/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12379813
Were those the only disappearances in those areas in 67 years?

>>12379813
>Missing 411

Daily reminder this is just "Bigfoot" shit repackaged for another generation of retards.

>>12379825

The author is an ex-cop. The data is solid. Anyone can look it up.

>>12379825
What happened? Can't explain this anomaly? Bigfoot has nothing to do with planetary position.

>>12379820
As far as I know, yes.

>>12379882
You need to look deeper, anon. The answer lies in the numbers.

>>12379813
Terrance Woods was disappeared on the same day as Connie Johnson. My apologies for leaving that out.

Three people vanished while Venus was in almost the same distance. Coincidence?

>>12379910

>>12379813

This is a clear case among many others that links the close proximity of another planet with missing people. There are multiple clusters indicating that it is recurring.

Any geniuses willing to chime in and solve this mystery?

>>12379895
So it's two arbitrarily selected people. You might as well pick any two people who were killed in Chicago 67 years apart.

>>12380177
People go missing all the time. OP showed no connection between these two people. There are likely many places that had two missing person sixty seven years apart.

>>12380220
>So it's two arbitrarily selected people.

They disappeared off the same mountain. 67 years apart. Without a trace. What is your definition of 'arbitrary'? lol. I expect much better from /sci/

>>12380233
Why are you retarded enough to believe that you made a compelling case?

>>12380177
Portals.


Not even fucking kidding. You can detect them through modern day weather radar systems(they sequester moisture in the air into whatever bizarre fucked realm they are connected to).

This is some /x/ tier shit so no one will take it seriously, despite any manner of physical proof. Proceed with caution.

>>12380233
Ok cool, now why do you think fucking venus has anything to do with it?

>>12380247
Planet list distribution should appear more random in the data set especially considering it covers decades of missing people in a specific area. Look at how they are organized. Not natural.

Distance may appear impossible to traverse in such a short period of time based on our current technology. However, it is well within the capability of unidentified space craft witnessed and acknowledged by the U.S. Air Force.

Either you are a retard or a shill. Which one is it?

>>12380274
explain more, i'm interested

>>12380351
should it? especially because you can just cherryPick missing people to be in the same month. Then you just hide up to a million miles of difference with rounding because you're using AUs. Anyone dumb enough to fall for this shit would have to have literal brain damage.

>>12380357
This is what they look like. Find one, go in. I am not interested in tiresome debates over the nature of reality anymore.

If you make it out alive, we can talk then.

According to observed flight characteristics in UFO history they have been clocked at 80 mph underwater and 4000 mph in the atmosphere. Anyone here know if they can go faster? I am not aware of anyone clocking them while in space. It is probably out of range. It would be fascinating to know their flight characteristics in space since there is no drag to contend with.

If we are to take some of the witness accounts involving transparent beings (cloaking technology) at face value, I would not rule out the capability to travel a few million miles. Our world still runs on fossil fuels, lol.

Another dimension, planet they weren't taken against there will they call it missing 411 because we want 'information' on where they went get it "411"
https://youtu.be/R8_wVka64KY