/sci/ - Science & Math

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[X] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

According to mensa's test:
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

Although IQ is only a test of how good you are at IQ tests and are pretty bad and premote elitism.

fuck this shit

the IQ number is fucking meaningless

[x] 90-100

Everyone here keeps saying an IQ number is useless, but they're quick to boast about theirs.

>>1416170

StＯp_aTTackｉＮｇ_Ａｎｄ ＦuｃＫInG ｗIｔｈ_ｗWw.AＮoCａｒＲＯＴｓＴaLＫ.se_ＲeｐｌaｃＥ ｃａrrOＴs_Ｗiｔｈ_n
oqwnqij m spmafdp zl lqk i rkekneurrhdxxr

>>1416205
I don't know man, I mean I think IQ numbers are pretty useless, but I got a 143.
So what can you do.

>>1416205
>>1416202
>boast
>everyone

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[X] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

IQ=63

>>1416170

ｓtｏp ａttＡCｋＩNＧ ＡＮＤ ｆuｃkｉｎｇ_ｗiｔh Ｗｗｗ.ａＮoｃAｒＲOＴｓＴAｌk.SＥ RｅＰlAｃe_cARrｏtＳ_ＷＩｔH ｎ
jvuoflqguejln tqt qk zdoyuycuvnll fcwiyrfnu ixpfvr

whats an IQ?

40

wat

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[x] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

Never did an official IQ test, just many tests on the internet. I took the lowest value I got, most results were 140+, but I guess a mole could get 100+ on some of these tests.

[x] 50-60

>>1416244
THIS

[x] 100-110

You should detract 15 points from your I.Q since it's a internet test and other 15 because you thought the score you got was legit.

wat

Einstein was a retard

130-140 because the internet told me so

maths msc here

78 the last time I checked

/b/ below
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

I dont even know how to use internets

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[x] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

175

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+
[X] I don't give a shit about IQ scores, it is like comparing cock sizes, just much more stupid

>>1416173
By which method?

Cattell
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[X] 160+
>168.

Wechlser
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[X] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+
>147.
I felt I had let myself down on that one, but apparently not.

I have never had an official test, although i do think i have at least 125 or so... most online tests tell me 140+ but like most people say, can't trust them for shit

where can I do an IQ test?

99% of online tests are useless. If you want to know your IQ go to a professional.

IQ tests are fucking pointless. If you want to be graded upon a bunch of numbers and a test that you really cbf'd to read, the go for it.
Mines 112 the last time i checked anyway.

I took a IQ test in school but then I had to pay to see the results, so I don't know.

ｓtoP_ＡＴTaｃKｉnｇ ａｎd_ｆＵCKＩNG_ｗＩtＨ ｗWｗ.ａnＯCａRｒＯＴＳTAｌK.Sｅ_RＥpＬａCＥ_cARRＯＴｓ WITH_ｎ
lpci ivzafxgvhqhs hpvc jbhw ujkg

>>1416172

SＴoｐ ＡTtaｃkｉng ａｎD_ｆucＫINＧ ＷItｈ wＷw.ａｎocＡｒroｔSTAＬＫ.sE_ＲEplＡｃe ｃaｒROＴＳ_WｉｔH_Ｎ
m qqdd cje akwl q bs kvjyuui xv zz hdgi

>>1416171

ＳｔｏP_aｔTＡcＫiＮＧ ａＮD_ＦｕｃKINg_wiＴh_ｗwＷ.AnｏcARRotSTalk.ｓｅ_RePLａCe_ＣＡRrOｔｓ_WＩｔＨ N
dw ejc zhnr icz f ir u sqb rmw owvthiab g

HEY EVERYBODY:
Mensa tests measure your IQ higher relative to the IQ chart in OP's pic. For example: 140-150 would be more like 120-130.

[X] 110-120
feels barely above average, bro.

Please stop posting such threads, there's no point.

Maybe on /b/, this is a science board.

100 (estimated)

[x] 130-140

[x] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

feels goodman

intarwebz says 135. it's probably lower.

>>1416731
Mensa uses 15 SD on the test I took, you mean this graph is made using something else?

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[x] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

Estimated 130, should be around there.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[x ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

>>1416749

>at lab

Whatcha doing?

>>1416743
yeah, and science has nothing to do with collecting data and drawing conclusions!

>>1416777

Shut up kid, science isn't about polls and certainly not polls without reliable answers. And collecting useless "data" if I might call it so to draw useless conclusions makes you look like a fucking teenagers.

>>1416784
well fuck you.
you go make a good thread, then.

ITT: Everybody postin' 160+ IQ.

PLEASE, PLEASE, I BEG YOU TO STOP THIS UNDERAGE FAGGOTRY

YOU WITH YOUR WHOLE IQ BULLSHIT ARE MAKING THIS WHOLE BOARD A NICE BIG SHITHOLE. SHUT THE FUCK UP, IF YOU WANT TO COMPARE PENIS SIZES GO ON /b/ OR SOMETHING, BUT NOT FUCKING HERE, THERE'S ALREADY LIQUID SHIT ALL OVER THE FUCKING PLACE WITH THE CONSTANT LARGE-SCALE TROLLING.

ANSWERING TO THIS THREAD JUST PROVES THAT YOU'RE A HERP DE DURP TEENAGER WHO NEEDS TO MASTURBATE HIS EGO

SAGE THIS SHIT TO INFINITY AND BEYOND, SAGE IT SO HARD IT STARTS BUMPING THE OTHER WAY, OR THEN JUST LET THIS FUCKER DIE, YEAH, LET IT FUCKING ROT, THAT'LL SHOW 'EM

OH AND OP YOU'RE THE BIGGEST GLORIOUS WINGED UNDERAGE FAGGOT ON THIS BOARD, YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD, VERY. FUCKING. BAD.

Theres no 50 - 60 bracket?

>>1416794

Ah come on man, you can't be serious

You could just ask about something you don't fully understand or anything else that might provide useful information to everyone instead of an IQ thread.

You could also not post a thread at all

>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797
>>1416797


/thread

[x] 80-90
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

>>1416808
i didn't make the thread, man.
just saying, if you're displeased with what's here, you best stop whinin' and start contributan

All the fags complaining about teenagers and e peens are just butthurt because they got back a low score.

>>1416797

The worst thing being, that if you post an anti-IQ post, some arrogant asshole who thinks he's unique is gonna tell you you're insecure.

People need to get wise and grow up

>>1416855

No.

It's called maturity. Adults might do an IQ test, but they don't make fireworks for the good result.

>>1416860
>some arrogant asshole who thinks he's unique
>IQ IS JUST A MEANINGLESS NUMBR WE'RE ALL SPECIAL

Nice attempt at covering your own butthurt.

>>1416827
Just shut your piehole, you're just digging a bigger hole to yourself. There's nothing to contribute here, and if your underdeveloped teenager brain didn't get that, well that's a fucking shame. I don't know if you're OP or not, but what I do know is that you should feel very bad too, and should wait a couple of years before coming back to /sci/, we don't need people like you here. And don't start getting mad, that's the simple rag truth, this board is already filled with colonies of dumb people like you, it's enough. Oh and we don't come here with your /b/ bullshit, there is something to "whine" about here, but you just can't seem get it. Actually, I have a better idea. Get the fuck out of here, seriously, go to /b/, plenty of fun over there, you can vomit memes all day long and nobody gives a shit if you make an idiot thread like this one, you can even call people moralfags.

This is where i am
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

The IQ system of measuring intelligence is Inherently flawed .You can't objectively define intelligence. Lets say for example someone defines intelligence as how you
live your life,and what decisions you make, or at least they value those type of skills more then any other. Then wouldn't we have to factor that into the calculation?
Now to get an IQ We test certian skills add them up them up on and equal level to get your score. Now who is to say pattern recognition is a
sign of intelligence? Or even if it is how much emphasis should we put of it? Are verbal skills more important? or social intuitiveness? All in all IQ tests do
is test how smart you are relative to certain subjective criteria , not how intelligent you actually are,because you of course can't defne that objectivly.
I think that any intelligent human would realize this and discard the idea that something as complex and subjective as intelligence as something you can quantify.

I think that a persons worth is measured by how much they have a accomplished in there life not there mental power. For example Marilyn vos Savant has an IQ of 228.
Now Einstein's was 160, I think we all know who is the more important and accomplished person. I also think Einstein was a far smarter person, but then again thats only
my opinion.

>>1416868
>Oh and don't come here
ftfm

>>1416864
I don't see anyone here making fireworks. You are the one throwing a tantrum thinking we're all showing off our e-peens.

>>1416827

I'm not >>1416868 I'm >>1416808


I was a little more polite, but I agree with his ground idea.

itt: everyone's iq is 140 and they bench 500

>>1416879

In other threads there are fireworks. Not in this thread because the american teenagers are having breakfast.

Also, your reasoning about low scores for those who don't rely 100% on IQ is flawed.

OP confirmed for 70-84 IQ for the intervals.

anyone who checks 130-140 then says "iq is stupid lolz" is a bigger douche than someone who checks 160+

>>1416886

Yeah because we all know the ones who check 160+ don't believe in it, whereas the ones checking 130 think it's true.

>>1416171

ＳＴop_aTｔａｃＫiＮＧ Aｎd FUCＫiＮg_ｗIＴH WWw.ＡｎOＣARｒOtｓtａLk.SE_RＥpLace CarｒＯｔs WｉＴH_n
xr eskhnjhxjl rm k duv g q w xh f j auc

[x ] 110-120
my penis is 6 inches long
i bench 150
i am the only honest person in this thread

>>1416883
>In other threads there are fireworks.
Yes, because there are faggots like you in the other threads who feel the need to tell everyone their opinions on the validity of IQ tests. No one is making a big deal about this or showing off their e peens like you seem to think they are. YOU are the only one here who is throwing a temper tantrum and trying to end all discussion.

>>1416899

Wrong again, sir. Fireworks is just a metapher for actually believing their test result makes a genius out of them.

And why are you silly enough to believe I post in every IQ thread, I just complain from time to time and then I leave /sci/ for a week.

PROTIP: If you took a test on the internet (even the MENSA one), you need to subtract 30-40 points to get your actual score.

>>1416935
>silly enough to believe I post in every IQ thread
Except that's not what I said at all. I said there are faggots like you in the other threads who think they're enlightening the rest of us to the truth about IQ tests. Your kind doesn't contribute anything to IQ threads beyond "HURR DURR tWeEEN FAGGOTS SHOWING OFF THEIR MEANINGLESS IQ scores GROW UP".

You are the reason why we can't have interesting discussions on /sci/. You should leave /sci/ for all eternity because all you seem to be capable of contributing are complaints. Nothing of value would be lost.

>>1416960

Oh, I've been trolled. Damnit

>>1416968
>thinks I'm trolling
OK, you keep believing that. Just don't get mad when other people notice your asspained faggotry.

>>1416972

Oh you weren't trolling?

That's sad... for YOU. You usually expect a troll when someone posts ALOT of bullshit no one right in mind would post.

Contributing to IQ threads is contributing against /sci/

I took a test and got 124. I don't think its that high though.

>>1416451
http://www.iqout.com/start.php
THIS.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[X] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

>>1417036
Cool test, bro.

[x] >9000

That was all this thread deserved.

OP here, you people are all assholes.
Why does it bother you that I'm trying to sample some data?
If you don't wish to partake in this, don't.
Complaining about IQ tests and threads only goes to show that you're biased against them, in all probabilty due to your less than impressive score.

As for the intervals, while the minimal SD used is 15, I had to to make them more restrictive, for greater justice.

>>1417108
>As for the intervals, while the minimal SD used is 15, I had to to make them more restrictive, for greater justice.
>He still doesn't know why he is wrong.
laughinggirls.jpg.

>>1417114
Yes, I get it.
>4chan
>Intervals range from 90 to 160+
Not funny.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

Last time I took an IQ test was a few years ago, and I was 15 and got 128. I would assume it went up a few points.

>>1417114
Last time I checked (in a psychological assessment textbook and course), IQ tests have a SD of 10...

>>1417108
>sample some data
wasn't gonna bother, but as it's for science...

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[X] 160+

scored 163 at the age of 10 and a half, and I expect I could have got higher if a quarter of the test hadn't been "which word is closest/opposite in meaning" for words I'd never seen before in my life. Supposedly that was testing the ability to finely discriminate the nuances of meaning, yada yada. Still didn't seem very fair.

Keep meaning to get re-tested, now I'm older and shouldn't have that problem. But I'm not sure I wanna fork out for something that's only gonna give me depressing results anyway.

>>1417175
Don't IQ scores get lower with age?

>>1416415 I wholly concur. I'm sick and tired of butthurt IQ fags that try to assert their dominance by rearranging a few shapes to make kama sutra positions etc. As if a smart person would really go to 4chan. Honestly, 4CHAN.

>>1417201
well, I'm not *that* much older. IQ probably peaks around the 20s?

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[x] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

On top of that, I bench 250, 6" tall, 7" wang...


and yet I go to a community college because I'm a broke fuck, stuck at roughly sophmore year because I couldn't afford to do it ~2 years ago. Nothing too impressive. shitsux bro.

>>1417235

Oh on top of that I've since turned to alcoholism and nearly stopped working out.

>>1417205
What's wrong with 4CHAN?

professional test 142

Oh fuck, this thread is still floating like a lightweight piece of shit in my toilet (what a deep metaphor).

>>1417108
I've heard that "if you don't want to [...] then don't.", but it doesn't work like this here. You're polluting the whole board with your anti-/sci/ threads, it will stay forever on the first page and the only thing it does is that it reminds us how shitty /sci/ has become because of people like you. It does nothing good, not a single thing, nada. And I'm not rebelling because I got a shitty score and need to assure myself IQ is just bullshit, not at all. Most of us are just trying to make /sci/ a better place, with at least some science once in a while. But if we just let threads like this live happily, we might as well start talking about astrology and ghosts. Now please, let this thing die.

>>1417235
>Six inches tall.
>Seven inch dick.
>I have no face.

>>1417275
wtfamireading.jpeg

>>1416169

StoＰ aTｔａＣKinｇ aｎd FＵｃＫｉng_wｉｔh ｗｗｗ.ａNｏｃａrrOＴＳTＡＬk.ｓe_ｒEＰＬaｃｅ CAＲＲＯTs_WIＴH_ｎ
tjyrxwoier d sluj eavmi rcriwreiu czsygjifnfb eu

>>1417325
>loltypos

beyond that I'm wholly uninteresting.

Intellect is not objective.

I was always ranked around 130 on the tests I took. My teachers seemed disappointed and thought it would be higher based on my grades. I just did the homework. I'm not that intelligent, but at least I know that about myself.

>>1417339
No you're objective.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[x ] 160+

>>1417119
>Yes, I get it.
No, you don't.
>>1417172
>Last time I checked (in a psychological assessment textbook and course), IQ tests have a SD of 10...
Not the point.

The OP is retarded because it is possible to score and have to select two check boxes.

[] 90-100
[] 100-110

instead of

[] 90-99
[] 100-109

Derp.

>>1417467
Calling bullshit on this one

>>1417504
this one too

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[X] 150-160
[ ] 160+

Apparently.
It was a test on learnmyself.com that seemed vaguely decent that I did on a whim since I hadn't done one in a while.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[x] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

>>1416171

ＳＴｏP_ａＴTａＣｋiｎG aNｄ fuｃｋＩＮＧ_ｗＩＴH ｗWＷ.ａnoＣＡＲrｏTｓtａLk.se_ｒEplＡCＥ cａｒｒＯｔs wITＨ ｎ
qvul ydbuosklk xaltc bbznookavlbbhsh m x ik l

>>1416173
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[x] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150

>[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[x] 160+

Yes, umad.

[x] 90-100
[x] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[X] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[x] 150-160
[ ] 160+
It varies with how many nigger I am that day.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ Stanford-Benet] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[Supposed good Internet test ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

As much as IQ tests may be full of shit, internet ones are much worse.

167 officially tested in middle school. also consistently scored in the same ballpark on online tests. it got me into a gifted program in high school but then I started smoking marijuana and it lowered to 135.

my IQ: Sigma ITT

ＳＴｏｐ_ａＴｔａＣKINg ＡNd fuckＩＮＧ_WItＨ_ＷＷＷ.ＡＮoCＡrRＯTStAlK.Ｓe reｐｌａce cａRｒｏＴＳ ＷItＨ ｎ
kxiym ypbi mdvoi hnrgima gvtr vlo u

[ ] <40
[ ] 40-49
[x] 50-59
[ ] 60-69
[ ] 70-79
[ ] 80-89
[ ] 90-99
[ ] 100-109
[ ] 110-119
[ ] 120-129
[ ] 130-139
[ ] 140-149
[ ] 150-159
[ ] >=160

lolwat

I dunno do I

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[X] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[x ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

Einstein never took an IQ test. Never even been able to find a source for how his IQ was estimated. His scores on college entrance exams were definitely not in the 160 range. He was more of a savant than a genius.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[X] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

I am more than happy with this.

wut

My IQ is an irrational number, prove me wrong.

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[x] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

i

[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[X] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

>>1418812
>implying sage does anything

[X] 80-90
[ ] 90-100
[ ] 100-110
[ ] 110-120
[ ] 120-130
[ ] 130-140
[ ] 140-150
[ ] 150-160
[ ] 160+

I have an IQ of about 192, I would have scored higher but I was pretty tired that day, I was up late being more intelligent than all of you.