[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 264 KB, 2166x2296, 1639036207418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657290 No.14657290 [Reply] [Original]

Roll it back to the High Bay edition

Previous: >>14653271

Upcoming launches:

July 14 2044 EDT - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - 39A, Florida - Cargo Dragon 2, ISS commercial resupply
July 17 1050 EDT - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - SLC-40, Florida - Starlink 4-22
July 21 1313 EDT - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - VSFB, California - Starlink 3-2
July 22 2000 EDT - Rocket Lab - Electron - New Zealand - Classified NRO payload
July 24 0220 EDT - CASC - Long March 5B - Wenchang, China - Wentian laboratory module for the Chinese space station
July 30 - JAXA - Epsilon - Uchinoura, Japan - RAISE-3 technology demonstration payloads
July 30 - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - Florida - Starlink 4-25
August 2 - SpaceX - Falcon 9 - Florida - Korean Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter
Q3 - Astra Space - Rocket 3 - California? Florida? - TROPICS-2 & 3
Q3 - Relativity - Terran 1 - LC-16, Florida - Debut flight
Q3 - Landspace - ZhuQue-2 - Jiaquan, China - Debut flight, first Chinese private and methalox rocket
Q3 - ABL Space - RS1 - Alaska - Debut flight
Q3 - NASA - SLS - 39B, Florida - Artemis I, uncrewed debut flight to lunar orbit and capsule reentry
Q4 - SpaceX - Starship - Texas - Debut flight

>> No.14657296
File: 950 KB, 958x1196, rocketman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657296

>>14657290
Glass the Earth, demigod war eventually

>> No.14657300

>>14657290
Congratulations, it's a boy

>> No.14657302

>>14657290
Too long, didn't read

>> No.14657303
File: 757 KB, 1317x1755, 1966 - Veterok and Ugolyok Cosmos-110 stamp - (6 коп.).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657303

>>14657290
FTS Archive
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KCJBL632oieD1r6JOh_5Eg9NTcf_-hH8?usp=sharing

110 New stamps, mostly for the USSR
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Jkq98UhzjxioSgBAOjoK2BFJgTFms_8k?usp=sharing

>> No.14657304
File: 104 KB, 720x566, 57fef7074f4c728df9642b2dbe1ba998.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657304

first for JATO

>> No.14657305
File: 185 KB, 1039x1450, 80b49731f7d480dfb19fa2baca9f6cc2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657305

my buddy translated pic related for me
it is an exact word for word parroting of the starship marketing blurb and also seems to be written left to right for some reason so I'm not going to bother transcribing it

>> No.14657315

>>14657305
Yeah there's one like that for Ariane too, it's bizarre. Cute, but bizarre

>> No.14657316
File: 456 KB, 1920x1080, JWST first image transition.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657316

>finds millions of new galaxies in its first image

>> No.14657321

>>14657315
the text at the top says something like: type: manned spacecraft

>> No.14657325

>>14657321
as a man, I wouldn't mind being inside that spacecraft

>> No.14657338
File: 1.18 MB, 970x1192, IMG_1306.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657338

>>14657305
Her proportions are incorrect

>> No.14657342

>>14657305
Wish I could see more of those panties, if you know what I'm saying

>> No.14657346

reminder that we'll all be resurrected by future spacefaring civilizations who regard us as golden-age heroes for billions of years to come and that they'll use our /sfg/ posts as training data

>> No.14657351

>>14657346
I hope not

>> No.14657353

>>14657316
This is with a 12 hour exposure. I honestly want NASA to point the JWST at a dark corner of the sky, similar to Hubble, and collect light for a full 100 hours, like Hubble. I really want to see what we find with that much light collected. I'd also like, not that it would happen, because NASA is retarded and won't answer questions that the entire planet was interested in for a long ass time about, but in a dream world, want them to point JWST at Tabby's Star aka the "Alien Megastructure" star, for a 100 hours collection timeframe, during its light dip period and then post the images; infrared and false color for public viewing.

Just to put that question to rest once and for all, and once again drum up hype and interest in science, space, and astronomy. But they won't do that, cause they're brain dead when it comes to being genre savvy and playing to their own audience they so desperately want to court to then get their senators and house members on board to push for more funding on.

>> No.14657356

>>14657346
I'd hate to imagine what abomination would arise from constructing a person using only /sfg/ posts

>> No.14657367

>>14657353
we're on day 2 out of 20+ years of useful observation time. chill nigga.

>> No.14657384

>>14657356
>The local galactic supercluster has to deal with the equivelant of a freeboota WAAAGGHH!!! Of recreated /sfg/ anons

>> No.14657389

>>14657353
we aren't even sure what the orbital period period for tabby's dyson swarm is. i'm sure it'd be one of their top priorities if they could plan it out in advance but as of right now there's only so much you can do.

>> No.14657393

>>14657305
>seems to be written left to right for some reason
that's how japanese is written

>> No.14657395
File: 156 KB, 1026x765, rocket science.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657395

anyone got rare /sfg/ memes?

>> No.14657407
File: 13 KB, 1167x925, sussy_falcon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657407

>>14657395

>> No.14657411
File: 217 KB, 500x358, Multigimbaldrifting.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657411

>>14657395

>> No.14657415
File: 29 KB, 711x725, leg_spread_alpaca.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657415

>>14657395
no one speaks of her

>> No.14657420
File: 80 KB, 594x586, Paul Allen's rocket.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657420

>>14657411

>> No.14657423

>>14657415
>rare
>frequently spammed here

>> No.14657425
File: 248 KB, 1200x800, 1623510712155.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657425

>>14657395

>> No.14657427

>>14657393
Japanese is written top to bottom and then right to left

>> No.14657428

>>14657423
look closely...

>> No.14657431
File: 1.11 MB, 1100x1100, We don't need wheels bro.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657431

>>14657395
Cheers to those who remember what the filename refers to

>> No.14657439

>>14657428
the stupid "leg's spread" version is posted more frequently than the original

>> No.14657440
File: 1.26 MB, 768x1024, It's Time (Q3 2021).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657440

>>14657395
My own OC that didn't take off

>> No.14657453
File: 2.19 MB, 1278x706, ohno.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657453

>>14657395
>aerospikes

>> No.14657454

Poland can into space

>> No.14657456

>>14657440
it's pretty good
your effort is appreciated but if we just reposted old hi-effort posts from the past then the general would be shit

>> No.14657457
File: 1.85 MB, 168x224, 10km hop.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657457

>>14657395

>> No.14657462
File: 413 KB, 528x430, this is my life now.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657462

>>14657420
From SN8's crash

>> No.14657466

>>14657440
it's a bad picture and text is hard to read, but if it makes you feel any better, i saved it the first time

>> No.14657467

>>14657407
pretty sus, I don't think that was ever a meme

>> No.14657472
File: 296 KB, 1308x1074, 800px-Methane-3D-balls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657472

>>14657395
I've made a number of shitty ones that weren't worth reposting.

>> No.14657473
File: 211 KB, 600x451, mars_man.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657473

>>14657395
Technically proto-sfg

>> No.14657482
File: 2.39 MB, 2048x1536, Insert meme.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657482

some OC from the past 2 years

>> No.14657483

>>14657427
no

>> No.14657489

>>14657482
a fucking feather
>>14657483
wrong

>> No.14657490
File: 615 KB, 528x932, Hop When.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657490

>>14657482

>> No.14657491
File: 1.75 MB, 2000x1125, nukeseadragon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657491

>>14657395

>> No.14657496
File: 2.39 MB, 1917x1102, Starbase Enterprise.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657496

>>14657490

>> No.14657497

>>14657490
THIS IS SHOOPED

>> No.14657501
File: 2.67 MB, 960x540, bsezos_v_musk.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657501

>>14657395

>> No.14657503
File: 2.82 MB, 640x360, oof.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657503

Do you guys remember this shit?

>> No.14657506
File: 301 KB, 1321x952, Perseverance.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657506

>>14657496

>> No.14657516
File: 280 KB, 516x351, 1631059636396.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657516

>>14657395

>> No.14657515
File: 254 KB, 1724x2000, 1620884048322.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657515

i wish i'd saved more of the schizo 4ASS designs that used to get posted, they were great

>> No.14657518
File: 861 KB, 1381x2048, A serious of unfortunate launches.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657518

some months old, never kicked off.
Posted only once before I think

>> No.14657519

>>14657489
I speak japanese fluently, it's not written top down except in traditional writing

>> No.14657526
File: 1.65 MB, 2931x2854, Bennu Gondols.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657526

>>14657395
:DD

>> No.14657533
File: 320 KB, 287x713, animated.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657533

>>14657526
very GOOD anon!

>> No.14657536
File: 160 KB, 600x589, 1604314097881.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657536

>>14657395
haven't seen this one in a while

>> No.14657542
File: 50 KB, 1764x816, 4ASS Satellite 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657542

>>14657515
This one is my fav, I wish we made more of these today

>> No.14657544
File: 575 KB, 1463x449, blue origin anime.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657544

>>14657395

>> No.14657546
File: 2.62 MB, 2560x1440, turbo fagioli.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657546

>oh SHITT, WOAAAHHH

>> No.14657550
File: 615 KB, 2510x1934, Mun.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657550

>>14657395
One night someone posted a Wojak in a space suit and I drunkenly started editing it. Afterwards I wanted to redraw Apu to have really short arms in addition to his short legs but never got around to it.

>> No.14657558

>>14657542
holy shit someone saved it, I like how its nowhere near aerodynamic, but it is from June 2020 so it's pretty old by /sfg/ standards.

>> No.14657568
File: 493 KB, 796x504, rage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657568

>>14657395

>> No.14657572

>>14657550
i think it looks cuter oversized

>> No.14657576
File: 155 KB, 936x922, 1587655742513.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657576

>>14657395
SN4-6 era

>> No.14657578

>>14657519
Also in Manga, some lns, signs, ...

>> No.14657579
File: 53 KB, 569x842, blindsight-2375157446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657579

Thanks to whoever in this thread recommended pic rel, super great fucking book, just finished it and I couldn't be more depressed and upset. 10/10

Also a cool trailer for it I found
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkR2hnXR0SM

>> No.14657580

the chinese astronauts are all work no play
https://twitter.com/CNSpaceflight/status/1547411756405821440

>> No.14657587
File: 133 KB, 770x770, 1589586223505.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657587

>>14657576
+ early hot gas thruster prototype meme

>> No.14657588
File: 136 KB, 806x971, bezos_space_pirate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657588

>>14657395
Might be the rarest posted so far

>> No.14657599
File: 440 KB, 2390x3000, BezosLongcat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657599

>>14657395

>> No.14657615
File: 22 KB, 408x402, 16377345978673.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657615

>>14657395
Possibly, but not as cute as this one done by another Anon

>> No.14657619
File: 20 KB, 887x747, 1624032606122.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657619

>>14657615
Or this one

>> No.14657623

some needs to post the TUBES edit with startship and booster.

>> No.14657627
File: 235 KB, 1183x912, 1629699230214.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657627

>>14657615
Meant to include >>14657572

>> No.14657632
File: 58 KB, 441x660, shuttle_comic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657632

>>14657395

>> No.14657638

>>14657431
They came in like a fucking meteorite from a 30 degree angle iirc
Total failure of the landing system

>> No.14657642

>>14657579
Good, you've begun your journey down the path of insanity-via-comprehension, now go read the sequel

>> No.14657644

>>14657619
>>14657615
These two were both made by the same Anon

>> No.14657649
File: 803 KB, 1265x836, wideboy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657649

>>14657395

>> No.14657655
File: 199 KB, 536x1202, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657655

>>14657395
https://a.uguu.se/jnYjLitn.xlsx
Here's the great estronaut raid. Not that old of a meme, but doesnt get posted often bc the spreadsheet is too big to post. might be able to export pages as jpegs, idk. but i uploaded the full export copy as it was Sept 8 2021

>> No.14657660
File: 175 KB, 1432x808, 1612287780234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657660

>>14657649

>> No.14657677
File: 94 KB, 518x800, PulledRaptor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657677

They pulled an engine from B7

>> No.14657678
File: 75 KB, 412x415, Frog Badge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657678

When Demo-2 patch was revealed

>> No.14657681
File: 131 KB, 642x642, 1635856096850.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657681

>>14657395
From the spaceplane wars, a dark chapter of /sfg/ history I do not wish to relive.

>> No.14657690
File: 283 KB, 368x639, msedge_Y1lX8NNwMM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657690

>>14657655
o_O

>> No.14657698
File: 43 KB, 1200x1000, planefag victory.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657698

>>14657681

>> No.14657701

>>14657677
Sometimes i pull on it so hard, i rip the bell.

>> No.14657703

>>14657503
Yeah, that lander tech is going to be great landing on a former stena line ferry.

>> No.14657705
File: 27 KB, 1255x720, Rocket function.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657705

>>14657681
You wanna remember dark chapters in /sfg/'s history?
Think of where this image came from

>> No.14657708

>>14657701
I recommend not doing that.

>> No.14657745

>>14657544
I can't believe someone saved this

>> No.14657763
File: 69 KB, 640x621, 1651696835029.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657763

>>14657395
Not sure if it was always roggs or if rogs was once an acceptable spelling.

>> No.14657772

>they're replacing raptors on the stand
maybe they wont take b7 back to the production site

>> No.14657779
File: 154 KB, 1600x900, 1629437609533.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657779

>>14657395

>> No.14657796

>>14657772
B7 is damaged goods. Artists of /sfg/, I commission B7 depicted as a used up slut, full of cuts, bruises, a black eye, and a blown out asshole.

>> No.14657820
File: 187 KB, 1419x1132, a-diagram-of-what-project-ramas-seed-craft-might-look-like.jpeg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14657820

So, what's the likelyhood of this kind of asteroid alteration working to move it to an accessable orbit? Is it reasonably feasible or would another form of architecture be better suited?

>> No.14657951

>>14657820
loosely bound rubble piles (the asteroid) will be very difficult to bend to our will.

>> No.14657973

>>14657820
Not even remotely possible / 10

>> No.14657991

Nuclear Pulse Propulsion.
Orion Drive.

>> No.14658037

>>14657991
Pinch magnetic fusion and Plasma magnet sails

>> No.14658050
File: 286 KB, 2120x1192, The_Fusion_Driven_Rocket_powered_spacecraft.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658050

>>14658037
Solar powered magneto-inertial fusion*

>> No.14658105

>>14657820
>The "seed" literally impregnating and shooting inside the cavity of an assteroid
Fake and gay

>> No.14658258
File: 68 KB, 600x600, rejected_his_message.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658258

>>14658050
>Solar powered
For that reason they hated it despite being the most realistic and achievable fusion design, proposed by John Slough himself. Seriously though, what happened to this? It got NIAC phase 2 funding, then nothing.

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/slough_niac_2014_fdr_v2_tagged.pdf

>> No.14658315

>>14658258
literally every person i've met who is into fusion rockets thinks solar electric rockets are also sick, who hates the idea of using both together? if you wanted to build a more specialized outer solar system fusion rocket you'd need to do something different, but most of what we're focused on is inner solar system stuff so that's immaterial.

>> No.14658343

>>14658315
solar electric is superb as long as you are small, in the inner solar system and not in a hurry

>> No.14658408

>>14657395
My OCs (only the ones Iv'e seen reposted before)

I'm missing this one i made where theres this stick figure in a physiatrists office looking at an ink blob and thinking of a falcon 9, does anyone have it?

>> No.14658414
File: 2.28 MB, 1824x1048, Screen Shot 2022-07-13 at 10.09.38 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658414

>>14658408
forgot pic

>> No.14658561

Good morning, /sfg/

>> No.14658576

>>14658408
>does anyone have it?
No, nobody saved your shit.

>> No.14658586

>>14657820
Relies on lots of tech that doesn't exist.
Will need to be a lot of pathfinding before asteroid mining.

IMO redirecting a small (very small) asteroid into earth orbit is an amiable goal, but expecting to be able to do ISRU straight away isn't realistic.
Need to find a very small rock, that only needs a small nudge.
Could use one of those unique captures that Don't need an insertion burn to put it into earth orbit.

>> No.14658613

>>14658343
I really don't think scaling is that big of an obstacle, solar power sails like the OKEANOS proposal would not only make it relatively easy to get ample power in the inner solar system but also greatly improve the spacecraft's TWR through being much lighter than conventional panels. It still wouldn't be fast in gravity wells but that is just a limitation electric propulsion. It would be great for interplanetary missions or mining NEAs and main-belt asteroids.

>> No.14658621

Anyone have that meme that’s like “time in the aerospace industry vs anger” or something? It has the vengeful zubrin and the boomer who’s like “oh the paypal guy?”
>>14657550
It looks better this way also I drew the original one and realized a few days ago that I still have the vector version of the original that I never shared with /sfg/. I gotta go to work rn but I can upload it later tonight

>> No.14658622

goodnight sfg

>> No.14658627

will the commercial suits have the carbon nanotubes in them?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0k9wIsKKgqo

>> No.14658634
File: 882 KB, 1423x981, Screenshot_20210626-152526.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658634

>>14658621
I have it but idk what i named it. have this redstone rocket instead, it's basically the same thing

>> No.14658643

>>14658414
The anime one is good and the kerbal one is hilarious, especially because it made its way to reddit and twitter and everyone was shitting and pissing themselves over the use of the word retard

>> No.14658728

>>14658643
Lol I would’ve loved to see that

>> No.14658746
File: 58 KB, 919x453, Pulsed Plasma Rocket s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658746

>>14657991
yes

>> No.14658761

>>14658627
seems likely

>> No.14658763
File: 100 KB, 882x861, Lunar Farside b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658763

>see posts in 2 consecutive threads talmabout 'the dark side of the Moon'
is /sfg/ really that dumb?

>> No.14658771

>>14658763
Are you denying it exists? who's the dumb one?

>> No.14658784
File: 109 KB, 736x1070, MORL Mars Flyby cutaway.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658784

>>14658771
there is no place on the surface of the Moon that receives no sun except craters at the poles and they do not qualify as a 'side'

>> No.14658787

>>14658784
are you suggesting that the moon doesn't cast a shadow?

>> No.14658799
File: 16 KB, 459x422, berry yoko.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658799

>>14658787
'dark side' means permanently dark, not temporarily dark. dont play dumb for comedic effect, I'm not in the mood

>> No.14658803

>>14658799
says who? that shit is dark for 2 weeks at a time

>> No.14658805

>>14658799
it's not playing dumb, you're straw manning

>> No.14658810
File: 43 KB, 915x524, Morton Downey noose.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14658810

>>14658803
>>14658805

Sophistry niggers get the rope

>> No.14658832

Imagine if there actually was a dark side of the moon though.
Think of all the frozen volatiles that would be there.

>> No.14658846

>>14658763
Far side, dark side, whatever. That's like not knowing the difference between Guinea and Guinea Bissau. The moon doesn't matter.

It's trash. Garbage. Totally unused. A pile of dust and abandoned junk.

>> No.14658875

>>14658832
That was how Mercury was thought to be like before we learned it wasn't tidally locked
http://variety-sf.blogspot.com/2007/09/larry-nivens-coldest-place-nivens-first.html

>> No.14658955

>>14658875
>tfw don't live in the alternate timeline where Mercury is tidally locked to the sun, Venus is a humid swamp planet, and Mars' atmospheric density is 10% of Earths rather than less than 1%
it's not fair bros

>> No.14659059
File: 57 KB, 486x578, 608167344.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659059

She's so perfect bros..

>> No.14659060
File: 1.47 MB, 762x1125, 1616801471775.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659060

>>14657395

>> No.14659080
File: 188 KB, 776x553, 1610672076888.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659080

>>14657503

>> No.14659130

>>14657395
Rememeber the KSP fapper and fleshlight?

>> No.14659209
File: 567 KB, 639x960, 7BF9412E-8C58-46D4-9FBE-9FDAE9A93C83.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659209

Vintage /sfg/ is best /sfg/
Why does SpaceX keep trying to save Booster 7? The damn thing has been damaged so much they might as well move on to Booster 8.

>> No.14659235

so when is the orbital test REALLY gonna be?

>> No.14659239

>>14659209
You learn a lot more by trying to fix something than by just trashing it.

>> No.14659241

>>14659235
The explosion set it back a month or so. It was hoped to happen in August but also remember that SpaceX still hasnt gotten their launch license

>> No.14659251

>>14659241
it's not gonna happen this year either, isn't it?

>> No.14659254

>>14659239
I know but using a damaged booster on something as dangerous as Starship OFT-1 risks nuking the pad. Can you imagine that happening and Elon saying “we were too dumb lol.”

>> No.14659258
File: 85 KB, 600x554, 1620135527498.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659258

>>14659254
ok concern troll

>> No.14659259

>>14659251
Leakers say it’s very likely to happen this year but the factors that are of biggest concern are
1) Launch license
2) Booster static fires
Seeing as Booster 7 had issues before even starting static fires, the second might be a big issue

>> No.14659268

>>14659254
>I know but using a damaged booster on something as dangerous as Starship OFT-1 risks nuking the pad
Absolutely wrong. A damaged booster will not risk 'nuking the pad'. It either won't work at all meaning the boost won't be there in the first place or the problem only arises much later when the consequences of the damaged booster, structure-wise or fuel-wise, extend to other systems of the ship. In both cases however, you're lack of knowledge amuses me and I urge you to get acquainted with aerodynamics and engineering

>> No.14659270
File: 347 KB, 2000x2767, 53C8F28B-B56D-4EB7-BBF9-C313F314624E.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659270

Remember when SpaceX spent eight months trying to hop 150 meters but kept having issues for weird reasons and vehicle failures?

>> No.14659276

>>14659209
I never understood this expendable booster meme.

>> No.14659287

>>14659268
>>14659258
Faggot I want this to work as much as you do. Do you know how embarrassing it would be if Artemis 1 not only launches first but is perfectly successful?
I’m more worried about the Raptors being damaged but SpaceX not finding flaws until launch day

>> No.14659297
File: 2.83 MB, 600x337, E002C062-1C78-4D4C-B3C9-C633DC45CCC5.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659297

I used to make fun of JWST and the “IFLS” crowd but hooooly shit those are some beautiful pictures I can’t even make fun of them for being PopSci. We need LUVOIR ASAP

>> No.14659301

>>14659287
Did you not read the pic? Why do you assume they are clueless? They're the ones being paid to do this, not you.

>> No.14659304

>>14659301
They’ve fucked up because of oversight before though. SN9 only using two engines on landing and especially the Booster 7 boom are examples of this. The latter had Elon stating “well we didn’t think that would happen”.

>> No.14659307

>>14659297
yeah we'll be middle aged or retired when that happens

>> No.14659315

>>14659307
>2039 estimated launch date
There will be people on Mars by then goddamn

>> No.14659316
File: 154 KB, 2048x1089, iTN3AFRgyY5sbAR3W83ofk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659316

>>14659270
the coke can hops were nostalgic for me. simpler times.

>> No.14659332

>>14659287
Embarrassing for whom? SLS is still a ridiculously expensive piece of shit. It's embarrassing for NASA that they are using "legacy" tech and still haven't launched it yet. They should be embarrassed that this rocket exists.

>> No.14659345
File: 57 KB, 384x558, 64DC667B-F456-4BAE-A7DC-A51FFD530FB1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659345

The /sfg/ raid on Estronaut’s patreon is funny. We should do that again some time.

>> No.14659358
File: 307 KB, 1920x1357, 1657807558332.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659358

Forget about Elon's methane bombs, bros
A 1/4th of Ariane 6's booster stage flew yesterday without a hitch.

Vega C is made up of 4 stages: solid+solid+solid+hypergolic.

>> No.14659364

>>14659304
So that means they need Captain Armchair to save they day?

>> No.14659365

>>14659358
Vega is really cool but Jesus why is it so expensive?

>> No.14659381

>>14659365
You see all those flags in the picture? That's why.

>> No.14659391

>>14659345
the best part is some janny cleaned it up, but missed a spot. wonder if it was tim dodd himself

>> No.14659401

>>14659287
>Faggot I want this to work as much as you do. Do you know how embarrassing it would be if Artemis 1 not only launches first but is perfectly successful?

What are you talking about, you dumb retard? Starship ultimately will beat out SLS because NASA is fucking retarded. Their entire mission objective for the future is based Block 2 of SLS and you know what? Not only has a single Block 2 not been constructed, but it requires its own tower that also hasn't been constructed and we know from the OIG report is literally years behind schedule and already a billion dollars past it's planned budget.

Do you understand what I am saying? It doesn't matter if Block 1 is a success because Block 1 was always just a stopgap, a pathfinder, for Block 2. And it doesn't exactly take a genius to realize that Block 2 might not even fly within the next five years.

If Starship can't get up and running before Block 2, then yeah, shit is fucked but we know that is never going to be the case.

>> No.14659402
File: 68 KB, 441x458, 4DA9C83C-4071-4D00-8C58-85431FB5CF52.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659402

>>14659391
Could you imagine a teary eyed Tim Dodd screaming at his computer because his google spreadsheet was raided by spaceflight autists and not his usual Reddit crowd? Lol.

>> No.14659403
File: 512 KB, 2274x1120, 1657588566805.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659403

>>14657395

>> No.14659411

>>14659402
I wonder if he even knows about this place

>> No.14659412

>>14659401
Anon, I'm sorry to break this to you, but Block 2 will never happen.

>> No.14659416

>>14659209
We don't know that. That section of the booster has a lot of protection by design. Musk sounded a lot more concerned about cracks in the engines than the booster. The thrust puck and the shrouds probably ate the explosion and barely noticed.

>> No.14659418

>>14659411
of course he does, everyone knows

>> No.14659424

>>14659412
Exactly.

Your honor, I move to dismiss this entire retarded idea that Starship has to launch before an entirely different rocket that is already obsolete before its first flight.

>> No.14659429
File: 967 KB, 795x566, armed_shelby.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659429

>>14659130
That was spaceplane fapper specifically
>>14659412
Whether or not it happens, it WILL be paid for

>> No.14659431

>>14659365
>>14659381
Solids were supposed to be cheap. Most of the rocket is solid, except for the Slava Ucraine upper stage.

>> No.14659444
File: 846 KB, 992x1600, 0ddf3587444dd4dad4be8aa1064a0be9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659444

How does Elon square away in his head that they shouldn't just make an actual cargo version of Starship that's literally just a giant set of fairings, a fuel tanks, and some engines? How does he find being restricted by a tiny door acceptable?

>> No.14659462

>>14659444
The work right now is focused on getting a vehicle in orbital launchable condition.... for starlink. Reconfiguring for other loads is small potatoes.

>> No.14659507

>>14659418
even elon? and jeff?

>> No.14659520

>>14659444
musk is completely out of touch with reality

>> No.14659523

>>14659358
What happened to the RUAG fairings?

>> No.14659529

>>14659523
(you)
Found the answer. Changed names of the "space oriented segment."

>> No.14659562
File: 238 KB, 665x665, 1627102204326.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659562

4pm and already on my fifth glass of French brandy, I love you anons

>> No.14659571

>>14657519
>speaks Japanese fluently
>has never seen the inside of a Japanese book
wow, tell me more

>> No.14659576

>>14659562
Men drink bourbon.

>> No.14659577

>>14659444
What if the fairings just separate like a normal fairing would do, but instead of them being jettisoned during the ascent they do it just before payload separation, one would position them next to the ship, then wait for the probe to get away from the stage, and finally have them come back and attach themselves to starship, as if nothing had happened in the first place. they'd have some methane-based RCS and it would be like a double simultaneous docking.
>muh complexity and moving parts
I know, it's not that easy, but it's fun to imagine these kind of scenarios

>> No.14659589

Skyrora hardware, think they will make it boys?
https://twitter.com/AndrewParsonson/status/1547492471306862592?s=20&t=jfSuAZ3OEAqGt7pi6-NqTw

>> No.14659591

>>14659571
>has never seen a Japanese newspaper or magazine
ok retard

>> No.14659608
File: 236 KB, 1200x675, bx82md.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659608

>>14659589
No, anything that happens in the UK is guaranteed to fuck up and be quietly dropped at some point, can't do anything right in this useless fucking country

>> No.14659621

>>14659576
Men drink scotch.
Ponce.

>> No.14659634

>>14657579
am i the only one who thought the writing was bad? it's a cool concept though

>> No.14659638

>>14659621
men drink whatever the fuck they want
anything I drink is by definition a man's drink

>> No.14659642

>>14659638
Enjoy your wine cooler.
Ponce.

>> No.14659643

>>14659621
Real men drink TEA-TEB, but only once

>> No.14659657

>>14659608
The UK desperately needs to unfuck its manufacturing situation. You have the indigenous know-how to domestically design and fabricate advanced tech but seemingly little political will to invest in it. Must be infuriating.

>> No.14659658
File: 350 KB, 1600x820, bigrokkit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659658

Humans for scale

>> No.14659662

>>14659621
Eurotrash.
Kentucky Bourbon or bust.

>> No.14659663

>>14659643
>mostinterestingmanintheworld.jpg
Stay thirsty, crewmates!

>> No.14659668
File: 447 KB, 3080x888, 1602156694708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659668

>>14657395
lol

>> No.14659673

>>14659634
No, lots of redditors complained about that too. I have no idea how they thought that, the prose was really captivating and evocative, just had a lot of big words. Which probably explains why redditors had trouble with it.

>> No.14659674

>>14659662
I guess it's ok as a cleaning product
I wouldn't drink it though

>> No.14659683
File: 169 KB, 1600x900, stage2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659683

What are the implications of creating a F9 second stage but the payload is just the second stage with larger fuel tanks, and then launching three of them and connecting top to bottom to create multiple in-space stages?
How far could this propel a 118,000 lb payload
>t. transplant

>> No.14659689

>>14659683
Play with the logistics of something like a Shuttle Centaur for that. If you need multiples, you're better off just refueling a Starship

>> No.14659693

>>14659657
It's worse than that, even trades jobs are a fuckery of supposedly lacking skilled tradespeople and charging a fortune for basic jobs since they have so much work available yet simultaneously won't even call back about interviews and complain there's actually no work at the moment so no one is really hiring. Just had enough desu

>> No.14659697
File: 244 KB, 2516x1024, VGR vs torchship.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659697

>>14657395

>> No.14659707
File: 951 KB, 4431x1808, 1596106631910.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659707

>>14657395
1/2

>> No.14659708

>>14659689
humor me anon, I don't know much about in-space travel or what it takes. All I know is that Starship isn't ready yet. I looked and the term is deltaV, any knowers know where you can with >>14659683 ?

>> No.14659714
File: 130 KB, 1157x700, 1596106631910b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659714

>>14657395
2/2

>> No.14659722

>Manly drinks
Any hard liquor, straight (ice is acceptable)
Beer
Red wine

>Girl drinks
All cocktails
Coolers
White wine

>> No.14659726

>>14659683
this concept is colloquially known as "expendable yeet train"
the main problem is getting funding and designing payload that would benefit from it
it would take a decade or so for NASA to come up with suitable mission and by that time Starship is expected to be ready and much cheaper than F9, let alone several of them
furthermore, congress basically forbid NASA to develop or even look into any alternatives to the welfare project that is SLS

>> No.14659731

>>14659365
>Vega is really cool
Proofs?

>> No.14659738
File: 1.35 MB, 8616x752, 1631554135226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659738

>>14657395

>> No.14659739

>2022
>orange tank flies before starship
Timelines changed the moment Elon started writing conservative comments on tweeter.

>> No.14659741
File: 2.99 MB, 800x1026, 1608583148646.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659741

>>14659358
so it's the yuro SLS, except it actually launched already

>> No.14659744

HERE'S HOW STARSHIP CAN STILL WIN

>> No.14659746
File: 1.82 MB, 2707x2182, 1644474700087.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659746

>> No.14659753

>>14659741
Everything in europoorland is SLS tier.

Oh, and a lot of those euro companies will figure in the SLS list too, since esa makes the Orion Service Module, and there will be as many companies as screws the ship has.

>> No.14659754

>>14659738
It's four months to Venus; how long does it take to get to Mercury?

>> No.14659756
File: 83 KB, 1104x509, chad terraf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659756

>>14657395

>> No.14659776
File: 287 KB, 1588x756, 1593375544160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659776

>>14657395
first pic

>> No.14659777

>>14659726
Hopefully yes SS would be ready but it's just a curiosity of mine if such a thing would would work. Not be a long term plan, but be able to get a significant payload to Mars or something to Europa with this method. Physically I don't think there's anything wrong with it, but I am brainlet and don't know how to calculate delta V or whatever as a hypothetical. I see graphs online saying how much you need to reach different places but still not sure how to get that number

>>14659643
>the reusable throat meme resurfaces

>> No.14659779
File: 78 KB, 782x639, 1593375544160b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659779

>>14657395
second pic

>> No.14659803

what's the latest on b7?

>> No.14659806

>>14659608
virgin orbit is launching from cornwall in september

>> No.14659809

>>14659803
it's over

>> No.14659811

>>14659059
Electric pump fed would be OP with better battery technology. Still I'm surprised they're not more common in upper stages or tugs since once you reach orbit you can do shorter burns and wait for the battery to recharge in between.
>>14659722
Imagine calling yourself a man when you can't do basic chemistry (H2O + sugar + yeast) and you go to the store to fork over your hard earned money like human cattle. Oh I'm laughing.

t. hasn't been to a liquor store in ten years

>> No.14659818
File: 32 KB, 1022x603, Asteroid Mining Plan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659818

>>14658586
>IMO redirecting a small (very small) asteroid into earth orbit is an amiable goal, but expecting to be able to do ISRU straight away isn't realistic.
>Need to find a very small rock, that only needs a small nudge.
A small nudge might still need ISRU to get enough propellant and keeping this loosely bound dust together might be a problem on its own

>Could use one of those unique captures that Don't need an insertion burn to put it into earth orbit.
How is that process called again? Wouldn't it take forever to get in an usable circular orbit?

>> No.14659823

>>14659803
One of the Raptor got swapped (possibly for inspection)

B7 will be moving back towards the megabay for inspections as well.

>> No.14659825
File: 951 KB, 1079x1732, Screenshot_20220714-173756.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659825

Would Starship get cancelled if WW3 starts this autumn?

>> No.14659828
File: 1.89 MB, 3024x3024, Cherry Red.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659828

>>14659722
The only truly manly drink is the forbidden punch.

>> No.14659830

>>14659803
We'll know more in two weeks

>> No.14659841

>>14659825

He also said He would use force to prevent china from invading taiwan

>> No.14659866

>>14659754
Mariner 10 took 147 days to get from Earth to Mercury, but that was a flyby and therein lies the rub, it's bloody hard to capture there using chemical propulsion. Even a fully fueled Starship starting from Earth-Moon L2 couldn't make low Mercury orbit.

>> No.14659870

>>14659866
Mercurychads, we were born just to suffer...

>> No.14659885

S24 testing today

>> No.14659887
File: 58 KB, 1073x623, Electric solar wind sail mercury.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659887

>>14659866
chemical engine cucks seething while e-sail chads display their Mercury roggs.

>> No.14659925

>>14659738
>mercury is on average the closest planet to every planet in the solar system
I love this bit of trivia, put it on the /sfg/ entrance exam, next to "describe the rocket equation" and "explain if spaceplanes are good or not"

>> No.14659936

EA's raptor vid is out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALiNmzoo1_E

>> No.14659943
File: 47 KB, 518x307, showOpenGraphArticleImage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659943

You should be able to solve this.

>> No.14659947

>>14659943
Imagine a spherical cow, neglect air resistance

>> No.14659957
File: 1.78 MB, 512x512, Spot_the_cow.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14659957

>>14659947
It's not that easy in bovinetry

>> No.14659986

new estronaut kino
https://youtu.be/ALiNmzoo1_E

>> No.14659992

>>14659986
Based Vesta poster.

>> No.14660001

>>14659957
Where's the vacuum?

>> No.14660009
File: 236 KB, 2518x1024, Chad SpaceX.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660009

>>14657395
haven't seen this one posted in awhile

>> No.14660011
File: 486 KB, 607x556, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660011

>>14659258
I just hate that pic, there's good reasons to doubt what Elon say.
You could make that pic about SLS using oldspace engine and this time the concern troll would be 200% right

Not supporting that "nuking pad" stuff, Musk is just the sort of guy who will make risky bet without caring about damage and SLS should have been cancelled long before Falcon 9 even worked.

>> No.14660029

>>14660009
>closest thing to reusable are the astronauts
kek

>> No.14660034
File: 433 KB, 1500x1500, SABRE_precooler.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660034

>>14659657
I know it's not a popular topic (until it work) but I've got hope on the SABRE engine project.
I could imagine such extreme precooling being worked in more common turbojet technology if it's proven to work.
https://reactionengines.co.uk/advanced-propulsion/sabre/

>> No.14660039
File: 114 KB, 1000x1000, MARS_KING_ELON.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660039

>>14659668
>>14657395

>> No.14660055
File: 36 KB, 634x160, sfg_amagicalplace.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660055

>>14657395

>> No.14660065

>>14660034
I think Sabre is too useful to be abandoned. One day it will work.

>> No.14660066
File: 632 KB, 2766x1364, Saturn_eclipse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660066

WHEN THE FUCK ARE WE GETTING MORE WEBB IMAGES

>> No.14660067

>>14660055
I actually argued with someone the other day that the best climate change fix is just removing the atmosphere

>> No.14660071

>jwst will take pictures of mars sometime
we're about to get kino

>> No.14660072
File: 102 KB, 900x1017, PIA17601-Comparisons-RadiationExposure-MarsTrip-20131209.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660072

>>14660011
>I just hate that pic, there's good reasons to doubt what Elon say.
Not about the technical aspects of Mars colonization which have been studied in depth by NASA and other organizations far more competent than the deboonking crowd. Most of those "people" couldn't even tell you what delta-v means without looking it up.
>>14660039
This is cringe

>> No.14660077

>>14660072
>NASA wants high travel time and low stay time
Its like they want to give them cancer

>> No.14660082

>>14660077
considering each day of stay time adds a not-negligible amount of payload mass, I'm not surprised

>> No.14660083

>>14660077
Its more so they want to pull in legacy companies, as they can't make a vehicle big enough, cheap enough, robust enough for astronauts to stay on mars for a year or more due to the size of their legacy vehicles being equivalent to that of a car.

>> No.14660092

>>14657579
>Blindsight
>Also a cool trailer for it I found
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkR2hnXR0SM
I was told Blindsight was the Hard-SF realistic kind of story. That pic make me feel like an off-shot of the game PREY (2017)
Also I just read wikipedia synopsis, did I just spoil myself everything? (Not that those themes are new to me)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindsight_(Watts_novel)

>> No.14660094

>>14660011
>elon skeptic
kek

>> No.14660113
File: 17 KB, 493x436, zubrin f u.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660113

>>14657579
>>14660092
>calls what is, in fact, an ogre, a vampire
dishonest fiction

>> No.14660116

>>14660092
>Hard SF
>One of the characters is a vampire

>> No.14660121

>>14660116
Vampires could be real in the future

>> No.14660125

>>14660116
*ogre

>> No.14660127

>>14660082
No, the mass of extra propellant required for an opposition transfer far exceeds any additional payload required for a longer stay on Mars.
>>14660077
It's mostly just political, a nuclear Mars mission requiring many SLS and New Glenn launches is a better sell to congress but beyond that it seems like a lot of NASA just doesn't want to take on the risk of a manned Mars mission and it would pull funding from other areas, especially if it was a real colonization effort instead of a 30 day flags and footprints mission.

>> No.14660129

>>14660034
damn that looks expensive. Reminds me of the hand made F-1 nozzle tubes.

>> No.14660130

>>14659943
Oberth effect?

>> No.14660134

>>14660116
its about a transhuman future

>> No.14660136
File: 125 KB, 800x649, origami rocket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660136

>>14660116
lets not forget antimatter getting quantum teleported from Mercury to the inner Oort cloud to fuel the ship

>> No.14660146

>>14660072
>radiation
Whats the problem with just putting a passive radiation shield like a water tanks around the crew area? You can reduce radiation by half just by having 3 inch thick waters around the area.

>> No.14660174

>>14659825
Didn't you get the memo. World wars are only risked when nuclear powers clash. US can curb stomp Iran at its leisure.
Sure Russia or China won't like that one bit, but they aren't going to war for it.

>> No.14660176

>>14660072
Yes yes, the radiation bit was meant to make the concerned anon look like a deboonk troll.
But "add more shielding" is always a variable in any space project even when it question the viability of further permanent base.
Elon routinely exaggerate the feasibility of his projects, knowing he can back away from his claim later (most of the time at least).

In our case, even if Starship never reach Mars it would remain a super heavy reusable launcher and the US will never ever let such things go bankrupt so it's a win-win-win-foreverwin situation.

>> No.14660180

>>14660146
sure, that'll be 6 more years of development and 5 billion

>>14660176
>In our case, even if Starship never reach Mars it would remain a super heavy reusable launcher and the US will never ever let such things go bankrupt so it's a win-win-win-foreverwin situation.

kek, maybe a little naive.

>> No.14660184
File: 1.93 MB, 1920x1080, _16-49-25 screenshot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660184

Chopstick is functional
Doomers BTFO

>> No.14660189

>>14660180
>sure, that'll be 6 more years of development and 5 billion
JPL pls go and stay go

>> No.14660192

>>14660136
>>14660116
>Hard SF
>vampire
>Vampires are predators from humanity's distant past, resurrected through recovered DNA, and live among the humans of the late 21st century.[6][9][11][12] These vampires operate with diminished sentience presented as comparable to high-functional autism with comparable dysfunction in affect and speech, but have the advantage of multiple simultaneous thoughts occurring in parallel within their minds.[11] Enhanced pattern-matching skills comparable to some forms of autism combine with this "hyperthreading" to make them invaluable in developing unusual and often very effective approaches to solving complex problems.
Why the fuck did the author even bother with the vampire tropes? Just make it a damn genetically engineered worker with a funny nickname and get done with it.
It's stuff like that that give a bad name to "hard" SF

>> No.14660194

>>14660184
Oh wow, SpaceX built a crane.

>> No.14660200
File: 823 KB, 1892x870, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660200

>>14660129
It's just lot of tubes, you should see how complicated modern jet turbine blade got.

>> No.14660202

>>14660077
That much radiation really isn't that big of a deal
>oooh big red color scary

>> No.14660204

>>14660192
I'll give you one guess what monster movies were popular in the early 2000s

>> No.14660205
File: 382 KB, 894x1145, 532608C4-3334-43AA-B45E-83E21C310CF7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660205

Although Redstone/Juno was more capable and more likely to succeed faster, the US government preferred the Viking/Vanguard approach as it used a CIVILLIAN vehicle (Viking was never a weapon of war). The two teams quarreled and ended up losing the race to the first satellite to the Soviets.

>> No.14660212
File: 121 KB, 612x756, insideeuropa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660212

>>14659683
Nobody? Come on, SOMEONE must know what the deltaV from low earth orbit would be psl I want to theory craft

>> No.14660214

Some fantastic pic of inside face of Falcon 9 fairing.
https://twitter.com/thejackbeyer/status/1547644336740831233?s=20&t=jfSuAZ3OEAqGt7pi6-NqTw

>> No.14660220

>>14660180
>kek, maybe a little naive.
More like hopeful.
Currently we still don't know if Starship can even work, but if it did the US would make sure to never lose such access to space.
The main reason the US didn't care much about loosing the Shuttle was because they believed SLS was around the corner and no one else could compete.
Now F9 is the new standard, the only way for manned launch and Starship would give the US extraordinary advantage.

>> No.14660221

>>14660212
>Diapirs
why are all space people fetishists

>> No.14660223

>>14660200
Less nations can make blisks than nuclear weapons. Going to be making some blades on ISS soon right?

>> No.14660226

>>14660204
Werewolf?

>> No.14660237

>>14660212
https://strout.net/info/science/delta-v/

>> No.14660243
File: 113 KB, 1280x720, Skylon-Mach-5-Space-Plane-Can-Fly-Anywhere-in-the-World-in-4-Hours.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660243

>>14660223
That's the point, some components look sophisticated but are actually simple, the real complication before practical application is elsewhere.
In this case the problem few country could afford just the test setup to test it in hypersonic condition.
https://reactionengines.co.uk/reaction-engines-test-programme-fully-validates-precooler-at-hypersonic-heat-conditions/

And in our market-driven economy few would take the risk making a spaceplane to begin with.

>> No.14660245

New Estronaut video about Raptor 1 vs Raptor 2
>https://youtu.be/ALiNmzoo1_E

>> No.14660251
File: 38 KB, 913x495, theplan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660251

>>14660205
Man this image makes me want to replay Take On Mars for the first time in years

>>14660212
Here you go, open wide, here comes the lander~

>> No.14660253
File: 2.81 MB, 1280x720, Peter J Beck-1547393107871862786-20220713 203040-vid1.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660253

>> No.14660261

>>14660245
based Neptune-anon

>> No.14660279

>roskosmos claims that Samantha Cristoforetti will not perform EVA in order to make the ERA on Nauka module operationable
>Rogozin also claimed that roskosmos is suspending the cooperation on ERA operations, in response to previous suspension of cooperation on ExoMars by esa
>Artemiev and Cristoforetti are preparing for the EVA, as scheduled
lol, lmao

>> No.14660293

>>14660072
Surely by 'cringe' you mean 'based', pbuh

>> No.14660306

>>14659683
Your first problem is that the second stage would get to orbit mostly empty, so you would need to figure out a way to in orbit refuel it.
If that's the case, it would likely be better to use a new system based around methane, so that you could use the starship refueling system and infrastructure.
If you wanted to connect them in series you would need some kind of novel interstage docking system that can withstand decently high forces.
You would also need RCS on each stage for Ullage and in order to dock them together.

IMO the broad concept of a reusable/refuelable methalox third stage for throwing small payloads (IE 1-20 tons) around and out of earth orbit is very interesting.
But I think that once you start having multiple expendable stages that have to dock with each other, the complexity and cost goes up too much, and for a 50 ton payload you are probably better off doing some kind of black buck, multiple step refueling operation with starship.

>> No.14660325
File: 375 KB, 2239x2725, 1532002011615.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660325

>>14659866
holy shit

>> No.14660333

Chop sticks getting ready to lift.

>> No.14660339

>>14660237
absolutely based, my autism is satisfied

>>14660306
It probably would've been more clear if, instead, it was a third stage as the payload, so second stage is expended getting the ~ 22T of a third, fully fueled expendable MVac piece into LEO to meet other's of the same thing, back to back. There isn't even a payload that needs this but the yeet train could work.
>inb4 Elon does this and sends a Tesla to Mars surface in December

>> No.14660351
File: 31 KB, 750x741, F4041709-AD81-4197-913B-F7B5CD4D529D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660351

I’m autistically roleplaying the Vanguard vs Juno “first to orbit” race in my KSP career (by myself).
I feel autistic

>> No.14660353

>>14659943
Don't send a rover when you can send a human?
>>14660067
based
>>14660129
just proont it bro

>> No.14660356

>>14660351
Autism and spaceflight enthusiasm go hand in hand. There's no need to feel ashamed

>> No.14660358
File: 257 KB, 1334x750, 37899F51-2F24-41AA-8B04-15DBBB9A0591.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660358

>>14660146
The other option is using a shorter transit, which in addition to lower radiation has the benefit of lowering the amount of consumables required. Either way, it's not that big of a deal and once on Mars the radiation dose can be very low zero since an excavator can pile regolith on the habitation.

Actually I want potential colonists to consider the voyage extremely dangerous so fair weather Earthers stay home. Ideally SpaceX wouldn't do any ISRU propellant production for twenty years so they couldn't go back. Mars is for Martians.

>> No.14660360

b7 is going to the scrapyard isnt it

>> No.14660372
File: 1.02 MB, 3840x1918, FXeouX8aMAA2YAt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660372

I thought that they recycled the Helios spacesuits from somewhere else, but it seems to be an original design, so far.

>> No.14660378

>>14660372
>suits are even bulkier than apollo suits
??????????? mars is less dangerous than the moon.

>> No.14660381

>>14660279
Seems like the higherups had enough of Rogozin's attempts to look better for Putin at the cost of Russia's space agency

>> No.14660389

>>14660356
I’m documenting every flight in the career and I have a spreadsheet. So far it’s late 1954 and there have been 48 or so missions. No one is at orbit yet. I want to post it somewhere but idk where

>> No.14660390
File: 787 KB, 1015x4096, FXpKmvxUEAYMZc_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660390

>> No.14660397
File: 3.81 MB, 4096x2732, FXpWRgzVEAAWXTZ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660397

>> No.14660432

>>14660223
>>14660243
If its discovered manufacturing blades in space and save airliners 1% fuel cost, commercial space station will be built over night.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180007894/downloads/20180007894.pdf?attachment=true

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/search.html?#q=Thermolab&i=&p=&c=Physical&g=&s=&a=

>> No.14660439
File: 1.02 MB, 3196x1808, flextape-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660439

>>14660397

>> No.14660459

>>14660130
Yes. On a side note, I hate it when people take the Oberth effect to mean that a low altitude circular orbit is ideal for interplanetary burns when that isn't the case. It's far better to be on flyby trajectory or orbiting the edge of a gravity well since you can cheaply drop your periapsis to be near the planet and you're actually traveling faster when you go to do your transfer burn. With orbital refueling EML2 straight up moggs LEO.

>> No.14660468
File: 86 KB, 962x541, DBE1BC42-F50D-4943-A560-CBBD3D54BF2D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660468

Some Raptor shielding was removed and thrown out

>> No.14660469

>>14660220
>>14660180
given that starship has already flown and landed, is balls deep in mass production optimization, and has billions in competent non-corrupt budgeting behind further development, chirping that it could fail is no different than preaching thunderf00t and CSS as gospel
there isn't a debate anymore, Starship is locked in and guaranteed

>> No.14660479

>>14660372
Leaks?

>> No.14660481
File: 18 KB, 191x264, A225F937-F5E5-458F-B947-95212F221C01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660481

>>14660372
It reminds me a lot of this old popsci cover.

>> No.14660488
File: 64 KB, 747x433, eml2 leo farqu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660488

>>14660459
Based Farquhar trajectory appreciator

>> No.14660497
File: 128 KB, 971x700, 492421main_spacesuits_testing_lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660497

>>14660481
It's a Mark III suit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_III_(space_suit)

>> No.14660499

>>14660469
Fuck off retard, it is still unproven and has a long way to go to reach the goals set out by Elon. It needs to reach orbit, have the booster be caught, then have in space refueling work and also have the heat shield perfected, and each of those has its own problems and pathfinding.
Good bait though, made me reply

>> No.14660505

>>14660497
Shit, that was also the suit they used in the Red Planet movie

>> No.14660510

>>14660432
Eh, I'm all for space manufacturing plant but we're going to need more than a measles 1% fuel cost to justify the expense.

>> No.14660512

>>14660497
The NASA suits are spot on for mk3s. The only suit I’ve seen with that shape that’s blue and has the side lights like the Helios model is that popsci art. I’m convinced they got it from there. They even have the same buttons on the front of the backpack.

>> No.14660515

>>14660499
>I'm elon musk skeptic
kek

>> No.14660523
File: 2.34 MB, 4096x2695, FReNfffX0AEtvvn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660523

>>14660469
It's a long way off and they didn't test the most difficult part: reentry
I'm a bit skeptical over how much they tested those little tiles. Even if we've gone a far since the Shuttle's ridiculously costly tiles I'm going to want to see those work at least once.

>> No.14660525

why doesnt anyone rent satellites out

>> No.14660527

>>14660512
I’m convinced /sfg/ would be a better technical advisor for For All Mankind than whoever they have now

>> No.14660531

>>14660523
It will work because SpaceX will throw starships up over and over until it works as planned

>> No.14660542

>>14660525
They already do, but current space satellite are extremely rigid.
Few people now that but we don't use the kind of flexible electronics our consumer gear use. It's all built for a specific job.

However this is starting to change.
https://www.rfi.fr/en/science-and-technology/20210731-world-s-first-reprogrammable-satellite-launched-into-space-from-french-guiana-eutelsat-quantum-esa

>> No.14660549

>>14659130
I still think of him when I'm playing Kerbal (the only place that spaceplanes are good)

>> No.14660553
File: 189 KB, 2000x1125, 1657619948406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660553

>Chinese Starship clone not coming out till 2035

Jeez, imagine what Starship will be capable of in 2035.

>> No.14660555

>>14660553
$50 says there will be at least a once-a week cadence

>> No.14660556

>>14660553
we'll be on starship v10 at that point with 18m starship and orbital shipyards under construction

>> No.14660562
File: 392 KB, 1024x667, FXhnyhiXkAIAiUI.translated.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660562

>>14660553
What I could get so far, if someone could translate better that would be kino

>> No.14660566

>>14660039
Extremely based, I remember when I would spam this. I unironically worship the man

>> No.14660567
File: 30 KB, 242x208, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660567

>>14660527
Don't be so sure of that.
Also, I'm told most of the problem with science-accuracy come from executive decision, planning and plain error from the artist who was asked to make it real.
Take the tiny bit on the side of the Sea Dragon, likely a error from copying a damn technical drawing.

Anon will make a good design for an Earth-Moon Orbit-to-Orbit spaceship, then the executive will decide to use it as an Interplanetary ship that do aerobraking.

>> No.14660573

Hullo was a consultant for a space movie, and it still had shit vehicular design

>> No.14660574
File: 280 KB, 1920x1080, mpv-shot0126.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660574

>>14660116
problem?

>> No.14660575

>>14659662
you Wild Turkey motherfucker

>> No.14660582

>>14660553
glorious zhonguoren rocketry will beat capitalist pigdogs every time just like in 1500. musk starshit will not launch until 2050, meanwhile 4 billion loyal chinese on mars.

>> No.14660585

>>14660192
man hearing about this put me off too much to even bother with this series-like, you have genetic engineering and biotech stuff but decide to invent the goofiest thing imaginable, ancient autistic psuedo-vampire cavemen?
and fuck that japanese vampire rocket anime, they're basically just goth elves shoerhorned in for waifubait

>> No.14660595
File: 84 KB, 1280x720, 598580.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660595

>>14660378
Could have been even bulkier, if they reused the spacesuits from Stargate Atlantis.

>> No.14660596

>>14660562
>China Muscle Sky
Western bros, it's over.

>> No.14660604
File: 117 KB, 232x250, 1651691049243.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660604

>>14660596
>China will just squat thrust their rockets into orbit
Fuck, were doomed.

>> No.14660605

>>14660585
Kinda what I think of modern SF and most anime
>good concepts, good design, good plot
>insert one retarded japanese fetish that could have been avoided without changing anything else

The anime "PLANETES" is good thought. Just don't be triggered by 2 episodes and it's great.

>> No.14660615
File: 75 KB, 855x558, 64556466415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660615

holly shit bros it's completely fucked

>> No.14660616
File: 174 KB, 736x847, Shipwreck by David Bergen l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660616

>Set in the year 2027, a time where Interplanetary travel has become commonplace, it starred David Calder as Nathan Spring, commander of the International Space Police Force—nicknamed the "Star Cops"—who provide law enforcement for the newly developing colonies of the Solar System. The series follows Nathan Spring and the rest of his multinational team as they work to establish the Star Cops and solve whatever crimes come their way. Operating in a relatively accurately realised hard SF, near-future, space environment, many of the cases that the Star Cops investigate arise from opportunities for new crimes presented by the technologically advanced future society the series depicts and from the hostile frontier nature of the environment that the Star Cops live in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Cops
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpeldoEzg2U

>> No.14660623

>>14660351
It's 1960 and i'm currently trying to design a workhorse light/medium launcher architecture, that I hope will last a few decades in some form or another.
Something like Titan or Delta.

>> No.14660624
File: 393 KB, 1920x1080, red planet spacesuits.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660624

>>14660505
Well, almost. They had these super-hi-tech retractable helmets.

>> No.14660625

>>14660523
Reminder that tiles are only important after the mission is done, to re-use the vehicle. Launches ARE the test for the tiles, they don't need to work perfectly the first time. They lost a lot of F9 stages before they started successfully recovering them.

>> No.14660629

>>14660567
>>14660573
Could you imagine if For All Mankind was a 1:1 retelling of the original Post-Apollo plans. I’m sure the show runners wanted OC vehicles but still.

>>14660615
Hooooly shit

>> No.14660640

>>14660562
>Chapter Three: Major Aerospace Projects and Exhibitions in Our Country
>Develop a new type of reusable rocket: there are two series of Φ5 and 10m, and the liquid oxygen/methane two-stage fully reusable rocket will enter service by 2035.
I don’t know why they seem to use Phi to refer to diameter, but that seems to be a thing. I don’t buy the ‘fully reusable’ meme for either diameter.

>LEO 5-150t, SSO 4-14t, GTO 7-65t, LTO 50t。

>CZ-9 is a three-stage series, repeatable, environmentally friendly and reliable, Φ10.6m, L=110m, G=4122t, P=5200t.
“P” is probably propellant but I have to fucking clue what “G” could be referring to.

>The first stage is 26 x 1961 kN thrust liquid oxygen methane, the second stage and the third stage are 4x and 1x 1176 kN thrust HO replenishment engine; LTO 50t. LEO 150t.
My first thought was that “replenishment engine” was talking about orbital refueling, but another translation for “补燃发动机” is “afterburning,” so I think it’s actually talking about the power cycle. If it’s only referring to the upper stage engines that might mean they’re looking at using something simpler like gas generators on the first stage. It’d be very Chinese to make a big deal out of having a functional staged-combustion engine in a rocket.

>But there is still a big gap between the US SLS and Starship rockets.
I’m not sure if this is a small cope over the CZ-9’s capability, or if it’s talking about the payload gap between SLS and Starship. Chinese grammar is confusing even before you try running it through a bad translator robot.

>> No.14660643
File: 65 KB, 725x527, 64561534556.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660643

>>14660629
other side

>> No.14660646

>>14660643
They cut out the heatshields to access the engines.

>> No.14660654

>>14660625
Without reusability the Starship is only an impressive but quite expensive ship. Thought recovering at least the booster would keep it economical.

>> No.14660659

>>14660654
Without reusability Starship launches ~300+ ton to orbit. That's double what Saturn V does. If Starship is only "impressive" without reusability, then Saturn V must be "meh" at best.

>> No.14660662

>>14660643
Looking at the higher res footage from stream they definitely appear externally unchanged, and I still really doubt they suffered internal damage

>>14660654
You can't salvage Raptor2s after they land in saltwater. They are sorta fucked and it is better just to get new ones

>> No.14660666

>>14660643
>>14660615
This is a good test on what damage does to Raptor and Superheavy I guess. Maybe it would be smarter to ground B7?
Also we need an anime Superheavy Chan with cuts and bruises and bandages ASAP!!!!!

>> No.14660667

>>14660625
>>14660654
The tiles are a hard bottleneck. Elon wanted to have a vehicle that can launch and reenter and land all in one package, which is great for cost savings if it works, but creates this complexity.

>> No.14660668

If B7 is messed up and cannot fly how soon would B8 be ready?

>> No.14660671

Elon says next month if testing goes well, BUT THEY STILL NEED FAA APPROVAL AAAAA

>> No.14660677

>>14660668
For rollout? Pretty much immediately. For launch? It still has to go through all the prelaunch spinup>sf>dress rehearsal campaign like SLS did so the FAA can start to review it for the license. So no real difference time wise

>> No.14660678

>>14660667
Bruh they will just fly them until the tiles work SpaceX isn’t afraid of iteration and failure

>> No.14660682

>>14660226
Put a little more sparkle into your guess.

>> No.14660683

>>14660671
Then they will finish testing soon and all will go well

>> No.14660686

>>14660683
Dubs say yes

>> No.14660688

>>14660686
You tried

>> No.14660692

Why are they trying to fly damaged B7 if B8 is already fully stacked?

>> No.14660693

HOP

FUCKING

WHEN

>> No.14660694
File: 180 KB, 1300x975, tom_markusic_falcon1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660694

>Yeah
>Hop in back

>> No.14660707

Is there any date for Oneweb's launch on Falcon 9?

>> No.14660708
File: 771 KB, 981x819, Screenshot 2022-07-15 003315.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660708

Tool for comparing Hubble images vs Webb images of the same parts of the sky:
https://johnedchristensen.github.io/WebbCompare

>> No.14660720

>>14660692
Who says B7 damaged beyond repair or the damage is extensive enough to take more than a month?

>> No.14660728

>>14660688
Witnessed

>> No.14660729

>>14660692
why not both

>> No.14660753

>>14660671
Elon's writing that history report as fast as he can

>> No.14660781

>>14660654
Starship isn't expensive though
it was made to be dirt cheap and retard proof
even if by literal magic neither the tiles nor any other possible reentry medium works, even the ones that have already been made and flight proven, it will still be dramatically cheaper than any alternative and send up more than could be dreamed of every launch

>> No.14660786

Franky I'm happy that SpaceX is testing hardware rich again. Worse case scenario, this is a 1-2 month delay. More realistic case scenario its ~1-2 week delay.

SpaceX isn't NASA. If SLS had this issue, it would be year+ delay. But SpaceX is testing raw hardware parts with minimal costs.

>> No.14660799

>>14660708
Jesus, the difference becomes so much more obvious with this. And this is with only a few hours of exposure, think of some way distant nebula that takes days to expose for, and how that will look

>> No.14660866

>>14660624
Wow that looks stupid

>> No.14660876

>>14660615
>>14660643
They purposefully took the heatshields off, dumbass. It was on stream.

>> No.14660880

>>14660786
SLS wouldn't have had this issue in the first place.

>> No.14660887

>>14660876
NSF said they got blown out lol. This is def good news if those were removed by hand.

>>14660786
Agreed. Also it’s funny that SpaceX’s unorthodox approach ended up saving Starship.
>Switching to stainless meant the vehicles could be repaired (Booster 7; SN9 Iguess)
>Not needing a clean room means engine swaps are easy and fast
>So many flights allows for iteration on vehicles and engines based on real world data
>So many flights also allows random issues to be found ahead of time instead of on “operational” missions
Etc.

>> No.14660895
File: 2.00 MB, 3000x2250, 1648071198067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660895

>>14660066
ANSWER MY FUCKING QUESTION

>> No.14660898
File: 384 KB, 3023x3023, FXp8szxUsAIZRtN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660898

>>14660066
>>14660895
They released a Jupiter pic today

>> No.14660899

>>14660880
SLS has had its fair share of issues. The tooling for the core stage was installed upside down once. Then the first operational core stage was damaged, forcing NASA to use the third core stage for Artemis 1 instead of, you know, the first one. And then while building the third core stage for the first flight, NASA dropped one of the LOX bulkheads, rendering it useless. SLS started development 5 years ahead of Starship (2011 vs 2016).

>> No.14660903
File: 400 KB, 1125x1481, 4BEE7E0C-4D79-4673-9D87-06BF3D6AFD81.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660903

Apparently Astra is dying now. Idk what this means but it’s bad I heard.

>> No.14660907
File: 1.62 MB, 1x1, Astra-Space-Inc.-ASTR.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660907

>>14660903
Astra has a really shitty business model. Good report on it and how they are really falling behind

https://www.kerrisdalecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Astra-Space-Inc.-ASTR.pdf

>> No.14660909

>>14660880
Right because muh perfect SLS hasn't had any issues so far…

>> No.14660917

>>14660903
maybe they should pivot to satellites and spacecraft

>> No.14660919

If SLS took a hardware rich approach, wouldn’t that make contractors even more money? Like imagine if NASA told Boeing to make 4 core stages a year and offered the amount of money they’re getting now instead
There is a timeline where Energia was resurrected and SLS is rushed to compete

>> No.14660932

>>14660907
What can we learn from ASTRA business wise? im a retard so i'd only say woke shit is a bad omen for space related stuff. but there has to be more, any insights?, maybe dont go public as well?

>> No.14660937

oh fuck they're back

>Craig Kundrot, director of the NASA’s biological and physical sciences division, said the agency is seeking funding starting in fiscal year 2023 for an initiative that could allow “hyper-specialized” scientists go to the ISS and future commercial space stations.
>“We seek to bring scientists back into space,” he said, drawing parallels to payload specialists who flew on shuttle missions. Those non-career astronauts included scientists and engineers who flew on missions to conduct research. One, Charlie Walker, flew on three shuttle missions running microgravity experiments for his employer, McDonnell Douglas.
https://spacenews.com/nasa-division-proposing-program-to-send-scientists-to-iss/

>> No.14660939

>>14660781
A fully expendable upper stage for Starship probably costs less than a single RS-25.

>> No.14660943

>>14660932
If you build a rocket, make sure it works before you put paying customer payloads on it.

>> No.14660951
File: 87 KB, 764x572, Aggregat 9 a9 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660951

>Once the Germans came up with a good configuration for the V-2, they stuck with it. They proposed to use it anew in a two-stage missile that again sported fins that look excessively large to the modern eye, and that was to cross the Atlantic to strike New York.8 But there was no avoiding the need for a new round of wind-tunnel tests in studying the second stage of this intercontinental missile, the A-9, which was to fly with swept wings. As early as 1935 Adolf Busemann, another colleague of Prandtl, had proposed the use of such wings in supersonic flight.9 Walter Dornberger, director of V-2 development, describes witnessing a wind-tunnel test of a model’s stability.
>The model had “two knifelike, very thin, swept-back wings.” Mounted at its center of gravity, it “rotated at the slightest touch.” When the test began, a technician opened a valve to start the airflow. In Dornberger’s words,
>“The model moved abruptly, turning its nose into the oncoming airstream. After a few quickly damping oscillations of slight amplitude, it lay quiet and stable in the air that hissed past it at 4.4 times the speed of sound. At the nose, and at the edges of the wing supports and guide mechanism, the shock waves could be clearly seen as they traveled diagonally backward at a sharp angle. As the speed of the airflow fell off and the test ended, the model was no longer lying in a stable position. It made a few turns around its center of gravity, and then it came to a standstill with the nose pointing downward. The experiment Dr. Hermann had wished to show me had succeeded perfectly. This projectile, shaped like an airplane, had remained absolutely stable at a supersonic speed range of almost 3,500 mph.”

>> No.14660971
File: 68 KB, 771x725, 1415032193214.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14660971

gimbal desding :DDD
https://twitter.com/AdamCuker/status/1547717237359775744

>> No.14660980

>>14660903
>>14660907
BLACK LIVES MATTER
SILENCE IS VIOLENCE
SAY HIS NAME

>> No.14661000

>>14660951
Imagine if WW2 never happened and we ended up with a England vs US vs Germany space race in the 40s

>> No.14661001

>>14660880
Minor SLS issues delayed the program by months

>> No.14661007

>>14660980
>Heisenberg

>> No.14661008

CRS 25 in about an hour get hyped

>> No.14661017

how big is too big when it comes to launching rockets? is there a point where we get to a certain size rocket and that's it, we cant or shouldnt go any bigger? 9m starship is big but it's still a small vehicle.

>> No.14661020

>>14660510
Not really
all you need is whatever they're willing to pay
if airlines want to collectively give you billions for that cost reduction, that's their choice and your profit

>> No.14661059
File: 30 KB, 472x307, inspect NACA langley.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661059

Reminder that 'NASA' is really 107 years old

>> No.14661061
File: 174 KB, 900x704, 55BCBB1F-F329-48FE-811A-4FBCC5B59B65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661061

I’m legitimately curious if, in a world where “the space race continued”, NASA could’ve actually built some giant post-Saturn rocket like Nova, or even ROMBUS

>> No.14661080

Weird how there was no accidental explosion with SN# testing.

>> No.14661093

>>14661080
MK1
SN1
SN3
SN4
SN8 almost blew itself up when a Raptor ate rocks
SN9 tipped over
SN11 literally ran out of new engines forcing SpaceX to resurrect some older Raptors which probably led to it exploding in midair later on

>> No.14661100

>>14661059
seeing the word NASA in the same sentence as the number 107 makes me uncomfortable

>> No.14661110

>>14660708
>SOUL vs soulless

>> No.14661129

LIVE
https://youtu.be/mnowEqqMiFs

>> No.14661135

>>14661110
>smudge vs clarity

>> No.14661141

>>14661129
>720p
How fucking long is nasa gonna take

>> No.14661142

>>14661141
>Stay tuned! - 2020

>> No.14661146
File: 118 KB, 1051x840, wind tunnel NACA Ames Aeronautical Laboratory in 1942.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661146

>> No.14661147

I'm thinking it'll be JELLYFISH time boys

>> No.14661148

70% weather go

>> No.14661150

always love an evening launch

>> No.14661152

NASA and SpaceX ever sort out the oh fugg gas leak with the capsule?

>> No.14661156

>>14661152
Dragon has quite the brapper

>> No.14661161

>>14661141
720p is the standard for High Definition video.

>> No.14661163
File: 2.90 MB, 1280x720, 2022-07-14 19-23-29 - 0.06.48-0.07.07.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661163

There it is! Project Gay Beam!

>> No.14661167
File: 64 KB, 473x844, Saturn V-4X(U).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661167

wew

>> No.14661168

>>14661163
What happens when it scans the middle east

>> No.14661169
File: 251 KB, 1834x956, oof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661169

>>14660932
>What can we learn from ASTRA business wise?
Nothing that wasn't already known, it was expected that Astra would struggle against an increasing field of competitors regardless of how well their launches went. While other companies were building larger rockets hoping to get ahead of the rest or deploy their own large satellite constellation so they're not beholden to launch profits, Chris Kemp fell for his own bullshit about how 'the cheapest rocket will win', ignoring that the other companies have nothing to lose so they can run at a loss for years and some of their rockets are just development platforms like the Falcon 1, which was pulled from the market with SpaceX citing limited demand despite that it was untouchable when it came to price.

Even if Astra got 100% of the small-lift launches and space tugs never eat into the little remaining small-lift market that wasn't taken away from SpaceX rideshare, the revenue potential is puny. It would take 27 Astra Rocket launches to equal the revenue from a single Falcon 9 launch. Now Astra shills would say "but Astra makes satellite buses too! Vertical integration!" which ignores that a lot of companies do the same and that vertical integration doesn't work well when your launch costs are a gazillion dollars per kg. Same thing if they ever try to deploy a constellation.
>>14661017
>how big is too big when it comes to launching rockets?
When the logistical and regulatory problems trump the economies of scale from larger rockets. A rideshare with thousands of payloads would be a nightmare to organize and considering the near future there are few single manifest payloads that would be too heavy for a standard 9m Starship or wouldn't fit inside a version with a larger payload bay. For tankers though bigger rockets are a great idea and would drastically reduce the amount of launches required for orbital refueling.

>> No.14661175
File: 117 KB, 1200x630, falcon-1-launch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661175

“Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” - Barack Obama

>> No.14661176

>>14660903
Where is this from?

>> No.14661178

this is gonna be a good one, tune in if you aren't already.

t. I'm from the future

>> No.14661180

>>14661178
It's gonna explode?

>> No.14661181

>>14660932
Make your rocket actually big enough to reach orbit.

>> No.14661182

Why is it so dark?

>> No.14661184

>>14661180
it's going to be sexy when it gets high enough that it's sunlit

>> No.14661186

>>14661182
Storms in front of the sun and 720p can't display a crisp enough picture to overcome it.

>> No.14661190

>No Clear-chan

>> No.14661193

>>14661186
They should really upgrade the cameras, an old iPhone can do better.

>> No.14661197

>>14661193
Judging by the way it looks at a distance, it's the same cameras, just fed through NASA's retarded compression

>> No.14661198

>>14661163
Gaydar from outer space

>> No.14661199
File: 475 KB, 332x292, launch.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661199

yeah science!

>> No.14661200

Max Qute

>> No.14661201

god tier audio

>> No.14661205

>NSF stream has a youtube sponsor watermark
lmao

>> No.14661209

>NASA: so beautiful are you seeing this?
>literally a black screen

>> No.14661211

Perfect

>> No.14661212

Bullseye from 104km, never not impressive

>> No.14661214

130 landings
entire rest of industry hopelessly mogged

>> No.14661215

have any boosters been officially retired because of use?

>> No.14661217
File: 85 KB, 720x556, cA3jh8BLa8s-w5iE85Hfkgy3nVEGNxfE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661217

Can we build a space elevator already

>> No.14661220

>>14661214
ENTER
https://frog.cnes.fr/en/frog-0

>> No.14661222

>>14661215
Old ones have been retired

>> No.14661223

Can't wait for the day when ISS isn't "the" orbital lab

>> No.14661225

>>14661217
lol how
>>14661220
i ain't clinkin that shit nigga

>> No.14661226

>>14661215
Some crashed, but most of the retired ones were gotten rid of because they're not as easy to work on

>> No.14661227

>>14660943
also check that your designs are wired right before building them
>STAGING

>> No.14661228

>>14661223
Finally we'll have a station on a not-dumb inclination so Russia can reach it

>> No.14661231

Elon can't keep getting away with it

>> No.14661232
File: 646 KB, 1844x1918, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661232

>>14661220
>FR
>frog

>> No.14661234

onions inbound to station

>> No.14661236

>>14661220
The Hopper FEARS the Frog

>> No.14661237

space cheese

>> No.14661240
File: 98 KB, 538x874, DEF1A67D-E81F-477F-913E-30AE30033063.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661240

Block 5 has a 100% successful launch rate

>> No.14661244

Her voice sounds so sexy, like ASMR, and i dont even like that stuff

>> No.14661250

>>14661244
I know right, so nice to listen to

>> No.14661251

>>14661220
>project start date: 2017
>first test flight: may 2019
>and absolutely nothing of note since
>will totally produce results sometime around 2035

>> No.14661252

Is this nosecone cam new?

>> No.14661253

>>14661252
It showed up once before, but fairly new

>> No.14661256

https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1547668890213240832
>NASA says it has begun a review of the Psyche asteroid mission to examine "project and institutional issues" that led to its delay from launching this year. A decision to cancel the mission has been reached

>> No.14661259

>>14660640
Nice translation!

>> No.14661262

>>14661256
It doesn't say the decision has been made, only that it is called for

IIRC the last time this got brought up someone mentioned there's a legal reason they have to bring up cancellation, I think it's mandatory if a contract goes over budget by a certain amount

>> No.14661263

>>14661220
>The panicked flailing of drowning Frenchmen.
Music to my ears.

>> No.14661266

>>14661256
That'll be 500 million + tip, goy

>> No.14661268

Post JWST kino. (Not that ugly Jupiter photo)

>> No.14661269

>>14661262
>It doesn't say the decision has been made, only that it is called for
knower here
its been cancelled internally for a few weeks already

>> No.14661271

Another comfy launch in the books

>> No.14661273

>>14661220
>powered by a turbojet because they don't have a methaloggs engine to test on it at scale

The absolute state of ESA

>> No.14661275

>>14661268
https://webbtelescope.org/resource-gallery/images

>> No.14661277

>>14661271
I want to go to Cape Canaveral to see a lauch irl, but the vax is mandatory for traveling to the USA, fuck that, ill wait. Its not like they will run out of launches
> verification not required

>> No.14661284

>>14661256
Bruh Falcon Heavy must be fucking cursed

>> No.14661295

>>14661277
I've seen a couple but none in the SpaceX era. Would love to get back there someday.

>> No.14661299
File: 174 KB, 560x420, 11111111.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661299

>>14661256
>decision to cancel the mission has been reached
>decision to cancel the mission has been reached

>decision to cancel the mission has been reached

>decision to cancel the mission has been reached

>decision to cancel the mission has been reached

>decision to cancel the mission has been reached

They were so excited for it in the video interviews godamn bros, what will they do with the spacecraft now?

>> No.14661307

>>14661299
Anon lied to you

>> No.14661308

>>14661228
Scientifically speaking, what is the ideal inclination for a LEO space station?

>> No.14661311

>>14661299
It isn’t yet

>> No.14661313

>>14661308
69 degrees

>> No.14661317

>>14661308
Whichever inclination the chinese chose because it gatekeeps ivan from mooching

>> No.14661318
File: 174 KB, 1920x1080, firefox_2022-07-14_21-28-02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661318

Nice

>> No.14661322

a space station in geo when

>> No.14661323

>>14661284
Not even Falcon Heavy’s fault. It’s payloads suck. Falcon Heavy is the equivalent of a girl who keeps having abusive boyfriends despite deserving better

>> No.14661329
File: 756 KB, 1920x1080, firefox_2022-07-14_21-30-42.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661329

kino

>> No.14661332

>>14661299
>NASA says it has begun a review of the Psyche asteroid mission to examine "project and institutional issues" that led to its delay from launching this year. Results of the review will inform a decision to continue or cancel the mission

>My sense is that there will be a lot of sound and fury about problems with Psyche and its test bed at JPL But it is very difficult for me to invasion its cancelation. Very, very difficult.

>Let’s wait to see what the review finds. There have been issues.

>> No.14661336
File: 724 KB, 2076x2560, A975CF2A-E296-43B3-9C60-B55A515B596A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661336

>>14661322
After we have unstable space colonies at L4 and L5

>> No.14661338

SpaceX audio still LIVE

https://youtu.be/EtpW0f81ZEc

>> No.14661347
File: 2.61 MB, 1152x1078, Carina Nebula zoom in JWST.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661347

Quick zoom in on the Carina nebula in the sky, and how JWST's image fits into it

>> No.14661349

>>14661347
>tfw no cool nebulas nearby

>> No.14661351

>>14661349
carina nebula is kind of "near by"

>> No.14661353

>>14661349
You can't see a nebula if you're in it.

>> No.14661371

>>14661353
Prove it

>> No.14661380

> All mass necessitated by an engine design should count as engine mass, eg shrouds, TVC hydraulic power or excess purge gas.
>Raptors in production now have electric TVC, saving over a ton of hydraulics mass on booster.
Raptor 3 is coming holy shit

>> No.14661384

>>14661380
Elon tweet btw
>https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1547759390513512455
He has a few more Starship tweets

>> No.14661392

>>14661308
Zero degrees would have the most rendezvous opportunities if you launched from equator since you'd always be in the right orbital plane.
>>14661322
When you have robots that can do all external work on the station because the Van Allen belt would fuck up your shit during space walks.

>> No.14661395

>>14661380
Raptor 4 really is going to be amazing. Cannot wait for raptor 5. Raptor 6 will be airborne in 2 weeks

>> No.14661398

>>14661395
Raptor 7 will be so simplified it will only have three parts as well as the ability to manufacture itself.

>> No.14661401

>>14661220
>>14661251
It's still slow but FROG is old news, now they're testing Themis and their methalox engine, Prometheus.
The timeline is FROG ->Themis/Callisto (reusable first stages, there are two of them for some reason) ->Maïa (microlauncher)->Ariane Next

>> No.14661429

>>14661299
get baited i changed the quote
it should really be cancelled anyway

>> No.14661435

>>14661380
>>14661384
>Enabling engines to take the heat without shrouds might save over 10 tons, all things considered.

>Shrouds are also a risk in that fuel leaks could be contained by the shroud, forming a MOX bomb.

>Booster is purging all 33 engine shrouds in flight to prevent this.
what does he actually mean by purging?

>> No.14661436
File: 1.06 MB, 3840x2160, FXmRDxbWYAcPCUJ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661436

>>14661380
>>14661435
>trying to cut mass
its over, starship is too fat

>> No.14661438
File: 177 KB, 1753x1224, Capture1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661438

>>14661322
>>14661392
>because the Van Allen belt would fuck up your shit during space walks.
On second thought maybe it wouldn't be that bad since the space station only be in the outer belt but this graph assumes 4 mm aluminum shielding which wouldn't make for a good space suit. I still can't think of a good reason why you would want to put a station in GEO but w/e

>> No.14661441

>>14661438
reminder that these readings were using old sensors that were shit

>> No.14661450

>>14661436
Is Starship chubby?
Tim’s vid was okay, I wish he did more of a deep dive like NSF does on autistic things between the engines.

>> No.14661455

>>14661435
>what does he actually mean by purging?
Venting a gas into the space (likely whatever they're using at the moment for tank pressurization) to prevent an explosive cooncentration/ratio of the LOX and methane from building up

>> No.14661460

>>14661436
>switch to Raptor 2 saves ~13 tons of booster weight
>with MORE thrust
jesus christ

>> No.14661465

>>14661460
Is it feasible to put raptors on Falcon 9 instead of Merlins got the gainz?

>> No.14661476

>>14661465
It’s too powerful lol. 3 Raptor 2s has more thrust than all of F9. And waaaaay too much for stage two - even a single RVav

>> No.14661478

>b7 being moved back to the production site
*sigh* "2 more weeks"

>> No.14661484

>>14661465
It's technically possible after spending hundreds of millions redeveloping Falcon 9 and switching the ground support equipment from RP-1 to methane but it absolutely wouldn't be worth it and could affect reliability. SpaceX is focused on transitioning as much as possible over to Starship, Falcon 9 will be for Dragon and single launch missions past GTO.

>> No.14661486

I’m documenting every flight in my KSP career and I’m thinkjng of posting it on the KSP forums. Like it will end with the end of the Apollo then BAM a sudden “special” episode where I LARP a Soviet lunar mission, which leads into a sequel series which follows a manned race to mars

>> No.14661489

>>14660623
first stage thor second stage x-405h is very good

>> No.14661493

>>14661465
>feasible
>possible to do easily or conveniently.
Not from SpaceX point. For any other company, its absolutely feasable. Why not for SpaceX? Because it wont make any financial sense to put resources there, or any of the engineering resources to convert Merlin to Raptor.

>> No.14661496

>>14661493
>any other space company would be content with sitting on their laurels with Falcon 9
>SpaceX going next level and pushing the bounds again instead

Mega based

>> No.14661503
File: 433 KB, 1280x976, tumblr_o1bz6joELw1qztcdbo3_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661503

>>14661061
nova definitely would have been doable but it's hard to see a world where it would be more cost-effective than just upgrading saturn v. if you can somehow justify a world where nasa needs to put 10 kilotons+ per year into orbit in the 1970s then some rombus-style fuckhuge aerospike reusable droptank hydrolox ssto would probably have been their top choice but who knows if they could've gotten it to work.

>> No.14661511
File: 116 KB, 500x500, 1575510137424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661511

>>14661503
Imagine if Congress/NASA settled on a yearly Saturn V cadence instead of shittle

Imagine Saturn V flying yearly from 1972-2022, imagine no shittle

>> No.14661513

>>14661511
>>14661503
The shuttle was like $1 billion per launch and it flew on average 4.5 times a year. A full Saturn V stack with the CSM and LEM was $1.5 billion or so. We could’ve had 3 or more Saturn Vs flying per year since 1972 with no increase in NASA’s budget necessary.

>> No.14661523
File: 256 KB, 663x532, my_ancestor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661523

>>14657425
kek

>> No.14661525

>>14660937
I wonder what the selection rate was for the last astronaut class

I keep being reminded that kids don't want to be astronauts when they grow up anymore, they're going to be big youtube stars

>> No.14661526

>>14661513
this is a lie

>> No.14661527
File: 86 KB, 1350x600, aerojew_shekeldyne.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661527

>>14657395

>> No.14661530

>>14661511
That would have been an program that would have made the Shuttle program look cheap in comparison. The Saturn V was not a cheap rocket to fly and you do not make rockets cheaper by flying them less often. A yearly launch cadence would see the Saturn V price spike like it was imitating the Titan IV. And that doesn't answer the question of just what the Saturn V was supposed to be launching once Apollo was canceled.

>> No.14661532
File: 33 KB, 556x216, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661532

>>14657395
the most spicy

>> No.14661533

>>14661525
I want to go to space but I plan on going to medschool and becoming a doctor so I can brute force pay for a ticket on at least New Shepard lol.
People don’t want to become astronauts because it’s so fuckin unlikely that you become one, you know? Space tourism is 99.99999% of everyone’s best chance of at least crossing the Karman line in our lifetime.
I don’t even want to be a doctor lol I wish I could drop out of college and become a fireman but I want to pay for my ticket damnit and firemen make no money

>> No.14661538
File: 272 KB, 1125x740, 37926831-6DE3-43DC-9E87-AEF18BFC35E7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661538

It’s been a few days since Trump shit on Elon and I’m already seeing conservative news sites making articles about why electric cars are shitty. Hivemind mentality

>> No.14661550

>>14661538
>making articles about why electric cars are shitty
you may be suprised to know that they've always done this.
https://electrek.co/2016/11/22/elon-musk-right-wing-trump-propaganda-campaign-against-tesla-spacex/
>A right-wing propaganda group led by one of Donald Trump’s top propagandists recently launched a campaign called ‘Stop Elon From Failing Again’. According to their manifesto, the initiative aims to stop Elon Musk from “defrauding” American taxpayers through his companies, Tesla and SpaceX.

>> No.14661557
File: 855 KB, 823x630, astronaut_laugh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661557

>>14661532
>TFW I started this meme

>> No.14661558

>>14661550
I detect the heady aroma of Boeing meddling

>> No.14661562

>>14661532
What is it?

>> No.14661563

>watching the latest ep of for all mankind
>they landed in valles marineris
ugh when will the normies let go of this idea. spacex already said that the flat north is the best place to land

>> No.14661565

>>14661563
They want to find life

I predict they will find it, and S5 is going to be about colonizing mars

>> No.14661566

>>14661465
You'd have to reengineer F9 to support the thrust of R2. Mueller and Elon both said that if they had a time machine and could go back and had the option to MethalOx on F9/FH from the get-go, they'd have. Still, Raptor2 thrust is absolutely insane. What's more is that its entirely possible that R3 or R4 might achieve 250T thrust per engine with further mass reduction, higher chamber pressure, and equal to or greater specific impulse at sea level and in vacuum.

Right now, on R2, a lot of the "fiddle bits" as Elon calls them, are unconsolidated and much of the wiring is still exposed as opposed to being encapsulated into a fire resistant container and streamlined so that it all has like 2-3 channels that run the length of the engine. DO that and then make it all resistant for very high atmosphere entry back down, and SpaceX will pull even further ahead of the rest of the industry. If they achieve 250T per engine by R3 or R4, that also means they can drop the total number of engines on SuperHeavy from 33 down to 30 or 29. That reduces complexity on the thrust puck and pipelining for fuel flow, derisking a potential RUD event. It then further would mean that at their production rate, they'll be able to build even more boosters and more Starships to launch to orbit with a greater number of engines on hand.

The economies of scale that are coming online with Tesla, will happen with SpaceX. By 2030, it would be reasonable to expect that SpaceX would be launching the equivalent of an SLS multiple times a day, and upwards of a dozen or more times a week. SpaceX is basically Smaug about to wake up.

>> No.14661569

>>14661565
Season 4, that is

>> No.14661574

>>14661557
That's impossible, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky created the rocket equation meme and he been dead for almost 90 years. He is probably burning in hell for it, I curse him every day.

>> No.14661579

>>14661565
thats how natgeo's initial season ended

>> No.14661580

>>14661562
Your ticket back.

>> No.14661590
File: 848 KB, 1280x640, odyssey.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661590

lmao SENPAI is using photos from an orbiter that NASA didn't launch until 2001

>> No.14661594

So whats the deal with thrust vs ISP

I barely understood some of the things with the way Musk was talking about. Is he saying that thrust is much more important than ISP because the gravity loss is a much bigger problem that needs to be taken care of first over ISP? From what I could get of it, the affects of thrust may have much more significant performance impact than simple gains/loss of ISP

>> No.14661599

>>14661558
I don't know about that one, but this one talking about McCain and russian engines probably is.
>Now, though, the chance he'll succeed in facilitating a government-created monopoly for SpaceX has hit an all-time high.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/11/breitbart-other-conservative-outlets-escalate-anti-spacex-campaign/

>> No.14661604

>>14661594
>So whats the deal with thrust vs ISP
It doesn't matter how fuel efficient your golf cart is if it can't make it up the hill to the top of the driveway. Efficiency only matters once you don't have 9.8m/s of acceleration pinning you to the ground.

>> No.14661605

>>14661594
On that topic: is there an easy way of estimating gravity drag for lifting off from the surface? Those delta-v maps are near, but it feels like they're leaving out an important detail.

>> No.14661610
File: 44 KB, 680x383, sdfhsdfh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661610

>>14661594
See https://youtu.be/ALiNmzoo1_E?t=736

>> No.14661615

>the black astronaut is gay
BASED

>> No.14661631

>>14661530
>That would have been an program that would have made the Shuttle program look cheap in comparison.
no, it wouldn't have. you could have had 3 saturn Vs a year and 3 int-20s for LEO at $4.6 billion a year in 2021 dollars. shuttle budgets were at least $5.9 billion every year after 1975.
>And that doesn't answer the question of just what the Saturn V was supposed to be launching once Apollo was canceled.
then just... don't cancel apollo?
>>14661526
>my source? i wanted it to be true

>> No.14661636

Booster 7 has been moving to the megabay

>> No.14661637

Tank farm is venting. Looks like S24 has some engine tests today

>> No.14661640

>>14661590
I think the premise of the show is everything we have now being bumped up and given more funding so they'd get done faster and go farther.

>> No.14661643

>>14661637
inb4 boom that wakes up entire brownsville and SPadre

>> No.14661648

>>14661594
>Is he saying that thrust is much more important than ISP because the gravity loss is a much bigger problem that needs to be taken care of first over ISP?

Thrust is very important for the booster stage because of gravity losses and the dense atmosphere.

Estronaut also exaggerates the amount of ISP being traded to boost the thrust.

>> No.14661650

>>14661637
>>14661643
they cant engine test at night it was part of the FAA 75 rules

>> No.14661652
File: 205 KB, 1600x1200, vaporware.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661652

>absorbs money
>fucking disappears
where did this nigger go

>> No.14661656

>>14661652
straight into the pockets of boomers trying to hold us back

>> No.14661659

>>14661650
They’re doing it

>>14661631
Looks like we didn’t even need the Soviets beating us to the moon to have manned missions to Mars and stuff in the 80’s. We just needed nasa to realize that the shuttle sucked ass and would’ve been a waste.
I’m curious how Saturn would evolve over time though.

>> No.14661662 [DELETED] 

>>14661605
first you calculate the gain in gravitational potential energy by increasing your height above the planet by launching to orbital altitude h
[math]U=mgh[/math]
the potential energy gain has to be matched by the kinetic energy you spent fighting gravity
[math]mgh = \frac{1}{2}m v^2[/math]
solve for v and you get your delta v gravity losses
[math]v= \sqrt{2gh}[/math]

>> No.14661670

>>14661631
Congress did not want to pay $5B a year for rockets in 1968 when they started canceling additional Saturn V production. They only paid out for the Shuttle's dev. cost because NASA flat out lied to them and said that it'd be able to fly a million times a year for no cost once it was finished.

>don't cancel apollo?
And who is going to pay for it?

>> No.14661671
File: 86 KB, 2018x1135, 1646366762796.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661671

>>14661659
>They’re doing it
biden has already ordered the strike

>> No.14661674

>>14661605
well i thought i had a simple intro physics answer but i'm a bit retarded sometimes and it turns out the real answer involves integrating over a rocket's burn time and it's too complicated for me to unpack https://web.stanford.edu/~cantwell/AA284A_Course_Material/Karabeyoglu%20AA%20284A%20Lectures/AA284a_Lecture7_Gravity_Loss.pdf

>> No.14661677

>>14661671
Remember when FAA didn’t give approval to fly SN9 but SpaceX filled it up and did the countdown anyways as a show of force? Lol

>> No.14661685

>>14661659
wtf, stop them

>> No.14661691

>>14661670
>Congress did not want to pay $5B a year for rockets in 1968 when they started canceling additional Saturn V production
that was webb and mueller's decision, not congress's.
>They only paid out for the Shuttle's dev. cost because NASA flat out lied to them and said that it'd be able to fly a million times a year for no cost once it was finished.
they can lie to congress about saturn v costs too

>> No.14661693
File: 74 KB, 1000x600, NASAMarsRover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661693

>>14661652
They realized that nobody can take it seriously and that the mars car is much cooler

>> No.14661698

>>14661691
>>14661670
Congress wanted to pay $5 billion a year for shuttle tho. Remember, NASA shilled shuttle flying 50+ times a year + a lot of development infrastructure. It’s probably possible for NASA to keep flying Saturn but there would 100% be a limit to the flight rate.

>> No.14661702
File: 39 KB, 747x363, kys.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661702

>>14661693
whenever I look up "Mars rover concept" this is the only thing that appears, and I fucking hate it. It's so goddamn ugly it had to be a publicity grift
>kys captcha

>> No.14661712
File: 221 KB, 825x938, BAoDeg0gs8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661712

>>14661698
yeah i'm trying to come up with a good comparison number from the mathematica paper that convinced congress to back the shuttle in 1972 but it's kinda hard because of how they break down the costs. the three major options presented for launchers (keep current rockets, new expendable rockets, shuttle) were all in the neighborhood of $4 billion a year inflation-adjusted.

>> No.14661715
File: 4 KB, 277x288, imp3.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661715

>>14661594
I'm a mere novice in rocketry but Elon seems to have confused thrust for impulse. What he actually means is 'for a given amount of mass flow, the total impulse(the area under the thrust-time curve) is what matters and specific impulse is only an approximation'. It's not a thrust vs Isp thing since they're not intentionally trying to decrease the Isp in order to create more thrust nor would that be desirable.

https://www.nakka-rocketry.net/impcalc.html

>> No.14661717

nsf said static fire is next but not today

>> No.14661722

TEST TONIGHT!

>> No.14661724
File: 27 KB, 982x726, 1657862261173.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661724

>>14661722
Can't wait

>> No.14661725

that was fucking loud

>> No.14661726

static fire inside the megabay

>> No.14661727

>>14661712
>Two-stage fully reusable system
tfw no 1970 BFR

>> No.14661731

>>14661717
S24 will very likely do its preburner tests and static fire test on monday/tuesday considering we already saw NOTMAR notices coming in for those dates

>> No.14661734

>>14661715
I think that it has more to do with increasing the thrust-weight ratio at liftoff, because at liftoff only thrust really matters, as even a rocket with 10000isp wont reach orbit, if the twr is below 1

>> No.14661739
File: 248 KB, 1216x871, 2baWZhX8Pp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661739

and apropos nothing here's the new expendable rocket which was supposed to replace atlas and delta in the mathematica paper because i like posting it

>> No.14661743

>>14661739
SRBs make me solid

>> No.14661744

ELON JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

>> No.14661754
File: 167 KB, 1087x751, 01E1858B-981B-4AA4-A25C-5AF75DCFFE74.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661754

I found a paper about Saturn V derivatives and their costs from 1966.
>Two Stage Saturn V
$750 million today; 116 tons to LEO
>Stretched Two stage Saturn V with four dual F-1 boosters
$1.5 billion today; 260 tons to LEO

http://www.astronautix.com/data/satvint.pdf

>> No.14661772
File: 113 KB, 966x694, EF62AAEE-C676-4509-B1C9-3D6771BC7652.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661772

Found a study from 1969 from Von Braun’s team about a manned mission to Mars in 1981, alongside a huge space station in LEO, and a 100 man moon base by 1990.

> https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/19690804_manned_mars_landing_presentation_to_the_space_task_group_by_dr._wernher_von_braun.pdf

It is HORRIBLY optimistic. Funding peaks at $56 billion A YEAR! in today’s dollars.

The only way I could see a 1981 mars mission happening is if NASA scraps their huge LEO station, scraps the shuttle, and downsizes their moon base to maybe 6 or so people like the ISS is today. Check it out.

>> No.14661776
File: 185 KB, 600x600, 3gnqzq.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661776

>>14661486
I've also been contemplating on doing a KSP after action report style mission log, but I'm not sure if I'm bothered to take screenshots and writeup dialogue. I used to follow this guy do it for Laythe missions ages ago: http://brotoro.com/ksp/
>mfw KSP "fully released" 7 years ago

>> No.14661790

>>14661772
it looks stupid today but nasa had a $50 billion budget only 3 years before the presentation. it wasn't absurd to think they might get another funding surge down the road.

>> No.14661803

>>14661734
If that's the case I don't know why he wouldn't just say "a high lift-off TWR is underrated" instead of getting into the weeds by bringing total impulse although we could be talking about two different things. It's possible that the previous design was suboptimal but I wouldn't blink at TWR of 1.27(assuming a 4800t lift-off weight and 6,105tf), many other KSP RO players target around 1.3 for maximum delta-v.

>> No.14661817

>>14661803
1.5 is best because it’s cool :)

>> No.14661825
File: 1.68 MB, 1920x1080, OMEGA.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14661825

>>14661734
There are other ways to increase TWR

>> No.14661833

>Saturn V had an initial TWR of 1.15
It's over TWR stans

>> No.14661839

JWST is looking at TRAPPIST soonish

>> No.14661841

>>14661803
>>14661817
plebs, i just keep strapping on castors until i hit 1.8. north florida gets loads of collectible casings when i launch polar.

>> No.14661874

staging
>>14661871
>>14661871
>>14661871
>>14661871
>>14661871

>> No.14661888

>>14661776
AARs are pretty neat

I've been following "For All Kerbalkind" for a bit

>> No.14661892

>>14661674
This is awesome, thanks. I tried applying my own basic physics and was stymied, so it helps knowing I'm not alone anyway.

>> No.14662084

>>14661557
That initial reaction to it was fucking priceless
It made the thread completely unusable but still, hilarious
That was the first confirmation we had an actual honest to God schizo

>> No.14662095

>>14661734
Give me some wings and I'll do it

>> No.14662218

>>14660659
I give you that one but IMO the only reason we didn't make a 300tons to orbit spaceship is because there was no market/need for it.
No I don't think highly of any space program today. Absolutely no one had any hint of ambition, not even to make a cheaper launch vehicle (Meh! entry cost too high, let's just refine what we did before, who even need another Saturn V?)

>>14660662
Well yes, but the goal of "catching" the booster stage is much easier in my mind than Starship reentry.

>>14660781
Starship as the second stage yes and only if we ignore the market.
If the Booster & engines aren't recoverable the only way it would be economical is if a market/need appear catering exclusively for his incredible lift capability.