/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14764579
We just got our next excuse for NASA to not fly humans to the moon yet again, otherwise those pesky flay earthers could live record the rocket and find out it doesn't really go up there

Moon dust is also carcinogenic.

>>14764579
>Pretty cool how the astronauts up there were able to stay for so long but have no radiation poisoning. Or when they passed through the Val Allen belt.
1000 times more than almost nothing is still minuscule.

Moon visits will likely only be for like 14 days at a time before the night sets in and it's time to jet back to Earth. The radiation and the dust aren't a problem for 14 day stints.

>>14764579

Buying 1000 lottery tickets means you are 1000 times more likely to win.
You will still not win the lottery.

>>14764580
Funny how it always happens that way. I guess there's no reason to go now that we have high tech visual equipment. It only worked when the news companies had to take a video capture of a CRT monitor and couldn't get any original live feeds.

>>14764579
As if more proof was required for people to find out what a pile of garbage science is.

>>14764580
satellites are launched into orbit dozens and dozens of times a year. what is stopping the flerfs from filming *any* of these?
>>14764579
>Pretty cool how the astronauts up there were able to stay for so long
they were up there very long at all anon

>>14764630
buying 1000 lottery tickets only subtracts 999 from the odds against you winning 1 ticket.

You retards realize radiation shielding exists right? Ever wonder why so many space craft and space gear is gold looking? Gold blocks radiation.

>>14765038
>Gold blocks radiation.
Gold is good at becoming irradiated and making some very very nasty radioactive particles that can be worse than what you were shielding against.

>>14765075
cool

>>14765038
The ships were made with reynold's wrap and kapton tape.

>>14764579
This is a bullshit headline because they lump everything into the term 'radiation', such as charged ions (mostly harmless), radio microwave and uv light (completely shieldable), with alpha/beta/gamma radiation all so they can say 'so much radiation omg!!!, but its really just a tiny amount and a bunch of shit that is easily mitigated.

>>14764579
The moon doesn't have a shit ton of liquid covering it that can't become radioactive. Also it doesn't have trillions of carbon meat sacks orbiting its surface absorbing the occasional gamma ray boosts.

>>14765107
Oh and also the moon doesn't generate radioactive shit in its core that comes to the surface.

>>14765038
>You retards realize radiation shielding exists right?
Lead and mother fucking Bismuth are the only materials dense enough to actually "shield" you from radiation.

>Ever wonder why so many space craft and space gear is gold looking? Gold blocks radiation.
Kapton foil is made of polyimide and aluminum though. It's for heat radiation, not spooky radiation.

>>14764579
>2 or 3 times more than the ISS
So not a big deal since people spend half a year there and only like a week on the moon.
Or is OP already into ISS-denial levels of schizofaggotry?

>>14764855
>It only worked when the news companies had to take a video capture of a CRT monitor and couldn't get any original live feeds.

wait, source?

>>14765145
https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes#Video_signal_processing
It was how they (not the news companies but NASA) converted the video to NTSC at the receiving sites.
I don't know how Anon imagines them getting original feeds. Every news organization should build a 50 meter tracking dish?

>>14764883
Which is the same for small probabilities. exp(-x) ~ 1-x

>>14764583
Why didnt they all die from cancer then? Moon landing disproven yet again