[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 58 KB, 430x600, 1275653516933.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1292101 No.1292101 [Reply] [Original]

So 2012 comes up because some douche bag watched a documentary
I show them http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
"you really think NASA would say we are all going to die... i dont think so"

:| I am dissapoint.
But fuck, I need to show him what an idiot he is.
Give me more sources to cite against 2012.

I don't even know why I care /sci/.
Also, 2012 general.

>> No.1292110

The fucking leader of modern day Mayan tribe said it was bullshit.

>> No.1292117

I don't know.

>> No.1292123

if theyre so sure, they should go kill themselves now.

thats all i got sorry

>> No.1292124

rather than citing sources against it, demand sources supporting it and then take them apart.

>> No.1292134

>>1292110
They extinguished.

>> No.1292145

sometimes people like to dance with their friends

>> No.1292146

>>1292110
What the fuck does he know? "The leader of Egypt says their old architecture wasn't that hard to build" See how dumb that sounds? You're comparing the modern leader of an ancient civilization as having credible knowledge of the astronomy preformed by his ancestors? I'm not saying for or against 2012, just to say that is poor argument.

>> No.1292156

>>1292101

The fact NASA felt they needed to speak out about 2012 is all the proof i need to know the government is worried.

The government has so much stuff to worry about, it would only spend time on something if it was very important. Clearly 2012 is important to NASA so it should be important to us.

>> No.1292178

>>1292156
People won't shut up about it.

>> No.1292191

>>1292156
Y2K. If I remember, the government was pretty worked up over that too, yes?

>> No.1292184

>>1292156
...except that NASA isn't actually worried. That's the whole point of that article.

>> No.1292203

>>1292184

>The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

We 2012 is nothing than NASA should pay no mind. But they are paying mind. By trying to calm the masses. Remember 9/11? This is the same story.

>> No.1292206

>>1292124
>>1292101

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HghEBxHvgg

>> No.1292214

>>1292191

The government never worried about y2k. Only the general public were worried. This is a completely different event.

>> No.1292218

>>1292206
NDT UP IN THIS BIIIIIIIIIITCH.

>> No.1292228

>>1292206

You can tell he is bias within the first couple of seconds. How can you site this as a credible source.

>> No.1292229

Here you are, good sir.

http://www.cracked.com/article_17445_the-6-best-2012-apocalypse-theories-are-all-bullshit.html

I do believe that sources are in the article. Farewell.

>> No.1292240

>>1292229

cracked.com?

The fact people on /sci/ are using this as source is scary.

>> No.1292257

2012 is valid and worthy of preparation:

Vivos - Underground Shelter Network for Surviving 2012 and Beyond

http://www.terravivos.com/

>> No.1292258
File: 25 KB, 480x360, Vegeta Facepalm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1292258

>>1292240
Did I not just say that sources were in the article? Read, faggot. >_>

>> No.1292269

>>1292258

cracked isn't a pausable source for anything. ever. you idiot.