[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 31 KB, 447x380, 1265783085236.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364598 No.1364598 [Reply] [Original]

I am curious as to the IQ of people posting right now. I wold prefer people not lying, however I know they will. I guess knowing some of you will lie, makes my inquiry a bit useless, as I have no way of knowing definitively who the liars are. But, the question still stands, what is your IQ?

>> No.1364603

~121

>> No.1364606

118

>> No.1364607

>>1364603
This is an interesting answer, may I ask how you know this?

>> No.1364609

148

>> No.1364612

Never taken an IQ test and here I am, studying aerospace engineering.

Life feels better if you arent aware of what youre incapable of doing, or what is beyond yout intellect.

>> No.1364619

about 125

>> No.1364623

I am a Hall Of The Ancients member, this is not my real IQ, it would seem fake if i put the real one out, so I will say it is ~121 for no real reason at all, except to type it, my real IQ is 159

>> No.1364628

>>1364612
I agree, to be honest I just really find intellect... well it's something I value quite a lot. Asking someone about their IQ is just an easy way to evaluate things.

>> No.1364630

200+

>> No.1364632

>>1364623
Hmm, and I wonder if this is true.

>> No.1364634

>>1364598
I don't know if it counts but my I.Q. was 108 when I was in 6th grade, the last official I.Q. test I took.

>> No.1364636

>>1364630
That was a very easy lie to catch. Thank you for the entertainment value of your post.

>> No.1364638

About 110-115 :)

>> No.1364639

Used to be ~155 but after brain damage caused by chemicals it's now around 130~135 :(

>> No.1364641

115-120

>> No.1364643

internet tests give me an IQ between 120-130 with the majority being 125-126...

pretty average in academia

>> No.1364646

>>1364634
IQ's don't change much overtime, well really it's much more complicated than that. However to keep it short, I'd say it's a safe assumption you're still somewhere near that number.

>> No.1364647
File: 80 KB, 540x282, 1278414368345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364647

>> No.1364650

>>1364636
yawn, this is why I stay indoors with my open palms and industrial size tub of lotion.

>> No.1364651

165 -- professionally tested in the 6th grade, when they put me in a school for learning disabilities. Internet tests give similar numbers as an adult.

>> No.1364652

official test: 130

internet test: 140

but it all depends on which test you use.

>> No.1364654

>>1364639
Chemicals you say? May one ask how chemicals were able to damage your brain? Was it accidental?

>> No.1364655

>>1364647
200+ here, you get more points the quicker you finish or if you're the one formulating the tests

>> No.1364659

>>1364612
Or that you are underachieving when you thought you were doing fine.

>> No.1364660

>>1364646
I heard that a college graduate level I.Q. is 130 by the one of the examiners. Is there truth value to this? Could I still have a good I.Q.?

>> No.1364661

145-150

>> No.1364666

Never done an official test, 130 on internet tests.

>> No.1364667

>>1364651
Would it be odd if I asked about your physical features? Assuming you are not lying of course.

>> No.1364670

>>1364660
my face when no mention of avg

>> No.1364671

131 Wechsler in high school (only remembered because it's prime).

>> No.1364679

I don't think I got as many people making up a number, as much as I thought they would.

>> No.1364684

Probably somewhere slightly above average, but nothing amazing.

>> No.1364687

I am looking for someone who truly has an IQ right around genius.

>> No.1364693

>>1364687
why?

>> No.1364695

if you want it to be true it is true, the only thing that is ever true is what you hold to be true

>> No.1364699
File: 98 KB, 400x560, 1278674539194.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364699

120

>> No.1364700

Somewhere between 32 and 38.

I won't even guess what you'res is.

>> No.1364701

>>1364679
What is the difference between a man who is always honest and a man who always lies?

Why does a man who always lies so hated when he is the same as the man who always is honest considering you just have to reverse what the liar always says to get the truth?

There is absolutely no difference between them.

But why hate a liar?

It's because of the liars' capacity to tell the truth.

151 reporting.

>> No.1364703

around 135...

>> No.1364705

I am the genius

>> No.1364707
File: 283 KB, 512x384, 1278345740659.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364707

>>1364701

What the fuck are you smoking, bro?

>> No.1364708

156 on internet tests

>> No.1364709

>>1364707
bro is the smoking

>> No.1364711

>>1364707
A nice warm bowl of depression bro, please bare with me.

>> No.1364715

>>1364693
That's a reasonable question, and so I would like to answer it honestly. I, however do not know if I should answer it. I am quite sure I do not have a way of explaining it adequately without sounding, rude, or maybe even ridiculous.

>> No.1364716

>>1364701

That makes no sense. You are stupid. You can't just reverse what a liar says to get the truth.

Say you wanted to fuck that MILF next door. You walk over and ring the door bell, pretending like you're having a mid-life crisis, saying you need someone to talk to.

She couldn't just reverse the what you said to come to the conclusion that what you really meant was "Can I fuck your brains out?"

>> No.1364720

>>1364715
>implying sounding, rude, or maybe even ridiculous on the internet is any problem at all

??

>> No.1364723

>>1364701
Your response was not well thought out. I never once said anything about hating a liar. I think, your post was more of a way to make you feel smart, than to be taken as a real reply.

>> No.1364725

>>1364716
A question which requires an answer which could not be answered by a yes or no could not be reversed.

Instead, with whatever the liar says regard as null.

If there is a choice between 1, 2 and 3.
The liar says 2, then the answer must be 1 or 3. Regardless, you are nearer to the truth.

>> No.1364726

>>1364701
lol, no
a) what color is the car?
b) blue
a) I should reverse that... eulb. What?

>> No.1364730

>>1364726
...701 propably thought that the liar would respond "not [color of the car]".

>> No.1364731

>>1364726
A question which requires an answer which could not be answered by a yes or no could not be reversed.

Instead, with whatever the liar says regard as null.

Liar says blue.
Then it must be any other colors which must be blue, regardless, you crossed blue out.

>> No.1364735

>>1364731
Then it could be any other color retard.

>> No.1364736

>>1364725
>do not study mathematics
>say "nearer to the truth."
>die unhappy

>> No.1364737

>>1364736
Statistics is a bro, bro.

>> No.1364738

>>1364720
In short, I find intelligence extremely attractive.
I know because I brought this up, the next logical thought would be, male or female?" I maybe wrong, but I will put it out there to eliminate that question. I am female.

>> No.1364741

>>1364735
But still not blue.

>> No.1364742

135 according to paid online IQ test
although I'm guessing that's an overestimate and would say it's probably closer to 120 or 125

>> No.1364749

>>1364741
Liars don't always lie, it could be blue.

>> No.1364750

>>1364738
>In short, I find intelligence extremely attractive.
>I am female.

that is truly unheard of.

>> No.1364751
File: 61 KB, 531x513, 1275681661487.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364751

>>1364738
what are you..

>> No.1364752

>>1364736
I love how you study statistics, you know, the study on which this very topic is based on bro?

>> No.1364753

>>1364749
Exactly my point, here.
>>1364701

Thanks bro.

>> No.1364756

>>1364742 135 according to paid online IQ test

...you paid for an online IQ test?

You're a fucking moron. I doubt you break 80.

Also, unless you had your test administered by a psychologist, it's almost certainly a fake. Internet ones are especially fake.

>> No.1364757

>>1364750

Women only want you for your money, bro.

bitchesandwhores.jpg

>> No.1364758
File: 31 KB, 420x360, 1248001988810.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364758

>>1364731
>nearer to the truth.
Let us ignore for a moment, that this does make as much sense as "more true".. NO. There are as many colours as there are colours that are not blue. (Before responding, consider that light does not have to be monochromatic.)

>> No.1364759

>>1364750
Uncommon maybe, but not unheard of. I assure you, I am not a "troll", I am being very truthful. It's a little awkward for me really.

>> No.1364760

Real IQ tests max out at 180, and only about one in a million people score that high.

Hell, only one in a hundred break 135 or so, so there's a lot of liars here. Which, considering you're all anons, is pretty pathetic.

>> No.1364761

>>1364759
you do not happen to live in Germany, do you?

>> No.1364764

>>1364760
>only one in a hundred break 135 or so
>there's a lot of liars here.

I do not see how you conclude the second quote from the first. Is there any chance, you could elaborate this?

>> No.1364766

>>1364757
You should at some point try to think for yourself. Don't say or act out in a way you think society wants you to. Think for your self. Statements like those do not make you seem nearly as "cool" as you think.

>> No.1364769

>>1364766
considering that he is currently posting anonymous, I sincerely doubt that he was trying to become known as a cool guy. Do you not agree, that this would make no sense?

>> No.1364773

>>1364758
Remember that considering an authentic source is always better than a non-authentic one.

Let's take it that you are about to die(though not seriously.).

Between surgical procedure "A" which would give you 1/3 of a chance to live and surgical procedure "B" which would give you a 2/3 chance to live, what would it be?

>> No.1364774

>>1364761
No, I live in a Northeast state located in the US, sadly.

>> No.1364778

>>1364758
Yes, but even though, you won't be as stupid as to answer blue right?

>> No.1364782

OP why do you ask for IQ's?

They're pretty silly since truly intelligent people (advanced physics or shittier subjects students) don't care about it.

>> No.1364783
File: 281 KB, 415x474, Rageface.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364783

>>1364774
I hope for you it is Massachusetts. I bet you would find immense pleasure in the guys at Harvard/the MIT.
>>1364773
none, I actually want to die.

>> No.1364784

>>1364769
Anonymous, or not. It made him feel better about himself. If you were to post something you thought others would surly take notice to, would this not make you feel somehow accomplished? The way I worded the statement was due to a guess on my part, that this individual has not fully matured and is still quite shaped by others. He wants to appear to others as... rebellious I suppose. In the mind of most young people, rebellion is status, rebellion is "cool" as it were.

>> No.1364785

>>1364760

This is the /sci/ board meaning the more intelligent of 4chan would frequent it.

There Chinese people hold about a sixth of the world's population yet if I go out in the middle of some town or city in America and notice that only about 6% of the people are Asian would I conclude that there are many people who are lying about their race?

>> No.1364787

>>1364782
>I regard what other people think because I am insecure.

>> No.1364791

>>1364782
>They're pretty silly since truly intelligent people (advanced physics or shittier subjects students) don't care about it.

Honestly, I think your justification for calling them silly is a bit weak, although I agree that they are silly.

>> No.1364792

>>1364783
If you would like, you could talk about it bro.

>> No.1364797

>>1364787

It's actually a general example for showing how insecure people who care too much about IQ are, because saying physicists aren't intelligent is dumb, you dumb shit.

I also said that to feel superior to other beings, like you.

>> No.1364799

>>1364785
>This is the /sci/ board meaning the more intelligent of 4chan would frequent it.

really not. Sorry, but just no. There is barely any science at all in /sci/, maybe even less than in /b/, where you can find some occasional "ask a mathematician" anything thread (at least you could back then when I was still a /b/rother.). Intelligent people do not find "atheism vs. religion" troll threads very attractive, I believe.

>> No.1364804
File: 27 KB, 360x410, richard-feynman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364804

>>1364787

>> No.1364805

>>1364782
Because, as I said before, it's an easy way to gauge someones intelligence. Of course I do not mean just taking their word for it. It's part of something more complicated, but because I do not have the means to physically meet with all of you, I ask questions and hold conversation, I can make guesses from that.

>> No.1364808

>>1364805
>It's part of something more complicated
now I am just waiting for you to take over the world

>> No.1364809

>>1364784

I was making a sarcastic remark about what most of the people on 4chan say when asked about female opinions. Stop trying to psychoanalyze anonymous people over the internet. It makes you look silly.

>> No.1364810

actually psychoanalyzing people makes one looks stupid regardless of where on does it.

>> No.1364811

>>1364797
Well I care too much for that piece of gold bro. I'm not insecure too.

Because some jobs need that shit, jobs that people like me dream of when they were kids.

And to say that I.Q. is universally worthless is like saying that the whole world thinks like you. Which is the concept of think of children of a younger if you would read some Psychology books, but that's not the point.

One man's trash is another man's treasure.

>> No.1364813

Intelligence is just a feature, just like being handsome or being good in a particular sport.

People priding themselves for being considered handsome are usually jackasses. The same goes for people flaunting around their intelligence.

One could argue that it doesn't matter if you're handsome or smart. But reality is that is seriously does. Only truly intelligent people understand that it shouldn't.

>> No.1364814

>>1364809
You do realize you are the silly one, expecting sarcasm to be understood with out spoken words. Even with speaking it, sarcasm is not always noted. I however understand what you are saying, and take it into account.

>> No.1364818

>>1364813
>Only truly intelligent people understand that it shouldn't [matter if you're (...) smart].

really? It is easy to claim that, but can you explain why you think it is true?

>> No.1364826

>>1364799
There are hardly ANY of religion troll threads, maybe one in 5 pages.

>> No.1364830

>>1364814

If you have spent any prolonged time on 4chan, you would realize that the majority of its users are either at a young age or simply pathetic when it comes to getting into a relationship. You shouldn't have to hear someone's voice in order to figure out something like that is blatantly sarcastic.

>> No.1364836

>>1364804
Search your name on google.

That's right, you can't.

>> No.1364837

I was afraid of this. Without fully explaining myself, some of you have made an assumption about me. I understand that intelligence is not everything, but to say it's nothing is wrong. I have been in a relationship with a man for a number of years, his IQ is utterly average. I try to tell myself it does not matter, but it does. I am very unhappy and I understand why, I am mentally unsatisfied. So I think the view on IQ not being important is irrational, at lest for me it is. It comes down to prospective, I see intellect as meaning something, others do not.

>> No.1364841
File: 21 KB, 438x400, o_rly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364841

>>1364814

>> No.1364843

>>1364837
Replace the word "IQ" with "Handsome".

Congratulations, you're intellectually shallow.

>> No.1364847

>>1364837
That's really "cool" (as society would see it)

>> No.1364849

>>1364843
what is your point?

>> No.1364851

>>1364830
I understand your view on this website, I have to agree. Now I have to ask, have you really never seen an intelligent post? They are out there. So Fourchan as a whole would not be considered a good place to find well adjusted people, I get that. However I have this slight hope /Sci/ would turn something up. Even if it turns up just these posts, I am enjoying this.

>> No.1364853

>>1364847
I doubt it.

>> No.1364854
File: 27 KB, 230x330, Adorufu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1364854

>>1364847
Sometimes, the world could just fuck itself. Not that person by the way.

Win or lose, you'd still be famous. Just like this man "Adorufu".

>> No.1364857

>>1364843
If it makes you feel better, then say I am shallow. Everyone is shallow in one way or another, don't say you're not.

>> No.1364860

>>1364849
There is nothing wrong with not being able to commit too a relationship when one person is unsatisfied with the other.

You're not compatible with the other, fine, that's normal.

But just because looks or smarts is important too you as a individual doesn't mean its important on a collective level. Or at least, it shouldn't be.

Nothing wrong with having certain standards, but realize that they're YOUR standards, not the ones of the rest of the world.

>> No.1364866

I took a test 2 years ago and it was 131.
I took one now and it says 128.
Well fuck.

>> No.1364868

I'm around the 150/160 mark.

>> No.1364869

Hi, OP. Don't know. We did a couple at school and I didn't do very well as I'm easily frustrated and just put whatever in the end. As an adult I refuse to do them properly and just select questions at random. Despite this I got a 120 on a picture thingy one so go figure how effective they are.

I always did real bad at school and got into trouble for it because my teachers always claimed I could do so much better and wasn't even trying.

>> No.1364871

>>1364860
Exactly my point! I am sorry if I was not clear with my words, fact is I am very tired.
I am now abandoning this thread, I am going to sleep. I will be back to discuss this more, if there is any more to discuss at that point.

>> No.1364873

>>1364860
what is your point??
You really should learn to express yourself clearly und understandable. Possibly English is not your mother tounge, and while that somewhat lessens your culpability, unfortunately it does not help me to understand what you say.

>> No.1364878

My IQ is 137 which means i'm probably the most intelligent person named Alex on the earth.

>> No.1364880

>>1364857
I'm not shallow.

>> No.1364885

>>1364873
I think it means, some people like looks others brains. It's not up to any one else to say it's wrong or right for you to like what you do. Also, it's okay to leave a relationship if not all needs are met, or maybe date a variety of people at the same time, with each one fulfilling something needed. I am sleepy, perhaps I am wrong.

>> No.1364886

What does it matter if your genes or your upbringing lead you to be intelligent or not, there's nothing you can do to change it.

>> No.1364888

>>1364847

You might be starting a "trend". (As society would see it.)

>> No.1364890

>>1364886
No you cannot but, that is not the matter at hand.

>> No.1364892

>>1364878
>he thinks IQ = Intelligence
laughingwhores.jpg

>> No.1364894

~145

>> No.1364896

>>1364892
More often than not the two go hand in hand

>> No.1364903

<3

>> No.1364905

>>1364903

gtfo

>> No.1364907

>>1364837
>whines about her husbands intelligence and her longings to have spouses with large IQ's on an anonymous imageboard

typical woman

>> No.1364909

Why do you care so much?

>> No.1364911

~140

>> No.1364913

/sci/ - ''My IQ is greater, thus I am smarter''

>> No.1364914

>>1364907
Boyfriend not husband. Also you're pretty typical yourself.

>> No.1364918

>>1364909
Same reason why some people care about big breast, or a tight butt. I just like intelligence.

>> No.1364921

Okay really goodnight.

>> No.1364922

>>1364914
typical of what? I was pointing out a characteristic that I found shared by many women I have encountered over the years, so much that I could infer that you were a women even if you didn't state you being in a relationship with a man.

>> No.1364924

>>1364918
You mean you like IQ. I bet you can discern a man's pattern recognition at a glance.

>> No.1364942

maths msc here

78

>> No.1364945

I probably have an IQ averaging on approximately 90; you don't need to be smart to like science, you just happen to do so

>> No.1364966

i m engnier

my iq be 3

>> No.1364969

129 138 139 on the ISA II test.