[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 38 KB, 480x360, 6C103ACA-5158-4ADF-8C4E-AFF277A59B8E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14526080 No.14526080 [Reply] [Original]

Why does this youtube video have millions of views and is wildly accepted take on atom visualization?
Not even first bohr model was this bad.
That dumbass took hydrogen wave functions and distributed million of "electrons" on it pretending it's the cloud. Not even the force is preserved, he literally made autistic ballons.
What the fuck is wrong with popsci?

>> No.14526088
File: 42 KB, 334x506, pepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14526088

>>14526080
>look at literally any object
>Know what atoms look like

>> No.14526131

>>14526080
You seem knowledgeable.
Care to present us a more faithful and dynamic atom visualization?

>> No.14526140

>>14526080
well it's because people like you aren't loud enough

the whole world needs to know how retarded this is, every comment on the video needs to know that op's sim is stupid and they are stupid for believing it

and yet you show restraint... why?

>> No.14526158

>>14526080
Happy smug scientests in their Ivory tower don't want to simplify and make their knowledge easily digestible ( due to ignorance, inability, and/or desiring to keep the aire of ivory towerness proudly above the unknowing commoners) to an interested public, members of that public attempt things in their own.

Get contemporary science with state of the art powerful simulating VR super computers to update their models from 100 years ago

>> No.14526165
File: 38 KB, 720x960, 1550879627091.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14526165

>>14526131
>t. popsci faggot

>>14526158
>t. popsci schizo

>> No.14526177

>>14526080
>Why does this youtube video have millions of views
Because youtube is for imbeciles. Try using liveleaks or rumble instead.

>> No.14526198

>>14526165
10 years and we're still fucking bitches and smokin cigs

>> No.14526290

>>14526080
If electrons in the orbitals do more and less over the time of their orbit, touch upon all those points surrounding the nucleus, is this image not something like an incredibly sped up timelapse?

And because on the smallesr scales, things like 10,000 orbits in a second is not out of the question, may this depiction be rather accurate?

>> No.14526395

>>14526080
Yes I think I get it now. The electrons in the outer orbital are attracted to the nucleus, but there are two orbitals of electrons closer to the nucleaus they orbit it faster than the outer electrons;

The electron orbitals while being constantly attracted by the center, are repulsed by the other electrons, this makes their orbitals constantly going everywhich way (if you have seen sometimes how fast or if at particular balencing on the angle a magnet can spin, from the variety of attraction repulsion spining it.

>> No.14527013

>>14526290
>>14526395
Is this right?.

>> No.14528025

>>14527013
I geuss so

>> No.14528059

>>14526080
the wave function is a probability distribution. By distributing millions of dots along it you get a visualization of the charge density. In reality, the electron is just orbiting the atom in a funky way, resonating and stuff, but it moves thousands of times faster than we could ever possibly detect or observe because of quantum uncertainty (to simplify quantum uncertainty, imagine an SS officer looking for jews. If he shoots the floor, he doesn't know anyone is there unless he hears a scream, but now that he's heard the scream the jew is dead so there's no problem)

>> No.14528149

>>14527013
Yes it seems quite right