/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12398627
>thread is sinking
Mmmmmmm.
I wonder why.

>>12398742
>I wonder why
It's because it's a shit thread.

>>12398745
Or maybe because it contains certain keywords that are not politically correct?

I think it is best that there is no more data. Now some "pope" from his academic throne can dictate what the narrative should be without even providing proof.

>climate change is man-made

>"Without successful mitigation, there will be a gap of between 2 and 5 years in our polar satellite altimetry capability. This gap will introduce a decisive break in the long-term records of the ice sheet and sea ice thickness change and polar oceanography and this, in turn, will degrade our capacity to assess and improve climate model projections."

>>12398768
Is everything OK at home, anon? Do you need to talk to someone?

>>12398905
Is that important for the topic under discussion?

>>12398914
OP's mental health (or lack thereof) is always important, anon

>>12398627
Scientifically speaking, how hard can it be to mount an off the shelf laser altimeter on a cubesat and use that?

>>12398928
Have you thought that nobody is interested in doing real science? Otherwise you might find that the global warming tale is an invention, and that ice might even increase on the South Pole while decreasing in the North one.

>>12398921
Only if your goal is to pull an ad-hominem. But that would be sad, I expect a bit of more effort, otherwise fuck off.

>>12398959
my goal is you getting to grips with your demons, anon.
now sit here, and tell me where the autistic swedish girl touched you

>>12398975
I wish an autistic swedish girl would touch me...or any girl for that matter

>>12398627
Well you're in luck, the Biden administration is on track to turn NASA back into an outreach and climate studies organization doing jack shit but look at satellite photos.
So I'm sure they'll get around to putting up a replacement in polar orbit sometime around 2030 or whatever.

>>12398627
You know it's the reverse and it will be used by big oil etc. to "point out" they stopped measuring sea ice when the results become inconvenient.

>>12399069
It doesn't really matter. Look up the IPCC fraud. They just invent whatever they want.
The moment all those big corps are suddenly investing billions in something "good", you know it is a lie.

>>12398993
t. not OP

good lord, anthropogenic climate change denialists are some of the stupidest damn people on this website. why do you come to this board? why do you feel welcome here without a legitimate degree? why do you spend your day convincing yourself that people spend their lives studying climatology just so that they can lie to you? why do you wallow in faulty arguments while not taking the time to read up on basic earth science which makes anthropogenic climate change extremely obvious and clear? why do you love oil companies so much and hate when non-polluting energy sources get cheaper?

>>12399085
no, you don't know it's a lie because you don't have real evidence and they have mountains of it published and publicly available. idiot.

>>12399089
>some of the stupidest damn people on this website
ad-hominem
>without a degree
strawman, I have 2, and one more in the coming
>people spend their lives studying climatology
argument of authority, ad populum
>faulty arguments
proof required

I'm dissapointed, anon. Try harder.
>extremely obvious and clear
proof required

>>12399091
>because you don't have real evidence
argumentum ad ignorantiam

>>12399126
>ad hominem
i'm stating a fact, not an argument
>strawman
your degrees are worthless, anyone can get a degree.
>ad populum
is often misused as a logical fallacy. i do not claim that something is 100% true because authorities say so, i claim that something is very likely true because authorities say so and back it up with clear arguments and evidence which i have seen. do not reference ad populum in the wrong context.
>proof required
no, you need to prove your arguments. i am perfectly capable of proving your arguments faulty. i'm not going to waste my time doing it.
>i'm disappointed
in what? my ability to point out your fallacious application of logical fallacies you found on reddit? this isn't philosophy class.
>>12399130
who knows what the fuck this means. it's completely true that you do not have real evidence, just shoehorned shit which exposes your lack of climatological knowledge. your degrees are probably in engineering or something.

>>12399151
Underage children should fuck off.

Opposite Behaviors? Arctic Sea Ice Shrinks, Antarctic Grows
>https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/arctic-antarctic-ice.html

>"There's been an overall increase in the sea ice cover in the Antarctic, which is the opposite of what is happening in the Arctic,” said lead author Claire Parkinson, a climate scientist with NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. "However, this growth rate is not nearly as large as the decrease in the Arctic.”
>"We have a good handle of the extent of the Antarctic sea ice, but the thickness has been the missing piece to monitor the sea ice mass balance,” said Thorsten Markus, one of the authors of the study and Project Scientist for ICESat-2, a satellite mission designed to replace the now defunct ICESat. ICESat-2 is scheduled to launch in 2016. "The extent can be greater, but if the sea ice gets thinner, the volume could stay the same."

Guess which sat is getting shut down?

>>12399173
That would save us a lot of climatehoax-threads, thats for sure

Why Is Antarctica's Sea Ice Growing While the Arctic Melts? Scientists Have an Answer

>https://insideclimatenews.org/news/31052016/why-antarctica-sea-ice-level-growing-while-arctic-glaciers-melts-climate-change-global-warming

>As the Antarctic sea ice reached record levels, scientists floated several hypotheses, including possible changes in the ozone hole over Antarctica, or increased amounts of fresh water—which freezes more easily—on the surface of the ocean around Antarctica. At the same time, they said it's important to remember the big differences between the poles. Assessing sea ice dynamics at opposite ends of the Earth is not an apples-to-apples proposition.

>"The climate models do not get it right at this point," Kaleschke said. "The models project a decrease of Antarctic sea ice, which is in contrast with observations."

>>12399215
>climatehoax threads
Which this thread is not.
Climate change exists. Earth is in constant cyclical change.

Now blaming human activity for that is where the big lie is. And where there are lies, there is economic interests, and ofc the nose.

>>12399087
This
I like young swedish boys, not girls
t. OP

somehow it is excellent that the majority of climate deniers come from a country that has the most to struggle with the consequences and has the most pollution at the same time.
a religious nut would now say that this is gods will. I would say that is irony of fate.
and since climate change is a complete hoas, nobody of those people now can complain about me.
so if I will get insults or 'wrongs' or any other posts, anybody else will notice that those retards are not so sure about denying climate change at all.
which now probably will again discourages a part or all of those /pol/fags to answer me.
lets see what I get an answer.
probably one or two misinterpreted scientific articles? nothing?
its difficult to say that now.
:)

>>12398627
>the non-anthropogenic cyclic changes that Earth has since literally always
Which ones are causing warming right now?

>>12398855
Fake climatologist, fake graph.

>>12399187
Nice cherrypicking.

>>12399229
>Now blaming human activity for that is where the big lie is.
Which cycle is causing the warming though?

>>12399296
Dont know, but it sure seems to coincide with jewish interests

>>12399314
>Dont know
So how do you know it's a natural cycle?

>>12399323
The jews are natural
They are behind it all or the cause of all.
Therefore, it is natural
>goys will argue against this

>>12399396
So you have no clue what you're talking about.

>>12399258
Who knows the mysteries of the cosmos, anon

>>12399296
>Which cycle is causing the warming though
Same one that causes the cooling. The law of the pendulum.

>>12399288
I see a nose in this graph.

>>12399245
Has this post been made by an AI? Can't the climatic megaemergency jews just debate in person anymore?

>>12399486
>>12399396
>>12399314
Oh vey

>>12399465
You claimed to.

>>12399470
>The law of the pendulum.
What pendulum? A pendulum is a physical mechanism. What physical mechanism is causing warming?