/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12648470
yes, a religion of my creation. I am its only follower

>>12648470

>>12648470
I believe that one day we will understand what the true god is but we don't understand it yet.

>>12648475
So then,
Do you consider yourself a God?

>>12648470
False until proven otherwise

>>12648509
Do you think humans posses such power to debunk the world's mysterious things.

>>12648470
Of course. You'd be a fool not to believe in God, given our understanding of mathematics. However, God is probably more complex than simple humans can ever understand.

>>12648542
Once Ancient people believed that you cannot leave planet earth and go out of our world but that was proved wrong.
What I mean to say is anything that is complex is not unsolvable but it takes time to understand and verify.

So explain your view on this

>>12648470
Yes, by my cumulative case a naturalistic theism appears to be more probable than atheism. I've been a mystic for a few years now and just recently started 'Dasein'.
>All of the arguments are phases of one ‘global’ argument, that the properly formulated theistically religious view of life and reality is the most intelligible, self-consistent, and satisfactory one that can be conceived. (Hartshorne)

>>12648470
No, I don’t believe in any religious conception of a god. I’ve yet to hear any sound, rational argument for the existence of a god. Of course, I’m open to being convinced, but it seems like a bunch of hand wavy bullshit to me.

>>12648470
don't know don't care

>God-no
>Religion-yes
festivals and religious ceremonies are a good way to socialize

>>12648675
also following a religion helps prevent degeneracy

>>12648678
If you need blind faith to counter “degeneracy”, then perhaps you shouldn’t counter it at all? Why is rational argument not enough?

>>12648470
If someone is not raised religious they will likely never become religious