[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 26 KB, 260x320, arrogant.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1469542 No.1469542[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>Atheists: Believe that Laws of Nature are always constant.
>Theists: Believe that Laws of Nature are not always constant.
>Agnostics: There's no evidence either way so believing either is STUPID. Also, disregard common sense.

Those who don`t agree and think there are atheists who believe Laws of Nature are not always constant and theists who believe Laws of Nature are always constant, do exist, can fuck off.

hey agnostics, why count on sceince so heavily and ignore common sense.
sceince alone can never be enough to form a grounded and stable worldview anyway.
Believing appears to be the destiny of a human so why swim against the tie and fallow a verry unlikely logic.

>> No.1469550

Dawkins looks sadface. You've upset Dawkins with your fail trolling.

>> No.1469554

>Agnostics: There's no evidence either way so believing either is STUPID. Follow common sense and believe neither derp

>> No.1469556

I'm an atheist and I believe the laws of nature are consistent as far as we know.

Which is different.

>> No.1469558

Agnostics= Coward who can't back up their believes

>> No.1469562
File: 92 KB, 825x1000, David_Hume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1469562

Problem of induction.

Checkmate atheists.

>> No.1469574

What in all 7 levels of hell does atheism have to do with someone's beliefs about the laws of nature?

Also, I want to be a Dawkins when I grow up.

Or Hitchens, either one is awesome.

>> No.1469588

Why did you make this thread?
>>1469558
What? You stupid fuck. I'm outta here.

>> No.1469592

>>1469562
derp

>> No.1469633
File: 45 KB, 400x300, peru.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1469633

>>1469574

Ever thought about becoming a serial killer?

You can expiriance natural selection to the max and make some big news. People will recognize your intelligence if you`re succesfull.

>> No.1469676

>>1469633

Not really as I'm a personal pacifist(or however I should call it).

Killing people isn't very nice.

>> No.1469764

>>1469542
Theists only believe that the laws of nature are not constant when miracles are involved. Derp.

>> No.1469772

>>1469764
And even with miracles, come to think of it, I am sure that some theists believe that they were done is some freakish-odds way that does not break the laws of physics.

>> No.1469785

We know the laws of nature have changed over the course of the universe

>> No.1469790
File: 4 KB, 126x126, mad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1469790

>atheists: don't believe in god, nothing to do with naturalism, scientific reductionism, logical positivism, etc., only sometimes followed by these systems of thought, but not dependent upon them
>theists: haven't really thought about it
>agnostics: unsure

>> No.1469797

>>1469772

if they don't break the laws of physics, then one is simply defining miracles as that which is unlikely, not that which is impossible, and that which is unlikely is a statistical inevitability.

>> No.1469815

Just because I'm an atheist doesn't mean I believe the laws of nature are constant. Way to assume, douchefuck.

>> No.1469817

Laws of nature are descriptive, not normative.