[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1.01 MB, 2008x3000, 1250213554961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239558 No.1239558 [Reply] [Original]

if you could change one (and only one) sign in any law of physics, which sign would you choose and what would the consequences be?

>> No.1239567

The one that prevents me from fucking that.

>> No.1239573

>>1239567
>Implying you can't rape

>> No.1239592

E=MC^2 becomes

E=MC^C

MORE ENERGY, MORE POWER!

>> No.1239603

>>1239592
a "SIGN" you gigantic transvestite

>> No.1239608

instead of sqrt(-1), make i^2 = -1 so that sqrt(-1) = i (positive number)

And call them complex numbers

>trollface.jpg

>> No.1239610

i would make entropy negative.
so we keep gaining energy out of nowhere.

>> No.1239612
File: 43 KB, 604x402, 1266901394634.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239612

G = m1m2G/r^2
to
G = m1m2G/(-r)^2

>> No.1239616
File: 3 KB, 128x110, 9cab6787646062d6e658cd1e83ad468f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239616

SAY GOODBYE TO YOUR PRECIOUS LIGHT WAVES, MORTALS.

>> No.1239619

F = G((m1m2)/r^2) changed to F = -G((m1m2)/r^2)

Fuck you, everything repels.

>> No.1239624

>>1239612
>>1239619
Law of gravitationmind

>> No.1239625

>>1239619
You have it backwards, bro. The negative implies an attractive force. The first one you wrote is repulsive.

>> No.1239626

Take the equation for the strong nuclear reaction, place a negative in front of it.

>> No.1239627

make Darcy's Law negative

>> No.1239631
File: 17 KB, 1648x61, fas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239631

>> No.1239645

Make like charges attract and opposites repel.

F=-k q1*q2/r^2
instead of +k q1*q2/r^2

Atoms rip themselves apart and collect in large pools of either positive or negative charge.

>> No.1239651

>>1239627
that would just be weird...

>> No.1239658

>>1239558

E = - m c^2

>> No.1239659

>>1239627
>>1239631
you faggots need to explain the consequences or else you don't know wtf you're talking about

>> No.1239661

>>1239625

Uh, no. The first one is Newton's law of universal gravitation.

>> No.1239669

>>1239625

r^2 = gravitation

r = electromagnetic

>> No.1239676
File: 63 KB, 505x400, 01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239676

>> No.1239683

>>1239661
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation#Vector_form

Since you were clearly not talking about the magnitude of the force (magnitude cannot be negative) I assume you are talking about a vector form.

No worries, bro. Apology accepted.

>> No.1239689

>>1239676

DAYUM

>> No.1239691

>>1239669
>r^2 = gravitation
>r = electromagnetic
... wut

>> No.1239694

>>1239612

<span class="math"> (inline) r^2 = -r^2 [/spoiler]

lets see if I can TeX

>> No.1239698
File: 8 KB, 910x48, fer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239698

>> No.1239706

>>1239683
I stand thoroughly corrected, and am humbled.

>> No.1239704

The electrons pull on the atom making masses of energy fly out and matter distabilized.


POWER THIRST!

>> No.1239714

<div class="math">F_G=G m_{1} m_{2} r^{-2}</div>
becomes
<div class="math">F_G=G m_{1} m_{2} r^{+2}</div>

Objects closer together feel little gravity from one another. Force increases with the square of distance. A small object far away pulls you harder than the Earth you stand on. All hell breaks loose.

>> No.1239715

>>1239698
>>1239631
samefag

it would be nice if you understood what those equaions mean

>> No.1239717

first law of thermodynamics lol.

>> No.1239723

>>1239706
>I stand thoroughly corrected, and am humbled.

Well in that case, my apologies for being a dick about it :P

>> No.1239732

>>1239715
who says I don't?

>> No.1239734

>>1239732
I say you don't and apparently the kind anon you're responding to also thinks that.

>> No.1239739

I'm not gonna waste my time explaining them to you idiots. Figure it out yourselves.

>> No.1239747
File: 18 KB, 235x247, 1275059357337.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239747

>>1239739
Can't even provide a link to the webpage you got those off of?

>> No.1239750

>>1239747

wikipedia.org

>> No.1239762
File: 58 KB, 533x401, 1275013076483.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239762

>>1239750

>> No.1239769

>>1239747

Sure I can.

>> No.1239780

>>1239616
You have just changed the sign of Lenz law, induced emfs would not work to increase the change in the magnetic flux. Things will blow up very quickly.

>> No.1239795

>>1239612
>implying this changes anything, or that distance can be negative.

>> No.1239802

E^2=(p^2.c^4)+(m^2.c^4)
->
E^2=(p^2.c^4)-(m^2.c^4)

Among many other changes my favorite thing that would happen is that to calculate the speed of light from this you need to divide by 0.

Speed of light is now undefinable.

Also gayfags putting up special relativiy need to go fuck themselves. General relativity ftw.

>> No.1239804

e=m(-c)^2

>> No.1239806
File: 3 KB, 142x111, d90903f57df5b773da77045dfd074c72.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239806

>>1239780
That is correct; but light wouldn't work either like I said because EM fields would stop satisfying the wave equation. (unless you made the adjustment shown in my pic)

>> No.1239817
File: 416 KB, 213x201, angry dome.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239817

>>1239804
>>1239612
For the love of fuck, don't put the minus inside brackets that are about to be squared!

>> No.1239823

>>1239817
I think thats the joke, guy.

>> No.1239829

>>1239612

but r^2 is the same as (-r)^2

>> No.1239832

>>1239823
I was aware of that possibility. It's the very prospect of being the butt of a joke that has me so infuriated.

>> No.1239843

>>1239832

SELF ESTEEM TOO FRAGILE TO ENJOY A GOOD LAFFO?

>> No.1239849

>>1239832
ITT double negatives.

>> No.1239851

>>1239832

pic was related on

>>1239612

>> No.1239855

>>1239843
I came here for /sci/ence, not titilation

>> No.1239865
File: 21 KB, 350x350, electron.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1239865

I'd make the charge of the electron called "positive" and the charge of the proton "negative". This would make EE math easier.

>> No.1239871

>>1239855

Then you are those kind of retards who think that being serious is the only way to go and become frustrated for the rest of your life because you can't even enjoy a single laugh