/sci/ - Science & Math

Not only not viable but also impoossible

>>12706751
youd have to have a predefined alphabet that corresponds in order and location sequentially somehow

>>12706751
no, but cryptography is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiiaAJ3c6dM

>>12706751
no

>>12707061
Literally the only viable application.
Banks, blockchains, smart contracts etc, are wet for the quantum stuff.

The rest of the world, not so much.

Maybe

>>12706751
Yes, the Chinese have done it.

>>12707036
You could use binary.

>>12708304
No they didn't.

>>12707036
Nope. Quantum entanglement is not a mechanism to transmit data since you can't can't force the local particle to be in a specific state without breaking the entanglement.

>>12706751

what the fuck is point? You can only send one bit information with one qubit and at the max speed of light.

it's useless thoe. Just send them via EM signals.

I live in Turkey and Turkey is going to fall quantum meme hard.

Not in the way you want it. FTL information transfer is impossible, period.

>>12707061
I'm so lonely bros

>>12708343
Entangled wavefunction collapse is instantanious but also OP>>12706751 to answer your question, no, it doesn't actually transmit data, because you can't control what one of the electrons collapses to. A good analogy for entagled electrn spins is putting two gloves of a pair in different boxes. If one is left, the other must be right, and vice versa, but you can't force one of them to be left to transmit right to the other one. Taking one glove out of the box releases the information of what glove must be in the other box, but it doesn't actually control the result.