/sci/ - Science & Math

BOMBS

BOMBS EVERYWHERE

Most common thing I hear is the pancaking effect. Once it got rolling, the weight of the previous floors just owned the lower ones.

>>1261614

Now lets not jump to conclusions, I'm just interested in possible effects of how it toppled like that.

God willed it.

All part of his plan to kill a bunch of people on that day.

>>1261701

Why the twin towers and not a gay bar then?

impact shakes the building and destroys concrete mantles around steel cores, high heat causes them to weaken (not necessarily melt), result: shit be goin' down fast

Fuel from the planes combined with items within the area struck combined to make a large fire.
When steel is heated too much it bends, taking away the structural integrity of the floors above.
The floors above collapsed and every floor they hit on the way down added to the weight and the force causing it to collapse.

>>1261748
Snowball effect?

>>1261704
Because God hates America. "Jesus has spoke to me and wants me to go to war with the Iraqis"

>>1261704
He was sick of doing it to gaybars, he wanted something different.

Well thanks for the answers guys, this documentaries pretty damn interesting, seeing the real life footage of the buildings coming down, the aftermath and the story of the people who lost family members etc. really puts the whole thing into perspective.

I once saw a video where the explosion actually happened the instant before the plane hit.
Anyone care to explain that to me, without shouting fake, I mean.
It's probably fake, but I want to know if there could be an explanation for such an event.

Snowball effect indeed.
Also i can't remember the name of the Institute but some group of scientists spent four years creating a computer program with steel strength, exact weight falling etc and showed exactly how it happened.
What's the name of the documentary btw?

Did the explosion happen at ground level or where the planes were about to hit?

>>1261858

Shit I'm not sure man, it's just over, UK fag here, was watching it on yesterday, give me 5 mins and I'll try and find the name.

>>1261877

Here, It was just called 9/11, it showed footage of the buildings coming down and being hit etc and it had survivors on telling their stories and reenactments of their stories.

Know what, OP? Your insinuation is right. It's clearly more likely that thousands of engineers, government employees, and scientists are all mutually conspiring to lie to us than it is that a handful of people on the internet are drawing bad conclusions from an incomplete understanding of the physics surrounding building collapse.

>>1261748


But that makes sense! It was the Joos.

jews did it

>>1261897

OP here, by saying it was like a controlled demolition I'm not being a conspiracy fag, I'm just describing what I though it looked like when it fell.

its ridiculous to think that this was a controlled demolition.

Do you idiots get all your info only from these kinds of programs?

Well, maybe if you paid attention in class, you'd know the unique architecture of the Towers meant the plane colliding into it caused the entire core support to fail, which meant the Tower hit by the plane collapsed under it's own weight

I'm pretty sure it was the Jews.

Srsly, though.
It DID look like one, doesn't mean it was one.

>>1261926

As I said above, I'm describing the way the building fell, I'm not saying it fell that way, the program also didn't say it was a controlled explosive, it was about the survivors stories, not hurr the jews did it.

glad people know 2 shits about the jews

OP said almost like a controlled demolition because it mainly fell downward into itself instead of collapsing sideways and leveling 5 blocks.
He's not saying the Jews did it but what it was similar to.

>>1261601
Do you know physics? If so then I will explain it.
IF NOT GTFO!

>>1261952

Do you know what manners are? You'd get fucking knee capping if you shot your mouth off like that in person.

How it happened has already been explained according to physics in this thread.
And anyway, it was the Jews.

There are actually ex-government employees who say it was a controlled demolition.

We call them "furious attention whores". Read any review on Amazon.com involving loose change etc. and you'll run into two or three of them.

You should be watching Futurama

let's assume for the sake of trolling and without even paying attention to the "why didn't anyone notice miles of cable and dynamite all over the place" or, as this >>1261897 anon says, the need to shut up thousands of collaborators. Assuming thus that such an undertaking was indeed possible, why then pretend that the planes were responsible? Why not simply claim the terrorists had done a controlled demolition, since it's apparently so easy to do it unnoticed
parts of that delusion

It's like you people have a preconceived notion of how a skyscraper SHOULD react to a plane flying into it

>>1261920
And what precisely gives you the skills to make that judgment? The only people who say this are the usual fetal alcohol syndrome babies that see Jews hiding in their own socks.

>>1261986

I'm saying that the manner of the building falling looks similar in the manner that a building in a controlled explosion looks like. I didn't say it was a controlled explosion, I said the manner in which it fell was similar to it.

Read what I type before being a stupid faggot.

It takes nearly a year to even prepare a building 1/200th the size of the twin towers for a controlled demolition, exposing every support etc,
Conspirators say the government invented a new super chemical capable of burning through pure steel in mere seconds and that's why there is no explosives remains.

Why were some of the structural support beams severed in a perfect diagonal line?

Why was the building closed for a few days before the incident?

Why were there test being done that day, before the incident, on a "what if two planes hit the world trade center" type of scenario?

Why aren't they releasing the pentagon tapes?

Why a bunch of shit.

>>1262036
Why do you have no fucking proof of any of this except the last part?

>Why were some of the structural support beams severed in a perfect diagonal line?
Laser cutting to remove debris.
>Why was the building closed for a few days before the incident?
Regular inspections. Have you heard of them?
>Why were there test being done that day, before the incident, on a "what if two planes hit the world trade center" type of scenario?
Are you serious?
>Why aren't they releasing the pentagon tapes?
Do you tell people your social security number when they ask?
>Why a bunch of shit.
Why so troll?

from what i remember from looking into this... the heat generated by the engine fuel was not nearly enough to weaken the steel structural beams, also It collapsed at an area that was not even close to the fire....

Pentagon tapes look like a rocket also. watch this video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0Ms7mId34

>>1262082
>from what i remember from looking into this...
You're already off to a bad a start.
>the heat generated by the engine fuel was not nearly enough to weaken the steel structural beams, also It collapsed at an area that was not even close to the fire....
This made me tear up. You know that's wrong, yet you refuse to admit it. Why must you lie to yourself?
>Pentagon tapes look like a rocket also. watch this video...
So the people in the imaginary plane that hit the pentagon were just rounded up by the government and killed in secret?

>>1262082

In the documentary I watched, a fireman who survived while inside the building when it came down said the explosive noises where each floor toppling on each other.

>>1262111
no they never existed, lol

>>1262128
So their grieving "families" were actors?

The people who were watching the towers collapse and commented don't understand even the basics of demolition.
The plane which hit the pentagon slid into the pentagon, it has also been scientifically proven by an institute how it happened.

>>1262160
LIES

WAKE UP SHEEPLE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pkd6oAuJqfs

All you sheep, bahhh nigga bahhhh

WAKE UP

>>1262199
We've got them now!

>>1262199
Witness the truth, Sheeple!

>>1262221

>witness the samefag

>>1262227
Steel melts at 2500 degrees F.

What. Now. ?

>>1262237

Your mams arse melts when I stick my cock in it, what's your point.

The Steel didn't melt when it collapsed it bent.

>>1262283
Okay, what do you think happens to a rigid superstructure when it reaches its melting point? Does it stay rigid?

Read the Popular Mechanics explanation of the World Trade Center collapse, and you will have understanding.

All I ask is that the government releases ONE video showing a plane hitting the pentagon. Don't even tell me that the shitty gas station camera is the only feed to a building like the pentagon that was around that side.

It has nothing to do with herp derp privacy or anything like that, I would just like to see the plane hitting the pentagon and it would shut up a lot of the 'conspiracy' questions.

>>1262337
the government doesn't answer to conspiracy nuts

>>1262381

Ok what exactly is the 'risk' of releasing any video on it? What is the national security bullshit that they could even try and use to justify it?

>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
>>1261601
The REAL question you should be asking yourself OP is whatdafuck was up with WTC building 7. nothing was said about this building's collapse. it wasn't damaged by the towers falling enough to cause structural collapse, not to mention fall into it's own footprint as in a controlled demolition. Patriots question 9/11

>>1262402
it's worth neither taxpayer time nor money to do, it just isn't a priority