space Center Director Commendation Award (2013)
Salem Trailblazer Award (2019)

>>14806316
You're trying too hard.

>>14806316
>>14806279
.

>>14806350
Seethe

>>14806279
I don't have a problem with sending black people into space.
I have a problem with sending black people into space because they're black instead of sending them into space because they're the best qualified people for the job.

>>14806363
> I have a problem with sending black people into space because they're black instead of sending them into space because they're the best qualified people for the job.
Well you don’t get a choice

>>14806316
>She outranks all of you.
Bullshit, I am an Emperor and All Supreme Leader of the Universe. Kneel before me.

See, anyone can make up a title.

>>14806350
kek
literal space monkey made it before black women.

>>14806363
>I don't have a problem with sending black people into space.
Me either. Send them all. One way.

So when do we give black nukes? Clearly we wont have true equality until all black nations control at least a dozen ICBMS. REPARATIONS NOW!

It's so she can inspire other young black women to go nuts and see their failures in life as a racist conspiracy against them.

>>14806395
The world is already 3/5th of the way there with nuclear armed India and Pakistan.

>>14806395
That would be kinda fun to watch!

>>14806399
>India and Pakistan.
They are pussies and will never use them. Blacks would actually use some nukes. I support giving African nations all of China's nukes just to see what they'd do with them.

>>14806399
>nuclear armed India and Pakistan.
>blacks
Not really. Top castes of India and pakistan are, basically white or very white.
South Africans, however, were given a nuclear power plant and since they kicked out all the "racist whites" (their own words) they can't handle it.

>She flew to space onboard three Space Shuttle missions

not mad, she's not just a diversity pick then

>>14806279
Because the Government is the most expensive GF in the world.
The worst kind too.
No sex, but constantly getting fucked.

>>14806279
Fuck it shoot all niggers to space and no support for them.
Erase all evidence a nigger ever walked the earth lmao

>>14807054
Social security is literally costing hundreds of billions a year paying for useless boomers, disableds and welfare niggers
And you have the audacity to question a paltry 0.01% of the national budget over a decade, which paid many white men to feed their families, that was used to build an instrument to probe the cosmos' mysteries?
I spit on you

>>14806279
It makes the white men of /pol/ seethe. There are many of them here, which is why there has been so much anti-intellectualism and anti-empiricism in recent months, we were not that retarded before 2016.

Even the most racist people of /sci/ understand that it's ultimately a good thing. Those are still space missions and every one of them will improve the next ones. The people inside those spacecrafts and landers aren't all that matter.

>>14806279
Who gives a shit? It's NASA. Half of the people working there were nepotism-ed or otherwise systematically enabled. It's never been a flawless meritocracy.
As long as whoever they choose is competent, I don't care about the other criteria.

>>14806279
Btw, I have a theory about Gravity.
I believe there are points tiers of the Earth where gravity becomes distorted from the Surface.

I believe that there is a Gravity "Field" that permeates the planet, and could maintain different gravitational zones by applying simple geometric observations in a practical way to theoretical models with testable and verifiable predictions.
If you assume that fields/forces can interact with each other on varying scales, then you can extrapolate some mathematical models.
Like, by taking the ratio of a circle's Circumference:Area, then you could find the minimum/maximum values that a given phenomenea will have, before it carries over to a characteristically different phenomenea, or particle, or field, or whatever.
For example, when a "particle"'s dimensions reach a value such that the circumference(or Surface-Area) is greater than it's Area(or Volume), then that might be where the cutoff is for that formula's applicability, and you shift-gears into the formula that picks up where the previous ends.

Or it could be the opposite of that, where the "particle/field" is stable until a certain ratio(s) are reached where in the area grows larger than the circumference.
This could certainly lead to "tiers" of energy levels where the perimeter:area of molecular particles are subject to the Rules of Ratio. Where their (sub)atomic dimensions can be assumed to have shaped-fields which are responsible for their given properties.
You can imagine overlapping fields that have similar rules, but operate at different "base lengths". So that if you imagine fields formed as concentric circles, then you can decrease the radius of each by "1", and there will be different effects marked by different benchmarks.

>>14806713

>>14807094
Well, since you asked.
>Spoiler Alert: There is possibly some Offensive Language in picrel

>>14806307
>>14806310
>>14806307
>the fact that we can send women into space is a huge achievement for men. we can literally do our usual protection of women and caretaking of women even from millions of miles away using robots. because we are smart and we can do our masculine duties even from afar
I diknow men enjoyed being beta cucks working for free to get women to have casual fun

>>14807113
kek I love how braindead you are. I always love when the ''i love science'' atheist crowd keeps saying statistics brings knowledge.


science is 100% statistics, ie rationalism, which is why there is no truth in science. Rationalism is not compatible with empriicism. It is rationalists who try hard to merge their rationalism with empiricism and the end result is what they call science but there is no empiricism in this.
It's like a redefinition of empiricism by scientists.
Scientists are not empiricists. An empiricist does not run an 'experiment'and even less a 'thought experiment. Running an experiment already is part of rationalism.

The whole secular infatuation over empiricism started by the self proclaimed enlightened secular rationalists who hated the christian rationalists larping as greek philosophers.

The secular intellectuals hated the endless christian speculations that they saw as unverifiable about god and the use of logic from aristotle. So they said they could speculate on nature and with their verification meme, their rationalist system about the world would be the truth.
So in order to be separate from the christian clerics, the secular rationalists said they were empiricist. Their big idea was the empirical proof which is completely retarded oxymoron.
A proof is never empirical. A proof always on the side of speculations passed as rationality.

Logic is just a field by autistic pedants about well formed formulas and valuations, ie a map sending a formula to 1 or 0 and asking what are those valuations which are stable under inference rules. Zero truth in this, especially truth in the casual sense. Tarski truth is moronic, meaningless. Peak atheist. Just like there is no truth in science, just some stats and a stat convention for saying ‘’if p value is XXX then the result is """"""""""""""’true"""""""""""

>>14807382

At best scientists can come up about some stats about some formal system (ie a model) like the spring or harmonic oscillator or the standard model. Like ‘’your material has such and wear and tear, and our backlog of such conditions lead to 60% of breaking in the next year, therefore your material may break or not within a year’’ That’s the pinnacle of the scientific claim and all their claims remain phrased as uncertainty.

>>14807382
>Peak atheist. Just like there is no truth in science
Funny, I was under the impression that Institutionalized Religion was behind quite a bit of the pseudoscience shenanigans.

>>14806395
>LOOK AT ME. I AM THE SUPAPOWA NOW!

>>14806395
>So when do we give black nukes? Clearly we wont have true equality until all black nations control at least a dozen ICBMS. REPARATIONS NOW!
I know this is bait, but I'm going to post it anyway...

/pol/ is not white

>>14806316
I have white skin. I outrank her

>>14806279
>>14806281
Has there been a MonkeyPox outbreak on the International Space Station yet?

>>14806279
What a nerd

>>14806279
Doesn't bother me, I think it's cool that we're going back to the moon.

>>14806279
I think racial quotas are fucking offense. I could care less if a black person or a woman or a black woman is the most qualified candidate for the job.

>>14808510
Agree! This wouldn't even be happening if it wasn't for Trump's changes to NASA and helping the space race again. MAGA!

Who the fuck cares about what color does the skin of astronauts have, when you send them to space you stupid fucking retarded primates.

>>14806279
>Why does this make the white men of /sci/ seethe so much?

Democrat shitstains never change even after 200 years. You fuckers are still pitting the races against each other.

Pic related because this is the same exact shit.

>>14808717
Why should they change if the scam keeps working?

Democrat Party has been the party of the rich elite, big business, and unions/mafia forever. That's where the money is.

>>14808727
>Why should they change if the scam keeps working?
Sadly, you're right.

>>14806279
Landing the first person on the moon was an incredible achievement for the time. It required a lot of effort and money to accomplish it.
Landing the first type of person from an specific background is not an achievement and it doesn't represent the same amount of effort and innovation that the apollo program represented.
Simple as.

>>14806292
A tale as old as time