[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 219 KB, 1200x1200, pebber.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14713391 No.14713391 [Reply] [Original]

ITT we compile Randall Carlson's argument from JRE episode 501 into a well sourced workable framework to help btfo "Science!" climate soys

I would do this myself and I certainly have the time but I have to go shit
https://www.jrepodcast.com/episode/joe-rogan-experience-501-randall-carlson/
Here's the link to the podcast on the website because Jewtube keeps deleting the full.

TLDW: IPCC utilized(s?) urban heat bubble effect and radiant heat sources to skew the data in favor of climate change for that sweet sweet grant money. The amount of C02 stored in existent sinks is so massive man made production is negligible, the current heatwaves and warming in Britain and Western Europe are below that of the Medieval Warm Period since during that time it is well recorded that grapes could be grown year round in mainland England, something not possible today without genetic engineering.

I need someone smarter than me to compress this all down into a workable sourced argument that's short and simple enough to be thrown at soys, yet still stands up to le deboonking.

>> No.14713393
File: 50 KB, 600x894, 3524.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14713393

>>14713391
Global warming is a >>>/pol/ topic.

>> No.14713396

>>14713391
>>14711709
Noticed this thread afterwards lol

>> No.14713401

>>14713393
nuh uh /pol is too stupid and shill filled, wait are you saying it's not /sci entific enough for you? ARE YOU SAYING ITS NOT BASED IN SCIENCE???

>> No.14713421

>>14713401
Sorry, it's just too infested with politics and lobbying to be /sci/. >>>/pol/

>> No.14713864

>I need someone smarter to do it for me
Climate denialists in a nutshell

>> No.14713886

>>14713391
holy shit dude.

imagine earth like a bottle. the contents of the bottle interact with eachother in their closed environment. now, imagine something changes inside the bottle. this is going to affect the entire environment of the bottle because it's closed.

that's it. that's climate change. little changes inside a bottle. do you see how it maes sense that we should consider what ways our bottle is changing, and how we might make it change in a way that benefits us? if you don't, take the already posted advice and go to /pol/.

>> No.14714057

>>14713421
Implying /sci/ isnt. Dear kid...