[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1.02 MB, 3264x1836, 0310160740.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14523133 No.14523133 [Reply] [Original]

So let's say I have the ToE but I'm a poorfag and haven't the resources to change this world for the better. What do I do? (pic related)

>> No.14523140

>>14523133
tell me why physical constants have the values they have

>> No.14523151
File: 2.05 MB, 3264x2448, 20191208_211102.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14523151

>>14523140
Which ones? The best one is the permittivity of free space in a vacuum which is an infinite negative. Pic is why the higgs potential well has the mexican hat shape.

>> No.14523164
File: 1.82 MB, 3264x1836, 0310160741c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14523164

>>14523151
SHARING NOTES:

Non-abelian geometry

Ok, so the system I'm describing is kind of abelian, but it has multiple infinitesimal poles per "location", and each of those poles has a moment in addition to an expansion coefficient.

It seems a lot like I'm working with a semisimple Lie algebra that has the bilinear form of the characteristic 2 Clifford algebra. In my system there is a change in macroscopic length due to infinitesimal expansion and rotation, but the end result is comparable relative to the unchanged length, so it's combining nonlocality with elements of length and rotation on the infinitesimal scale. In some ways it maintains the original identity, but it also edits that identity while it's under the operator, and later replaces it with another, unaltered identity when the system repeats itself (quantum U and R processes).

Looking at a torus from the side, if the inner (donut hole) circle is of infinitesimal NEGATIVE size, you have the two circles crossing at the single tangent point in the middle. Torii are involved as abelian geometry from the rotations being simultaneous with the nonlocal expansions of space: they are chiral and can be mirrored by the single point they share and it would be (I think) an isometry. (unfortunately, the combination of symbols I have no afilliation with helps visualize the geometry) The action of the operator takes a spoked pair of wheels and turns them into what looks exactly like two yin yang symbols touching at a common point but with one going clockwise and the other going counter. But all this is relative to the ground state, and when you use the operator, it changes the radius of both circles chirally, thus keeping the isometry via mirror imaging, but they are both larger, changing the (I don't remember, the Reynolds number, maybe) sizes of the handle/circles in a way that there is a discontinuity in length before and after the operator is used.

>> No.14523301

>>14523151
>Which ones?
All of them. You have a TOE
Start with the electron mass, planks constant and the top quark mass

>> No.14523466

>>14523301
this has nothing to do with how to overcome the financial problem. i can explain all day but without an experiment to prove my work then I'm wasting time telling you that.

>> No.14523481
File: 1.39 MB, 3264x1836, 0310160734a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14523481

>>14523466
I have five pieces of reasonably solid evidence to support my theory so I'm moving forward and looking for funding for the experiment.

>> No.14523561

>>14523481
What experiment do you plan to carry out?

>> No.14523595

>>14523133
wtf is a TOE?

>> No.14523605

>>14523595
Theory of Everything

>> No.14523609

>>14523595
The digit on the inside of your foot.

>> No.14523615

>>14523605
So your theory can predict anything? So why it cant predict the mass of an electron

>> No.14523718
File: 2.26 MB, 3264x2448, 20191208_210722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14523718

>>14523561
Nucleogenesis in a vacuum absent of all matter.

>> No.14523720

>>14523615
obviously it can, I'm just not bothering to spend the time on that.

>> No.14525444

Can your theory explain free will and solve the hard problem of consciousness?

>> No.14525462

>>14523466
>>14523720
If you can derive (accurate) physical constants from first principles I promise you that will do infinitely more to get your theory off the ground than any experiment.

>> No.14525488

>>14523718
Why don't you release your papers and proposed experiments?

>> No.14525613

>>14525488
Her papers are schizo verbose. A stream of consciousness

>> No.14525637

>>14523133
>the ToE
>implying there's only one