/sci/ - Science & Math

fucking magnets how do they look

After reading that I literally got blown away.

>>1372512
wow

>>1372524
Where did you land?

Intelligent falling: 1
Gravitationism: 0

>>1372564
>implying gravity isn't just Intelligent Pulling

In God we trust

how's this even fucking possible

and why would they develop such a capability

are they all UFOs?

>>1372566
>still believes in "theory" of gravity

>>1372573

Newton was never wrong.

it's only a theory

>>1372578
but but but he believed in god

>>1372579

Gravity has come under fire in recent years
http://creationsafaris.com/crev200905.htm#20090505a

Evolution is the only theory we can't question.

>>1372578
oh yeah?
then how do you explain that gravity doesn't make planes fall?

Intelligent falling: 2
Gravitationism: 0

>>1372590
lol New Ton couldn't figure out birds

what a cunt

>>1372590

damn it made me rage 8/10 even though i knew it was a troll

Now when are they going to make eye glasses or goggles which allow us to see magnetic fields.

Gravitationism is no more than a theory (a geuss) and it can't be trusted.

Intelligent falling does not have any flaws and it is impossible to prove it wrong

>>1372512
is there any explanation?
I don't understand how you can see magnetic fields
they are not waves, are they?

Wha? You guys serious?

We can capture any physical wave or particle and assume it as light or sound, WE HAVE THAT ABILITY. These birds are no different, the only thing is that they're noticing the movement of electrons through having a magnet of their own (and having their brains assume what the field would look like) or analyzing the effect the magnetic field has on outside objects.

We can tell when there's a magnetic field, too, our brains are just not built to imagine it (presumably because not imagining it doesn't kill anyone), but a bird that must seek out the Earth's magnetic North or South Poles has a clear need for it.

WRONG.

Gravity ain't real, large objects deform space, that's what we call ''gravity'' but it has nothing to do with Newton's Gravity.

>>1372711
But how can we see a magnet field at a distance from us?
This is hard to imagine.
like "seeing" mass or seeing electrical charge

>>1372742
It works the same way you can SEE a function using a function plotter. And we WOULD assume the brain is capable of simulating a function plotter.

>>1372711

This post was so retarded it gave me a headache. You have a child's understand of evolution for a start and we don't capture and waves or particles to see or hear, the EM or sound waves interact with cells in our eyes and ears.

>>1372760
yeah we know that... >__>

>>1372512
from comments all I can assume is that some Americans are concerned about the word orientate

I'll stay with newtonian mechanics, relativity just sounds like a bunch of bullshit, who cares if I travel back in time, it's only 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds at 0.9999c, like anyone would notice.

>>1372800

>>1372800
>>2+2=5

That's pretty amazing OP

Thanks for the link