/sci/ - Science & Math

Complete failure.
Would not have passed trials under normal circumstances.
Get ready for a second round of shots that do nothing but drive new variants

>>14774960

>>14774885
>Old vaccines
Soul
>New management vaccines
Soulless

>>14774885
>Hmm what does this board need? I know, a 5th Covid vaccine thread on page 1

>>14774885
>How effective is this vaccine compare to other vaccines?
No "vaccines" are effective anymore, they have been overused and people are weaker than ever.

>>14774885
-20%
Not only is it completely ineffective against covid, but will likely give you blood clots and heart failure.

>>14776207
>ineffective against covid, but will likely give you blood clots and heart failure.
But democrats and big pharma say they have pills and shots to help with clots and heart problems.

>>14776213
Wew, what convenient timing!

>>14776204
I don't know how parents are willing to get their babies jabbed up with 7-in-one combo vaccines. When I was a kid I had 7 total inoculations, one every year or two until I was 10 starting as a toddler. The medical consensus at the time was that overloading the immune system with too many at once would result in inferior immunity to the components or an autoimmune disorder.

>>14776216
parents on government dole or have all inclusive insurance be like, "how much deez vaxxs gwanna cost me? Nuffing? Shit yeah, get dem needles in dat brat, I don'tz care!"

>>14776213

>>14774885
its not a Vaccine

>>14776231
You're a bot.

>>14776226

>>14776216
I should also add that I've never come down with any of the diseases I was inoculated against, because they don't need booster injections if they're delivered one at a time with breaks for an immune response. Even chickenpox/shingles jabs don't really need a booster if you develop immunity properly.

It is very effective at its intended purpose, depopulation.

>>14776249
boosters?

>>14776256
/thread

>>14776256
>>14776298
might be on to something, considering many more people have died from the vaccines than the virus, and the virus is over while the vaccine effects are just starting to be widely expressed.

>>14776237
He's right though, it's not a vaccine.

>>14776318
The last time I asked someone to define what a vaccine is he failed miserably, do you want to give it another shot (pun intended)?

>>14774885
It's probably the most effective vaccine of all time

>>14776329
trust the science!
safe and effective!
government says so, so it must be true! government cannot lie!

>>14776324
Which definition? The old one or the new one that the CDC changed when the shots rolled out?

>>14776341
whatever one makes the clotshot a vaccine

>>14776324
Cringe

>>14776347
That's not the CDC definition

>>14776356
>Yes, the CDC changed its definition of vaccine from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” The public health agency also changed its definition of “vaccination.”
https://www.newswest9.com/article/news/verify/coronavirus-verify/cdc-changed-vaccine-definition-more-transparent/536-03ce7891-2604-4090-b548-b1618d286834

>>14776347