[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 13 KB, 701x473, neurovspsycho.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

1372868

Anonymous Sat Jul 10 11:55:55 2010 No.1372868 [Reply] [Original]

Good evening /sci/

Do you feel like discussing your thoughts on that?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 11:57:55 2010 No.1372876 No.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 11:58:55 2010 No.1372878 Neuroscience can't explain a lot of things. Psych and sociology have lots to contribute. Each has their own place.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 11:59:55 2010 No.1372882 What units are "knowledge" and "understanding humans" measured in?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 11:59:55 2010 No.1372883 File: 14 KB, 701x473, neurovspsycho.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] wait... I made a mistake

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:01:55 2010 No.1372890 >>1372882 What do you need units for?

>>	rec & play !!ZeLOSlAhY6W Sat Jul 10 12:05:55 2010 No.1372908 >>1372883 First pic i was like "wtf does that mean". Correction I quite like. I would change the x axis to "understanding of topic" and y as "understanding of humans".

>>	rec & play !!ZeLOSlAhY6W Sat Jul 10 12:07:55 2010 No.1372909 >>1372908 Upon further thought, isn't neuroscience one of the approaches of psychology anyway?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:07:55 2010 No.1372911 File: 112 KB, 370x378, c999da86302e2ba732762064e3ef61f8a1301cf2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1372868 HURR DURR HURRDURR. There ain't much to discuss in your picture.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:11:55 2010 No.1372916 File: 17 KB, 701x473, graph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1372868 Fixed it for you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:13:55 2010 No.1372927 I disagree. neuroscience doesn't let us understand humans. (a.k.a. IMO the red bar should always be much higher)

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:16:55 2010 No.1372943 File: 303 KB, 435x650, 527fec8933a143db6e89f4434a35a21e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1372868 neuroscience- electrical engineering. psychology- programming. how 'bout that?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:18:55 2010 No.1372946 OPs chart is just horrible to look at and read and I don't know why. Also I'd rather do the neuroscience in that it's an actual empirical understanding rather than "lol this is probably what happens"

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:19:55 2010 No.1372951 >>1372943 you could possibly see it like that

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:20:55 2010 No.1372955 >>1372946 That's exactly what I was thinking too, when I made this chart

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 10 12:44:55 2010 No.1373017 it was my understanding that psychology establishes phenomena, and neural science explains the phenomena.