[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1.60 MB, 1150x1150, Luna 24.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741698 No.14741698 [Reply] [Original]

Previous: >>14737738

>> No.14741701

First for propellant slosh

>> No.14741704
File: 650 KB, 1570x1210, 1985 - Series stamp 3 - Lunakhod-1 - (2 Riels).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741704

>>14741698
FTS Archive
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KCJBL632oieD1r6JOh_5Eg9NTcf_-hH8?usp=sharing

34 new stamps from the Peoples' Republic of Kampuchea, 1984-1988
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/165jOZm52WUw4g-xQBCZMR9PtnfTdScmu?usp=sharing

>> No.14741711
File: 396 KB, 1536x2048, cute.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741711

First for cute girls going to space!

>> No.14741713
File: 837 KB, 867x649, Fake SLS Configurations.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741713

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Orion, is in fact, SLS/Orion, or as I've recently taken to calling it, SLS plus Orion. Orion is not a launch vehicle unto itself, but rather another multibillion dollar component of a partially functioning pork system made useless by the SLS subcontractors, shitty designs, and Alabama river rocks comprising a gigantic scam as defined by the GAO.

Many taxpayers fund a small part of the SLS scam every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of SLS which is widely mocked today is often called "Orion", and many of its victims are not aware that it is basically the SLS scam, developed by the SLS lobbyists.

There really is an Orion, and these people are seeing it blow up, but it is just a part of the scam they fund. Orion is the capsule: the payload in the system that allocates the government's resources to other districts that need pork. The capsule is an essential part of a launch system, but useless by itself; it can only incinerate astronauts in the context of a complete launch system. Orion is normally used in combination with the SLS boondoggle: the whole scam is basically SLS with Orion added, or SLS/Orion. All the so-called "Orion" debris fields are really distributions of SLS/Orion.

>> No.14741718
File: 392 KB, 2400x1348, 970981560.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741718

Friendly reminder that NTP is happening this decade whether you like it or not.

>> No.14741721

>>14741718
Why are drop tanks so popular bros

It's not like they grow on trees

>> No.14741722
File: 104 KB, 1000x636, bezos_chad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741722

>>14741718
All thanks to one man, no less

>> No.14741723

>>14741713
Reddit

>> No.14741724
File: 631 KB, 1176x1620, 1990 - Series stamp 7 - MIR - (35 Riels).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741724

>>14741704
7 stamps from the Kingdom of Cambodia, 1990
This one shows an early MIR with only a single module

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1DpPHOkDGnsizz8l0DN3OI9ZbmmM0yklZ?usp=sharing

>> No.14741733

>>14741711
>Giant nigger nose
>cute

>> No.14741736

>>14741733
yes anon, we know you're an incel. just contain yourself for a moment

>> No.14741738

>>14741723
Namefag

>> No.14741754

>>14741736
>simping for old hags
Come on, you can do better.

>> No.14741755
File: 302 KB, 1920x1080, mpv-shot0131.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741755

How can we get season 2? How the fuck can we get it?

>> No.14741758

I'm a game developer. What kind of a space game should i make?

>> No.14741759

>>14741713
Slow claps. Gnu copy pasta rocketfied amused me

>>14741723
Meme Parroting newfags like you are not liked here

>> No.14741763

>>14741755
With the way Russia is acting at the moment I think that any show that doesn't potray them as the bad guys is gonna have a hard time

>> No.14741765

>>14741758
KSP2

>> No.14741767

since /sfg/ owns this board please submit feedback to ban namefagging. we got the image limit increased after all

>> No.14741783

>>14741758
On the off chance you're even slightly legit, Microsoft made what I believe is the world's first and only asymmetrical space dogfight sim / RTS hybrid called Allegiance

No one has ever revisited the concept but it was astonishingly unique at the time

Net Devil followed up with a similar but much larger scale dogfight sim called Jumpgate that codified a bunch of stuff that later showed up in EVE

>> No.14741834

>>14741763
how does it make russia look good? it's the soviets for one. second it is completely incidental

>> No.14741843

>>14741834
A) everyone treats Russia as the successor state to the soviet union
B) Never said that it made Russia look good, but they are not the bad guys in the story and that's enough I think

>> No.14741846

>>14741767
we need thread IDs badly

>> No.14741849

>>14741843
do the zipperheads really give a shit?

>> No.14741863

>>14741849
Prolly, like most western aligned nations

>> No.14741889
File: 84 KB, 1200x800, 1660037152211.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741889

>> No.14741903

Flight of the rare Long March 6 tonight, wonder if they'll stream

>> No.14741909

What do we know of Firefly's Miranda engines that will be used on Antares? The RD-181 engines previously used were pretty much the best kerolox engines out there and even then the Antares had shit performance. Unless the Miranda engines are some high performance ORSC engines they would have to replace that garbage solid booster upper stage just to reach orbit.

>> No.14741911

>>14741846
Tranny niggers like you need to be necked

>> No.14741913

>>14741911
you give yourself away too easy

>> No.14741916

You hate to see it...

>> No.14741921

>>14741916
namefag, kys

>> No.14741925

>>14741921
How drunk are you? Fucking hell...

>> No.14741926
File: 6 KB, 327x55, sshot-056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741926

>>14741921

>> No.14741927

>>14741916
the fatty can't help himself

>> No.14741928
File: 5 KB, 394x84, 2022-08-09 11_55_50-_sci_ - _sfg_ - Space Flight General_ Luna 24 Edition - Science & Math - 4chan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741928

>>14741926

>> No.14741934 [DELETED] 

Pure 3rd world autism on display...

>> No.14741945

>>14741926
>>14741928
don't care, he needs to be shamed
>>14741925
not at all, why?

>> No.14741946

The fatty continues to eat his oreos

>> No.14741949

>>14741718
U L T R A
S A F E

>> No.14741955

>>14741718
So whats the plan?

100kg payload NTP?
1 ton payload NTP?
100 ton payload NTP?

Starship equipped with NTP that costs extra hundreds of million dollars?
Some tiny ship equipped with NTP that costs dozens of billions of dollars?

>> No.14741957
File: 151 KB, 723x4000, firefly antares 330 render 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741957

>>14741909
I'm sure Miranda performs worse than RD-181, but they'll get better performance out of the rocket by scaling the stage up.

>> No.14741966
File: 24 KB, 862x1086, Delta_IV_family.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741966

>>14741957
fat core Antares looks... off
it's like Delta IV medium with a small fairing

>> No.14741972
File: 169 KB, 1280x1372, FZp4RkVWQAAWHPP-1280x1372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741972

>>14741957
so based. will Antares 330 fly before New Glenn?

>> No.14741982

>>14741957
Ah, so they're basically replacing the entire first stage.

>> No.14741984

>>14741909
It’s got a vacuum isp of 302, so it’s almost certainly using a gas generator instead of staged combustion. With just over 1 kN of thrust it looks a lot like modernized equivalent of the RS-27A.

>> No.14741999
File: 68 KB, 460x977, space race.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14741999

This completely accurate image will upset /sfg/. Why can't it handle the truth?

>> No.14742004

>>14741999
What do you think is the finish line, if not the Moon?

>> No.14742006
File: 1.56 MB, 776x777, 1646763847851.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742006

>>14741999
/sfg/ likes Soviet shit though, aside from that one /pol/tard.

>> No.14742011
File: 453 KB, 512x512, vb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742011

>>14741999
communists getting their shit kicked in by freedom-loving amateurs makes me happy, not angry

>> No.14742016
File: 79 KB, 1100x743, Monument to the Conquerors of Space.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742016

>>14742006
bit shameful that the US doesn't have the equivalent of this to commemorate its achievements in space

>> No.14742019

>>14742006
The USSR had great space shit. It’s sad that it was always undermined by their awful politics.

>> No.14742020

>>14741972
Neutron bros...
Dream Chaser bros....
It's over

>> No.14742022

>>14742004
then the ussr crossed it first

>> No.14742023

>>14742022
that's not what the picture says

>> No.14742024

>>14742023
yes it is

>> No.14742027

>>14742020
Over for Firefly, probably. It’s actually kinda fun watching Northrop wind up to anschluss another aerospace company.

>> No.14742031

>>14742022
Are you pretending to be retarded? USA was first to send people to the Moon, USSR has never done that.

>> No.14742032

>>14742024
no it says USA won

>> No.14742034
File: 244 KB, 930x930, Salyut interior.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742034

Arguably the USSR walked away from the space race with far more benefits than the US did.
Apollo missions were pretty scientifically scuffed, the retrieval of lunar rocks being the main scientific benefit of the program. The problem that the US had was the fact that US rockets were too expensive for continuous manned flights. Skylab only had three missions before it was abandoned, though it was planned to be boosted with the shuttle.

>> No.14742038

>>14742031
LM gets ABL Space systems
NG gets Firefly
Boeing gets Astra
:)

>> No.14742040

>>14742031
they sent a cute frying pan robot. it counts too.

>> No.14742041

>>14742038
meant for >>14742027

>> No.14742048

>>14742038
>LM, NG, Boeing
I can't wait for the day those 3 just stop existing.

>> No.14742054
File: 1.58 MB, 1600x1165, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742054

percy caught a martian hair and /sfg/ doesn't even care

>> No.14742058

>>14742034
>though it was planned to be boosted with the shuttle
There was a good chance that the Shuttle would have been used to intentionally de-orbit Skylab over uninhabited territory rather than boost it since many at NASA thought a revived Skylab around would jeopardize their chances of getting a "true" space station funded and built

>> No.14742059

>>14742038
As much of a shitshow as they are now, I could see Astra doing better as an IP under a big defense industry player. Rocket 3 costs about the same as a tomahawk cruise missile which presents some interesting possibilities as a prompt global strike system. They just need to get a 2nd stage that’s actually reliable.

>> No.14742063

>>14742038
dont forget BO gets Relatively. Even Bezos himself toured the factory, clearly an interested investor. sadly no one wants rocket lab. just not glamorous

>> No.14742078

>>14742063
I could actually see Relativity either fighting off a takeover or getting eaten by a larger non-space launch company. If you can print the first stage of a Terran R, you can also print the fuselage of a Douglas DC-8. There’s got to be a lot of people that’d be interested in buying that kind of capability that aren’t involved in building rockets.

>> No.14742094
File: 77 KB, 699x525, mars life gale fungi a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742094

>>14742054
wait there's animals as well as plants up there? woah

>> No.14742112

>>14741909
berger was saying they'd bought a few f9 flights for cygnus too so they aren't expecting them to be ready for a while. anyone who knows how these things go can expect that they'll have to buy a few more before the new antares is ready.

>> No.14742122

>>14741718
Instead of wasting time here shilling and being a faggot as per usual, you should use your autism for good and make a diagram that would break down the various nuclear development efforts.

>> No.14742170
File: 53 KB, 1080x1080, 1647229262590.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742170

>>14742059
They also have god-tier avionics.

>> No.14742190
File: 57 KB, 750x502, Saturn_V_upgrades.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742190

>>14741999
The US made the moon the goal because they figured they could "win" if they set a goal and pretended that is what it was all about.
The sad fact is humanity lost because both nations where more focused on firsts instead of building sustainable LVs. Even when all the money was already spend and the Saturn V produced the MLVs were canned because politicians couldn't see any point launching huge payloads now they has "won".

>> No.14742201

>>14742054
What the hell?

>> No.14742205

>>14742201
probably a piece of EDL hardware

>> No.14742280
File: 103 KB, 522x640, PTM moon LANTR LTV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742280

>> No.14742303

Hi anons, are there any aerospace positions who have remote work + no ITAR/citizenship requirement?

>> No.14742306

we reached 100 launches so far this year

>> No.14742357
File: 9 KB, 225x225, spiral blue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742357

>>14742303
There's plenty of small startups focused on payloads. Generally the more software development ones will be remote work.

>> No.14742364

>>14742357
can you name a few companies like that?
im good with programming, bachelors in aerospace. But not american, so looking for remote work.
I desperately want to work with anything space.

>> No.14742367

>>14742364
I did check out the more well known ones but they had ITAR requirements.

>> No.14742377

If anyone is thinking of getting a L2 subscription, do it only if you want to donate. Take a 2 month for $20 and then if you think its worth it, you can take a $200 one.
I didn't feel it was worth it so stopped after step 1.

>> No.14742397

>>14742377
Anything worthwhile that gets posted there eventually finds it way out into the wild anyways

>> No.14742511
File: 387 KB, 416x1026, kuva_2022-08-09_181539538.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742511

>need an orbital station for a 30-day contract
>only Soyuz and Salyut parts, no Proton parts
Enjoy this wretched-ass Soyuz with a Proton fairing

>> No.14742547

>>14742511
Vague Soyuz-ST energy

>> No.14742556

>>14741999
*triggers american /sfg/ posters
Most anons from other countries already know that the US winning the space race is propaganda. Both countries achieved great things, the URSS achieved them first. The URSS simply collapsed before the US.

>> No.14742592

>>14741758
Game about colonizing the solar system.

>> No.14742613

>>14741999
>>14742556
(You)

>> No.14742636

>>14741758
Clone Empire: Total War and reskin it for space, different maps are different parts of the solar system and various planets/moons/asteroids can be conquered.
Nobody else is gonna make a futuristic Total War game so you might as well do it.

>> No.14742673
File: 119 KB, 738x604, 8-Figure1-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742673

>> No.14742712

>>14742636
>No dev will ever make Total War: Medieval II - but in space
>You will never set up blockades around other worlds
>You will never send assault fleets to perform gravity slingshots and take enemy armadas by surprise
>You will never construct orbital defense platforms on captured asteroids
>You will never form alliances with powerful interstellar empires
>You will never groom your progeny to become Space Emperor
Closest anything gets to this is Stellaris, but like all modern 4X games it devolves into a glorified spreadsheet simulator after an hour or so of gameplay. You basically never see good strategy/tactics gameplay combos anymore.

>> No.14742743

>>14742712
An actual spreadsheet simulator would be step up over Stellaris.

>> No.14742788
File: 168 KB, 1170x780, ezgif-3-0aa9cefcb1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742788

Holy fuck those nets are massive.

>> No.14742792

>>14742303
Those jobs are reserved for red blooded Americans

>> No.14742810

>>14742788
and useless

>> No.14742831
File: 197 KB, 1200x1040, Aft Cargo Carrier Shuttle Martin Marietta z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742831

>>14742788
They'll never catch any fish that way wtf

>> No.14742880

>>14742006
>/sfg/ likes Soviet shit though
Speak for yourself; the word following "Soviet" is the relevant one.

>> No.14742881

>>14742788
these don't exist anymore

>> No.14742898

>>14742880
I already mentioned you subhuman /pol/tard.

>> No.14742906

>>14742898
>It's all just the one guy I swear and there's no way that my opinion is contentious and is therefor fact and I will revel in my carefully crafted sense of validation
t. you

>> No.14742908
File: 1.55 MB, 1888x2956, Space Shuttle STS-120.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742908

>>14742880
If you're talking about shit then boy do I have the spacecraft for you

>> No.14742918

>>14742908
The Shuttle is awarded no points except for working out a lot of the troubles inherent to heat shield tiles, being surprisingly good at light-weighting a reusable hydrolox engine that uses a pair of fuel rich preburners for some ungodly reason, and pioneering lightweight, friction stir welded tanks.

>> No.14742928

>>14742906
I don't really care if it's one guy or three. You can easily tell they're retarded /pol/ subhuman regardless nonetheless and that they're the small minority here.

>> No.14742930

>>14742928
k

>> No.14742942

>>14742930
t. butthurt

>> No.14742950
File: 127 KB, 417x535, Nice Starlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742950

>SpaceX will be launching Starlink Group 4-20 on booster 1069
https://twitter.com/Matt_Lowne/status/1556544741206102016
He can't keep getting away with it!

>> No.14742983

>>14742950
b-but he smoked weed once, a fraud, cancel him reeeeee

>> No.14742997
File: 367 KB, 2500x2500, InFocus_IN124_IN124_XGA_DLP_Projector_846361.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742997

>>14742942

>> No.14743001
File: 2.11 MB, 1920x996, 1638202639016.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743001

>>14742997
You literally responded to a 6 hour old post because you got butthurt over it claiming /sfg/ likes Soviets space tech.

>> No.14743031

>>14743001
>if you respond to a post, you're butthurt
Not everyone is like you

>> No.14743054
File: 213 KB, 1284x1293, FZvDnoWWQAIhOQG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743054

Alpha WDR success

>> No.14743059
File: 167 KB, 586x401, 19-25-15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743059

>> No.14743072
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, SegerYu-1556980173329043458-20220809 072615-vid1 - 0.00.13-0.02.12.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743072

>> No.14743075
File: 2.90 MB, 854x480, AstroSamantha-1557026359431544834-20220809 102946-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743075

>> No.14743097

>>14742983
apparently SpaceX was forced to randomly drug check their employees after that stunt and Elon had to apologize to staff

>> No.14743112

>>14742004
it's called the space race, not the moon race

maybe that means the finish line is space

>> No.14743121

>>14743072
>>14743075
Horeee sheet, china has done what the ISS did 40 years ago. Trooley numba wan!

>> No.14743126
File: 35 KB, 700x394, wernher2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743126

>>14743112
In that case, the winner is Germany.

>> No.14743132

>>14741889
starship station is retarded
using starship to lift construction material for a mega station is real shit

>> No.14743137

>>14743132
what is the benefit of a mega station

>> No.14743139

>>14742712
Aurora 4x you uncultured faggot

>> No.14743140

>>14743137
mega volume

>> No.14743143

>>14743140
what is the benefit of mega volume

>> No.14743149

>static fire today
OH SHIT OH FUCK

>> No.14743152
File: 115 KB, 602x633, jeffy b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743152

>>14743126
oh so NOW suborbital counts, does it?

>> No.14743153
File: 649 KB, 244x230, Tick Tick Boom Lost Girl.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743153

>>14743149

>> No.14743182

>>14743149
How do you know?

>> No.14743199

>>14743182
>small object removal
>watering down the area to prevent fires

>> No.14743225
File: 375 KB, 1004x1280, 3A989FE9-8F87-4015-BD99-04E07091907B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743225

>>14743126
The winner was always Germany

>> No.14743235
File: 2.13 MB, 1600x900, monster markusic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743235

>>14743054
looks like a can of monster

>> No.14743253
File: 101 KB, 850x400, quote-i-do-not-allow-fan-fiction-the-characters-are-copyrighted-it-upsets-me-terribly-to-even-anne-rice-68-33-70.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743253

>>14743152
No manlets allowed

>> No.14743311

https://www.space.com/artemis-1-launch-ticket-sales-crash-website
>Artemis 1 moon mission launch ticket sales crashed website
>Ticket sales for the Artemis 1 launch, which is targeted for Aug. 29, were so popular after opening Tuesday (Aug. 2) that the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex's website was briefly overwhelmed, Florida Today reported late last week.
>The news comes amid expectations that more than 100,000 people will show up on the Space Coast of Florida, which includes the Kennedy Space Center and the nearby Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, both of which are an hour east of Orlando.
SOON

>> No.14743313

>>14743143
mega industry
no more faggy science faire experiments
we do real shit now

>> No.14743315

>>14741711
Listenning to /sfg/ music for the feels.
https://youtu.be/EZSTkunGczI

>> No.14743332

>>14743311
its an unmanned flight tho

>> No.14743348

>>14742511
what mods are these?

>> No.14743385

>>14743348
Tantares Launch Vehicles, and some other Tantares mods
Probably the best stockalike Soviet mod for KSP, RO has some nice models but they’re janky as shit

>> No.14743451

EARTHER (derogatory)

>> No.14743514
File: 111 KB, 1196x879, 8FEBC51E-890B-407A-94F5-B6F4A0AC137A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743514

How can anyone compete?

>> No.14743528

https://spacenews.com/starlink-satellites-encounter-russian-asat-debris-squalls/

https://www.airforcemag.com/multiple-air-force-units-buy-spacexs-starlink-satellite-internet-services/

>> No.14743531

>>14743514
crazy how few there are.

>> No.14743538

>>14743531
Everyones pretty lazy nowadays.
how about robots.
Theres just boston dynamics, thats it.
Thats the price of peace.

>> No.14743542
File: 97 KB, 707x752, 6R.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743542

>>14743538
>Theres just boston dynamics, thats it.
I assure you there is more than that, you just don't hear about them.

>> No.14743548

>>14743542
the sad thing is you're wrong.
there's no secret black projects that got a better robot than atlas.

>> No.14743552
File: 292 KB, 2048x1366, FZsXPYaWIAEtLwH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743552

to the heavens, godspeed

>> No.14743583
File: 280 KB, 950x632, Automation.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743583

>>14743548
uh huh
Robots have been around for a LONG time. It's an entire field of industrial automation. Adept, Omron, Panasonic, Mitsubishi all make robots. Most industrial companies will make custom robots inside their own facilities.

>> No.14743591

>>14743583
Those are mechanical arms.
You know what i mean by robot.

>> No.14743612

>>14743552
Praise the lord

>> No.14743617
File: 535 KB, 1024x768, ytj2jydhw6k71.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743617

>>14742170

>> No.14743681
File: 41 KB, 1080x1080, 1644526786619.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743681

>>14742170

>> No.14743691

>>14743552
great picture - when will it actually launch?

>> No.14743711

>>14743691
two weeks

>> No.14743723

>>14743691
two months

>> No.14743732

>>14743711
>>14743723
kek

>> No.14743734
File: 1.37 MB, 2048x2048, elon-chan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743734

GET BACK TO WORK /SFG/

>> No.14743745

>>14743313
Truth. I think a big part of early spaceship construction will be figuring out how to do welding in space. Once they figure that out, I think they can send up stacks of beams/hexagon/pentagon/triangles and have robots weld them into massive pressure vessels, trusses etc.

>> No.14743751
File: 70 KB, 805x449, orb 2 construct.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743751

>>14743745

>> No.14743755

>>14743745
Welding is extremely easy in space, you don't even need to create an inert gas bubble around the bead as the metal isn't going to oxidize.
It's so easy spacecraft designers have to actively design against it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_welding#In_space

>> No.14743767

>>14743745
>>14743755
i sort of agree. welding in a vacuum is well studied topic and bead dynamics are mostly dominated by surface tension and not gravity.

>> No.14743791

>>14743751
>within the New Glenn's payload fairing
uh oh, who's gonna tell him

>> No.14743802
File: 67 KB, 952x654, orb 2 full 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743802

>>14743791
I know, I know, but that's the only art of construction

>> No.14743824

>>14743802
How do you pressurize this after construction?

>> No.14743827

>>14743824
with gas retard

>> No.14743834 [DELETED] 

>>14743827
How do you evaporate retard?

>> No.14743837

>>14743827
>inb4 15 aneurysm inducing redditspaced questions with creative spelling
shouldn't have responded

>> No.14743840

>>14743827
How do you sublimate retard?

>> No.14743841
File: 123 KB, 593x900, the-pacifist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743841

>>14743834
>>14743840
like this

>> No.14743849

>>14743514
>astra: 11kg
oof

>> No.14743852

Did they stand down for todays launch?

>> No.14743855

>>14743734
It's past midnight, also fuck you.

>> No.14743856

static fire in a few minutes

>> No.14743858

>>14743852
Siren sounded, braaapp imminent.

>> No.14743865

THARR SHE BRAAAAPS

>> No.14743866
File: 129 KB, 640x642, 6zfpjg4a6dj71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743866

Im skeptical Elon will take people to anything beyond orbit for less than 50 million dollars

>> No.14743867

that was loud

>> No.14743869

only once engine ?

>> No.14743873

>>14743869
one*

>> No.14743874

HOOONK

>> No.14743877
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, 2022-08-09 17-23-23 - 0.01.40-0.02.24.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743877

>> No.14743879
File: 1.63 MB, 1612x1192, braaaaaptor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743879

>>14743869
Yup.

>> No.14743883

Who the fuck is the diversity hire on NSF stream that has to ask whether that's LOX or not?

>> No.14743889

>>14741758
Asteroid mining with tech/ship/infra upgrades

>> No.14743902

>>14743883
Stop watching the commentary for fuck's sake
https://youtu.be/mhJRzQsLZGg

>> No.14743913

>>14742592
>Game about colonizing the solar system.
>>14741758
That's a good idea. Like pretty realistic, and you can fly ships to different planets, and you develop and utilize robot and ai to build bases and towns and cities, using different energy sources and techniques. Make it so to can do things like fly into the sun, and shoot 1000 nukes a Venus.

Like grand theft auto in space meets sims meets star craft meets warcraft meets starfox meets minecraft meets animal crossing meets original pokemon Gameboy meets final fantasy meets halo meets Mario Cart meets super smash bros meets Zelda meets second life meets science jeopardy meets chess

>> No.14743915

>>14743332
Doesn't matter, it's a fukken big rogget, and it's going to drop the bass harder than an Atlas V with all its SRBs

>> No.14743931

>>>/wsg/4677141

Sound

>> No.14743936
File: 77 KB, 632x609, Protector ln.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743936

>>14741758
Relatvistic Bussard ramjet warships like in Protector by Larry Niven:-

A directed magnetic field would churn the interstellar plasma as it was guided into a Bussard ramjet. As a weapon it might be made to guide the plasma flow across the ship itself. The gunner would have to vary his shots, or an enemy pilot could compensate for the weapon’s effect. If the local hydrogen density were uneven, that would hurt him. If the plasma were dense enough locally, the enemy could not even turn off his drive without being cremated. Part of the purpose of the ram fields was to shield the ship from the gamma ray particles it was burning for fuel.
“Hit him near a star, if you get the choice,” said Brennan. “And don’t let him do that to you.”
The laser was surer death, if it hit a ship. But an enemy ship would be at least light-seconds away at the start of a battle. It would make a small, elusive target, its image delayed seconds or minutes. The thousand mile wings of a ram field would be easier to hit.
The guided bombs were many and varied. Some were simple fusion bombs. Others would throw bursts of hot plasma through a ram field, or carbon vapor to produce sudden surges in the burn rate, or half a ton of pressurized radon gas in a stasis field. Simple death or complicated. Some were mere decoys, silvered balloons.
Brennan was throwing everything at him. The Pak scouts had used a three gee drive until they crossed his wake, and then Wham! Six gees and closing. Some of his missiles were going wild; the scouts were doing something to the guidance. The pair dodged his laser with such ease that he’d turned the damn thing off. They’d used lasers on him, firing not only at his ship but at the field constriction behind him where hydrogen atoms met and fused, so that Protector surged unevenly and he had to worry for the generator mountings. They threw bombs at unreasonable velocities, probably through a linear accelerator. He had to dodge in slow random curves

>> No.14743939

>>14742034
It's incredible what's achieved with that technology.

Humans went from horse and buggy late1800s to wires and electronic computer metal box machines blasted into space, with such trust in what we see as rustic technology, barebones, simple, sparse, pretty remarkable.

I think of like early life form creatures, developing to fly, or leap out of the pond onto a tree, early life forms that crossed great boundry of ability, the first spider to lay webs, first beaver to build dam

>> No.14743946

>>14742094
This picture is of shadows. The rover moving andor the sun changing position

>> No.14743950

>>14742034
Arguably it was the seismic experiments they deployed that scientists got the most mileage out of

The Saturn IVB thumps revealed more about the moon than the rocks did, although the D/H ratio they got from those did give the Theia hypothesis wings

>> No.14743957
File: 1.78 MB, 960x540, Tbw14kq-1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743957

>> No.14743963

>>14742636
^^^
This is cool idea too

Different players play as society of people in the future who live on the different planets, and they have to do tasks and games and city building, mini games, then a mode can just be fighting mode like forrnight and cod on the scale of flying between planets and using large scale weaponnry and defensive strategy, doing activities, winning mini games getting earnings that you spend on covering your planet areas you can afford and moon, with different offense and defense and satelites;

And this can possibly be large teams of like 20 or more people as a team member of this or that planet; and and then they take to planes and battle in the sky and try to bomb the other planet, and/or defend the home planet from the other teams incoming attackers;

This could possibly be an online game with each planet team consisting of 100s of possitions;
Players can leave, and their character can be picked up by someone who wants to enter the game;.

All that plus this are pretty great ideas;>>14743913

>> No.14743965 [DELETED] 
File: 2.90 MB, 418x408, Erdayastronaut-1557146330564333568-20220809 182630-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743965

>> No.14743966 [DELETED] 
File: 2.89 MB, 1066x600, Considercosmos-1557091749184536580-20220809 144937-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743966

>>14743965

>> No.14743969
File: 3.43 MB, 3840x2160, FZwZBv7VEAAL_Kc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743969

SpaceX photo

>> No.14743976

>>14743072
This view of orbiting is incredible.

It's just crazy to see this steady flowing, or talking toward earth, but it in lockstep falling away from it. Just how consistently this works, the camera is just flying there, and getting sucked and drifted and caught up by and with and dragged and curled and soared and pushed and pulled and pressed and forced, and its just steadily working the same orbit path?

Or every so how often there is some thruster to shoot up and to lock for a while in a higher rush of gravities gasues liquid metal river? But only a little thruster energy to change lanes into a higher orbit?

>> No.14743977
File: 356 KB, 1280x1758, regression-of-cheolsu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743977

Reading the manga that someone here recommended the other day. First raised an eyebrow when the MC said they needed to develop liquid core nuclear thermal for the asteroid redirect and nothing else would work. Then seeing the depiction of it, holy fuck, what was the author thinking?

>> No.14743978

>>14743976
Take your meds, schizo

>> No.14743980
File: 2.88 MB, 1272x888, Erdayastronaut-1557146330564333568-20220809 182630-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743980

Let's try that again

>> No.14743981
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, Considercosmos-1557091749184536580-20220809 144937-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743981

>>14743980

>> No.14743982

>>14743075
Is this cgi or real? Why is that thing spinning so much?

>> No.14743983

>>14743982
Never heard of a timelapse?

>> No.14743985

>>14743982
It's spinning out of control, they haven't been able to correct it since the latest Russian thruster mishap

>> No.14743991
File: 46 KB, 482x505, spacex hammer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14743991

>>14743980

>> No.14743994

>>14741889
>>14743132
>starship station is retarded
What would it be like keeping starship locked in orbit around earth? And it can be outfited to be a station?

With oxygen and water supply? And pressure situations and I think maybe one advantage of module is if something bad happens part of your ship, like a wall breach, the entire ship is not jeopardized.

>> No.14743995

>>14743982
They take great pains not to expose the radiators to direct sunlight

>> No.14744002
File: 362 KB, 2048x1365, abl static fire 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744002

https://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_2_6752.html
https://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_2_6773.html
ABL launch NET 8/29 (windows currently through 9/10)

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/09/northrop-grumman-moves-rocket-work-from-russia-ukraine-with-firefly.html
Firefly launch NET 9/11
Also haven't seen it mentioned, but Beta (or "MLV" or whatever it'll end up being called) will also be a Firefly-NG collaboration, NET late 2025.

>> No.14744005

>the animal locomotion schizo has made at least 50% of the posts
fucking hell

>> No.14744009

>>14744002
heh, two new rockets are scheduled for the 29th, SLS and ABL, at opposite corners of the country. Any bets about which one is most likely to actually take place?

>> No.14744011
File: 119 KB, 595x416, habot lunar base.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744011

>>14743995
just develop liquid drop radiators and quit the jitterbug bullshit

>> No.14744020

>>14743877
How when the ship fires it is strongly held down and not let to launch off, and this doesn't damage anything? It's firng enough to lift all that weight, so what is clamping down the rocket body to prevent it from taking off and preventing damage to the ship by holding it in place?

>> No.14744021

>>14744020
It was only 1 engine

>> No.14744023

>>14744021
>>14744005
>>14743837

>> No.14744040

>>14744023
Ok, schizo

>> No.14744047
File: 156 KB, 955x2007, space plane.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744047

>>14743977
That redirect effort with 30 NTRs failed and firing hundreds of nuclear warheads at it didn't work either. Backup plan was a single spaceplane with no mention of how it would work. This plot is less thought out than the action movie Armageddon.

>> No.14744048

>>14744040
tell me i'm wrong
>>14743824
>>14743834
>>14743840
>>14743913
>>14743939
>>14743963
>>14743976
>>14743982
>>14743994
>>14744020

>> No.14744060

Why does the Starlink launch keep getting pushed back?

>> No.14744061

>>14744060
two weeks

>> No.14744062

S24 testing moving forward. Maybe two static fires today.

>> No.14744063

>>14744060
fraud, I'm sorry you had to find out this way, anon

>> No.14744117

whats a good news source for rocketry advancements for a cave man that has relinquished social media like me

>> No.14744122

>>14744117
Professional societies were social media before social media

IEEE is probably most involved in the rocket biz

>> No.14744128
File: 26 KB, 920x457, blimp space shuttles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744128

>>14744117
read the JBIS

>> No.14744130

>>14744122
>IEEE is probably most involved in the rocket biz
IEEE which thinks Falcon 9 is nothing special and Starship is a fraud by Elon Musk?

lol

>> No.14744132

>>14744130
https://r5.ieee.org/houston/event/the-future-of-rockets/

recognize any faces

>> No.14744137

>>14744132
Thats not IEEE that Eric Berger. IEEE is controlled by its senior editor, which thinks Falcon 9 is a nothingburger and Starship is a fraud.

>> No.14744140

>>14744117
What advancements?

>> No.14744147

SIREN
S24 static fire habbening

>> No.14744153

how many tiles will fall off?

>> No.14744162

>>14744153
rolling, count last four digits

>> No.14744165
File: 69 KB, 650x1000, cheers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744165

>>14744153
none

>> No.14744167

>>14744165
Looks like you're wrong

>> No.14744173
File: 1.03 MB, 1342x761, unknown-252.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744173

>> No.14744175
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, 2022-08-09 20-14-00 - 0.05.00-0.06.00.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744175

>> No.14744177
File: 754 KB, 1200x900, zero_tiles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744177

>>14744167
Looks like you're wrong

>> No.14744180

>>14744175
That's six engines.

>> No.14744181
File: 47 KB, 900x600, fireflyalpha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744181

>>14744002
Hopefully it goes better than their first collaboration with AeroJew Shekldyne.

>> No.14744183

>>14744181
What would she look like as a Pokemon? I'm thinking a non-human bug type.

>> No.14744185

Double static fire BRAAPP

>> No.14744190

>>14744177
>>14744167
Okay I concede, like one came off above the right flap.

>> No.14744199
File: 249 KB, 687x286, unknown.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744199

>>14744190
It's all good. Looks like a few came off in a few other spots too.

>> No.14744202
File: 890 KB, 1174x1316, Screen Shot 2022-08-09 at 9.38.08 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744202

Why did it take so long?

>> No.14744204

>>14744128
>JBIS
google returns me a horse racing japanese website
jbis.or.jp

>> No.14744205

>>14744202
Making the impossible merely late

>> No.14744207

>>14744202
Raptor 2 became critical path.

>> No.14744209
File: 691 KB, 1327x1358, review.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744209

>>14744202
You know why

>> No.14744211

>>14744202
The FAA was taking so long that they skipped straight to the reengineered booster for the engine upgrade path.

>> No.14744212

>No tiles fell off
Uh, debooonk bros.. I don't feel so good...

>> No.14744218

still calling six engines. the center three are obvious and then you can see a big flareup inside the initial flames.

>> No.14744219

>>14744202
what a conman

>> No.14744225
File: 1.79 MB, 600x640, 1659518056714447.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744225

>>14744202
They completely changed everything in the design multiple times since they still needed to wait for launch approval anyway, skipping static fires since those are more for operational testing than designing when it comes to doing them while attached to the vehicle.

>> No.14744226

>>14744202
2 more decades

>> No.14744238

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck5z0uMGz8s


Now that we had 2 static fires, lets watch a real rocket go up in space.

3 mins till Starlink

>> No.14744241

>>14744238
>lets watch a real rocket go up in space.
oops, wrong link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb9mCpEWsyE

>> No.14744247

T-13:00
let's gooo

>> No.14744249

>>14744238
Might be delayed by ~15 mins

>> No.14744251

>clear can't stream
;_;

>> No.14744260

3000th Starlink sat launched if F9 launches today.

>> No.14744262

Live now

>> No.14744264

>>14744238
Music live now

>> No.14744266

>>14744260
>3000th Starlink sat
are you for real? last i heard it was 1000 something

>> No.14744268

>>14744251
it's over

>> No.14744270

holy fuck that sizzle reel

>> No.14744273

>It's a Starlink launch filler episode

>> No.14744274

Will there be another F9 launch failure

>> No.14744275

JESSIE <3333333

>> No.14744276

>>14744275
>Jesse is clear chan

>> No.14744279

>>14744276
that's a juicy rrat

>> No.14744280

>>14744266
They passed 2000 early this year or late last year or so.

>> No.14744281

>>14744251
Maybe SpaceX could officially collaborate with Clear one day, that would be cool

>> No.14744282

Did that idiot just do the countdown twice?

>> No.14744284

>>14744281
If Clear wears cat ears during a SpaceX stream, Elon would retweet it

>> No.14744286

Holy crap, that supersonic video

>> No.14744287

>>14744286
That smoke ring in the sonic boom was sick

>> No.14744288

anyone else watching at 2x speed?

>> No.14744289

>MaxQute without Clear

>> No.14744291

>>14744281
I'm for it just because it would make the nasasoifaces seethe themselves to orbital velocity

>> No.14744292
File: 484 KB, 1600x893, Screen Shot 2022-08-09 at 10.17.44 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744292

kino

>> No.14744293

>>14744292
requesting webm

>> No.14744295

>>14744288
based relativistic flyby poster

>> No.14744300

singles and it lands perfectly

>> No.14744301

Starlink launch later tonight get your popcorn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck5z0uMGz8s

>> No.14744302

>>14744300
OH N-

>> No.14744303

>>14744293
when it's done

>> No.14744304

>>14744301
the booster is already landing nigga

>> No.14744305

>>14744300
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>> No.14744307

PLASMA KNOIVES

>> No.14744309

>>14744301
Based Ceres poster

>> No.14744310

This can't be happening

>> No.14744311

embarrassing

>> No.14744312

>almost missed
It's over...

>> No.14744313

Clean landing

>> No.14744314

It looks so easy these days

>> No.14744315

The cameras kept rolling!

>> No.14744316

it really is amazing every time they do it, giant fucking rockets landing themselves like its a videogame or some shit

>> No.14744318

>Trying to catch Super Heavy
>Can't even land F9 on center after 100 landings

>> No.14744321

>>14744301
based Ganymede enjoyer

>> No.14744323

>Not showing the satellite deployment

DoD starlinks are in this batch

>> No.14744325

webm assembly beginning

>> No.14744324

>>14744318
SPACEX IS FINISHED AND OVER

>> No.14744326

>>14744318
Super Heavy can hover. It'll be fine

>> No.14744330

>>14744300
Uh, well it ended up off-center

>> No.14744332

>>14744316
On a twelve-car parking lot in the middle of the ocean

>> No.14744333

>>14744323
NOAA cut off the stream

>> No.14744335

>>14741955
20% of the Apollo budget went to NERVA, so long as all the research wasn't thrown in the bin most of the R&D is done.

>> No.14744336

Jesus christ why isnt the NSF feed at least 4k60? the replays look like total ass

>> No.14744338

>>14744335
what is a sunk cost?

>> No.14744339

>>14744199
looks like we will never get to mars.:(

>> No.14744341

>>14744202
Didn't have permission, then when they finally got permission they were in the middle of returning some videotapes

>> No.14744342

WE FINALLY GOT A BOOSTER STATIC FIRE GET EXCITED YOU FUCKS IT'S HAPPENING

>> No.14744343

Cool video of fairing RCS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yuq8nUSdtY

>> No.14744345

>>14744342
when launch?

>> No.14744348

>>14744345
2 weeks

>> No.14744349

>>14744345
at least a couple of days after SLS launches, guaranteed

>> No.14744351

>>14744342
Save the excitement for when they do >10 engine static fire

Save for it when they start stacking for flight. Save for it when they get flight license.

>> No.14744350

>>14744348
hey it was my turn to say that

>> No.14744352

Sorry guys, but Starship can't launch yet. The history report is still not finished...

>> No.14744353
File: 199 KB, 808x1024, faa agent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744353

>>14744345
They still need the launch loicence which needs them to meet a bunch of local environmental donations, constructions and alterations and a literal essay on the local history (I shit you not) then the FAA and other agencies needs to check them all and sign them off. Many months with all the red tape I reckon.

>> No.14744355
File: 2.97 MB, 1280x720, ship.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744355

It was two engines.
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1557187138352861186

>> No.14744356

>>14744353
Bureaucrats are even worse that beetles. They all deserve to be exterminated.

>> No.14744359
File: 2.88 MB, 1280x720, 2022-08-09 21-06-57 - 0.08.00-0.09.45.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744359

>> No.14744361
File: 2.89 MB, 1280x720, 2022-08-09 21-06-57 - 0.09.52-0.11.35.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744361

>> No.14744362

Neat list of Falcon9 boosters
https://spacex.niwax.de/

>> No.14744367
File: 2.86 MB, 1280x720, 2022-08-09 21-06-57 - 0.14.25-0.15.40.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744367

>> No.14744371
File: 2.87 MB, 1280x720, 2022-08-09 21-06-57 - 0.16.28-0.17.06.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744371

>> No.14744378
File: 594 KB, 620x1025, Big Rocket.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744378

>>14742511
This is my RP-1 solution for getting 40 tons to LEO.
>Stage 0 - 3x UA1205 Boosters
>Stage 1 - 1x F-1-1.52M with 2m 45s of fuel
>Stage 2 - 2x J-2-200K with 4m 50s of fuel
The boosters really help get it off the pad with a 1.62 TWR.

>> No.14744379
File: 61 KB, 765x1024, 1656170149333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744379

>BREAKING: Elon Musk sold $6.9 billion worth of Tesla shares, new filings show
I hope the amount ended with 69 cents.

>> No.14744391

>>14744338
Sunk cost is when you still don't having something working and think throwing more money at it will fix it. NERVA worked and wasn't flown for political reasons,

>> No.14744396

>>14744391
It wasn't flown because there wasn't a mission that needed anything close to what it brought to the table.

>> No.14744399

>>14744342
>nothings happening
it's over
>a little progress
vaporware
>more progress
lul 2 weeks = 2 years
>something happens
nothingburger etc

>> No.14744408

>5 engines tomorrow
>10 engines thursday
>20 engines friday
>install center engines over the weekend
>31 engines monday
>OFT tuesday

>> No.14744410

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1557200629365293056

>> No.14744425

>>14744408
My penis would redefine the Mohs scale

>> No.14744428

>>14744425
kill yourself

>> No.14744434

>>14744428
are you offended by that because you can't get it up? (to orbit)

>> No.14744441

>>14744408
>31
??????????

>> No.14744445

>>14744441
isn't it 31? 33? haha idk

>> No.14744446

>>14744428

1) We do NOT condone self harm in any way for our general

2) Anyone suffering mentally and having terrible thoughts, please call 988 for US, and contact your local prevention hotline for non-US (you got this and people love you)

3) You must be a blast at parties, go away and thankyou

>> No.14744448

>>14744446
kek, complete with redditspacing. 9/10 parody

>> No.14744450

>>14744448
>t. redditor

>> No.14744452

>>14744396
>what it brought to the table
Which isn't much because 18 ton engines and massive liquid hydrogen tanks don't make for that good of a spacecraft despite the ~850 second specific impulse. Instead of acknowledging the downsides of nuclear thermal and the limited mission opportunities with just a modest increase in delta-v, people would rather craft conspiracy theories. Literally every single dollar going into nuclear thermal would be better spent on solar electric, beamed power, or fusion.

>> No.14744458
File: 23 KB, 300x300, 1646223611554.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744458

I saw no tiles fall off. This might actually work.

>> No.14744459

>wake up
>a static fire actually happened
this is a dream, im still sleeping arent i

>> No.14744461
File: 480 KB, 1280x835, 1637579310556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744461

>>14744446
/sfg/ disapproves of all suicides EXCEPT:
* Standing under lit rocket engines (launch or static fires)
* Deorbiting your corpse to hit EARTHERS
* Depressurizing airlocks/pisslocks
* Barehanded manipulation of radioactive material to supercharge an NTR engine

>> No.14744462

>>14744459
2 static fire
1 launch

>> No.14744463

>>14743528
>https://spacenews.com/starlink-satellites-encounter-russian-asat-debris-squalls/

>In the Aug. 6 event, Oltrogge said there were more than 6,000 close approaches, defined as being within 10 kilometers, involving 841 Starlink satellites, about 30% of the constellation. It’s unclear how many, if any, of the satellites had to maneuver to avoid collisions.
poggers

>> No.14744467

>>14744410
he's a tankwatcher

>> No.14744469

>>14744463
we'll fix it in software don't worry bout it

>> No.14744473

>>14744462
oh shit you're right. im definitely still asleep.

>> No.14744479
File: 21 KB, 482x54, Screen Shot 2022-08-09 at 11.52.04 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744479

>>14744362
needs work

>> No.14744480

>>14744452
The US military wants NTP and they're going to get it. The near future will probably turn out like marine propulsion where tech for militarized nuclear drives remain closely guarded secrets and it doesn't percolate to the civilian markets because 1) fuck off, it's secret and 2) it's not economical.

>> No.14744482

>>14744479
that's just finnish

>> No.14744501

>>14744461
>Barehanded manipulation of radioactive material
A traditional format of honor duel in Lunar society is known as the Hot Staff. The participants are both armed with a thin staff that is tipped with a red-hot ball of encapsulated plutonium, and the goal is to overheat one's opponent until yield or death. The Hot Staff may be carried out in pressure suits in the hard vacuum of the surface, or bare-skinned in a habitat environment. The former is generally a slower contest of strategy and endurance, while the latter involves ample sizzling flesh, and draws larger audiences.

>> No.14744506

>>14744367
What's going on in the left side of the video? Is that rain or ice?

>> No.14744515

>>14744506
That's soot/sublimated metal/plasma or maybe some combo.

>> No.14744525

>>14744408

All of the engines aren't installed?

>> No.14744529

so i heard about the static-fire. sothat means launch soon? this month?

>> No.14744532

>>14744529
OLT tomorrow AM (central). Don't sleep anon

>> No.14744536
File: 194 KB, 1296x1338, rocket3chan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744536

I think I speak for all Astra investors when I say she doesn't deserve this. More care and attention can help her succeed

>> No.14744538

>>14744532
you're bluffing

>> No.14744544

>>14744538
I'm not. Check https://www.cameroncountytx.gov/spacex/

>> No.14744556

>>14744480
What they're going to get is a limited amount of small solid core NTP engines that can be paired with spy satellites which can then do large inclination changes to get into position, at the expense of reliability, longevity, and of course cost. As much as people here claim it's inconsequential, the Outer Space Treaty will mostly prevent the militarization of cislunar space, an area where chemical propulsion faces few obstacles and higher delta-v doesn't do much to reduce trip times, especially once factoring in the lower thrust of higher Isp propulsion. The military would be wise to ditch their sci-fi influenced ideas and love of anything nuclear to instead learn that space is a game of economics, logistics and infrastructure.

>> No.14744578

>>14744355
Tiles okay?

>> No.14744586

>>14744525
>>14744578
yeah

>> No.14744593

>yeah

>> No.14744596
File: 960 KB, 1914x1062, 1652842288621.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744596

>>14742122
>make a diagram that would break down the various nuclear development efforts

You need a diagram to follow the 3 demonstration programs?

DARPA has an NTP demonstration called DRACO. The NTP engine will be made by General Atomics and both Blue Origin and Lockheed are competing to make the demonstration spacecraft that will use it.
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2021-04-12

DIU awarded contracts to demonstrate both Ultra Safe's REP craft and Avalanche Energy's "micro-fusion reactor".
https://spacenews.com/diu-selects-nuclear-powered-spacecraft-designs-for-2027-demonstrations/

NASA's nuclear program is the one we know the least about, mostly relying on inferred information such as that Artemis 8 will have a demonstration or their planned manned Mars mission.

>> No.14744604

>>14744596
What about the non-US countries?

>> No.14744629
File: 3.46 MB, 1x1, Maneuver_Warfare_in_Space_Policy_Paper_33.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744629

>>14744604
Only Russia and the UK have made tangible claims. Russia wants to send a NEP craft to Jupiter but doesn't have the funding. The UK has awarded contracts to Rolls Royce to study nuclear propulsion but no actual projects have been announced.

https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases/2021/12-01-2021-rr-uk-space-agency-launches-first-study-into-nuclear-power.aspx

>> No.14744634
File: 218 KB, 2048x1364, 1654483938454.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744634

another chinese launch

LM-6
10 Jilin-1 earth observation sats
6 Yunyao “atmosphere imaging” sats

>> No.14744637

>virgin orbit will be launching out of korea too
so that's 4 countries they can launch from... korea, japan, uk, us... very flexible system

>> No.14744644

>>14744637
>virgin orbit
stopped reading. entirely irrelevant

>> No.14744653

>>14744644
You appear to be confusing Orbit with Galactic, the latter being suborbital tourism.

>> No.14744659

>>14744452
High weight high ISP is only good for pushing big payloads to big speeds.
If you want to send 100 tons to Mars docking with a NERVA in LEO for the TMI burn makes perfect sense, if you want to send a 5 ton payload like Curiosity it's a waste of time.

>> No.14744663

>>14744653
nta, but I don't think he's confused at all
virgin orbit IS fully irrelevant

>> No.14744665

>>14744637
"Flexibility" in lifting 500 kg payloads for 12 million isn't worth much, all those countries are US allies who could ship their payloads to the Cape for integration or use their own launchers.

>> No.14744671

>>14744452
>Which isn't much because 18 ton engines and massive liquid hydrogen tanks don't make for that good of a spacecraft

Modern NTP engines weigh less than 3500kg.

Having double the ISP means you can carry at most half the weight of propellant, when the bulk of your crafts weight is propellant this is a significant weight savings.

>> No.14744674

>>14744659
>basing your NTP specs on NERVA

Anon it isn't the 1960's.

>> No.14744686

>>14744556
>the Outer Space Treaty will mostly prevent the militarization of cislunar space

It hasn't stopped it so far because the only thing it prevents is nuclear weapons in space.

>an area where chemical propulsion faces few obstacles and higher delta-v doesn't do much to reduce trip times

The military isn't interested in very high delta V to reduce trip times, it wants to be able to make large orbital changes multiple times.

>> No.14744687

>>14744686
>nuclear weapons in space.

in orbit

>> No.14744703

>>14744674
Did reactors get small and light while I wasn't looking? Sure you could ditch NERVAs shielding if robots fueled, transported, mounted it in the fairing and you are 100% sure it's not going to explode but the fuel rods are still going to be heavy.

>> No.14744707

>>14744536
isn't that what they're giving it by not rushing the other launches?

>> No.14744722

>>14744703
Reactors did get smaller and lighter compared to the primitive designs of more than 50 years ago. NERVA was also not an optimized design, its job was to prove the concept.

>> No.14744723

>>14744536
Astra couldn't get a fucking pressure fed engine to work reliably.

>> No.14744751

>>14744536
astra has monkeypox

>> No.14744769

>>14743791
he pitched the idea with NG in mind because BO is building space station and Bozo expressed interest in orbital construction rather than planetary colonization

>> No.14744879

refuelable NTP makes sense from a logistical perspective, hence why the USSF is interested in it.

Whilst for a single use spacecraft it doesn't offer a worthwhile performance benefit over low drymass chemical set up, for an orbital ship that regularly makes maneuvers over say a 10 yr period, it massively reduces the mass of fuel required for refueling, which all needs to be lifted out of earth's gravity well.

>> No.14744965
File: 55 KB, 450x338, 9ad12fbe5897017d6c0ce43425fff5b2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744965

>>14744446
kill yourself

>> No.14744972
File: 134 KB, 1196x879, FZvfNV8WIAAXk71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14744972

fixed this graph to show the scale without the cringe zoom in

>> No.14744985

>>14744879
if they want the Isp advantage they need to use LH2 which is a well known balls-ache wrt in-space storage

>> No.14745058

I just woke up from a dream where Starship blew up after T+3 seconds, barely lifting up from OLM

>> No.14745093

>>14744251
Amen

>> No.14745186

>>14745058
don't worry it's not real, starship (full stack) will never go that high

>> No.14745217

>>14744452
NERVA is not a good comparison for what modern NTP can be

Let's take the RD-0140 which was fully developed
>2000kg dry mass
>910s
>36kN

>> No.14745237

>>14743755
statement still applies then
rather than figuring out welding, its figuring out how to properly align and construct shit on the first go since you don't get a cheap second chance

>> No.14745282

>>14742054
that shit is gonna contaminate the hell out of all the samples they will take kek. I wonder if they will try to nudge it loose and shoot it with the laser.

>> No.14745291

>>14742908
it is an abomination

>> No.14745320

>>14744723
Pressure feeding is for hypergolics, ie engines for those who can't even ignite reliably.

>> No.14745326
File: 259 KB, 1600x1011, von Braun space plan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745326

>>14744879
Remember what they took from you

>>14744985
This is a solved problem and non-issue (see ULA's ACES Depot)

>> No.14745344
File: 58 KB, 573x817, galaxy planet space.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745344

>>14745326
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Cryogenic_Evolved_Stage
>IVF was designed by ULA to be optimal for depot operations, since only liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen would need be transferred, and it could, if built, conceivably extend mission lifetimes from the present dozens of hours to multiple days.
ok but how *many* days? weeks? months?

>> No.14745388
File: 64 KB, 1200x720, there is no way to sugarcoat this.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745388

Just hurry up and launch it already, you're up to building ship 25/26 now anyway, it's not like you'll run out soon

>> No.14745403
File: 1.35 MB, 1x1, a-practical-affordable-cryogenic-propellant-depot-based-on-ula&#039;s-flight-experience.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745403

>>14745344
>The loaded LH2 could also be increased to support boil-off over the desired 90 day LEO stays
or
>The study shows that efficient passive cryogenic storage for periods up to a year is feasible with proper system design coupled with key thermal isolation technologies.
With rapidly flying rockets, this becomes even more of a non-problem. Just launch some more hydrogen if it boils off.

>> No.14745404

>>14745344
I saw something about up to 1 week in one of the sources.

>> No.14745406
File: 79 KB, 885x673, ula sunshield.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745406

>>14745403
I fucking hate how ULA has been cucked

>> No.14745409

>>14744686
>the exploration and use of outer space shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries and shall be the province of all mankind;
>astronauts shall be regarded as the envoys of mankind
>outer space is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means;
>States shall not place nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in orbit or on celestial bodies or station them in outer space in any other manner;
>the Moon and other celestial bodies shall be used exclusively for peaceful purposes;
It bans all weapons of mass destruction which could easily include kinetic bombs, high power lasers, open cycle nuclear, etc. You could get around some of that restriction by pretending it's for civilian use like with SBSP which the Chinese are interested in, but still military activities in space are quite limited.
>very high delta V
>NTP
lol. Most designs are <20 km/s of dV, which is analogous to multistage chemical.

>> No.14745412

>>14745406
You can personally thank senator Shelby from Alabama.

>> No.14745416
File: 540 KB, 1680x945, Screenshot 2022-08-10 at 14-38-32 Live Falcon 9 and Starship work at SpaceX&#039;s launch pad 39A - YouTube.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745416

the tower rises

>> No.14745422
File: 193 KB, 1320x742, MW-CX301_shelby_ZG_20141023150539.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745422

>>14745412
You asked for jobs, you got them, now pay up

>> No.14745426

>>14745422
I didn't.

>> No.14745431

>>14744671
>>14745217
There are criticality limits which means you can't get much lighter than that, most of those designs use highly enriched uranium which the government has insisted won't be put into space, and a Pewee class engine would use a 2 ton shadow shield. Anyway you shake it the total TWR is much worse than chemical.
>significant weight savings
At the expense of less dense reaction mass and many MLI layers to prevent long term boiloff. It's simply not hard to move very heavy payloads around cislunar space, the delta-v requirements are relatively low and depots are easy to create. You'd be crazy to greatly increase cost just to increase the payload of any one rocket.

>> No.14745438

>>14743994
the whole point of starship is that its rapid reuse lets it hurl retarded amounts of mass into orbit
it has a fuckton of equipment that's only good for that reuse
by making it a station, you throw away all that and get a mediocre station with unhelpful shit taking up space

>> No.14745445
File: 25 KB, 300x400, 9458568.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745445

>>14745426
There seems to be a misunderstanding. The contract was to produce work on spacecraft, not working spacecraft. On my end, I have delivered.

>> No.14745448
File: 711 KB, 1020x541, Saruman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745448

>>14745416
>The world is changing. Who now has the strength to stand against the Launch sites of Boca Chica... and Canaveral? To stand against the might of Falcon 9 and Starship... and the union of the Two Towers? Together, my Lord Musk, we shall rule this Oldspace-earth.

>> No.14745479

>>14744972
Nice

>> No.14745535

3 more Starlink launches coming up in the next 2 weeks

>> No.14745543

>>14744202
they literally dont know what theyre doing

>> No.14745554

>>14745543
We were too dumb.

>> No.14745555

>>14745416
When did it start stacking? How fast is the Florida tower going to go from first segment to operational?

>> No.14745557
File: 114 KB, 1800x812, 1654496017421.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745557

Stop caring about mars.

>> No.14745559

>>14745557
nah

>> No.14745565

>>14745557
What is the counterargument to this?

>> No.14745567

>>14745565
Humanity is perfectly capable of doing multiple things at once

>> No.14745572

>>14745565
Fuck urf

>> No.14745583

>>14745565
"Focus on fixing what we already have" has never worked, not even to fix the thing focused on. If it can be fixed then it doesn't need to be the sole focus of our efforts because it'll get fixed anyways and narrowing the scope of our ambitions only results in getting less done overall.
Also anyone who advocated for less funding and effort going towards space is a retard who knows nothing about return on investment.

>> No.14745593

>>14745438
You can cut out the common dome, slosh baffles and downcomers really easily. wet workshop starship would be a really large space for cheap.

>> No.14745596

>>14745593
If you take a truck, park it in an empty lot, and somehow connect the cabin with the cargo compartment, you get a small house for cheap

>> No.14745602

MARTIAN (Neutrally charged)

>> No.14745605

>>14745565
if we can live on mars which has a 96% CO2 atmosphere, we can easily fix urf's climate no?

>> No.14745607
File: 593 KB, 662x600, 35353.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745607

>>14745602
(positively charged)

>> No.14745613

>>14745605
>if we can live on mars which has a 96% CO2 atmosphere, we can easily fix urf's climate no?
no that's retarded.
stopping or reversing net CO2 flux is hard but it's becoming economically favourable so it'll happen.

>> No.14745614
File: 364 KB, 577x474, 1614336763789.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745614

>>14745565
The habitability of earth can never be sustained unless you plan to eradicate humanity, the best move is to terraform a near dead rock like mars and move the majority of the species their to continue growth and evolution and allow the earth to repair and regain sustainability, you cannot maintain the ever growing human population on earth alone for much longer without disrupting the habitability of the planet sacrificing the majority of the species to protect our own. The more you hold back humanity's efforts into space colonization the more you damage earth in the long run.

>> No.14745616
File: 70 KB, 700x500, 72q464.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745616

>>14745596
uhh based

>> No.14745631

>>14745565
There is no counterargument to his strawman. Bu now one is saying 20% of GDP should go towards Mars or something.

>> No.14745632

>>14742054
This is why we need dragons on Mars.

>> No.14745635

>>14745613
I wish I had that paper that mentioned how there might eventually be a point where we have to worry about people taking too much CO2 out of the atmosphere.
>>14745614
This.
>>14745631
I would. I would dedicate as much of the GDP as humanly possible towards space if I had it my way.

>> No.14745641

>>14745614
>the earth is overpopulated
popsci brainwash that'll be the end of our species.
all western countries have fallen below replacement rate. the average person is becoming lazy and non-technical.
we need to eradicate this culture of castigating ourselves, have three kids per family and teach them to reach for greatness through hard work.
otherwise ngmi

>> No.14745649

>>14745616
Not quite as based when you remember that you also have to take out the fuel tank and slash all the tires

>> No.14745654
File: 858 KB, 2400x1799, ugh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745654

>>14744659
Let's look at a realistic design for a conjunction Mars transfer NTR with modern NTP engines like what has been suggested in this thread, oh look it sucks.
>78 ton payload with no lander and no aerobraking ability
> <7 km/s of dV, 215 day one way transit time, both worse than Starship
bro but think of the mass savings after spending 50 billion on this piece of garbage aha

>> No.14745656
File: 88 KB, 655x849, lem larp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745656

>>14745593
there's an autiste here who gets absurdly irate when wet workshops are proposed idgi they're cool

>> No.14745660
File: 18 KB, 190x623, martian lanklet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745660

>>14745607
> Mars or Martians ever being strong
lmao

>> No.14745664

>>14745656
there's the argument that the potential lost revenue means spacex would never sell you a starship but i don't believe that.

>> No.14745669

>>14745656
It just doesn't make sense for Starship.

>> No.14745673

>>14745656
That's me and I'm right.
>>14745593
> wet workshop starship would be a really large space for cheap.
Minus the cost of taking a steel cylinder in space and turning it into a space station using astronauts that likely have the most expensive labor cost per man hour in human history and countless supply launches to bring up the equipment that could have been installed on the ground if you weren't fucking retarded.

>> No.14745679

>>14745565
"lol"
"lmao"

>> No.14745680

>>14745673
Starship as a wet workshop maybe makes sense for mars and beyond, but never earth orbit

>> No.14745697

>>14745641
Have you checked western food and housing prices? That's the true reason for people not having babies because they are afraid they cannot afford to (even if in reality they can), the land has been bought up by money grubbing scumbags and nothing is left without forcibly taking it which people are not going to do unless a western revolution kicks off and that will only delay the limited space we have. Get to a new earth sized planet and grab all the free land you want just like America let its citizens go and do to keep it's claims in the fledgeling states.

>> No.14745701

>>14745673
>Minus the cost of taking a steel cylinder in space and turning it into a space station using astronauts that likely have the most expensive labor cost per man hour in human history and countless supply launches to bring up the equipment that could have been installed on the ground if you weren't fucking retarded.
if your station doesn't fit in the starship cargo bay you have to do all those things but to an even greater extent. i don't see your point.

>> No.14745707
File: 74 KB, 1000x743, 241530.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745707

>>14745697
>Have you checked western food and housing prices? That's the true reason for people not having babies
nice cope.

>> No.14745713

>>14745707
dumb people get paid to breed, rich people too smort to have sex (except Elon)

>> No.14745714
File: 93 KB, 951x713, Mack Crawford Supermodule station nasa ames.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745714

>>14745701
this bugs me too. starship has a fat payload upmass but it has to fit through those bay doors, nothing heavy, large volumed and monolithic like a decent space station module

>> No.14745717
File: 138 KB, 370x329, 1513568795465.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745717

>>14745707
>cherry picked only part of the comment
>'cope'
>Amerimutt ((statistics))

>> No.14745724

>>14745717
Amazing, you destroyed your entire own argument in a single post.

>> No.14745725
File: 201 KB, 1200x600, olympus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745725

>>14745714
Olympus was ahead of its time. It's a shame that the CIA used ayy-tech to cook Bigelow's brain.

>> No.14745727

>>14745697
Newsflash. People used to have more children with less living space and material wealth.

>> No.14745730

>>14745713
you'll turn a blind eye to the problem until our species decays enough so that nobody can build a new factory or bridge anymore.
space colonization is a nice industrial counter force but we need more.
if the average person was working 10 hour days doing really difficult things the birth rate would increase steeply.

>> No.14745732

>>14745707
>>14745727
Really though what's the deal with this? What's the real reason behind declining birthrates?

>> No.14745736

>>14745680
no it doesn't
any situation where you'd be sending shit there at all would be a situation where you could use starship's lift capacity to send hardware designed for the job
inflatables might be a meme now, but starship opens the door for inflatable habs of absolutely retarded scale because of its godlike lift

>> No.14745741

>>14745732
becoming too comfortable, doing bullshit menial jobs and having no grand ambitions for the future.

>> No.14745743

>>14745714
Starship is built for Big Bulky Cargo, ie. propellant and oxidiser. Most of Starship flights will be refuelling.

>> No.14745752

>>14745725
Is it possible for SpaceX to acquire some expertise in expandable habitat without paying Bigelow a huge bucks? Just do it in house?

>> No.14745755

>>14745752
has no practical or commercial value for them at this point, maybe in 15-20 years

>> No.14745758

>>14745732
microplastics

>> No.14745762

>>14745755
They could lob a Starship with expandable modules in its side. Each of those expandable modules could have an attachment point for a inflatable habitat that can house 100+ humans in space. Each one can be lobbed by a single starship launch and can expand in few weeks/months time.

>> No.14745764

>>14745741
People weren't comfortable in the 60s?

>> No.14745770

>>14745764
birthrates crashed after 1963

>> No.14745771

>>14745758
wrong. it's our culture of being useless drones doing useless things and ending the day with useless shows on tv.

>> No.14745772
File: 63 KB, 948x711, 5a30a5b4b0bcd58c028b45cf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745772

>>14745654
>the people in charge of SLS are bad
Yes they are, a decent NTR would be designed to push a payload to TLI / TMI, undock and then burn retrograde to stay in LEO. This way you keep refueling the same NTR for decades until fuel decay kills it.
For some reason NASA just can't get orbital refueling past congress.

>> No.14745778
File: 164 KB, 1272x721, space station bigelow B2100 Cutaway View.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745778

>>14745725

>> No.14745800
File: 1.21 MB, 1200x1372, stationhls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745800

starship wet workshops are retarded for largescale projects but sacrificing one for something more modest like pic related would cost a lot less than developing a purpose built station module from scratch

>> No.14745803

>>14741723
Kill yourself, faggot

>> No.14745805

>>14745800
something more modest that would have five times the capability of the iss.

>> No.14745806

>>14745800
>docking into the fuel tank
??

>> No.14745808

>>14745806
What are you talking about?

>> No.14745813

>>14745800
>>14745805
The catch with wet stations is outgassing of propellant from the walls. If we are going to do it lets do it right with a film lining the tanks than can be removed once on station.
This way you add a couple of tons and get something people can stand being in.

>> No.14745814
File: 20 KB, 577x400, AAP Wet Workshoop vs Skylab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745814

>>14745800
>starship wet workshops are retarded for largescale projects but sacrificing one for something more modest like pic related would cost a lot less than developing a purpose built station module from scratch
based on what? we've had one serious effort at doing a wet workshop station in AAP and they ended up deciding a purpose built station module was cheaper.

>> No.14745821

>>14745814
Because reusing the Starship to launch several modules would be a vastly better solution than sending up the Starship, going through the trouble of converting the rest of the volume into habitable space, and then sending up equipment in more Starship launches and having the astronauts move every piece in through the docking port like it's fucking moving day, which also puts a strict limit on the size of your equipment.

>> No.14745823
File: 816 KB, 4096x2304, FZxC7sNaIAEwNsY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745823

>>14745808

>> No.14745824

>>14745823
Your point?

>> No.14745825
File: 612 KB, 836x673, FYJC3B3XwAIrZ0C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745825

>>14745824

>> No.14745827

>>14741926
You really don’t get it. It’s not about making everyone anonymous. It’s about getting rid of people who are so stupid and egotistical that they post on an anonymous image board with names because they think other users know or care about who they are.

They should be allowed to namefag for the sole purpose of identifying them so their posts can be ignored and they can be subjected to ridicule.

>> No.14745829

>>14745821
>modules
weld together tubes or you're not building a station.

>> No.14745830

>>14745825
Again, your point?

>> No.14745833

>>14745806
>>14745823
>>14745825
google "wet workshop" stop being a retard

>> No.14745834

>>14745823
>>14745825
>a fucking passfag

>> No.14745835

>>14745825
if it's a wet workshop then presumably they aren't going to have header tanks built in

>> No.14745837

>>14745814
>they ended up deciding a purpose built station module was cheaper.
Skylab wasn't purpose built, both it and the AAP wet lab were converted S-IVB stages and much of the tech that went into Skylab had already been developed for the wet station
they chose Skylab because they had available saturn v's and and going for ground integration with more mass to work with is a no brainer if the option's there.

>> No.14745838

>>14745835
>"we were too stupid"
>station explodes

>> No.14745839

>>14745833
>>14745835
You guys are also missing the point. The Starship in >>14745800 never had a header tank to begin with because it's not one that's going to come back down.

>> No.14745844

>>14743253
I’m writing an original story about Anne Rice being forced to read fan fiction which features long passages of both original and existing fan fiction. I hope she likes it.

>> No.14745845

>>14745839
>exactly what i just said
>hurr u missed the point hurr

>> No.14745849

>>14745806
>>14745823
>>14745825
>>14745835
>>14745839
>>14745845
starship HLS has a nose docking port, no header tank

>> No.14745851

>>14745845
Yeah, don't know how I glanced over that.

>> No.14745853

Why is header tank at the top of the rocket?

>> No.14745855

>>14745680
Once the colonization wave begins, we'll have far more Starships on Mars than we need for return missions. Finding creative uses for them will be big business.

>> No.14745858

>>14745853
because the head goes at the top of the body

>> No.14745862

>>14745853
>It’s mostly to balance the ship during entry. After delivering satellites, the front is light & back is heavy due to engines & landing legs.
From Elon himself

>> No.14745875

>>14745855
header tank wet workshops

>> No.14745876

>>14745825
Oof

>> No.14745881

>>14745853
Because the big window was always a lie to get you to invest all your money. now youre broke and fucked and elon ran away with the cash. youre a total fool

>> No.14745884

reminder that starship has a huge barrel section of payload space. the header tank being there or not doesn't matter.

>> No.14745885

>Brig. Gen. Steve Butow, director of the space portfolio at the Pentagon's Defense Innovation Unit, said the satellite network has had a strategic impact, telling Politico that it had "totally destroyed" Russia's information campaign.
JUST SELL HIM THE FUCKING ROCKET

>> No.14745887
File: 176 KB, 767x750, 1558823795363.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745887

>>14745823
>SpaceX will have 3.5 ships and 3.5 boosters ready by the time SLS is supposedly launching this year
jfc

>> No.14745888

the year is 2041. estronaut freezes to death because his third-class cabin on dearmoon is crammed right next to the LOX header tank.

>> No.14745890

>>14745701
>>14745714
Length isn't an obstacle, simply assembling modules with wide adapter rings gives you whatever length you want. The only benefit of a wet workshop is that instead of the outer diameter of the station being like 8.5 meters it's instead 9 meters, big whoop.
>>14745855
It's uneconomical regardless of the cost of buying a surplus Starship, even compared to other uneconomical station ideas like inflatables.

>> No.14745891

Do we really need closed loop life support system for a space station?
What is the mass of water + oxygen + military rations required for a human in a single year?

>> No.14745893

>>14745884
Its payload bay is honestly pretty small given its size.

>> No.14745897

>>14745893
This is the downside of fully reusable spacecraft.

>> No.14745898
File: 2.87 MB, 640x360, Cosmic Penguin-1557247514008363008-20220810 010834-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745898

Long March 6

>> No.14745905

>>14745893
it's literally 1/3 of the entire ship.

>> No.14745915

>>14745890
>assembling modules with wide adapter rings
cringe

>> No.14745923

>>14745897
i wonder how much extra LEO payload they'd get if they ditched the bay and just had an expendable adapter on the ship's nose with a fairing. it'd be way less steel and tiles to carry around.

>> No.14745927

>>14745898
When will those bastards finish LM 9?

>> No.14745930

>>14745875
This, but on the ground rather than in orbit. Also hab modules, greenhouses, various liquid/gas storage, chopped up for pieces...
A few, in the best shape, will transport people back to Earth (there will be returnees, cursed though they would be). There will be very little cargo from Mars worth dragging back - you only need so many rock samples, especially when you've got people running a lab on Mars to analyze it instead. It might be worth returning rocket engines that have been scrapped off the aforementioned hab/lab/etc Starships, since those are both an expensive part of the rocket and don't have much alterative usage on Mars.

>> No.14745932

>>14745923
You could remove
>sea level engines
>header tanks
>doors
>burn all fuel
>fins
>tiles
>rad alt ect.
It would have to add at least 20 tons.

>> No.14745937
File: 76 KB, 1200x1200, cringe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745937

>>14745932
>reading comprehension

>> No.14745940

>>14745923
>>14745932
>>14745937
I'm retarded, I thought you meant non-recovered 2nd stage not just swapping the doors for a fairing.

>> No.14745952

>>14745186
>starship (full stack)
Will it be tallest ship ever? Are unbiased critics really unsure about the physics of it working or not?

>> No.14745953
File: 1.05 MB, 1170x702, 45834.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14745953

>2022
>I am forgotten

>> No.14745970

>>14745953
No you're not, you are perfectly safe and ready for manned flight. You wouldn't have put anyone in danger with the guidance fucking up, an RCS thruster dying and a chute not deploying, I believe in you.

>> No.14746008

Tiangong space station is too hard to say, how about we just call it the orient station?

>> No.14746015

>>14746008
or CSS

>> No.14746016

>>14746008
In honour of orient express

>> No.14746017

>>14746008
>Tiangong space station is too hard to say
that's a you problem

>> No.14746019

>>14746015
No, that reminds me of that uncommon nonsense sceptic tank dude

>> No.14746024

>>14745915
That's not an argument.

>> No.14746032
File: 52 KB, 930x1163, 1599834926758.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746032

>>14746019
don't think about retards at all

>> No.14746037

>>14745923
>>14745937
>Just completely redesign Starship and its flight profile to save a few tons of mass, bro

>> No.14746054
File: 523 KB, 2000x1462, Spacecolony1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746054

>>14746024
You think this is built from docked modules?

>> No.14746073

>>14745952
physics aren't the issue. cost, practicality and reliability are

>> No.14746074

>>14746054
No but that's not built from retrofitting a spent stage either, ignoring that O'Neill cylinders are the work of science fiction.

>> No.14746086

>>14746074
I'm not arguing for wet workshops. Just saying that modular stations are worse than you think. Weld it together in orbit from sheet.

>> No.14746093

>>14746086
I mean coils of sheet like Starship obv.

>> No.14746101
File: 60 KB, 1200x745, SpaceX-carbon-fiber-liquid-oxygen-tank.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746101

Doomed timeline: SpaceX never switches to steel

>> No.14746117

>>14745565
It is quite easy. Retards who use this argument do not actually care about Earth, or at least not as much as they claim to do. For simplicity's sake, let's just take the global GDP, which is approximately 85 trillion USD. The total amount of money spent on anything related to space in 2021 was at around $92 billion. This "space sector" is mainly composed and blurred with defense spending, think spy sats and black projects like X-37; Earth-monitoring and climate sats, and commercial sats. Even considering that a huge part of this is managed by the government and heritage contractors, and thus its cost will be orders of magnitude higher than it should be (hello SLS), it's still a mere 0.108% of our initial number. The amount that goes towards beyond-Earth exploration is only a tiny fraction of that. And the money spent specifically on the Starship program is, again, a fraction of that last fraction. So it was all just a rounding error. Meanwhile, let's go towards other "unnecessary" uses of our money instead of solving Earth problems. The sports betting and lottery market size worldwide amounted to $194.63 billion in 2021, the combined global theatrical and home/mobile entertainment revenue reached $99.7 billion in 2021, the video game industry is projected to generate $200 billion revenue this year, more than $200 billion have been spent on the upcoming WC in Qatar so far, and we can go on and on and on. Of course not a single soul complains about Earth problems when talking about these industries, but maybe we could spend a little less on Marvel movies, soccer, and Nintendo games, and instead focus on combating world hunger and poverty like they want? Although if we take these toys away from earthers they'll get very angry and defensive, that's for sure.

>> No.14746131

>>14746101
>With this characters death, the thread of prophecy is severed...

>> No.14746139

>>14746008
Call it Sky Palace then, that's what it means

>> No.14746149

>>14746101
>SpaceX-carbon-fiber-liquid-oxygen-tank.jpg
that must be the methane tank given the size no?

>> No.14746152

>>14745557
wait, it was Kim fucking Stanley Robinson, author of the Mars trilogy, who said this wtf
https://farsight.cifs.dk/interview-kim-stanley-robinson/
>My Mars trilogy is a good novel but not a plan for this moment. If we were to create a sustainable civilisation here on Earth, with all Earth’s creatures prospering, then and only then would Mars become even the slightest bit interesting to us. It would be a kind of reward for our success – we could think of it in the way my novel thinks of it, as an interesting place worth exploring more.
>But until we have solved our problems here, Mars is just a distraction for a few escapists, and so worse than useless.
the fuck is wrong with him

>> No.14746155

>>14746008
transdong station

>> No.14746157

>>14746149
IIRC it was a "small" LOX tank to see how CF went with the coldest propellant they would be using. At the time it was the biggest thing made out of CF and the answer to how does it deal with LOX was "not well".

>> No.14746165

>>14746117
This.

>> No.14746169

>>14746054
Welding in space is hard because there's no atmosphere to disperse some of the heat in, or gravity; so all the sparks and radiation and possibly liquid metal just flows everywhere and directly at you?

>> No.14746173

>>14746169
hello retardposter

>> No.14746175

Is a ship on the way back with mars samples yet? Eta?

>> No.14746179

>>14746173
Looks like you were incapable of answering my question, making you as retarded as me in this instance.

>> No.14746185

>>14746179
Welding in space is not hard. Even welding with an arc by hand is probably feasible.
Robotically welding with a laser or electron beam definitely is.

>> No.14746192

I really wish the schizo would just off itself already
This stupid neet tranny schizo has lost touch with reality and is even posting with multiple personalities now

>> No.14746193

>>14746175
two more decades

>> No.14746196
File: 86 KB, 1063x444, 1646026089100.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746196

>>14746117

>> No.14746212

>>14746192
>This stupid neet tranny schizo has lost touch with reality and is even posting with multiple personalities now
what

>> No.14746248
File: 701 KB, 1638x1028, LUNAR BASE DURING ECLIPSE space art by William K. Hartmann.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746248

>>14746152
he's a commie, didn't you know ?

>> No.14746251

>>14745593
Why pay the maintenance costs of keeping something in orbit forever? When you need to land to restock and presumably drop manufactured goods anyway. Same with tourism and extended stay research. StarShip will have endurance capabilities to reach Mars that directly translate to puttzing around LEO for a bit and landing. Short of massive manufacturing or extreme duration tests. One would be hard pressed to justify anything more than floating a StarShip around for a year and landing.

>> No.14746259

>>14746152
KSR writes some good sci-fi when he doesn't let his politics invade everything, but he got a pretty bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome and never truly recovered. Actually, it was probably W. Bush that did him in. His novels have basically been a straight linear descent from philosophical ruminations on abstract political concepts into direct analogy for contemporary political situations. It's sad to go back and read his earlier stuff and compare it to more recent novels.

>> No.14746300

I need to get this off my chest. I'm a closeted gay. I have been hiding it from everyone. Nobody suspects a thing. On evenings where I need to spill my putrid seed, the only thing that can satisfy my insatiable lust to breed is strong handsome roughneck out in the oil fields. I dress up and drive out to the rig once the supervisor is gone. Just me and the rig workers. I get passed around and analy destroyed by these buff hot cowboys. After my thirst for piping hot oil is quelched, I drive home to my studio apartment. I also enjoy space.

>> No.14746303

>>14746300
based

>> No.14746307

>>14746300
huh, never knew you liked spaceplanes

>> No.14746321
File: 1.11 MB, 1471x1080, elonandwerner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746321

will we colonize space? things feel like things are falling apart fast-or is this largely an illusion of algorithms that feed off of spreading fear?

>> No.14746331

>>14745565
A bullet

>> No.14746340

>>14746321
Things are going absolute lightening speed, you just don't hear about it. Check out a few recent Marcus House vids for the huge amount of work currently going into ground infrastructure and vehicle R&D whilst they wait for orbital flight

>> No.14746342

>>14741758
assuming you may still be following this thread, revamped and modernized CoaDE

>> No.14746351
File: 502 KB, 1580x2048, D7F46D6C-1602-4C93-89B9-2A543594ABDB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746351

License granted: Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)
Dates: 09/01/2022-03/01/2023
Purpose: Experimental orbital demo and recovery test of the Starship test vehicle from Boca Ch(...)


https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=117025

this is not the same as a launch license. It is a specific radio license for the test vehicles and does not indicate a change in status.

>> No.14746359

>>14746351
Yeah, because FAA is the one responsible for the launch license.

>> No.14746367

>>14746321
If you have to ask, you need to go outside.

>> No.14746372

The FCC also does some licensing for rockets. For SpaceX, the FCC allows a spacecraft to fly up to 330 feet, but only at speeds up to 150 miles per hour, which is fairly fast, but not absurdly fast. That’s fairly typical for other launches, too. But there’s a bit of wiggle room there, too, which might allow SpaceX to have a bunch of rockets and ride them together, up to a maximum altitude of 310 feet.

This is actually one of the few limitations the FCC does put on launches. The agency also limits the payload weight, in metric units. The Skylon rocket can carry 3,050 kilograms, but the maximum load must be 2,300 kilograms. While those are very, very heavy numbers, if the launchers do happen to be in formation, they’ll be so packed together that the excess weight won’t matter.

But there’s the problem: These rockets aren’t going to fly together; the main one, along with the Tesla, won’t fly together. The Falcon Heavy is going to fly in several sections

>> No.14746375
File: 64 KB, 600x407, ae0b085c780d79a512b15c2c43cb6ef3--project-gemini-mockup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746375

>>14741718
Man, MTV Copernicus was such a cool vehicle.

>> No.14746378

>>14746331
absurdly based

>> No.14746379

>>14746351
Sept earliest.

Hopefully middle of Sept for my birthday present.

>> No.14746391

>>14743132
Starships would serve well as temporary stations, but their best role would undoubtedly be launching huge modules into desired orbits. Starship will pave the way to the first large spinning stations and will probably live on in history as the first surface-to-orbit freight ship, like an orbital semitruck.

>> No.14746397
File: 591 KB, 840x859, angry-pink-wojak-11563399169kcxgjrxtfq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746397

>>14746351
Just hurry the fuck up already

>> No.14746399

>>14746397
Be patient.

>> No.14746400
File: 696 KB, 1230x1557, 1984 - Lunar series stamp 2 - Luna 2 - (1 ₭).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746400

>>14741704
24 new stamps from Laos, 1984-1987
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1h29srcvlAMsyfHFR-m9b7eTfnBispdiY?usp=sharing

>> No.14746401
File: 146 KB, 911x893, starlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746401

big oof for starlink bros...

>> No.14746405
File: 960 KB, 2380x982, 1986 - Halley&#039;s comet stamp 1&amp;2 - Bayeux tapestry and E. Halley - (1&amp;2 ₭).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746405

>>14746400
Halley's comet was understandably a popular subject in 1986, so seems the Bayeux tapestry

>> No.14746409
File: 67 KB, 1135x756, 1_0aNrR5Ki6K3d_CVFwS9bhQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746409

>>14745656
Wet workshops would be cool as shit for disposable rocket tanks like SLS, that basically go into orbital velocity before being trashed anyways. It's cannibalizing perfectly good starships that I'm not to enthusiastic about, especially the ones that are meant to land. Though, I could see the HLS starship being wet workshopped into tanker stations with spare raptors.

>> No.14746411

>>14746401
it's over

>> No.14746412
File: 560 KB, 1602x1114, 1987 - Series stamp 3 - Kosmos-97 - (2 ₭).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746412

>>14746405
And a rare example of a Kosmos mission getting a stamp, Kosmos-97 to be exact.
Ironically the same stamp series accidentally calls a Sputnik-3 a Sputnik-2

>> No.14746415

>>14746401
Probably failed to secure funding because SpaceX's plan is with Starship launching Starlink 2.0 sats and they either wouldn't or couldn't bet on a still-prototyping radical system.

>> No.14746423
File: 72 KB, 602x909, main-qimg-798e6bc57ca003aedf4f70ff2b26cc1c-lq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746423

>>14745881
The big window could still fit, but it would look much more like a fucking toenail than an actual canopy window. Or a shuttle-esque cockpit window with a large window behind.

>> No.14746429
File: 23 KB, 418x384, obs bubble.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746429

>>14746423
just attach an inflatable observation bubble

>> No.14746431

>>14746397
Take a seat, young muskrat.

>> No.14746442

>road is open
it's over

>> No.14746449

North Korea will be the first on Mars.

>> No.14746454

Are Canada arms available to the public?

>> No.14746460

>>14746454
My arms are available if you want me to beat your obese ass to death.

>> No.14746461
File: 1 KB, 186x36, 56763537.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746461

>>14746401

>> No.14746473

>>14746300
it's ok fatty, just stop posting and we'll be good

>> No.14746476

>>14746401
https://www.fiercewireless.com/regulatory/biden-appoints-rosenworcel-as-acting-chair-fcc

>THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY.WEBM

>> No.14746480
File: 22 KB, 236x385, 1652992196384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746480

>>14746461
>>14746476

>> No.14746498

>>14746401
good. subsidies are not needed

>> No.14746503

>>14746476
Sabotoge at all levels

>> No.14746509

>this private enterprise didn't get 0.8 billion dollars gifted to them by the state
>this is somehow a bad thing

>> No.14746517

>>14746509
/sfg/ is full of musk cocksuckers, this is nothing new.

>> No.14746521

>starlink loses 0.8 B subsidy
>Starlink wins 10B military contract

>> No.14746528

>>14746521
>Starlink wins 1000 bazillion out of my ass
keep coping startard

>> No.14746531

>>14746521
>Starlink wins 10B military contract
never happened and never will

>> No.14746533

>>14746509
When every other lethargic billion dollar enterprises in the same field do get it despite providing nothing of value to their customers, yes it's bs

>> No.14746540

>>14746533
Starlink currently can't provide the speeds required for the subsidy because they oversubscribed their cells so much, so this is the correct decision and their own fault. The biggest winner was also rejected for that reason. Don't meet the criteria, don't get money, it's that simple.

>> No.14746541

>>14746509
You realize there are competitors who get money the money right, which are all private enterprises.

>> No.14746547
File: 78 KB, 1201x928, ookla_satellite_internet_comparison_north-america_0622.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746547

>>14746540
The whole point was that it would enable rural internet access.

Its not just they're not meeting it, its that they're meeting ~90% of the required services.

>> No.14746549
File: 56 KB, 1201x785, ookla_satellite_comparison_us_canada_0622-01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746549

>>14746547
On top of that, they've been improving their overall average speeds over the last year, so they were very close to meeting it, they would likely meet the speed by end of next year, but they decided to cancel it instead of work admit that.

>> No.14746554

>>14746547
https://www.ookla.com/articles/starlink-hughesnet-viasat-performance-q1-2022

Their reason for denying Starlink seems more like an excuse than an actual problem with Starlink. Likely due to political ideology influencing the decision to punish Musk for going against Biden. Same reason California is punishing Musk right now with Tesla, same reason they've punished SpaceX in the past for Tesla.

>> No.14746561

>>14746554
In anycase, the faster SpaceX/Starlink becomes profitable, the better it is for them. They can then brag that they'll shit on all the government funded projects. Being married to government is a problem if you go against the political ideology thats in charge of the government. The sooner they get out of Earth's government and establish their own self-sufficiency, the better. Ultimate goal should always be sovereign/independence on Mars

>> No.14746588

>>14746152
>People ignore the central message of his last few books
1. Humans are shitty to each other regardless of cultural values
2. If we go to space with our problems unsolved we will bring those problems with us
3. We are so bad at science that any self-sustaining system is a fantasy

>> No.14746602

>>14746588
So basically, "I hate humans" nonsense. This is basically liberal ideology at work.

>> No.14746603
File: 1.27 MB, 888x888, 1637292403898.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746603

Why are earthers so disgusting?

>> No.14746607

If Starlink is available in your area and you're not a customer you're morally a bad person and you should feel bad about yourself. Shame on you. The money spend on it would advance space technology.

>> No.14746608

>>14746547
>>14746549
>>14746554
The issue seems to be more the upload speeds, which the FCC release also points out, which are at 50% and decreasing. I also don't know if median speeds are enough for the subsidy, the language I can find always says essentially "at least" the requirements, so 90%/50% on median only is very far from meeting the requirements. Plus there's the issue of Starlink apparently not responding to the FCC's communications, which is probably the major reason for pulling everything instead of working through the issues and only pulling what they can't meet, which is hard to do if Starlink refuse to discuss.

>> No.14746609

>>14746607
kek

>> No.14746616

>>14746608
The problem is essentially they're measuring a problem without any context. Starlink has brought 500K rural customers in the US to the modern digital internet. Where does that stand in reference to other companies? Did they sign up 500K residential customers in the last year? 100K? 20k? 10k? The real world effective data is missing.

The whole goal was to bridge the digital divide, if other companies fail to do so, but Starlink did it with half the upload speed and provided 500K with modern internet, that should merit something shouldn't it?

SpaceX should request the data so they can get the real reason why this was the case.

>> No.14746627

After the spin tests are complete, what is left to do before launch?

>> No.14746632

>>14746627
Static fire
Stack
Flight license
Weather
Wayward ships

>> No.14746635

>>14746627
Get a Russian orthodox priest to bless it, pay the requisite bribes, write a history report, conduct the usual rituals

>> No.14746636

>>14746627
Probably some stage 0 stuff.
More static fires (including full stuck, I guess)
Launch loicense

>> No.14746640
File: 126 KB, 626x822, 1635292957924.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746640

>> No.14746647

>>14746632
>boomer seagoers blocking flights
SpaceX navy when?

>> No.14746648

>>14746616
Sure it should merit something, but if you don't provide the service you were contracted for, you shouldn't get (all of) the money, that's how contracts work, what other contractors do is irrelevant. I'm sure the FCC has more accurate data internally, if not they're stupid. SpaceX will probably sue and they should, if they really are refusing to communicate on some issues this may just be the FCC's way to get them to the negotiation table, even if that ends up being the courts.

>>14746627
Installing a full set of engines would be a decent idea.

>> No.14746660

>>14746648
If FCC has accurate data (thats if they have it at all), which I strongly doubt. FCC sources Ookla for speed test, I doubt FCC keeps track of how many people are signed up through the program at all, other than what they read on the news

>> No.14746662
File: 197 KB, 975x1127, 630651E3-B6D2-4951-8DF6-A52CEC8A76F1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746662

almost there

>> No.14746663

>>14746640
>Launch cost $350 million

The shuttle getting btfo by this shitpost of a spaceplane will always be hilarious

>> No.14746671

>>14746662
holy autism

>> No.14746674

>>14746662
How do they calculate it?

>> No.14746675
File: 109 KB, 873x589, buran autopsy photos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746675

>>14746640
Buran-Energia always makes me unbelievably sad. It's everything the shuttle should have been, yet the collapse of the Soviet Union killed it before it could be used

>> No.14746677

>>14746662
>progress bar

>> No.14746678
File: 2.94 MB, 2728x1400, energia booster landing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746678

>>14746640
kino

>> No.14746688

>>14746675
Shuttle should have been a small, top-mounted spaceplane, not the abomination we got.

>> No.14746701

>>14746688
It shouldn't have, it should have been what Buran was. Liquid fueled and with a rocket core usable as its own launch vehicle.
A top mounted little shuttle gimps your payload and limits it to only a crew transport, or with very small satellites. I think Buran would have worked best as something that would work side by side with TKS, TKS being a pure crew transport for stations, so that you don't need to accost an entire shuttle launch just for a crew rotation.

>> No.14746708

>>14746663
The fact it launched and relanded crewless too is fucking amazing

>> No.14746725

>>14746588
>humans bad
>conflict shouldn't exist
>its IMPOOOOSSIBLE to be self sustaining on mars
why are communists so cringe?

>> No.14746732
File: 281 KB, 1868x1602, 201.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746732

>>14746675
>The Buran shuttle was designed to perform 100 flights to space, while its engines were ready to do 66 flights without replacement. During its flight, it lost just eight of its unique thermal-insulation tiles out of 38,800

>> No.14746738

>>14746701
>limits it to only a crew transport, or with very small satellites
Yes, that's the point. Expendable rockets at the time were a much more viable option for launching cargo to space. Soviets used Proton to launch their ISS modules and its cost was $65 million per launch. Meanwhile Shuttle was at $1.6 billion per launch.

>> No.14746749
File: 60 KB, 900x586, f0325-lkc-1-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746749

>>14746738
There was actually an orbiter that was designed to fit on top of the Proton

>> No.14746758
File: 96 KB, 1200x988, delta-ii-chan-redux.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746758

will there ever be another blue rocket? and dont say blue glenn or i'll kill you

>> No.14746770

>>14746758
Tory tried to make SLS blue instead of orange but apparently the results were downright nightmarish.

>> No.14746775

>>14746738
This makes me think, why didn't NASA just use a cheaper Titan IV rocket to build ISS? Its fairing was both wider and longer and Shuttle's payload bay.

>> No.14746777

>>14746738
>>14746749
MAKS were the most kino of them all. Especially because of the RD-701.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywbfCBxZ2uA

>> No.14746779

>>14746775
Because launching the crew with the payload allows the crew to install all the equipment inside the payload in the same mission, saving time and money.
Of course the US didn't have any other manned spacecraft in their roster

>> No.14746785

>>14746775
The modules would need to be a lot more complex for that. Just look at the differences between the Russian modules and the American ones. Russian ones are basically spaceships of their own while the Americans ones are basically just pressurized tin cans.

>> No.14746788

>>14746770
Sauce on this?

>> No.14746796

>>14746788
he astral projected into a ULA meeting

>> No.14746797
File: 388 KB, 1365x2048, FOGgvsDWYAUVd8z.jpg_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746797

>>14746758

>> No.14746802
File: 58 KB, 929x590, Ron Miller Soviet Salyut extended space stations.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746802

>>14746797
> almost Soviet green
I dig it

>> No.14746807

>>14746788
Twitter.

And it actually wasn't for SLS. He wanted to try it for one of the last flights of the Delta IV.

>> No.14746808
File: 2.04 MB, 1920x1080, RSUorbiter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746808

>>14746701
what you're describing would still be an expensive piece of shit
smaller top mounted shuttle wouldn't have to deal with tile strikes and could have had a launch abort system
only loss in capability compared to a full sized orbiter is retrieving large satellites (meme capability, basically never used) and always having a crew present to look keep things running smoothly, neither of these were worth the trouble.
smaller orbiter means smaller price tag, this + delete the SSME and you can afford some of the fancier booster options that NASA had to ignore in favour of solids due to their lower dev cost, meaning this system would actually be more economical than expendable rockets

>> No.14746813
File: 1.77 MB, 4000x2250, 20220810_224416.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746813

Just went in the garden to get some washing and I saw something pass over, N going SW, looked just like the ISS in slow steady motion but the tracker says it's way off atm and flight radar shows no planes around in any direction where it would be visible just over the roofline. Apparently not the chang station either. Shit pic but 100% was not an aircraft, a satellite maybe?

>> No.14746817

>>14746813
What makes you think it was human?

>> No.14746820

>>14746817
common sense

>> No.14746823

>>14746813
Probably a weather balloon.

>> No.14746825

>>14746813
it was me, got lost on the way back to venus

>> No.14746827

>>14746823
Drifting over central London?

>> No.14746829
File: 69 KB, 911x695, ayy clothmo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746829

>>14746820
you should be running not redditing

>> No.14746833
File: 412 KB, 623x473, 9fd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746833

>>14746823
Xeno claws typed this post

>> No.14746843

>what's this random satellite above me?
Jesus, someone post that satellite tracker website that was doing fundraising

>> No.14746847
File: 1.79 MB, 2230x1463, usss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14746847

>>14746813
it's real

>> No.14746851

>>14746813
I saw a similar thing from Finland, moving SE to North. From where I was looking was about 240-250 degrees East
It was bright enough to possibly be something like a booster or a wide span satellite

>> No.14746853

>>14746843
What kind of satellite would be so big?

>> No.14746859

>>14746843
celestrack
you could try heavens above too

>> No.14746870

>>14746859
Thanks, bookmarking for future use

>> No.14746896

>>14745596
true though, the problem is that the government will show up and shoot you if you do this

>> No.14746905

i saw a UFO in the sky, it stopped directly over me. suddenly i heard a voice say "ur a faget", i was hit with strange visions and when i woke up my foreskin was missing

>> No.14746906

>>14746896
1984

>> No.14746910

>>14745813
it's just methane, which isn't an issue to breath aside from the fire and explosion hazards

>> No.14746915

>>14746896
living in a van parked on the side of the street is very common in california

>> No.14746931

>>14746905
>jews are an alien plant to harvest human foreskins because the aliens like to use human foreskins as chewing gum

>> No.14746943

>>14745862
This is necessary, I do it in KSP all the time

>> No.14746959

staging when

>> No.14746964

>>14746959
never

>> No.14747017

Page 10, staging...
>>14747016
>>14747016
>>14747016
>>14747016