/sci/ - Science & Math

the best thing about being alone is not giving a fuck about how stupid everyone around you is. enjoy this faggot

>>12519029
And you shouldn't send that signal either, because those fucks will be miserable alone.
It's time to make a pact with some fag hag or something. Purely for societal reasons. But make it smart, to the mutual benefit.

>>12519035
It works only until you want to turn your science into business. And for some science you need some collaborators who are often "taken".

>>12519044
>It works only until you want to turn your science into business
why the fuck would you want to do that?

>>12519053
To change the world for the better, of course.

>>12519053
Maybe you dont want to die in poverty like a certain someone

>>12519040
That quote reminds me of the "why be fit when you can be smart" crowd, you can do both and it's in your best interests.

>>12519056
are you 12 years old? you can't change the world for the better. god wants carnage mayhem and suffering. create your little bubbles of tranquility where you can and laugh at those too stupid to embrace and utilize organization and foresight.

>>12519059
you act as everybody and soon you'll think like everybody (at least that's what I'm affraid of)

>married life
>good things
be careful what you wish for

>>12519066
no matter what you were taught, jew is not a god.

>>12519058
what you consider poverty i consider paradise. a modular home is moar than enough and extremely easy and cheap to maintain.

>>12519069
It didn't call married life a good thing. It told that chicks weave the structure of society, from which they exclude the brightest ones as inconvenience.

>>12519073

>>12519068
Really depends on how you form your opinions, if you just go with whatever is popular you probably will change them on exposure but if you have reasoned yourself into them you will need to be reasoned out of them.

>>12519040
mutual blowjob should be accepted as long as it's not homo.

>>12519085
I was talking not of opinions, but on the way of thought. Ever smoked weed?

>>12519108
Ah k, I get what you are saying.
Also yes, smoked too much weed in my youth.

>>12519090
Sexual activity brings the mind to a lower state and damages it over time and makes muh orgasm the ultimate goal rather than your work. Not going to make it, sodomite.

>>12519181
It's easier to just release it than to fight it. Make it a mandatory routine at 6am and 10pm, and you will nefver think about sex again.

>>12519221
Newton never jerked his rod once and he did alright. Don't know how the hell he did it but it is possible.

>>12519226
There's an opinion that Newton was an asshole, and probably a plagiarist. Otherwise why would he got pissed when asked to explain: who wouldn't want to speak about his research other than someone who wasn't sure he understood it completely? He was a career scientist, not actual one. But you're not taught that, because he was a mason master.
At least that's what Hawkins wrote about him, but then again how can we trust a catholic influencer, when vatican has a beef with masons.
> Don't know how the hell he did it
Some congenital deformity maybe? Masons would love that shit.

>>12519677

>>12519677
>newton plagiarist
We wuz kangs n shit

>have female friend/coworker
>have never met her husband in knowing her for ~8 years

You might be onto something.

>>12520629
>Isaac Newton was not a pleasant man. His relations with other academics were notorious, with most of his laterlife spent embroiled in heated disputes. Following publication of Principia Mathematica – surely the mostinfluential book ever written in physics – Newton had risen rapidly into public prominence. He was appointedpresident of the Royal Society and became the first scientist ever to be knighted.
> Newton soon clashed with the Astronomer Royal, John Flamsteed, who had earlier provided Newton withmuch-needed data for Principia, but was now withholding information that Newton wanted. Newton would nottake no for an answer: he had himself appointed to the governing body of the Royal Observatory and then triedto force immediate publication of the data. Eventually he arranged for Flamsteed’s work to be seized andprepared for publication by Flamsteed’s mortal enemy, Edmond Halley. But Flamsteed took the case to courtand, in the nick of time, won a court order preventing distribution of the stolen work. Newton was incensed andsought his revenge by systematically deleting all references to Flamsteed in later editions of Principia.

>>12520667
> A more serious dispute arose with the German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz. Both Leibniz and Newton hadindependently developed a branch of mathematics called calculus, which underlies most of modern physics.Although we now know that Newton discovered calculus years before Leibniz, he published his work muchlater. A major row ensued over who had been first, with scientists vigorously defending both contenders. It isremarkable, however, that most of the articles appearing in defense of Newton were originally written by hisown hand – and only published in the name of friends! As the row grew, Leibniz made the mistake of appealingto the Royal Society to resolve the dispute. Newton, as president, appointed an “impartial” committee toinvestigate, coincidentally consisting entirely of Newton’s friends! But that was not all: Newton then wrote thecommittee’s report himself and had the Royal Society publish it, officially accusing Leibniz of plagiarism. Stillunsatisfied, he then wrote an anonymous review of the report in the Royal Society’s own periodical. Followingthe death of Leibniz, Newton is reported to have declared that he had taken great satisfaction in “breakingLeibniz’s heart.”
> During the period of these two disputes, Newton had already left Cambridge and academe. He had been activein anti-Catholic politics at Cambridge, and later in Parliament, and was rewarded eventually with the lucrativepost of Warden of the Royal Mint. Here he used his talents for deviousness and vitriol in a more sociallyacceptable way, successfully conducting a major campaign against counterfeiting, even sending several men totheir death on the gallows.

>>12519035
cope

>>12520667
>>12520671
> doesn't mention Hooke

>>12520671
fuck off euro. you guys just couldn't accept that a tiny island beat you to it. hurray brexit.

You folks are not stupid, but because you are alone and because you are anti-social, you've formed your own kind flock where it's very rare to notice individuals who are in high intelligence and also well socialized (read: gifted).
Have you been around those people in real life. They are very intense. Their homes look like a playground of tinkered materials. Usually outperform the calculator and they give off this radiant emotion that is high to describe - but every one around them loves them for their character. As you talk to them you can see the brilliance in their eyes they possess a glint which is probably where the word 'brilliant' comes from (the shine in their eyes). Have you ever seen it?

>>12520908
You're barking at a wrong tree. I wholeheartedly support brexit.
https://www.youtube.com/c/patcondell/videos
I just have an ever-growing disdain for academia and distrust to any hierarchy.

>>12520718
But is light corpuscular?

>>12520956
Yeah, from a smart extravert, who considers it a tragedy that he is an extravert, because he is smart enough to know that to do anything great in life one must be intravirtuous.

>>12520978
obviously: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbLzh1Y9POQ