[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 31 KB, 600x541, 1601155727293.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252141 No.12252141 [Reply] [Original]

Big Jim's Rocket Racing Edition

prev: >>12248813

>> No.12252147

>>12252141
*BRAAAAAAAAP*

>> No.12252149

Second stage ignition failure.

>> No.12252155

more like science-fiction general

>> No.12252157

>>12252141
virgin orbit btfo?

>> No.12252161
File: 490 KB, 744x427, 1602235549821.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252161

>> No.12252164

>>12252155
ahahaha boeing is mad

>> No.12252179

>>12252155
Niggers will get space welfare - free government rides to promote immigration and colonial enrichment.
Meanwhile the space pioneers will be 100% male and male* and autistic as fuck ancap/natsocs or as I have recently taken a liking in calling it Ancap plus Natsocks (and shimapan UwU).

>> No.12252180
File: 418 KB, 1500x500, 1590334785030.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252180

>> No.12252187

>>12252164
copespace has been going wild lately

>> No.12252207

>>12252179
ancap is the opposite of natsoc, anon
the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi
or a paperclipped Nazi, I guess

>> No.12252217
File: 183 KB, 1562x422, index.php.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252217

one of the dipshit paypiggies at NSF made a big chart
I'm reposting it because I have no chill

>> No.12252224

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6K2dqCoin8

Reminder that this is happening later today.

>> No.12252227

>>12252224
ha ha bennus :DDD

>> No.12252230

>>12252227
Touch my bennus

>> No.12252233

>>12252224
wow I must look at that

>> No.12252248

>>12252207
only good ancap is a dead one

>> No.12252251

>>12252217
Is Ell Two worth it?

>> No.12252268

>>12252248
I second this
ancaps are degenerates

>> No.12252290
File: 271 KB, 1024x683, gettyimages-1195081165-1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252290

>>12252141

>> No.12252295

>>12252217
Someone explain this I'm retarded.

>> No.12252297

>>12252217
noooooo you cant just do that how will they keep the lights on reeeeeeeeeeee

>> No.12252307
File: 608 KB, 1406x955, iss_%.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252307

>>12252217
Are these the Starship speedrun splits?

>> No.12252312

>>12252295
Timelines from recent tests so you can try to predict when something is going to happen based on visual cues

>> No.12252326

>>12252312
pretty based I knew I could count on weaponized autism to extract information from the latest events

>> No.12252340

I bet that resonance at the end just delayed the hop to December

>> No.12252351

>>12252340
600 hz resonance means Raptor ate its turbopumps so yeah, we're at least getting an engine swap and probably going through this whole process again before they put the nose on. Then they have to fire with the header tanks.

>> No.12252356

Blue literally beggin Air Force for money.

https://spacenews.com/blue-origin-trying-to-convince-the-air-force-to-continue-to-invest-in-new-glenn/

>> No.12252365

>>12252356
BO's mission control be gettin dusty already

>> No.12252368

>>12252356
Hard to pump Amazon money into it when all that shit is funneled into Ireland.

>> No.12252396

>>12252356
They fuckin lost the competition, same as Northrup. If Chair Force makes and exception for Blue, imagine the lawsuits. Also, since when is money an issue for Jeff? He's dumping 1B of Amazon stock per year into that pit. And why is Blue clamoring for the national security launch scraps left by SpaceX and ULA? They should focus enturely on Kuiper IMO since there aint much commercial market left for them to speak of. Guess you get what you get when you hire oldspace and reject SpaceX enployees

>> No.12252405

>>12252396
>since when is money an issue for Jeff?
He'll have to pay taxes to bring it back into the US and consequently dump it into Blue Origin. A lot of taxes.
Jeff does not like paying taxes.

>> No.12252414

SLS absolutely must detonate during the greenrun if the program is to be cancelled. There is no path to shutting it down otherwise

>> No.12252416
File: 1019 KB, 1920x1080, 1601252449958.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252416

SN9 is getting fins

>> No.12252425
File: 43 KB, 392x457, iso-8601-xkcd-1179.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252425

>>12252217
>yuropoor dates
>not based ISO dates

>> No.12252432

>>12252425
Looks gay
month/day/year, all other answers are not only wrong but are actively homosexual and should be discouraged.

>> No.12252435

>>12252432
DDMMMYY
As in 20OCT20
All else is gay

>> No.12252439

>>12252351
Why would they need a new engine, why not design a more robust thrust puck to dampen the vibrations, why didn't they anticipate this? Sounds like amateur hour for spacex or it could just be misleading information

>> No.12252444

>>12252141
Anyone on /sfg/ have some spess related books they'd recommend? I just finished Mike Collins' Carrying the Fire and Mike Mullane's Riding Rockets, I'd highly recommend both to anyone who frequents this general

>> No.12252447

>>12252435
That's real retarded sir

>> No.12252452
File: 227 KB, 969x1200, 1603056079220.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252452

>>12252447
>>12252435
>>12252432
>>12252425
Hey Faggots,

My name is Jonny, and I hate every single one of you. All of you are fat, retarded, no-lifes who spend every second of their day looking at stupid ass pictures. You are everything bad in the world. Honestly, have any of you ever gotten any medical degrees? I mean, I guess it's fun making fun of people because of your own insecurities, but you all take to a whole new level. This is even worse than jerking off to pictures on facebook.

Don't be a stranger. Just hit me with your best shot. I'm pretty much perfect. I was a medic in the Navy SEALs, and top of my astronaut class. What accomplishments do you have, other than "jack off to naked drawn Japanese people"? I also get confirmed kills, and have a very sweet wife (She bore me three children; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening.

Pic Related: It's me and my loving mother

>> No.12252455

>>12252452
BASED

>> No.12252458
File: 83 KB, 632x427, 56495459-9482-4EBC-B421-CE10BCB7E408.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252458

>>12252141
>The weird sound is back
Oh no SN8 bro’s we got too cocky... Also goddamn it’s amazing how SN9 is already getting fins and shit

>> No.12252465

>>12252425
God I hate xkcd so much

>> No.12252466
File: 228 KB, 746x497, 1580689372990.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252466

>>12252452

>> No.12252473

>>12252432
>>12252435
yyyy-mm-dd is the only one you can sort retards

>> No.12252475

>>12252473
Who said I wanted to sort it?

>> No.12252476

>>12252473
You can't sort dates other ways? Sounds like a personal failing anon.

>> No.12252481

>>12252476
just saying you have to rearrange other formats or convert them to unix time if you want to sort them, it sounds like a date format failing

>> No.12252484

>>12252475
if you're not autistic enough to instinctively wanna sort everything maybe you shouldn't be here anon

>> No.12252485

>>12252481
No

>> No.12252509

>>12252396
>They should focus enturely on Kuiper IMO
They should focus on making an orbital rocket that will put things in space first.
Or at least a BE-4 that will work on another rocket.
The AF hasn't seen shit from BO, they don't want another BOING.

>> No.12252513

>>12252439
elon said they fixed the resonance like a year ago, and clearly they didnt. it's not the thrust puck that's the problem, it's the raptor itself

>> No.12252517

>>12252452
wait a minute....you posted this in the last thread. i'm starting to wonder if you're actually trhe real Jonny Chang.

>> No.12252522

>>12252465
Why, is it because they're smart and you're just not?

>> No.12252525

>>12252517
No lad, just a hard working Memesman out here trying to make an honest day's meme.

>> No.12252527

>>12252509
What's the point of building a rocket if they have nothing to launch on it? You're right about BE-4 though, BO droppin the ball hard on all fronts

>> No.12252538

>>12252527
I agree you should have a market to launch stuff before building the rocket. According to Jeff Who and BO reps, there are plenty of contracts already signed for New Glenn to launch payloads.
Either way, BO keeps whoring for contracts and launches but has nothing to show their capability. Some people are going with them because its not SpaceX, or they offered stupid low prices.
The Air Force was pushing money towards them and still hasn't seen even an attempt to launch anything - prototype or not. After seeing the garbage SLS has become, I'm not surprised they told BO to get out.

>> No.12252552
File: 289 KB, 732x445, 403CB66A-38BE-42A1-B57A-01383B2D3131.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252552

Nuclear SRBs when?

>> No.12252565
File: 40 KB, 640x480, 1527081165268.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252565

>>12252552
>Nuclear SRBs
>Nuclear Solid Rocket Boosters
How would that even work?

>> No.12252582
File: 681 KB, 807x612, F9CC2CE1-DB96-4C99-B724-3C79B920397F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252582

So static fire wasn’t a success? It sounded like they have the sound issue again

>> No.12252587

>>12252351
it's made that sound before during the prehop static fires, it might not be an issue

>> No.12252601
File: 2.22 MB, 1522x2048, EktOQAIVMAM9M4R.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252601

>> No.12252606

>>12252587
Elon said it was an fixed issue in July 2019, except it's clearly not fixed
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1147790758449012736

>> No.12252607

>>12252601
it's... beautiful.

>> No.12252615
File: 77 KB, 900x400, 1572715580374.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252615

NATO will set up it's own space command in Ramstein
>serves as a coordination hub for space intel among NATO countries
>claims that NATO will focus on defensive operations and wont put weapons in space
>also planning to create a think tank for NATO space operations
https://www.stripes.com/news/europe/ramstein-air-base-to-house-new-nato-space-center-1.649112

>> No.12252621

Can someone explain what sound issue you are talking about?

>> No.12252626

>>12252601
>>12252607
sourced here-
https://twitter.com/InfographicTony/status/1318469412530262023

content fill coulda been better but i'm lazy

>> No.12252633

>>12252621
the two "honks" at engine shutdown
https://youtu.be/FLZFMaJsxYM?t=87

>> No.12252638

>>12252513
Do you have the tweet for the 600hz resonance info?

>> No.12252639

>SpaceX & SES teaming up with Microsoft to form an anti Blue Origin/AWS alliance
based, get fucked baldy

>> No.12252640

>>12252633
...this is bad why? Engine instability or something?

>> No.12252645

>>12252639
Source?

>> No.12252646
File: 61 KB, 300x902, 1420042580216.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252646

>>12252633

>> No.12252648

>>12252621
>>12252638
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1147790758449012736
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=47506.msg1963559#msg1963559

>> No.12252651
File: 85 KB, 960x790, 1e5744064f77069f92d5bf97dc7cf00e7016b5b41fdc934d0c650f7130c13be2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252651

>>12252179
Some of us had hope for humanity, you know.

>> No.12252656

>>12252606
Is it confirmed that sound from engines? there is lot thing could make similar sound.

>> No.12252657

>>12252645
>Microsoft on Oct. 20 announced it is expanding its cloud computing services for the space industry.
>The company will offer mobile cloud computing data centers that can be deployed anywhere in the world and connect to SpaceX’s Starlink and SES’ O3b internet satellites.
>The service is part of Microsoft’s space-focused cloud business called Azure Space.
>Azure Space has emerged as a direct competitor to Amazon Web Services’ space data business.
>SpaceX joining forces with Microsoft adds another twist to the rivalry between space billionaires Elon Musk and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
https://spacenews.com/spacex-ses-to-provide-broadband-for-microsofts-azure-space-mobile-data-centers

>> No.12252664

>>12252648
This is from last year, how did you know today's issue was the same, elon hasn't even confirmed it?

>> No.12252665

>>12252639
and also Google and DoD behind Starlink.

>> No.12252668

>>12252606
"Looks like" is not a term you use when you say something is fixed. That's a term you use when you hope something fixed itself and you're praying really hard that it stays that way.

>> No.12252671

>>12252668
that's a lot of stretch and projection. more likely the problem seemed to be fixed but needed more testing. especially if it comes from single engine stand tests, it's impossible to say 100% what will happen with three engines on an actual vehicle from that.

>> No.12252673

>>12252601
God damn, really looks like actual conceptual space art. 10/10

>> No.12252676

>>12252671
Did they actually ever fire more than one engine at once?

>> No.12252683

>>12252656
>>12252671
>>12252664
this is a well known issue with Raptor shutdown. It did go away for awhile, but has since reappeared. Elon's mentioned it multiple times, you'll have to check NSF forums for more detailed info. This instability in the past resulted in an engine swap

>> No.12252689

Lmao remember when they installed the RS-25's at Michoud and got all excited? Yeah well SLS has yet to do anything important after that, and it's been a year. And that's only ONE booster. This thing will need multiple boosters if they want to fly more than one mission.

>> No.12252691

>>12252689
They get excited over at Michoud when they put in a fucking bolt in the SRBs.
Must be the dreariest fucking place to work in aerospace.

>> No.12252695

>>12252676
it's possible they didn't, just going off of what seems to be general consensus. other anon said they've had the same thing on previous prehops so it seems more likely to me that the problem translates poorly from stand test to static fire, but if multiple engines are resonating at once it makes sense it would be more noticeable

>> No.12252701

>>12252689
Seriously. What’s the time delay going to be between Artemis I and Artemis II? They will need to build an entire new booster: which doesn’t look like it’s happening? Was the Saturn V also made at this same rate, or faster? The entire SLS program is a mind boggle.

>> No.12252705

>>12252676
they don't have the capability to fire more than one on anything other than prototype starship tankage.

>> No.12252707

>>12252665
Yeah this is basically Microsoft buying into Starlink. They might be Starlink's second biggest customer after the military, or maybe even first depending on traffic? Someone said that Azure makes up 20% of the cloud market. That's alot of internet traffic.

>> No.12252711
File: 2.11 MB, 3000x2202, 6521185.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252711

>>12252701

>> No.12252728
File: 355 KB, 1182x1407, SaturnV_VAB_rollout.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252728

>>12252701
The Saturn V was announced in 1962, and first launched in 1967. NASA is definitely dragging its feet getting SLS ready.

>> No.12252732

>>12252689
>and got all excited?
They've been doing this for every tiny incremental step of progress the SLS has made since it started. It's one of the most infuriating aspects of its development

>> No.12252738

>>12252689
SLS is real. You've seen it down at Michoud. We're building the core stage. We have all the engines done, ready to be put on the test stand at Stennis.

2014.

>> No.12252739

>>12252728
They're dragging their feet because the entire thing is a gargantuan millstone around their necks that they're mandated by law to develop and use.

>> No.12252743
File: 182 KB, 1024x1024, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252743

>>12252711
>You and your welding brothers are taking a break in the coffee room. Suddenly the doors fly open-
>HE'S COMING, HE'S COMING! GET TO WORK!
>Suddenly a group of men in black with sunglasses walk in. Behind them strides in Wernher Von Braun
>He approaches you. You try to stand up but you know it is too late. He caught you off guard.
>"Von Braun," you begin, "this is an unexpected pleasure. I am honored by your presence-"
>"You may dispenze wiz ze pleazantries kommandant. I am here to put you back on zchedule."
>"I- I assure you my men are working as fast as they can!"
>"Perhaps, I can find new ways to motivate zem" He continues, as he lifts up part of his trench coat revealing his gold-embroidened luger

>> No.12252745

>>12252689
Who cares if it's creating AMERICAN jobs

>> No.12252759
File: 2.99 MB, 800x1026, SLS_contractors.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252759

>>12252745
https://www.nasa.gov/specials/ESDSuppliersMap/
based and patriotpilled

>> No.12252786

Mommy Shotwell talks with Tom Keane of Microsoft, video unlisted-
https://youtu.be/aY1_UMQvTcw

>> No.12252787

>>12252565
You have a highly enriched fissile fuel embedded in solid propellant that you burn from the bottom up like a candlestick, and as the SRB exhaust passes through the nozzle a nuclear fission reaction is initiated and sustained by the moderating effects of a surrounding tank of deuterium oxide (heavy water). This causes the temperature of the exhaust to flash from ~2300 celsius to >40,000 celsius instantly, greatly increasing thrust and Isp, but you need to use water for active cooling of the nozzle OR an opaque gas to insulate the nozzle from the nuclear exhaust.

>> No.12252793

What would be the minimum size and weight of a metallic fuel fission reactor used as a NTR engine?

>> No.12252795

>>12252668
Bold of you to suggest Elon's speech patterns are consistent with the rest of humanity or even with himself

>> No.12252798

>>12252795
Even autists follow speech patterns. I scored rather high myself.

>> No.12252800

>>12252786
https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2020/10/20/azure-space-cloud-powered-innovation-on-and-off-the-planet/

>> No.12252808
File: 203 KB, 306x459, starship 10-20-2020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252808

>>12252798
Does Musk like, legit have autism? I've noticed he has a scar on his throat and my brother told me it is most likely due to a thyroid surgery. He claims the thyroid is connected to autism but I have no idea how that makes sense.

>> No.12252813

>>12252808
What the fuck is "autism" today? That term has been watered out to the extreme. I've actually spent some time working as a tard wrangler at a small company for downies and actual autists about 25 years back, this was long before autism was considered a "spectrum". There was rainman tier autists there. A dude who you could give a date to and he would list famous people who were born that day.

He's not neurotypical. Then again, what the fuck is typical.

>> No.12252818

>>12252786
>>12252800
What is the technical impact of this when you strip away the MS lizardman jargon?

>> No.12252820

>>12252813
>What the fuck is "autism" today?
Not liking sportsball, GoT, not wanting revolution because media told you that you did, etc.

>> No.12252821

>>12252793
EBR-1 was a nuclear reactor that was first in America to generate electricity for the grid AND it was a breeder reactor, yet its core was the size of a big lunchbox. Literally 7 inches in diameter, about a foot and a half long, and produced almost two megawatts of heat. That's probably the lower limit for the size of a nuclear thermal rocket engine core.
On that note, it would probably make sense to have NTRs be very small in every case apart from surface-to-orbit shuttle craft operating from objects up to Ganymede in size. NTRs have low thrust to mass ratio but better efficiency than chemical rockets, which means if you want a normal total stage mass but improved delta V you need to keep your engine no more massive than a typical chemical engine. Otherwise despite being twice as efficient your 20 ton engine will add so much dry mass that your delta V will just go down.
A tiny NTR that only produced a kilonewton of thrust would still be extremely useful for any spacecraft operating in a low TWR requirement environment, like the asteroid belt or among the irregular moons of Gas giants. Vehicles propelled by them would be able to refill their main propellant tanks with water and get back their entire delta V budget in weeks if starting from scratch on virgin land, and in hours if landing at an established DEPOT

>> No.12252823

>>12252818
Fast, low latency data streaming for cloud centers via Starlink. MS gets to leverage even lower latency than fiber can provide, and over long distances. Azure gets an competitive leg up over Amazon Web Services. Basically it's a match made in heaven, and Jeff is on suicide watch

>> No.12252826

>>12252786
I expected Google to jump at Starlink's capability since they own like 20% of SpaceX. But microsoft got to it first. Not only does Google own portion of SpaceX, SpaceX's Starlink is an unofficial successor to Google balloon/fiber internet. Both Musk/Larry Page/Google execs talked with each other about it.

>> No.12252828

>>12252818
Really nothing groundbreaking, data centers could already transfer data to anywhere, but they will get better speeds with starlink if the distance is far enough it needs to span lots of networks.
For starlink it's a huge win for optics. A FANG company legitimizing your business and product is huge. This could also be another revenue stream for starlink, renting out priority starlink bandwidth to companies could be a real money maker.

>> No.12252830

>>12252823
ty anon
Surprised google didn't come forward with something like this first since they have an interest in both SpaceX and cloud computing

>> No.12252831

>>12252826
They don't own spacex what are you talking about

>> No.12252832

>>12252826
Google has bigger problems
https://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-department-to-file-long-awaited-antitrust-suit-against-google-11603195203

>> No.12252834

>>12252832
Better way-too-late than never I suppose

>> No.12252836

>>12252832
Just a pre-election stunt, unfortunately. If it was anything serious their stock would be way down.

>> No.12252838

>>12252813
Elon is a weird dude but it's not because he's autistic.
It's because he works 130 hours a week and sleeps in 3 hour alotted time slots, stimulating himself with caffeine in between and constantly working with teams at his various companies to solve a massive variety of problems.
Elon is what you may call "strung out". He's not unhappy about that though, he's like if one of those old 80 year old men who spent their entire life perfecting their ability to make the exact same clay teapot a billion times had gone into the tech industry instead. He's a total workaholic to the point that if he stopped now his system would crash completely.

>> No.12252841

>>12252831
Google is a large investor in spacex, I'm sure they didn't do it for free.

>> No.12252848

>>12252832
>Google gets split up by DOJ
>Alphabet buys Boogle and Doogie
>trollface.jpg

>> No.12252851

>>12252432
>gay gay gay
Come out of the closet anon

>> No.12252854

>>12252851
>t.irritable poof

>> No.12252862

It's not just connecting to Azure, but connecting remote areas to Azure. If you watch the videos they are talking about mobile Azure platforms (literally shipping containers) that they will send to remote areas, disaster areas, and military operations. Azure's customers will connect these Azure shipping containers to the main Azure network using SES and Starlink. It's very useful for enterprise and remote customers.

>> No.12252864

>>12252621
>>12252633
Are they pogo oscillating like the engines of the Saturn V?

>> No.12252869

>>12252601
I love that art style. Reminds me of 60s/70s conceptual illustrations.

>> No.12252873

>>12252826
5%

Google and Fidelity total owns 10%.

>> No.12252880
File: 356 KB, 1626x1064, Venus Flyby Craft.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252880

Redpill me on the manned Venus flyby, /sfg/. Economical use of Saturn-Apollo hardware for an early interplanetary mission? Or a frivolous make-work project that asked astronauts to risk their lives to sit around and contribute nothing?

>> No.12252883
File: 144 KB, 1024x768, spacestation_painting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252883

>>12252869
this

>> No.12252889
File: 27 KB, 500x536, venus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252889

>>12252880
It could've been great.

>> No.12252891

>>12252880
>Can't even see shit out of the window
A venus flyby was just a concept because we had the hardware at the time. But now it's obviously not a focus (except for China who knows they can't flex with a Mars landing but could build a big ass rocket and do a manned venus flyby instead)

>> No.12252893

>>12252880
Merely a vanity project to try to one-up Apollo during a time when the country didn't even want to return to LEO.

>> No.12252896

>”Welcome back to Red Mars Radio, I feel something magic in the atmosphere tonight and I’m not just talking about the cosmic rays. Here are our top stories.”
>”Boeing continues to fortify its position at Deimos, where it remains a constant concern for SpaceX orbital fuel depot and the nearby L1 Magneto station.”
>”Now I’m gonna play one of my very favorite songs for you... “BOLTGUN, MARS BOLTGUN...”

>> No.12252897

>25 non-starlink launches planned for 2021
>35 non-starlink launches planned for 2022
I'm ready for bi-weekly launches.

>> No.12252906
File: 143 KB, 515x627, EN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252906

Do nuclear thrusters actually have any potential if properly researched, or are they just a meme from a bygone era?

>> No.12252914
File: 145 KB, 971x585, NASA9902020.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252914

>>12252906
They have potential, but they require space infrastructure to use their full potential. No such infrastructure is up yet.

>> No.12252920

>>12252891
What will happen if there's a CME during the Venus flyby? WIll the Chinese people be ok?

>> No.12252921

>>12252897
Still don't see them being able to supply anything close to this cadence, feels like growing pains as F9 stopped developing and growing in scope when they started developing SS.

>> No.12252923
File: 406 KB, 1050x894, 1_QU6Od4QmqYQDWTPpBJ6wzQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252923

>>12252673
>>12252869
Would subscribe to any Robert McCall-tier starship concept art patreon in an instant.

>> No.12252942

>>12252906
Until we have orions my flagship will be a water NTR

>> No.12252945

>>12252522
That's exactly it anon. I wish I were as smart as you and xkcd

>> No.12252950

>>12252945
lmao

>> No.12252961
File: 1.12 MB, 4503x5567, 5uxwda33ibp21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252961

>>12252838
Damn that is really strung out. I hope he still spends enough time with his sons. How will we get the great Marian Musk dynasty if the sons are raised without a father.

>> No.12252979

Could we miniaturize a MOXIE system for recycling CO2 onboard a spacecraft if a Mini pressure swing CO2 concentrated the exhaled CO2 for feedstock? That way, we don’t have limited Lithium scrubbers and you could recycle more water rather than just using it for oxygen
Maybe we could miniaturize down to a reasonable size for a space suit

>> No.12252980

>>12252906
Has Musk ever commented on NTR?
With all the massive regulations that area has it seems like something that he'd get incredibly bored with because of all the red tape, since his cadence of progress would severely put pase the bureaucracy

>> No.12252985
File: 2.43 MB, 1128x1244, 1890C36F-B089-4B6B-8E99-5F9DB1AA8671.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252985

>>12252961
He’s gonna neuralink himself to a powerful computer/synthetic body in a cross between Mr. House and Samuel Hadyn

>> No.12252993
File: 48 KB, 526x994, Samuel_hayden_doom_2016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12252993

>>12252985
>Samuel Hayden
This but you CAN shoot a hole into Mars.

>> No.12253000

>>12252979
>MOXIE
meme, split water, there's plenty and it's a much more generalizable solution
>miniaturize down to a spacesuit
MOXIE doesn't have the output to make that useful

>> No.12253005

>>12252961
Men who grow up without fathers are more likely to commit violent crime, so therefore it’s good to have no dad, because violence is manly and badass.

>> No.12253007

>>12252883
Wait, the stations in Elite are literally just copied from 60s art?

>> No.12253013
File: 145 KB, 944x690, 5tvxEQHAKL.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253013

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750016730

1975 Boeing study of future space program possibilities. A lot of the 1969 integrated program plan stuff shows back up here as they try to figure out ways to make it happen with a shuttle infrastructure.

The most interesting part is their preferred choice of heavy-lift launcher:

>a configuration using either two or four SRB's clustered around a modified shuttle external tank (ET) made into a stage, fitted with three space shuttle main engines (SSMEs) in a recoverable propulsion package.

So Boeing came up with a better shuttle-derived rocket than SLS in 1975, without really putting much effort into it even.

>> No.12253017
File: 61 KB, 900x429, von-braun-infrastructure-source-usgov.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253017

>>12253007
To be fair, 2001 copied from 50s art of Von Braun's concepts

>> No.12253018

>>12252980
He's expressed interest so it's not an ideological opposition, but yeah I don't think it would be worth it for SpaceX with political issues taking precedence over engineering ones

>> No.12253024
File: 80 KB, 800x394, docking_station5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253024

>>12253007
>2001: A Space Odyssey released in 1968
>Elite released in 1984
The developers of Elite most likely drew some inspiration from 2001.

>> No.12253028

>>12253024
Assuming Musk go infinite gooberment money to "build the exact rotating station from 2001" could he do it? Either with a 9m or 18+m starship? Could it be build in parts?

>> No.12253029

>>12252979
ECLSS are a whole thing anon.
Ideally you could couple CO2 scrubbing, O2 generation, water filtration, and even food production with algae.
That's hard though, SpaceX will probably focus on this when they need it and see that public research is slow as fuck.

>> No.12253034
File: 1.16 MB, 1920x1080, starship_stationx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253034

>>12253028
Anything is possible with cheap launches.

>> No.12253035

>>12253028
With Starship you could start building all sorts of giant pieces of orbital infrastructure. At that point the hardest part would be getting the parts built to begin with, not getting them into orbit or assembling them.

>> No.12253036

>>12253024
>The game plays the Blue Danube when you use the docking computer from the very first versions of the original game
>"The developers of Elite most likely drew some inspiration from 2001."
You think?

>> No.12253039
File: 328 KB, 1736x1302, odysseystation.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253039

>>12253028
The station was clearly supposed to be constructed from pretty small pieces since you can see the unfinished sections with the scaffolding

>> No.12253052

>>12252979
MOXIE is actually a joke, I am dumbfounded by how that experiment made the cut on the new rover. What a waste of mass.

>> No.12253061

Space is cool and all, but when is Musk releasing the genetically modified catgirl? I think that it should be a higher priority

>> No.12253065

>>12253061
That's why he's going to Mars. He'd never be able to get away with doing it on Earth.

>> No.12253066

>>12253028
Jesus fuck the more I read my question the more typos I notice
>>12253035
Yeah the coolest idea was from a thread or two ago when an anon noted that you could build a giant ass depot by launching half the spheres at a time to get something like 17,000 cubic feet of fuel with a 5m radius sphere launched in halves

>> No.12253067

>>12253061
Space first, where you can break all the laws of science you want and dare fags to come and stop you.

>> No.12253071

>>12253067
in space you can say nigger

>> No.12253074

>>12253071
>janny has to wait for launch window before coming to clean it up
>flies SLS and ruds on pad

>> No.12253078

>>12252823
This is why Jeff wanted Kuiper, but because he is a retard he insisted on using BO and its paper rockets.

>> No.12253136
File: 3.59 MB, 6001x4017, 1589029337630.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253136

The Space Force swore in the first recruits. The four recruits will go on to basic training in San Antonio with three other recruits who will be sworn in later. By the end of 2021 the Space Force is expected to have about 6,500 active-duty Space Force members

>> No.12253145

>>12253136
The fuck is up with Texas and space recently? I'm not complaining; I'm just glad they didn't choose California or Alabama or something. Or a gay ass northern state like New York or Maryland

>> No.12253147

>>12252830
desu, I don't know what the fuck google does nowadays
shit phones
their big products like android, drive and youtube are still the same old shit
neat smart home stuff but stiff competition from alexa

I daresay MSFT is being forced to innovate faster than GOOG

>> No.12253151

>>12252552
>>12252787

The Russians are working on it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEM_(nuclear_propulsion)

>> No.12253152

>>12253145
LBJ's legacy as the master of the Senate.

>> No.12253155

>>12253136
I see milkers

I wonder if female astronauts wear bras in space

>> No.12253160

>>12253136
Dare I say it...

THICC
H
I
C
C

>> No.12253161

>>12253136
Not off to a great start, huh?

>> No.12253167

>>12253145
That's where everyone in the Air Force (and now Space Force too) undergoes basic training.

>> No.12253168

>>12253078
Yeah but it wouldn't make sense to use SpaceX to launch his satellites and pay off his greatest competitor

And if he used OldSpace rockets it might not be profitable

>> No.12253174

>>12253061
I fully expect him to divorce Grimes and abandon the kid with the retarded name and build a harem of cat girls

>> No.12253187

>>12253028

Starlink is phase 1 in his infinite gooberment money, it's how he's funding Starship. But once Starship's going he'll be able to do whatever the hell he wants.

>> No.12253190

>>12253147
Right now the engineers who give a shit are working on a lot of tech debt problems like un-fucking Android's update situation, while the weaselly kikes at the top try to interfere in the US election again.

>> No.12253193
File: 577 KB, 1280x960, vegetable.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253193

What will the first Martian colonists eat?
I'm thinking they'll all be vegan at least for the first few years before we have excess square km of room. And by then we'll just be proonting steaks

>> No.12253200
File: 260 KB, 900x720, f045d0749223cc158bcbdc7dc97e799d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253200

>>12253061
the important question is, are they going to be actual furry catgirls like this or the fake and gay meme version where it's basically just a normal human with cat ears?

>> No.12253206
File: 588 KB, 750x1037, elon kagerou.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253206

>>12253187
Imagine muskman selling slabs of Mars rock for $100 million each for CEO/head-of-state desks and giving the first three to the White House, the US Senate, and the US House of Representatives free of charge. He'd have the full brrrrr machine at his beck and call forever.

>>12253193
If you have excess square km of room, grassdomes with cattle (or bison or ostriches, they use less water) are unironically a better way to get meat than steak proonters - the whole animal being available for use matters. Hooves for glue, skin for leather, etc.

>>12253200
Elon is an enormous weeb so nekomimi.

>> No.12253207

>>12253155
>bras
>female astronauts
guys can breastfeed too you know

>> No.12253208

>>12253193
Fish grow pretty easy, unnaground martian fish farms would be cool plus you wouldn't be stuck eating only plants and MREs. Shrimp too maybe, how fast do those grow?

>> No.12253210

>>12253193
I wish lab grown meat was 50+ years ahead of where it is now. I would be willing to switch to lab grown only so long as it has a descent texture and taste and isn't made from onions. Like if its molecularly made of protein and real "meat" I think it would be good to replace real meat
>>12253167
Hmm maybe I'm just getting confused. I remember seeing a proposal to build the actual academy in San Antonio

>> No.12253219

>>12253208
There are people working on farming kelp and shellfish on Earth too, those would be a great way to provide edible water filtration and CO2 scrubbing that isn't vats of goo.

>> No.12253220

>>12253207
based

>> No.12253226

>>12253193
WE'RE EATING BUGS

>> No.12253228

>>12253206
>cattle... are unironically a better way to get meat than steak proonters
What are the numbers on this? I always heard farm animals are innefficient in terms of the calories/water you put in vs what you get out.
Like for every 10 calories you put in a cow you get 1 calorie of meat. Makes more sense to plant beans and grains.

>> No.12253233

>>12253206
>nekomimi
Literally the diet coke of furry

>> No.12253238

>>12253155
what about diapers? Do femstronauts have to wear diapers during long spacewalks and if so who cleans them? How does one apply for this job?

>> No.12253239
File: 58 KB, 1606x542, 1602693408214.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253239

>>12253013
>in a recoverable propulsion package.
yeah but think of the JORBS you can create if you just fucking destroy the most advanced reusable engine on the planet every time

and what in god's name is that thing on the right? Is it actually viable to have a rocket be that chunky?

>> No.12253242

>>12253190
>Android's update situation
Man, it's been more than a decade of Android, and this is still going on. I'm guessing it's literally unfixable at this point

>> No.12253245

>>12253193
Vegans are gross malnourished betas

>> No.12253246
File: 622 KB, 2048x2428, crew dragon toilet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253246

>>12253238
I just want to sit in the Crew Dragon couch and casually watch a femstronaut struggle to use the exposed Crew Dragon Toilet (TM) in plain view

>> No.12253249

>>12253228
>I don’t understand thermodynamics
>I want to eat phytoestrogens and be a beta male with bitchtits

>> No.12253250

>>12253228
That's trash broscience designed to encourage people to eat unhealthy diets. Meat eating cultures consistently beat plant eating cultures in everything from athletics to war to innovation.

>>12253233
>>>/d/
>>>/trash/

>>12253242
The permanent fix is for Google to deny certification to anyone not using 100% open source kernels and committing to ten years of updates. They've been working in that direction recently, requiring more and more of the OS to be covered by either update packages or to use mainline versions of libraries.

>> No.12253251

>>12253207
Very woke of you, well done anon

>> No.12253254

>>12253210
>I would be willing to switch to lab grown only so long as it has a descent texture and taste and isn't made from onions.

You’re a pussy. Real men enjoy the thrill of hunting and killing animals.

>> No.12253255

>>12253239
>SSME
>most advanced reusable engine
go back to 1975 grandpa

>> No.12253258

>>12253246
>feed femstronaut tacos
>forget to install privacy curtains around toilet, turn away while she's using it but secretly film it
>turn off ventilation fan and tell her its broken
>also tell her the toilet is clogged but you'll take care of it

>> No.12253261

>>12253207
No they can’t, unless there’s something really wrong with them.

>> No.12253262

>>12253193
Just yeet livestock in dedicated starships. A Mars livestock cycler has great economic potential believe me I know what I'm talking about

>> No.12253265

>>12253249
More estrogen in milk and chicken than in any plants dude. And its the kind that actually affects humans, not just plants.

>> No.12253266

>>12253255
Until Raptor stops eating preburners that's still correct. The Merlin is very cool but it's not an SSME.

>> No.12253269

>>12253255
"complex" would have been the better word to use

>> No.12253270

>>12253258
>>also tell her the toilet is clogged but you'll take care of it
H-how, anon

>> No.12253271

>>12253239
SpaceX should see how it would cost them to make RS25 clones

>> No.12253273

>>12253262
Since the first colonists will be all male, it makes sense to bring female horses and dogs along to relieve sexual tension so they guys don't have to resort to homosexual degeneracy. At least until >>12253200
happens.

>> No.12253274

>>12253254
Half the meals I cook are backstrap I hunted myself and keep in the freezer. I only feel bad when it comes to eating pork. Pork in all forms is so good but I feel guilty about the death of a pig the same way I feel guilt about watching a dog die. I don't feel too bad about eating chicken though. Its a per-basis thing for every animal. But I agree mostly with >>12253206, you NEED animals for more than just food. Especially if you want to be self sustaining (unless you want to make everything out of cotton with no leather)

>> No.12253278

>>12253270
with your bare hands

>> No.12253280

>>12253228
Just bring a Starship full of whey to hold the colonists over until we get cows on Mars.

>> No.12253285

>>12253246
Female astronaut struggling desperately to hold her pee/poop in for hours so she can make it to the ISS when?

>> No.12253286

>>12253265
>More estrogen in milk and chicken than in any plants dude

Wrong. Phytoestrogens in based beans are in much greater concentrations than in chicken or beef.

> And its the kind that actually affects humans, not just plants.

Phytoestrogens affect humans. Stop being a lying faggot trying to justify your feminine diet

>> No.12253291

>>12253274
Cows are cheaper than a petrochemical industry for synth-leather.

>> No.12253293

>>12253258
Stop, my dick can only get so hard

>> No.12253297

>>12253274
Killing animals is fun. Guilt is faggotry

>> No.12253308

>>12253161
Still the same old chairforce, just with a new logo.

>> No.12253310

>>12253297
You have masculinity issues

>> No.12253313

>>12253262
how would livestock handle 0g? Sounds like a fucking nightmare

>> No.12253327

>>12253313
Rotating chicken habs!

>> No.12253329
File: 48 KB, 1054x450, AR1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253329

What will happen to it?

>> No.12253331

>>12253310
You have beta male basedboy issues. I don’t feel any remorse whatsoever when I kill a dumb animal past my respect for it’s ability to resist my advances.

>> No.12253339
File: 35 KB, 474x503, soybeans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253339

this triggers the conservative

>> No.12253343

>>12253339
What bra size do you wear?

>> No.12253352
File: 1.71 MB, 1010x645, SOOOOOOY_uz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253352

>>12253339

>> No.12253353

>>12253193
Fast growing veggies, ration packs and Methalcoccys spread until aquaponics system and grasshopper habitats are set up and ready to go, then fish and bugs will be added to the menu

>> No.12253354

>>12253339
I don't like how onions tastes though

>> No.12253358

>>12253353
>then fish and bugs will be added to the menu
why bugs?

>> No.12253369

>>12253358
Eat the beetle, bigot.

>> No.12253370

>>12253343
Not the person who posted that but I unironicslly have onions every day and I'm both hairy and hung as fuck.

>> No.12253372

>>12253238
SNIFF SNERTT HUMINA HUMINA

>> No.12253373

>>12253358
Bugs are pretty efficient to grow, small, and aren’t plants. I hate plants.

>> No.12253374

>>12253358
Because they’re protein rich, don’t need much water and air, plus many of them can eat parts of plants you grow that you yourself can’t digest so it rounds out the food cycle a bit

>> No.12253378

>>12253370
>My mom smoked every day and lived to 92

>> No.12253379

>>12253285
Mah niggas I would be her personal space toilet. Yummy!

>> No.12253380

>>12253373
>I hate plants
You have to be 18+ to post here anon.

>> No.12253384

>>12253358
so white people can be punished fr racism in Space bigot, eat the bugs

>> No.12253386
File: 262 KB, 1920x1080, New Tent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253386

tent for elon's fyre festival 2 is going up

>> No.12253387

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHeZHyOnsm4
Starlink announced in 2015.

>> No.12253393

>>12253339
Based, time to suck milk from my own male titties

>> No.12253399

>>12253343
I don't believe in them, I'm a free spirit not bogged diwn by illusion of toxic masculinity

>> No.12253402

>>12253380
>Eat low nutrient density junk !!!111

Lol
Plants exist only to add flavors to meat dishes.

>> No.12253404

>>12253386
? new update will be in the high bay silly

>> No.12253406
File: 390 KB, 960x720, image-asset.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253406

here's your fucking sample return bro

>> No.12253408

>>12253399
Toxic masculinity is some nonsense made up by communists.

>> No.12253410

>>12253339
this nigga eating beans

>> No.12253411

>>12253406
https://youtu.be/IVzzw7Vkiyg

>> No.12253413

>>12253406
Is there a single picture of Zubrin smiling where he doesn’t look like a rapist?

>> No.12253417
File: 7 KB, 259x194, index.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253417

>>12253404
haha yeah see you in the "high" bay

>> No.12253421

>>12253369
>>12253384
Why do people react violently when adding insects to a Martian diet so much when they’ve been part of everyone’s diet for hundreds of thousands of years with no s.o.y. type issues and can be proven to be better than mammals for what the requirements are?

>> No.12253428

>>12253239
>146 million per engine
>4 engines
>584 million per launch in engines alone
Keep in mind:
>F9 launch costs
>60 million
So launching F9 9x is cheaper than just the engines for SLS.
What the fuck is going on there?

>> No.12253429

>>12253421
>they’ve been part of everyone’s diet for hundreds of thousands of years
dont know about you pal but i dont go around eating cockroaches for breakfast lmao

>> No.12253435

>>12253421
>for hundreds of thousands of years

This is space travel, what humans did for hundreds and thousands of years could not possibly be more irrelevant

>> No.12253438

>>12253421
No thanks

>> No.12253439

>>12253421
>Appealing to nature when talking about spaceflight

>> No.12253440
File: 3.18 MB, 5100x3300, SLS_vs_F9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253440

>>12253428
Have some more cost numbers.

>> No.12253441

>>12253421
I’d eat a million wasps before I eat any beans.

>> No.12253444

>>12253435
It is very relevant. Human nature must be accounted for at all times.

>> No.12253447

>>12253440
Cost plus contracts where a misstake.
Why they don't negotiate a fixed price is beyond me...

>> No.12253449

>>12253444
Does human nature compel us to eat the bugs?

>> No.12253450

>>12253444
Alright bro you can have the Grasshopper Guts irradiated MRE pack, I'll take the beef stew and chocolate pudding

>> No.12253455

What would greta do

>> No.12253456

>>12253439
>>Appealing to nature when talking about spaceflight
You do realize we need to perform the things nature normally does to survive in space right?
Nobody’s saying you mainly eat insects, just add them as an ingredient to a colonial meal to get a more balanced diet with low resource consumption

>> No.12253461

>>12253447
The entire point of SLS was to keep Shuttle jobs alive since they'd been in place for 30 years and were full of boomers that couldn't retrain.

>> No.12253465

>>12253456
nature normally doesnt eat bugs you NIGGER RETARD

>> No.12253467

>>12253441
imagine being this fragile
>>12253378
?

>> No.12253468

>>12253444
What does that have to do with eating bugs

>> No.12253470

>>12253449
Insects are a reliable and common part of the human diet historically, yeah. Grubs in particular are something I look at and think “That thing should be eaten by me”. They look delicious.

>> No.12253474

Why don't we use some room-temperature stable fuels and oxydizers like hydrazine derivates and ClF3 instead of hard to handle and constantly boiling off LH2 and LOX?
That stuff would also be more dense, meaning you can save weight on smaller fuel tanks while having pretty good specific impulse.

>> No.12253476

>>12253449
Yes, with sufficient hunger, you’ll eat nearly everything
many insects are better tasting and better for you than most of the high fructose processed roadkill meat most people in civilized societies eat today

>> No.12253480

>>12253467
Imagine eating something that feminizes you.

>> No.12253483

>>12253461
Fuck boomers, they should just go into a company, talk to the boss in person and give him a firm handshake...

>> No.12253485

>>12253465
Yeah it does? Bugs are perfectly edible and have been eaten by many human cultures for millions of years

>> No.12253486

Why are people so easily fall for low effort /pol/ memes about bugs or onions?
I like SpaceX but this thread has attracted too many /pol/tards

>> No.12253487
File: 82 KB, 1280x720, just.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253487

Bug Eater General vs Breastfeeder General

>> No.12253488

>>12253456
Bugs have eaten way more humans that humans eat bugs, that means it has to be in the mission plan right

>> No.12253498

>>12253200
>Martian wasteland frontier
>Cyborg technocrat Musk
>Catgirls and Furgirls
>No CURRENT YEAR faggotry or jews
How the fuck do I get to Mars? I need to get there

>> No.12253506

>>12253485
>human cultures for millions of years

>> No.12253507

>>12253480
imagine thinking masculinity is superior to femininity

>> No.12253508
File: 2.27 MB, 179x320, 1477067629046.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253508

>>12253470
>Grubs in particular are something I look at and think “That thing should be eaten by me”. They look delicious.

>> No.12253515

>>12253508
They do have a nice, nutty flavor to them
The gooiness is a bit odd at first though

>> No.12253520

>>12253470
dude yes, i loved that shit in the lion king

>> No.12253524

>>12253508
I’m serious!
A few days ago, while it was raining, these big white grubs, beetle larva I guess, came out of the ground and started running around. I picked up 23 of them and fried them in a skillet with some garlic, lemon juice, salt, and pepper. Pretty good. Taste was sort of similar to peanuts or almonds.

>> No.12253527

>>12253508
bro u havent lived till u slurp down some mealworms

>> No.12253530

the amount of shitposting is getting to critical mass in this thread

>> No.12253531

>>12253524
based based based this is just like in blade runner oooooo

>> No.12253535
File: 218 KB, 1024x884, osirisrex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253535

Osiris-Rex sample collection attempt today in 3+ hours from now!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6K2dqCoin8
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/update-nasa-to-broadcast-osiris-rex-asteroid-sample-collection-activities
https://www.asteroidmission.org

>> No.12253537

>>12253531
People ate grubs in Blade Runner? I don’t recall

>> No.12253542
File: 54 KB, 600x944, DmGtYBn25GDHFdc4Gui8CS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253542

What was Astronaut Farmer about? I can't remember

>> No.12253545

>>12253507
Funny bait almost did a serious response.

>> No.12253548

>>12253537
it was in 2049, not the original iirc

>> No.12253557

>>12253545
Thanks for the (you)

>> No.12253558

>>12253480
Show me the study that shows beans turn you into a girl

>> No.12253560

If Musk wants solar arrays for power, would one just pack in standardized cells then make plastic sheets with slight bubbles on top of the cell so that it’s protected from dust and the bulges act as focusing lenses so they get more light on them

>> No.12253563
File: 37 KB, 620x263, Dreamer_launch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253563

>>12253542
It's about what happens when a garage engineer from /sfg/ actually gets the funding to build his own meme rocket.

>> No.12253565

>>12253406
Someone should upload that shouting match between zubrin and the astrobiology guy. Fucking hilarious

>> No.12253566

>>12253474
handling large amounts of hyper-toxic chemicals presents its own complications.

>> No.12253575

>>12253566
That's not big of a deal, just don't spill any...

>> No.12253577

>>12253560
>launch starlink with laser com/power
>swarm focus laser power to recharge power space sat batteries

>> No.12253578

>>12253563
but it was suborbital though, right?

>> No.12253580

>>12253578
That's a Mercury-Atlas.

>> No.12253587

>>12253578
No, it orbited the Earth 9 times more than what Boing can manage without screwing something up.

>> No.12253597

>>12253558
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11305594/

Phytoestrogens bond to estrogen receptors. When estrogen receptors bond with an estrogen particle, or something that appears to be one, they travel to the nucleus and begin regulating gene expression in a “feminine” manner. This difference in gene expression is why men and women have different body fat distributions and whatnot.

>> No.12253598

>>12253028
Yes. We are separated from giant space construction projects by three technologies, and only one of them is actually a hard problem.
These are cheap launch to orbit, real-time remote operation of robotic factory machinery, and a space-worthy electron beam welder.
If we can launch a 100+ ton roll of steel into orbit for $5 million, the materials cost of a 10,000 ton space station is half a billion. The ISS masses ~500 tons, and cost ~150 billion, so the station you could build using rolls of steel bend, cut, and welded in space could approach as little as 1/300th the ISS while having 20x the internal volume. If you devote 80% of that station's volume to propellant storage at an 80% mass ratio you have a single stage vehicle that has a wet mass of 42000 tons, a dry mass of 10,000 tons, and a delta V budget of ~5 km/s if using only methalox thrusters. If you're using methane NTR instead, you have 8.4 km/s of delta V and can go all the way to Jupiter orbit. In fact you can go all the way to Jupiter orbit while carrying an additional 2000 tons of payload, which could be an entire fully loaded Starship with its own payload on top of its propellant mass.
Basically we'll be able to build one-shot spacecraft that can set up an entire surface base and propellant production facility in the Jupiter system in just a couple decades, pessimistically.

>> No.12253600

>>12253542
Was this movie based or what

>> No.12253602

>>12253598
Didn’t the Soviets weld in space?

>> No.12253606

>>12253602
Yes.

>> No.12253613

>>12253193
Aquaponics growing a population of fish and crustaceans will be day one
Martians eat lobster dinner every day

>> No.12253617

>>12253329
gone, reduced to atoms

>> No.12253620

>>12253535
thanks for the heads up.

>>12253560
I wonder if there will be a movement away from solar in satellites due to light pollution issues. Some serious irony here.

>>12253575
that's just the thing. You have to jump through a ton of hoops to GUARANTEE that you never spill any. It's a pain in the ass and sensitive to changes in political policy. Imagine the environmentalist activist shitstorm that would erupt if a major launch system started using these things. It's just not going to happen in the west.

Of course china is a different story because they don't give a shit if they crush a village under a 1st stage and give the survivors a bad case of melting

>> No.12253634

>>12253566
>>12253474
NO2/Propane fuel blend subcooled via a chilly night cheaply made and not super toxic rocket

>> No.12253644

>>12253474
Besides being toxic as fuck and causing cancer, they're not very high impulse.
LH2 needs to go as a first stage fuel though. RP-1 and Methane is the way to go.

>> No.12253648

>>12253620
Whatever, rockets tend to launch over the atlantic anyway.
So no need to give a fuck about where they land.
That boost in performance is worth it.

>> No.12253649

>>12253597
I hear people with more estrogen debate online instead of fighting it out.

>> No.12253651

>>12253428
>spend $1.5 billion
>launch SLS
>get ~100 tons to LEO/~30-40 tons TLI
or
>spend $1.5 billion
>launch 25 Falcon 9s (expendable)
>get ~500 tons to LEO/~112.5 tons TLI
>BUT you gotta dock some modules or something, idk space is hard bro :^)

>> No.12253661

>>12253634
That fuel has lower performance and you need to build a more complex engine to run it.
Hydrazine + ClF3 doesn't even need an ignitor, just a preburner, a turbopump, an injector and an ablative nozzle made from phenol impregnated asbestos.

>> No.12253662

>>12253474
Cryogens are not a big deal once you have the hardware understood, which we do.

The benefits of density VS Isp land on a sweet spot, and that sweet spot is closest to the performance of sub-cooled propalox.
If you consider more factors, like ease of ISRU and optimizing for engine reuse metrics, methalox becomes superior to propalox, though not by a massive amount.

>> No.12253664

>>12253651
Don't forget.
>BUT your project is going to canceled by the new administration because your mission development was lean and didn't kiss the ass of Congress across all the states

>> No.12253670

>>12253644
Hydrazine and ClF3 have a pretty good specific impulse and you don't need the fuckhuge tanks like LH2 does.

>> No.12253673

>>12253602
Yeah, I just mean that you can't go out and buy a welding robot that works in space at the moment, so that's a barrier between current day capabilities and the ability to build large non-retard structures in space. Not a huge barrier, but a barrier nonetheless.

>> No.12253675

>>12253670
Yeah, CIF3 has good specific impulse. Except for the fact that it eat fucking everything it comes into contact with including tanks, combustion chambers, engines and pad personnel.

>> No.12253676

>>12253661
Ablative nozzles are harder and shittier to manufacture and operate than regeneratively cooled nozzles, unless you're working with solid propellants.

>> No.12253679

>>12253673
>implying SpaceX wouldn't send their mexican welders and a bunch of sheets of stainless up there

>> No.12253685

>>12253651
IRL doesn't have magical docking ports like KSP. Orbital construction is not as advanced as you think.

>> No.12253695

>>12253675
It's not that hard to work with, even good old steel tanks work with that stuff, and beeing hypergolic prevents combustion instabilities.
>>12253676
If you have a mold to manufacture them from, they are pretty easy to make:
>coat mold in release agent (wax/silicone/whatever)
>apply first coat of phenol resin
>laminate a few coats of asbestos over it in a certain pattern
>let it harden
>release from mold

>> No.12253701

>>12253685
Docking is easy. NASA just takes a million years to do it for safety reasons

>> No.12253703

>>12253695
>It's not that hard to work with
I suggest you put your money where your mouth is and go forth and make an engine using it then.

>> No.12253704

>>12253673
Honestly, with launch costs being what they are, it seems like the actual assembly wouldn't be hard.

Just do it like ikea furniture where there's a simple "put tab A into slot b" assembly process. Maybe have little electromagnets to stick the welders to the parts, and stick the parts to each other during the welding process.

>> No.12253706

>>12253701
Wrong

>> No.12253708

>>12253701
>NASA just takes a million years to do it for safety reasons
and to maintain an illusion of "spes iz hard :(((("

>> No.12253709

>>12253701
what's the current docking sim speedrun record?

>> No.12253719

>>12252906
How the fuck does Hydrogen become radioactive?

>> No.12253720

>>12253701
Nah. If that were the case Elon would have built a Mars ship in orbit by now

>> No.12253726

>>12253598
>it's hard because robots
>nooo you can't just--
Cut out the robots.

>> No.12253728

>>12253719
Maybe by getting turned into deuterium or tritium?

>> No.12253738

>>12253720
I don't know who told you "docking is hard" is what prevents interplanetary spaceships from being constructed in orbit yesterday, but they're retarded.

>> No.12253744

>>12253719
Did you miss the whole Enriched Uranium bit? There's a reaction going on there, those hydrogen atoms don't go through there unmolested. They get turned into shit like deuterium - 2H (most common) and tritium - 3H (very unlikely).

Deuterium is what makes Heavy Water radioactive after all.

>>12253728
Yes, it does. But not tritium, that requires lithium in the mix to occur.

>> No.12253748
File: 536 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20201020-221256.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253748

Seems like SN8 getting a nose cone bros. I guess 21st is going to look like this: SN8 to build site -> attach nose cone -> back to launch pad -> static fire from header tanks

>> No.12253752

>>12253748
I guess the engines aren't kill then

>> No.12253755

>>12253728
>>12253744
How do you turn Hydrogen into Deuterium or Tritium?
Also Deuterium is not radioactive.

>> No.12253761

>>12253752
lets hope so. or else elon is thinkin fuck it and we get a mid air rud

>> No.12253764

>>12253761
Considering that Elon has said he expects the first ninja backflip landing to fail anyway, they sorta might as well

>> No.12253765

>>12253748
All in a single day?

>> No.12253769

>>12253755
In that case, it produces tritium or some of the other weird ass unstable short lived isotopes that rapidly decays into more stable isotopes.

>> No.12253774

>>12253755
>How do you turn Hydrogen into Deuterium
A stray neutron produced by the decay of Uranium-237 gets captured by Hydrogen-1, turning it into Hydrogen-2, or Deuterium.

>> No.12253788

>>12253765
Closures? Yes.
The fact that they'd do all that in a day? My optimistic guess

>> No.12253794

I guess it got lost in the news today, but Microsoft is partnering with SpaceX to build military satellites:
>SpaceX recently won a contract with the US Space Development Agency to build new satellites—separately from Starlink—to "provide missile tracking data for hypersonic glide vehicles and the next generation of advanced missile threats."
>Microsoft today said it is joining that project as a SpaceX subcontractor and that the two companies plan more collaborations.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/10/microsofts-new-data-center-in-a-box-will-use-spacex-starlink-broadband/

>> No.12253798

>>12253794
Are you a retard? It was posted plenty

>> No.12253809

>>12253752
there's been zero evidence that they are. If they had trouble you'd expect activity around them but as far as I can tell no one has been near them today.

>>12253761
>>12253764
but going 200% agile is something elon would do, too

>> No.12253811

>>12253798
>Asking 4chan users if they're retarded
What does he mean by this?

>> No.12253814

>>12253798
The Azure part was posted, not the part about building military satellites?

>> No.12253815

>>12253794
nice. I can't wait to see him price gouge wallstreet using starlink

>> No.12253818

>>12253809
For all we know they might switch out the engines at the midbay

>> No.12253819

>>12253814
Military sat is old news like a week or two old news. Its been posted the hour it hit the news.

>> No.12253822

>>12253818
how many raptors are available for use, anyways? I know they're up to like #40 but they've also lost a good number of them, too

>> No.12253824

>>12253814
the writer or poster conflated two different stories. spacex military sats are for that transport layer thing. MS has nothing to do with that. The Azure thing links up with Starlink for low latency networking between distant cloud centers

>> No.12253833

>>12253811
Nothing, don't worry my fren

>> No.12253844

>>12253822
I mean they’re willing to kill three raptors this month

>> No.12253845

Do they have a nosecone already built for SN9?

>> No.12253851
File: 3.27 MB, 1644x2048, kwoueyx3u9u51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253851

>blocks your path

>> No.12253857

>>12253851
What is that engine behind Jim

>> No.12253858

>>12253851
It’s okay SLS was supposed to have a wet rehearsal in 10 days but it just slipped. Again. It’s all so tiresome.

>> No.12253863

>>12253822
>lost a good number of them
when?

>> No.12253864

>>12253844
>kill
The proper word is "high risk testing"

>> No.12253870

>>12253863
L2 NSF ;)

>> No.12253874

>>12253857
SSME

>> No.12253883

>>12253863
https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-elon-musk-raptor-engine-bug-fixes/

>SpaceX’s propulsion development team have struggled to get any single Raptor engine to survive more than 50-100 seconds of cumulative test fires. According to information from sources familiar with the program, Musk has enforced an exceptionally hardware-rich development program for the first full-scale Raptor engines to such an extent that several have been destroyed so completely that they could barely be used to inform design optimization work

>This is why SpaceX has been chewing through an average of one Raptor engine per month since February 2019 – by testing engines to destruction and aggressively comparing engineering expectations with observed behavior and post-test hardware conditions, rapid progress can (theoretically) be made.

>Instead of spending another year or more analyzing models and testing subscale engines and components, SpaceX dove into integrated testing of a sort of minimum-viable-product Raptor design, accepting that the path to a flightworthy, finalized design would likely be paved with one or several dozen destroyed engines

>> No.12253888

>>12253858
Just chop down the biggest fucking redwood on the western seaboard, sharpen it into a stake and put it through the core stage already.

>> No.12253890

>>12252307
I like that hop

>> No.12253891
File: 3.04 MB, 1719x2048, Screenshot_20201020-155759.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253891

>>12253136
>if you only knew how bad things were
Looks like they will even be a good bit worse than the air force

>> No.12253896

>>12252513
B...B..But it's the most advanced rocket eva!!!!!

>> No.12253897

>>12253542
boomer astronaut has to leave project mercury before going to space in order to help out on his family farm.
years later he decides to replicate mercury-atlas in his barn and follow his dreams, making nasa and the feds cope and seethe

>> No.12253903
File: 51 KB, 550x471, hippiepepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253903

>>12253883
Same way NASA built and tested the F-1
Good vibes man

>> No.12253904

>>12253874
Thanks!
Hopefully those museum engines will never be used & dumped into the ocean.

>> No.12253909

>be NASA
>be stuck with wastefull contractors building a 1980s rocket in the 2020s that won't launch anytime soon
>ends up eating more money than the entire programm and hundreds of launches of the other guy that launches most of your stuff and personal at a 70% profit margin
>congress cucked you into using wastefull contractors 1980s rocket
>idea
>don't make congress angry by cutting off wastefull contractor
>just set some fixed dates and don't increase budget too much
>tell el cheapo launch guy you may need a heavy launch vehicle soon
>let sink through you will launch in time with wastfull contractor, but also consider to launch with el cheapo
>because the launch window of a certain probe is kind of special and some other shit needs to get done within the administion period of the guy that for once didn't cut your programms
>few years later
>oops, the launch window is in a few months and you haven't even launched a boilerplate?
>Oh no, we absolutely HAVE to launch NOW
>only el cheapos rocket is ready, so we have no choice

>> No.12253913

>>12253904
The ones currently strapped to the the beast that shall not be named are historic engines and they will go in the drink if it doesn't RUD.

>> No.12253918

>>12253844
Starting sentences with "I mean" is pure Reddit

>> No.12253922

>>12253913
WHICH IS WHY IT MUST RUD

>> No.12253927

SLSME is the most advanced engine ever made, Starship may be neat, but its a pipe dream, SLS will send the first female American astronauts to the moon

>> No.12253928

>>12253922
Personally I'm more in the "put a stake through its thrice cursed foam core" camp.

>> No.12253932

>>12253918
I mean, it's not that big a deal. The narwhal beacons

>> No.12253931

>>12253888
>cellulous-rich exhaust

>> No.12253938

>>12253932
>to be fair

>> No.12253941

>>12253695
https://www.lookchem.com/Chlorine-trifluoride/

Have fun. I await the liveleak of you getting yourself killed

>> No.12253948

>>12253918
Shut the fuck up nigger

>> No.12253952

>>12253927
If SLS flies EM-2 in 2023 I’m confident that it would beat Starship to the moon, yeah. No joke even.

>> No.12253958
File: 1.88 MB, 1080x1920, Columbia.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253958

>> No.12253961

>>12253883
Isn't that how SpaceX does kind of everything?
>starship tanks/hoppers
Allways blowing up, but improving quickly.
>propulsive landing
Many blew up before they nailed it, now it's a routine operation.
>Falcon heavy
That thing was very likely to blow up.
>evolution of F9 from first flight to full thrust version
It also blew up quite a few times.
>Falcon 1
That thing failed 2 out of 3 flights and laid the foundation for Falcon 9 and Heavy.

And besides that, even if the first batch of Starship/Superheavy engines need maintainance or replacement parts every launch, that's enough to do the job for NASA as the lunar lander uses different engines anyway and all raptor flights would be unmanned.
That brings in a shitload of cash to further develop raptor.

>> No.12253964

>>12253952
I think SLS will fly before New Glenn

>> No.12253975
File: 85 KB, 1600x855, sn8 brap analysis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12253975

>>12252340
>>12252351
>>12252513
Not exactly ~600hz, but I guess the profile looks somewhat similar to the raptor honk on starhopper with the 2nd harmonic. 2nd harmonic is at about 500hz. The second honk is roughly a semitone higher than the first one. I wonder what two structures could have caused those.

>> No.12253982

>>12253964
Tbh the order of likely hood for first orbital flight will be
>Vulcan next year
>SLS
>New Glenn
>Starship (maybe lmao)
You can't launch a rocket into orbit with engines that don't work

>> No.12253986

>>12253952
>If SLS flies EM-2 in 2023
That's a big if, given Boeings track record and they will most likely require several unmanned tests before human rating SLS.
>I’m confident that it would beat Starship to the moon, yeah. No joke even.
I don't think Starship will do it before 2023, but I don't think Boeing is going to pull that off either.

>> No.12253989

>>12253982
Yeah it’s weird how New Glenn is super secretive though. We have no idea how far they are at the moment. We do know that BE-4 had some issues and is the main reason Vulcan was delayed.

>> No.12253992

>>12253982
Vulcan and New Glenn both require engines that currently dont work. SLS will launch first of all these, New Glenn last

>> No.12254000

Hey we were supposed to have the starship update this week. What gives?

>> No.12254004

>>12253206
>says he's a catgirl
>posts a picture of a dog

>> No.12254007

>>12254000
Elon time.

>> No.12254008

>>12253989
It's "super secretive" because it only exists on paper and BE-4 is nowhere near as far along as raptor.

>> No.12254011

I know orange tank bad, but why is orange tank bad?

>> No.12254013

>>12254011
Orange tank is not bad, but the politics around SLS’ creation are awful. If SLS started flying in 2017 like intended, it wouldn’t have been so bad

>> No.12254016

>>12254004
I want to fuck everything

>> No.12254022

>>12253145
It’s obvious to anyone paying attention that Texas is where the future of rocketry is. Florida may have more existing infrastructure but much of it is mothballed or badly in need of refurbishment, Texas is where Starships will launch from and until a competitor shows better results, Starships are the future of large scale heavy lift American rocketry.

>> No.12254025

>>12253313
just spin your chickens bro

>> No.12254027

>>12254011
Because orange tank in development in one way or another for 20+ years and 20-60+ billion dollar spent already on the program with 0 results.

>> No.12254028
File: 15 KB, 230x308, In-Line_SDLV_1978.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254028

>>12254013
>If SLS started flying in 2017
The concept is so old that there's concept art of it with a white tank. Because Shuttle was still using a white tank.

>> No.12254040

>>12253602
yeah but they fucked it up and almost died

>> No.12254044

>>12253644
subcooled propane, anon

>> No.12254045

>>12254028
Dude if we had that thing flying in the 80s that would’ve been really cool. Also Constellation program was neat but by the end of it it was not even shuttle derived anymore

>> No.12254049

>>12253726
>it's easier to teach Mexican welders how to wear a space suit than it is to teach Spot to weld
>delightfully belterintuitive

>> No.12254051

>>12254044
Why add more carbon to the mix for no extra impulse when methane does just a good a job?

>> No.12254052

>>12253982
I would hope BE4 works perfectly at this point considering how conservative it is and how slow its development has been but until they have been tested to a comparable degree, this is conjecture. It's only because Raptor gets to leave the test stand and get real world data that SpaceX knows its actual limitations.

>> No.12254055

>>12254049
Mexicans are based.

>t. Chicano who wants to fly in space one day

>> No.12254057

>>12254004
Calling the wolf 2hus "anime catgirls" is a long and proud tradition.
>on /pol/

>> No.12254058

>>12253975
Is this from NSF or your own doing? Because if it's you I applaud the 'tism

>> No.12254063

>>12254055
Until you start with the beheadings and shit. That fucking aztec blood, man.

>> No.12254065

>>12254052
Even Tory Bruno said that BE-4 was having issues....last month. Shits bad

>> No.12254066

>>12254011
hydrogen first stage, big orange hydrogen tank

>> No.12254071

>>12254058
I don't think NSF would call NSF spergs or call the Raptor instability "braaaaps"

>> No.12254074
File: 69 KB, 612x491, 1595334582151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254074

>>12254065
Why don't they just switch to Raptors? Don't say "it's not that easy in rocketry" because it totally is

>> No.12254076

>>12254022
once the government abandons the Cape completely, the rockets will return without the red tape
it's such prime land
>>12254051
propane, when chilled, is much denser than methane, and density is king
>>12254057
sorry, I wouldn't know, I don't go to shitholes

>> No.12254077

>>12254074
Political issues. ULA and SpaceX are competitors. Raptor shits on BE-4 though

>> No.12254080

>>12254076
Density is not king if you're looking for a quick turnaround and would rather not be scrubbing tar out of your engines with a fucking toilet brush.

>> No.12254082

>>12254074
by oldspace standards Raptor is still having issues

>> No.12254083

>>12254011
It killed the Challenger and its inability to take vertical loads has delayed SLS for like a decade.

>> No.12254087

>>12254074
Raptor was never on offer, if I were SpaceX I wouldn't put it out there either, unlike Blue Origin they aren't really desperate for oldspace partnerships and the value proposition isn't there

>> No.12254088

>>12253819
What the fuck do Microsoft know about building satellites - of any description? Their software is fucking dogshit on a good day

>> No.12254089

>>12254080
propane burns clean, anon
taste the meat not the heat

>> No.12254093

>>12254087
Just charge RL-10 prices per engine and pocket the rest. Oldspace is willing to spend obscenely on engines.

>> No.12254096

>>12254011
I'll write out the full manifesto:
So after kerosene-fueled Apollo program ended (yes this goes that far back) the USA had ambitious ideas for a conceptual "shuttle for space". This was SUPPOSED to be a cheap, low maintenance, highly reusable vehicle to get a ton of Tons to space. It was during this time that NASA decided to ditch kerosene (more specifically "RP-1") for hydrogen... which on paper has a terrific Isp. The shuttle basically got raped to death in the design process and ended up being an anemic piece of shit that needed dangerous solid rockets strapped to the side just to lift off- and hydrogen ended up being a devil (hydrogen is SO small atomically that it quite literally leaks out of your solid metal tank). This was the first orange tank bad. The foam could tear off and damage the shuttle. Fast forward to 2012. Shuttle is retired. Nasa spent a lot of money on shuttle and wanted to "convert" it into a capsule launcher. "IT'LL BE CHEAP!" Problem was, shuttle orange tank was designed to have shit hang off the sides. SLS needs to carry weight on top. So it was redesigned essentially from scratch for SLS (new alloy of metal, new welds, hell even new orange foam polymer). What was "supposed" to be cheap has now cost millions of dollars (billions of dollars I think?) and it has taken them 10 YEARS to even build the first one, which has YET to fly.

>> No.12254099

>>12254096
>New alloy
>New welds
>New polymer
What the fuck? Why didn’t they just make the Delta IV core fatter?

>> No.12254103

>>12254088
Microsoft isnt building satellites. They're using Starlink. SpaceX is also building military sats. It has nothing to do with Microsoft and was announced a week ago or so.

The article written by JON BRODKIN is designed to conflate the two and confuse the readers.

>> No.12254106

>>12254099
Shut up, goy.

>> No.12254108
File: 996 KB, 2376x1543, 1594822123552.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254108

>>12254096
So it's not even the same orange tank, really. It's a brand new tank using some of the same tooling and all of the same mistakes.

Fucking hell.

>> No.12254107

>>12254096
I should add on to this: it has already taken 10 years just to build the first stage. But really it has been in development since 2012 and even BEFORE that. By the 90's NASA new shuttle was aging. The plan was to retire shuttle eventually and convert it to a standard rocket using the same parts. It's just an overall piece of shit. Orange tank bad because orange tank is quite literally intrinsically bad, unsafe, stupid, dangerous, anemic, underpowered, expensive, and can never live up to the raw power of a kerosene tank with F1 engines slapped to the bottom

>> No.12254116

>>12253239
Thing on the right is the old convair nexus/chrysler SERV SSTO concept. It was relatively common in the 60s to see it thrown around as a post-Saturn reusable rocket design. It fell out of favor by the 70s though. I didn't even realize Boeing was still considering it as late as 1975.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=___JNGJog0A

>> No.12254121

>>12254099
>>12254108
Yeah it's literally not even close to the shuttle tank. Don't be fooled just because it is orange. They literally had to redesign it from the ground up. The only heritage piece of SLS is the Shuttle engines... which SHOULD be in a museum. SLS has been going on for so long they already have an array of NEW RS-25 engines they built in their free time (at around $200 mil a piece) while SLS kept getting delayed. But it's already mandated by congress to fly with old shuttle engines so they HAVE to launch with them and destroy them.

>> No.12254124

>>12254096
I'd like to add that NASA messed up installing the new friction stir welding machine at Michoud by setting it upside-down. Righting it took months.

>> No.12254127

>>12254107
Imagine how fucking cheap you could make a big dumb booster with 304L and F-1Bs. Probably cheaper than Starship in unit build cost... but it'd be expendable because F-1Bs aren't reusable like Raptor.

>> No.12254130

>>12254103
Well that puts my mind at ease

>> No.12254131
File: 33 KB, 598x340, Screenshot_20191001_Elon_Musk_on_Twitter_AngelNDevil2_MarkChica_FutureJurvetson_bluemoondance74_SpaceX_Raptor_cost_is_tra....png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254131

>>12253239
The SSME isn't the most advanced reusable engine ever built anymore.

>> No.12254133
File: 519 KB, 2692x1928, nerva.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254133

DURCH STETIGEN ZERFALL ENTSTEHEN RADIOAKTIVE STRAHLEN AUS DEM URANKRISTALL

>> No.12254134

>>12253673
Industrial welding has massive energy requirements too. Way beyond anything we've put in space so far. An electron beam would require something crazy like 10 megawatts per cubic millimeter.

>> No.12254137

NASA's OSIRIS-REx stream just went live, but nothing but a info picture on it yet.

>> No.12254139
File: 73 KB, 671x699, f1b booster.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254139

>>12254124
No fucking way. This is the first I'm hearing of this. If this is true then I do not know what to do with this information other than scream at my monitor
>>12254127
An F1B booster would have been fucking amazing and could lift so much shit into space.

>> No.12254150
File: 795 KB, 2250x1500, 1601790306378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254150

>>12254134
bro just build more solar panels
t. anti-nuclear retards

>> No.12254151

>>12254131
Starship actually looks like it’ll cost less to build that Falcon 9 wtf?

>> No.12254152

>>12254121
>The only heritage piece of SLS is the Shuttle engines... which SHOULD be in a museum.
>But it's already mandated by congress to fly with old shuttle engines so they HAVE to launch with them and destroy them.
Shit like this makes me wonder if Congress had some sort of plan to destroy or downplay American spaceflight achievements so that nobody would have any reference to what a well managed space program would be. That way Congress can just set up infinitely delayed programs without anyone fighting back.

>> No.12254157

>>12254151
Yes, Falcon will eventually be completely retired in favor of Starship. Rideshare bus companies will fill the gap.

>> No.12254163

>>12254137
yup

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6K2dqCoin8

So are we getting live feed of the capture attempt or just people talking about it?

Wait they just answered my question:
>main event occurs in about an hour

>> No.12254164
File: 468 KB, 450x446, black_lagoon_filter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254164

>These masks

>> No.12254165

>>12254151
Starship could be used in a purely expendable mode on every launch, yeeting hundreds of tons into orbit.

AND IT WOULD COST LESS THAN SLS. BY A LOT. EXPENDABLE STARSHIP IS ***CHEAPER*** THAN SLS.

>> No.12254166

>>12254163
>>12253998
Separate thread is here.

>> No.12254170
File: 233 KB, 1948x1096, 1601315521620.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254170

>>12254164
what the actual fuck?

>> No.12254171

>>12254165
Holy shit how do SLSfags justify this? All criticism to starship is about its reusability. If it BTFOs everyone while being expendable OldSpace is finished

>> No.12254174

>>12254139
>orange rocket bad
>blue rocket good

>> No.12254175

>>12254170
>TAG TEAM
Oh shit it’s that woman from “The Universe” right? I used to watch that show

>> No.12254177

>>12254124
Jack Schmitt: "Let's see the next generation leave footprints like these"
Update: We cannot

>> No.12254181

>>12254076
>propane, when chilled, is much denser than methane
Methane has 86% of propane's density if you were just comparing fuels, but every kg of methane corresponds to 3.6kg of oxidizer which is much, much denser than either. I don't know what the optimal oxidizer ratio is for propolox but if it's not massively different then you're probably looking at single digit differences.
And clean burning is relative, pure methane is still significantly better.

>> No.12254188

>>12254171
They can't, but congress and jerbs keeps SLS chugging anyways.

>> No.12254189
File: 81 KB, 1210x2104, starship ika.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254189

>>12254165
>>12254171
Expendable cargo Starship would be able to yeet 350 tons to LEO per flight. It would humiliate every other rocket ever flown in the same way the Saturn V did at the time.
AND IT WOULD STILL BE CHEAPER THAN THE SHUTTLE PER FLIGHT.

>>12254174
>orange and blue morality

>> No.12254191

>>12254177
They also dropped the first SLS lox dome and had to rebuild it from scratch

>> No.12254194

>>12254174
I only made it blue because the Delta II rocket is blue and it looks cool as fuck. But I'm not quite sure why it's blue hahah I assume it's just insulation or something.
Also the Atlas V has a cool copper color that comes from the Titan rocket's weird copper insulation

>> No.12254196
File: 32 KB, 359x481, CC7C9789-8FD2-4D9B-A8D4-9976FA272C3E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254196

>>12254194
>>12254174
They wanted to paint Delta IV Blue, too

>> No.12254198
File: 723 KB, 3840x2160, ss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254198

>>12254194
>>12254174
I like shiny steel rockets. The best paint is no paint.

>> No.12254199
File: 103 KB, 380x570, Vertical_Assembly_Center-NASA-380x570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254199

>>12254139
>No fucking way. This is the first I'm hearing of this. If this is true then I do not know what to do with this information other than scream at my monitor
I might have misremembered it, but I was at a tour there and they mentioned something getting installed upside-down resulting in the huge welder in pic related being misaligned. This https://spacenews.com/boeing-still-tinkering-with-giant-welder-for-sls-stages/ is the closest source I can find pertaining to it.

>> No.12254201

>>12254191
How the fuck do you even contact Jim about something like this? Email?
>Subject: URGENT SLS MONEY REQUEST AGAIN

>> No.12254208

>>12254196
>HYDROLOX STRAPONS
I know we've been over this many times but WHAT THE FUCK WERE THEY THINKING

>> No.12254212

>>12254198
Why did the Saturn V have so many thermal problems? I remember them having to repaint it multiple times because some areas would get too hot and some too cold; hence the strange black stripes everywhere. How does Starship get away with pure steel? Is it because they do load-and-go?

>> No.12254216

>>12254189
Cargo SS would be steel plates, an RCS system, and raptors (200k-2m ea depending on how things go), fuck Shuttle the internal cost would probably be comparable to a F9 second stage, maybe less

>> No.12254220
File: 32 KB, 474x551, OIP (25).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254220

>>12254212
actually AFAIK the black stripe scheme was used from the early days of American rocket testing with V2s through to the Shuttle era so they could get better data with the primitive television cameras of the time

>> No.12254228

>>12254208
Sometimes it's hard to know how dumb an idea is until you actually try it out.

>> No.12254230
File: 187 KB, 962x641, saturnv_transport.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254230

>>12254212
>Why did the Saturn V have so many thermal problems?
They tried painting it with black and white stripes for visibility, but the black areas kept absorbing too much heat from the Sun and boiled off the cryogenic propellants faster than normal.

>> No.12254232

>>12254151
Yeah, they've learned a ton from Falcon 9/Heavy to the point that they can optimize a new vehicle that reduces unnecessary clutter.

>> No.12254233

>>12254216
No, I mean including expendable Superheavy. Just throw THE ENTIRE STACK away, with all 40ish Raptors. Still cheaper than SLS. Probably cheaper than Delta IV. 350t+ to orbit.

>> No.12254236
File: 436 KB, 840x859, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254236

>>12254165
It takes a team of builders ~1 month to put together a Starship prototype.
Combine that with SuperHeavy, let's be conservative and say it takes 2 months to build and test SS/SH.
That means an EXPENDABLE SS/SH COULD FLY 6 TIMES A YEAR COMPARED TO 1 SLS LAUNCH
AND THAT IS AN EXTREME CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE
AND STARSHIP WILL BE CHEAPER

>> No.12254239

>>12252601
Absolutely love this guy. I had no idea he also made all those massive graphic charts. >>12252626

>> No.12254240

>>12254208
Well it’s not a terrible idea. I mean on paper you’re just slapping together three first stages, and because you can build more the cost per unit goes down.

>> No.12254241

>>12254208
I mean to be fair ULA is kind of a forced government conglomerate. They wanted a company that could build "reliable" rockets that could launch any month of any year to deliver DoD satellites to space. Hence why it's owned by boeing AND lockheed (and the "results over rhetoric" meme). The gov't basically gives them ICBM rocket designs like Atlas and Delta and whatnot and tells them to convert them to payload launchers. And because all of government R&D has been on hydrogen since the 70's their rockets are all hydrogen. Plus no matter how shitty and expensive their stuff is the DoD will still pay for a launch. Vulcan Centaur is their first ground-up rocket AFAIK and its design started before Falcon 9 was taken seriously so it looks like they are basically fucked

>> No.12254242

>>12254236
Yes, but SLS provides more jobs than Starship. You need to think more politically.

>> No.12254247

>>12254236
Raptor production would IMMEDIATELY bottleneck an expendable SS/SH program.

>>12254240
Yeah, the dumb idea isn't strapping first stages together. Falcon Heavy shows that it works fine. The dumb idea is hydrolox first stages.

>> No.12254249

>>12254241
>ICBMs
>hydrogen
ding dong ur wrong, nobody has ever made a hydrolox ICBM because that would be fucking stupid, they're all either hypergolic or solid (very early missiles like Atlas and R7 were kerolox)

>> No.12254255

>>12253918
Wait a minute. It takes a reddit to know one.

>> No.12254257

>>12254247
>Hydrolox first stages
Still not an entirely dumb idea. The fact that it used pathetic little boosters instead of something like the Ariane 5 is stupid

>> No.12254263

wait is tagsam just a fucking space roomba

>> No.12254268
File: 43 KB, 1148x143, delta.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254268

>>12254249
Modifications of ballistic missiles at least. Ding dong bitch

>> No.12254282

>>12254242
>Yes, but SLS provides more jobs than Starship.
The operative part left out is 'in the short term'. You could easily generate many more jobs constructing payloads to put onto those ships but that's long term dep*t style thinking

>> No.12254284

>>12253685
Well they could‘ve spent all of SLS' and Orion's development budget to advance it.

>> No.12254285

>>12254268
Delta IV had nothing to do with Delta II except that Boeing kept the brand name. That's why DII and DIV launched alongside each other for 16 years. Take the L bro.

>> No.12254287
File: 94 KB, 692x526, heritage-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254287

>>12254268
Delta I through III were modified Thors, but Delta IV has no hardware from Thor at all. Also, Thor was a kerolox IRBM, not a hydrolox ICBM.

>> No.12254292

>>12254040
It‘s the soviet space program. That‘s always implied.

>> No.12254293

>>12254285
Well, if you wanna be specific, Delta IV (in the medium config) uses the same upper stage as the Delta III, which used a modified version of the Delta II lower stage.

>> No.12254296

>>12254247
>Raptor production would IMMEDIATELY bottleneck an expendable SS/SH program.
Good thing SH/SS will be reusable, then!

>> No.12254300

>>12254285
>>12254287
Hmm I take it back then. But if that is the case I need to ask: What is stopping someone like ULA from creating a new rocket and just calling it a Titan for the hell of it? That would be cool

>> No.12254301
File: 110 KB, 512x1024, Fashwave.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254301

>>12254293
>delta IV is derived from a hydrolox ICBM, because the previous version of DIV used the same upper stage as a rocket which used the same lower stage as a different rocket which itself was based on a kerolox IRBM
just stop bro

>> No.12254306

>>12254151
Much easier to work with steel than whatever composite nonsense Spacex works with right now. The biggest issue is they need more facilities and much larger facilities as well to assemble a 9by120 meter dildo.

>> No.12254308

>>12254300
They could, I think Lockheed probably owns the Titan name. Vulcan could have been Titan IV if they wanted to name it that. I think Vulcan is a cooler name though, and as a clean sheet design is shares no Titan heritage.

>> No.12254309

>>12254301
>delta IV is derived from a hydrolox ICBM
I didn’t say that, that’s retarded. I was just pointing out that saying the Delta IV has nothing to do with the II is also incorrect.

>> No.12254310

>>12254301
Not that it matters but that anon wasn't me
>>12254308
I love Titan because of what it did. It cost a shit ton but it was absolutely based. A reusable rocket family with the Titan name made solely by Lockheed would be fucking cool

>> No.12254311

>>12254300
Nothing except that the Titan IV's run didn't end with a great reputation. Atlas has had a sterling reputation so I'm a little surprised they aren't just calling the Vulcan Atlas VI. Maybe they need a new name that isn't tied specifically to Boeing or Lockheed.

>> No.12254312

>>12254301
Its kinda like Atlas.

>Atlas uses balloon Kerolox tank
>Atlas-Centaur adds a centaur upper stage to the tank
>Atlas III gets rid of the “half stage”
>Atlas V gets rid of the balloon tank

>> No.12254316

>>12254308
Interestingly enough Vulcan is derived from Delta IV as it uses the same 5.4 meter tooling

>> No.12254320

>>12254212
Steel has a much higher boiling point than aluminum.

>> No.12254324

>>12254309
there's no connection between DII and DIV if we pretend DIII didn't exist, and given that it launched once and exploded I don't think that's unreasonable

>> No.12254325
File: 1016 KB, 1196x3004, 1578884361282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254325

>>12254011
I personally think it's beautiful that the legacy of the Hindenburg is being carried on

>> No.12254329

In No Man’s Sky, tritium is used as fuel for a sort of fusion thruster. Is there any basis to this in reality?

>> No.12254333

>>12254329
>In No Man’s Sky
No

>> No.12254334

>>12254329
no

>> No.12254337

>>12254324
lmao
>>12254170
Get this god damn astronomer out of my sight. Why do "science communicator" astronomers always feel the need to butt in where a geologist would be way better and way more based

>> No.12254339

>>12254309
It really doesn't, though. It was designed to fit the DOD's launch requirements for the EELV program in the 90s. The DOD had been wanting an all-hydrolox launcher since the 80s with ALS so Boeing finally gave them one.

>> No.12254340

>>12254329
D-T fusion is a thing, and fusion thrusters are a speculative thing, but nobody has ever actually built one AFAIK

so I'd put it on the same tier as Epstein drives

>> No.12254342
File: 538 KB, 480x533, 06D90186-2B2D-4F87-947F-F86C15DB1CF9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254342

>>12254324
> there's no connection between DII and DIV if we pretend DIII didn't exist,
AHHHHHHHHHH
H
H
H
H

>> No.12254344

>>12254324
It flew 3 times, and failed each time, with the last being a partial failure.

>> No.12254345

>>12254339
>The DOD had been wanting an all-hydrolox launcher since the 80s
but why though??

>> No.12254347

>>12254334
You sure? Supposedly modern fusion reactor designs use tritium and deuterium, but I dunno how exactly that crosses over to a fusion thruster.

>> No.12254348

>>12254339
>the DOD wanted the hydromeme
What? Source? Why is it that every setback in American space exploration can be directly linked to the DoD asking for dumb shit?

>> No.12254349

>>12254329
You can slam Deuterium and Tritium together, that's basically the most efficient (Lawson wise at least) fusion possible. The thrust would be awful relative to the heat produced, though.

>> No.12254352
File: 294 KB, 1200x827, 1AA404E0-422F-4C07-97BF-965B3A085109.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254352

>>12254348
Cant get a source but he’s right. They wanted an all-Hydrolox launcher since the 80s

>> No.12254354

>>12254349
>thrust awful relative to heat produced
100% efficient thermionic emission thrusters when bros

>> No.12254355

>>12254349
Makes sense. Can fusion thrusters, which only exist on paper I guess, hypothetically get TWRs comparable to fission NTRs?

>> No.12254358

>>12254342
what's with the random asymmetrical cutaways

>> No.12254361

>>12254355
>fission NTRs
why stop there when you could have an autophagic fission torch SRB

>> No.12254365

>>12254348
Yes. DoD wanted hydrogen for god knows what reason. Lots of government money goes into R&D for it. Therefor most rockets since then have been hydrogen because the most research has been done in that area. Just a guess but if you want to get mad at someone in particular, get mad at the air force

>> No.12254369

>>12254358
I like the fact that they decided to show us there's nothing inside the booster core nose cones. Clearly the most important cutaway.

>> No.12254371

>>12254342
>hydrolox lower stage with a 412s vacuum ISP boosting an aerozine upper stage with a ~320s vacuum ISP

sure, that makes sense.

>> No.12254374

>>12254365
>Air Force: Hydromeme and Boeing
>Space Force: GO ALL IN ON SPACEX
Yup I'm thinking they are based

>> No.12254376

>>12254365
>>12254374
Don't forget it was the chairforce's retarded requirements that made the Shuttle the crazy deathtrap it was rather than a Starship style TSTO, all for a capability they NEVER USED.

>> No.12254377

>>12254352
note that NLS-1 is essentially the delta IV medium

>> No.12254379
File: 898 KB, 2190x3300, d269.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254379

>performs its first two test flights with satellite payloads
>Fails and explodes on both launches
>Partially fails it's third launch with a mass simulator, and launches into the wrong orbit
REMINDER that Boeing hasn't been allowed to build a rocket on its own since this disaster, now they have SLS lmao

>> No.12254380

>>12254371
>Hey you know how the Atlas V uses a low ISP first stage and a high isp upper stage
>Yeah.
>What if we did that...but in reverse
>Holy shit let’s tell the DoD right away!

>> No.12254389

>>12254379
Why do people use solid boosters instead of liquid?

>> No.12254394
File: 20 KB, 768x598, lockheed shuttle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254394

>>12254376
So you're telling me the Air Force is the reason we have chased hydrogen for 40+ years, the reason Space Force might be getting cucked from actual space experiments like x-37 and starship E2E delivery programs, AND the reason we didn't get a dolphin sex shuttle???? What the FUCK

>> No.12254396
File: 17 KB, 474x355, jim_birdenstein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254396

>Budget Big Jim

>> No.12254399

>>12254389
pros
>cheap per unit
>low infrastructure requirements
>very high thrust-per-weight
>can just strap on the side no issue

cons
>more dangerous to make
>storage mishaps are more explosive
>vibrations up the ass
>less control during flight

>> No.12254400

>>12254389
Solid boosters can sit in a warehouse for like 50 years and fly at literally a moment's notice. Also their thrust is really good. Not to mention the fact that (I believe) they used to be cheaper than liquid boosters. (but I think that has changed now. SLS's solid boosters cost a fuck ton but that might just be because northrop wants that sweet money)

>> No.12254402

Someone must have saved those /sfg/ KSP parts. Please don't make me dig through the archive before they are lost forever.

>> No.12254404

>>12254379
Delta III was a good idea on paper too. The fact that they couldn't make it work may have been one of the first signs that Boeing was becoming >BOING

>>12254389
If you're just looking to boost the thrust on takeoff then there's nothing wrong with GEM-sized strap-ons.

>> No.12254406

>>12254400
Also I’ve heard that there’s a strategic reason to use SRBs for rockets; because solid fuel is used for military missiles and keeping them producing rockets keeps them employed and preserves that specialization

>> No.12254407
File: 176 KB, 474x355, jim birdenstine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254407

>>12254394
>birdenstein

>> No.12254408

>>12254400
Shuttle SRB's are dumb as fuck, made in four (now five) sections and have to be constructed on site.

>> No.12254410

>>12254396
>>12254407

>> No.12254411
File: 10 KB, 873x119, fapping_to_KSP.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254411

>>12254402
I have this.

>> No.12254414

>>12254402
No one knows what you're talking about.

>> No.12254427
File: 91 KB, 357x389, ksp_part.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254427

>>12254414
It was stuff like this, but with starship parts and /sfg/ meme descriptions

>> No.12254429

I had to do it

>>>/wsg/3656925

>> No.12254430

>>12254414
I know what he's talking about but it wasn't funny or interesting or spaceflight related so I didn't save them

>> No.12254433

>See Jim's tweet
>Oh shit! Osiris-REX does it's thing in 10 mins!
>Log on to the NASA live stream
>It immediately dies
FUCK YOU NASA

>> No.12254434

>>12254399
forgot a con:
>can't be turned off or even throttled

>> No.12254441
File: 224 KB, 850x637, __hayabusa_and_minerva_original_drawn_by_dei_shirou__sample-20e0d956e332ae604562aede10007a8a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254441

Stream back nerds

>> No.12254442

>>12254411
now post the proof

>> No.12254443

>>12254394
>>12254376
Hate to break up the circlejerk but the OMB killed dolphin sex and NASA was hydrolox-crazy completely independently of the air force.

>> No.12254449

How does Osirix rex change its orbit or pull out in case of an emergency? Does it use low powered RCS thrusters?

>> No.12254453

>>12254449
Yes

>> No.12254454

>>12254449
>How does Osirix rex change its orbit or pull out in case of an emergency?
It's a robot lander. The emergency plan is to crash.

>> No.12254456

>>12254443
Nah not breaking up the circlejerk. If it's the truth its the truth. What does the OMB stand for in this case though?

>> No.12254467

>>12254456
Office of Misdesigned Boosters

>> No.12254470
File: 178 KB, 800x1194, 800px-Dissimilar_joint_made_by_FSW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254470

why is FSW so based bros

>> No.12254473

>Thomas Zurbuchen isn't mic'd up
He doesn't have time for your pop sci bullshit. Based swiss science man

>> No.12254481
File: 33 KB, 937x1458, 1479758451002.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254481

Spatially speaking, why is the physics of rotating objects so unintuitive?

>> No.12254490

>>12254429
Nice but whats the drum sound? Actual sound or sfx added?

>> No.12254491

>>12254456
Office of Management and Budget. They ended up playing a pretty substantial role in designing the Shuttle because Nixon kept wanting to whittle down NASA's spending.

https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4221/ch8.htm

>>12254467
pretty much.

>> No.12254492

>>12252862
What's the point of shipping an Azure box to a disaster area. Isn't the whole point of the cloud that you can use extra processing power/storage anywhere so long as you have internet.

>> No.12254493

>>12254442
see you on /gif/

>> No.12254494

>>12254481
Humans haven't had to care about orbital mechanics except for the past 100 years or so.

>> No.12254498

>>12254490
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELzyz4BkIfs

>> No.12254501

>>12254490
all of the audio is from a godzilla movie, anon

>> No.12254502

>>12254492
Latency and local bandwidth still matter for a lot of use cases. They say "for disaster relief" but it's probably for military stuff.

>> No.12254503

>>12254498
>>12254501
lmao

>> No.12254507

>>12254491
Why did they fall for the hydromeme so hard?

>> No.12254513

>>12254507
bad formulas for calculating the cost of a vehicle
they assumed that it scaled essentially only with gross vehicle lift-off mass, and going all hydrogen minimizes gross vehicle lift-off mass

>> No.12254516
File: 30 KB, 413x395, 1585957584963.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254516

>>12254429

>> No.12254527

>>12254507
I think it's mostly that the shuttle was an overambitious project and they needed magic engines to make it work on paper with the SSME (remember, the booster was supposed to use 9+ SSMEs too). They knew hydrolox was a bitch to deal with after the S-II was the pacing item in developing the Saturn V, but maybe they thought it was going to get easier now that they had some experience under their belts.

>> No.12254531

>Data from 3 engine Starship static fire this morning looks good.
oh no 600hz bros we got too cocky

>> No.12254533
File: 2.56 MB, 1920x1080, screenshot88.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254533

here's your experimental rocket plane bro

>> No.12254535

>>12254533
>Sleepy Hollow Space Agency

>> No.12254538

>>12254533
The front fell off? Is that typical?

>> No.12254542

propellantpill me on keroxide

>> No.12254547

>>12254538
not very typical at all, they're built to very rigorous aerospace engineering standards

>> No.12254549

Aisha Yesuf
@Aisha_yesufuu
·
20m
Replying to
@elonmusk
They are killing us in Nigeria please help

>> No.12254553
File: 45 KB, 1196x221, 1584287539681.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254553

>>12254531
neat. Crater time, bros.

>> No.12254554
File: 56 KB, 590x350, elon_money.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254554

>>12254549
No

>> No.12254559
File: 37 KB, 540x690, Meteoroid_track_through_aerogel_from_EURECA_mission.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254559

*pomf*

>> No.12254562

>>12254542
it could be a good choice for RCS/OMS on a reusable vehicle where you don't want to have to clean toxic propellant out of tanks/pipes. otherwise it's not useful for much.

>> No.12254563
File: 2.49 MB, 1920x1080, screenshot89.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254563

>> No.12254565

>>12254553
Despite how slow it feels I seem to remember most posters on /sfg/ thinking the hop was going to happen around late October.

>> No.12254570

>>12252923
I love these kind of illustrations where the spacecraft is very accurately detailed but the background is very stylized and almost dreamlike.

>> No.12254583
File: 33 KB, 506x270, pekora pixel bunnies.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254583

>>12254565
HOPTOBER!

>>12252923
>they misspelled Apollo

>> No.12254584

>>12254553
Dude it really sounded like the 600 hZ thing. What was that then?

>> No.12254593

>>12254325
orange rocket bad but "its dangerous" can't be a reason for anything. No form of transportation in its infancy was free. And even today hundreds of people can still vaporize on an airliner for far less.

>> No.12254608

>>12254593
I think there's a useful distinction to be made between "dangerous through the necessities of design" and "dangerous through negligence". The former is forgivable, the latter (like plagued the Shuttle, but also looks to plague the SLS: take the recent info that there will be no integrated software testing for example) less so.

>> No.12254610
File: 106 KB, 998x573, stuffing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254610

redpill me on stuffing whipple shields with aerogel bros
https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/tb/pub/techbriefs/materials/16127

>> No.12254612
File: 546 KB, 1920x1080, npnc2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254612

It's ok to be white

>> No.12254613

>>12254593
To be fair SLS is not a bad rocket. Actually it’s good and will BTFO anything flying today...if today was 2009. NASA should’ve made SLS in the 90s

>> No.12254615

>>12254470
FSW is troll magic, we can attach any metals to each other by fucking stirring them

>> No.12254619

>>12254593
>"its dangerous" can't be a reason for anything.
Space travel is still very much at the mercy of public opinion. Every fatality sets humanity's progress back by years.

>> No.12254620

>>12254612
are they actually painting it what the fuck

>> No.12254626

>>12254620
TPS, bro. We're gonna HOP.

>> No.12254629

>>12254620
Elon is a white supremacist

>> No.12254631

>>12254619
But there's no rocket you can design that's accident free but pushes our capability

That's the problem. A handful of astronauts and a school teacher blow up on launch and maybe we shouldn't do this space thing, but had they died in a plane crash across the country that's life.

>> No.12254632

>>12254612
I hate this, WHY PAINT IT

>> No.12254635

>>12254626
They better just be painting one side, I need my re-entry H O T B L U E

>> No.12254636
File: 2.05 MB, 4272x2848, DSC_3519 (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254636

This kills the /sfg/ lurker

>> No.12254638

>>12254613
They should've made SLS from the start. Make an Energia-style rocket with a recoverable engine pod and then slap the shuttle on it later.

>> No.12254639

>>12254636
bruh

>> No.12254640
File: 367 KB, 1196x2098, 1572223980035.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254640

>>12254613
Hickam seems to believe that it has a place as a cargo rocket

>> No.12254643

>>12254636
AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
WHAT THE FUUUUUUUUUUUCK

>> No.12254645

>>12254632
To be the same black and white as Falcon, which is also what ITS uses, which is tight as FUCK

>> No.12254646

>>12254620
>>12254632
My speculation is elon doesn't want the press to show off rusty welds and oil canning

>> No.12254649

>>12254636
>mexicans with paint rollers
bro

>> No.12254650

>>12254631
Yeah, but unfortinately the only way forward right now is to play the game. Unless Elon can figure out a way to independently extract money from space we're being held back by the taxpayer and the government officials who are beholden to them.

>> No.12254653
File: 102 KB, 1080x1080, 1599572259783.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254653

>>12254632
they're probably making a mock-up of the lunar version

>> No.12254654
File: 132 KB, 1037x1977, CB68A4D4-8528-48FA-A01F-1D7F50E69A46.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254654

HELL YEAH

>> No.12254661
File: 93 KB, 1000x907, 1200928237621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254661

>>12254470
>>12254615
FSW is one of those things that proves God gets drunk sometimes (Australia too)

>> No.12254663

>>12254631
>>12254650
the moment going to space becomes lucrative the problem solves itself.

>> No.12254664

>>12254636
Fuck the paint, is the crinkle coming back?

>> No.12254665

>>12254654
Yes but can starship get to the moon by itself? Although I guess there's no logical reason why they can't put a smaller payload on superheavy.

>> No.12254667

>>12254654
Is that the 12m ITS?

>>12254665
>Yes but can starship get to the moon by itself?
With refueling in LEO yes.

>> No.12254670

>>12254636
Assemble the council. One must take the paint thinner to the cylinder of fire in Boca Chica,

>> No.12254674

>>12254667
>With refueling in LEO yes.
So no in other words. Not to say that starship isn't impressive but it's shaping up to be a different beast with different capabilities and goals to the Saturn V

>> No.12254675
File: 1.23 MB, 772x1622, Battle_Angel_Starship.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254675

>>12254612
>>12254636
Wrong paint job.

>> No.12254678

>>12254650
The taxpayer has essentially nothing to do with what Elon's doing right now, outside of Dragon which isn't in any danger

>> No.12254679

>>12254674
>so no
Dumbass, can Saturn V go to the Moon without LEO and return in one piece? No. Because that's not the mission profile. Judge rockets based on their intended mission profiles. Also, expendable Starship can yeet 350 tons, so used as a Saturn stand-in it could probably do a direct ascent landing.

>> No.12254682

>>12254679
>without LEO
meant LOR derp

>> No.12254683

>>12254640
As fun as it is to shit on SLS, i can see that happening. I mean they have built the rockets. they just need to, ya know, launch them. If we want to set up shop on the moon, every ton is precious, so the more rockets the better, especially if they're already done.

>> No.12254686

>>12254674
No shit, dog. The SS isn't designed for an environment where bootprints and flags is sufficient.

>> No.12254693

What's the status on Super Heavy?

>> No.12254695

>>12254679
Who said anything about one piece? That's not the mission profile of the Saturn V missions. Yes your e-hero built a very impressive rocket, but why do you insist on comparing it to every other rocket that exists and changing the goal posts to make it come out favorable?

>> No.12254697

>launch Saturn V to Moon
>come back
>you now have a very wet Apollo capsule and a flag on the Moon

>launch Starship to Moon
>come back
>you still have THE ENTIRE ROCKET and can IMMEDIATELY DO IT AGAIN

>> No.12254698

>>12254693
cancelled, starship is for suborbital touristm

>> No.12254701

>>12254695
>changing the goal posts
says the retard who defines "going to the moon" as excluding orbital refueling, but is totally fine with throwing away the entire rocket

>> No.12254704

>>12254701
I originally said "By itself"
That was my initial argument and I haven't yet changed it.
Do you know what changing the goal posts means?

>> No.12254706

>>12254533
Very unsexy. Would not fap to.

>> No.12254708
File: 475 KB, 2560x1707, LauncherOne-scaled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254708

heres ur smallsat launcher bro

>> No.12254709
File: 50 KB, 720x720, 0009481225_20.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254709

>>12254697
the future is bright boys.

>> No.12254711

>>12254693
Many parts, waiting for few more and then stack.

>> No.12254713

>>12254704
One unrefueled Starship can put the entire LEM, SM, Command module, AND SIV-B stage into LEO if you expend the Starship. So yes. It can one-shot to the Moon. You shouldn't, but you can.

>> No.12254714
File: 151 KB, 1200x1200, sir-richard-branson-9224520-1-402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254714

I know this is /Elon/ general but let's talk about Richard Branson for a second, hasn't he kind of just been useless for spaceflight?

>Virgin Galactic has only ever been for the ultra rich to have a 15 minute joyride, not to actually go to space
>Virgin is just a budget airline
>Virgin hyperloop is going to be a total meme failed investment

What has he actually contributed to the world

>> No.12254722

>>12254708
>13 years

>> No.12254724

>>12254714
>What has he actually contributed to the world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULeDlxa3gyc

>> No.12254725

>>12254714
He got early start but got left behind in the dust.

>> No.12254734

>>12254553
Doomers BTFO

>> No.12254737

>>12254612
Lunar starship prototype

>> No.12254736
File: 32 KB, 630x630, SpaceShipOne.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254736

>>12254714
SpaceShipOne was pretty cool. Had a model rocket based on it. If anything, it proved that quick turnaround times are possible in a post-Shuttle era even if the applications were limited.

>> No.12254740

>Rep. Kendra Horn (democrat) will chair the Space Force Caucus
Isn't she the same Congresswoman that gets paid by Boing to target SpaceX?

>> No.12254741

>>12254734
When will they learn?

>> No.12254743

>>12254584
this entire 600hz conversation is a bad case of people playing telephone and making assumptions. Also this >>12253975

>> No.12254745

>>12254740
Yep. She hated how Boeing didn't get any lunar lander contracts

>> No.12254747

>>12254650
>>12254663
Airliners are saved from extinction by governments all the time though. I think the difference is people know we have to have air travel, whereas space is some ambiguous science thing

>> No.12254749

>>12254640
This would be true if Starship weren't shaping up to be at least almost contemporary to SLS plus maybe a year or two absolute maximum (so SLS may launch maybe once and very improbably twice before Starships start flying, assuming the most pessimistic timetable for Starship development). The thing is, a stripped down expendable superheavy booster (legless and only reusing the thrust structure via down range splashdown) and an expendable or pseudo-expendable legless, near-wingless Starship, SS-Superheavy could significantly exceed SLS1-B's 105-ish tons, in fact if I'm not mistaken speculation on the uprating potential of Starship puts it's (very) theoretical maximum payload in reusable mode at 150 tons, which exceeds even the theoretical payload capacity of SLS block 2, a rocket which at present seems unlikely to ever be developed or deployed.
On top of that, while Elon says that Starship would "hopefully never" be fired in expendable mode, in that regime it's theoretical maximum payload rests somewhere between 250-300mT, or substantially more than double SLS1-B or SLS-B2's maximum theoretical payload capacities.
On top of that, even fully expended Starship+Superheavy would likely not exceed a fourth of SLS's cost, while it's manufacturing cycle means that in single year even fully expendable Starships could probably put up to two kilotons of payload into LEO.

Frankly, in any scenario in which Starship+Superheavy is successful, SLS is made completely obsolescent.

>> No.12254753

>>12254740
>paid by Boing to target SpaceX?
Source? Sounds too crazy to be true.

>> No.12254755

>>12254714
>hybrid motors
lmao

>> No.12254758

>>12254714
That's because he set out to make a suborbital toy and got a suborbital toy. It's like making amphibious cars if boats were shit.

>> No.12254759
File: 527 KB, 1200x675, NTSB_Go-Team_inspects_a_tail_section_of_VSS_Enterprise.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254759

>>12254714
keeping NTSB investigators employed

>> No.12254761

>>12254736
>SpaceShipOne
I've got an irrational hatred for this thing based purely on how often it was hyped up back in the day for "starting the commercial space revolution". Before the Falcon 9 really got going it looked like all commercial space was going to be was smallsat launchers and suborbital tourist rides

>> No.12254765

>>12254753
That is standard fair in politics anon, let alone cuuhhhrrrrazzzy

>> No.12254766

>>12254674
What it could do is carry a CM, LM, and SPS inside of itself massing up to 100 tons, and deploy that vehicle in orbit. The total Apollo vehicle weighed in at around 58-60 tons, a Cargo starship could carry a significantly larger (wider and probably significantly shorter) vehicle of equivalent function inside itself.

>> No.12254772

>>12254753
Read up on her criticism on NASA's decision for lunar lander contracts. She wants NASA to own their landers + want least risk. Aka boeing SLS and artemis based lander.

>> No.12254775
File: 393 KB, 1920x1280, download (29).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254775

>>12254708
>tfw some New Zealand autist rocky hobbyist can build a better rocket in less time than a billionare with multiple failing companies
lmao

>> No.12254776

>>12254749
SLS doesn't need much help to be rendered obsolete, a rocket that can't reliably launch, period, and yet is supposed to be the backbone of an orbital infrastructure is DOA

>> No.12254777

A school in West Texas is getting Starlink. Service is supposed to start in January 2021, so that means we can expect most of the US to be covered by then.
https://www.oaoa.com/news/education/ecisd/ecisd-to-pilot-spacex-internet/article_3b32150c-1317-11eb-9437-afc9d3113db1.html

>> No.12254781

>>12254755
Alumilox hybrid motors are based.

>> No.12254789

>>12254749
SLS will still be kept for few more years after Starship does regular orbit runs. To save face.

>> No.12254793
File: 131 KB, 657x527, 1511558306001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254793

>There have been a series of delays to the SS2 flight test vehicle becoming operational, amidst repeated assurances from Virgin Galactic marketing that operational flights were only a year or two out. The Wall Street Journal reported in November 2014 that there has been "tension between Mr. Branson’s upbeat projections and the persistent hurdles that challenged the company’s hundreds of technical experts."[115] The company has responded that "the company and its contractors 'have internal milestones, such as schedule estimates and goals, but the companies are driven by safety and the completion of the flight test program before moving into commercial service.' Virgin Galactic’s schedules have always been consistent with internal schedules of its contractors and changes have 'never impacted flight safety'."[115]

>> No.12254796

>>12254772
You mean this? https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/chairwomen-johnson-and-horn-statements-on-artemis-human-lander-systems-contract-awards

>> No.12254800

>>12254781
Based on the moon

>> No.12254801

>>12254796
Yes. Also you can see/hear her various defense of SLS in many of congressional hearings.

>> No.12254804

There's a spooky October surprise at NASA Goddard! Despite there being an ongoing pandemic, the JWST remains ON SCHEDULE! Is Northrup Grumman secretly employing necromancy to keep JWST on schedule?
https://spacenews.com/jwst-remains-on-track-for-october-2021-launch/

>> No.12254806

>>12254693
Give me your mom's phone number and I'll find out.

>> No.12254811
File: 524 KB, 1920x1200, dew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254811

>on track for a 1954 first orbit in RO, maybe even Q4 1953

>> No.12254813
File: 10 KB, 500x500, 1482827853001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254813

Initially, the company hopes to fly 50 miles high or more. While that is short of the 100-kilometer, or 62-mile, “Karman line” that is often considered the edge of space, military and NASA pilots were awarded astronaut wings for reaching 50 miles or higher in the X-15 rocket plane. And many, including Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who keeps a list of all spaceflights, say that space begins at 50 miles.

“My plan is to count those people as astronauts and to include them on my list,” he said.

Virgin believes 50 miles qualifies as well.

>> No.12254822

>>12254813
The new bar for cope has been set at 50 miles high

>> No.12254832

>>12253286
Imagine being so insecure in your masculinity that you think eating certain foods is gay. Also it takes 5 seconds to Google and see that you're spouting speudoscience.

>> No.12254833

>>12254822
4ASS should make a rocket that goes 51 miles up.

>> No.12254840

>>12254833
>make a sounding rocket called Urethra Franklin to humiliate a Virgin

>> No.12254845
File: 8 KB, 208x242, mfwsls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254845

>>12254832
You must cleanse yourself of the onions my brother.
Purify your sinful flesh.

>> No.12254865

>>12253728
>>12253744
>>12253755
>>12253774
Deuterium is a stable isotope, not radioactive.
Deuterium can undergo neutron capture in the reactor and form tritium, which has a half life of 12 years and emits a very weak beta particle. It's only a hazard if you get tritium into your body, and since it also gets biologically eliminated via pissing you need pretty much continuous exposure to get any significant dose. The tritium produced in a nuclear thermal reactor would be absolutely minimal in volume because deuterium has a very low neutron capture cross section even for low energy neutrons, and a nuclear thermal rocket is using fast neutrons, which means for every quadrillion neutron-deuterium interactions you may get one or two capture events.
The real reason a nuclear thermal rocket's exhaust would be mildly radioactive is because of the relatively small amount of volatile fission products being released from the solid fuel elements. Basically, you'd be seeing xenon and caesium and shit in the exhaust, which would all decay away after a few seconds/minutes/days depending on the isotope.

>> No.12254875

>>12252906
You bet your sweet ass they do.
>>12252914
bullshit. One application for a nuclear rocket is an orbital tugboat to lift spacecraft up to higher orbits

>> No.12254876

>>12253774
>A stray neutron produced by the decay of Uranium-237 gets captured by Hydrogen-1, turning it into Hydrogen-2, or Deuterium.
Jesus christ, couldn't even read a wikipedia article?
U-235 is fissile, not U-237, which actually does not even exist.
Neutrons produced from fission do have a low chance of being absorbed by protium and forming deuterium, but that's not an issue because the likelihood of any single atomic nucleus being hit by two neutrons when residence time in the reactor is less than a second is basically zero.
Any tritium being produced is formed when the 1 in ~6500 atoms of hydrogen which are already deuterium manages to absorb a neutron.
Tritium isn't even the reason the exhaust is measurably radioactive though, that's due to fission products entering the exhaust.

>> No.12254882

>>12254845
So I can be an insecure coping beta who's terrified of soi beans like you? Nah thanks. Future is female anyway.

>> No.12254883

>>12253927
>SLSME
fuck you

>> No.12254885

>>12254882
>unironic söyboy says the unironic buzzword
Imagine

>> No.12254896

>>12254882
>the future is female so i will just turn myself into a girl
are sòy eaters that delusional?

>> No.12254904

>>12254134
>An electron beam would require something crazy like 10 megawatts per cubic millimeter.
Luckily for us electron beam welders actually only melt a tiny volume of metal at any given moment, they create a heat effected zone a few microns thick at most. An EBW could weld steel at a rate of a few cm/s for just a few kilowatts of power. They're super efficient and work really well, and unfortunately for earth-based industries they only work in hard vacuum.

>> No.12254906

>>12254865
>Deuterium can undergo neutron capture in the reactor and form tritium, which has a half life of 12 years and emits a very weak beta particle. It's only a hazard if you get tritium into your body, and since it also gets biologically eliminated via pissing you need pretty much continuous exposure to get any significant dose.
RADIOACTIVE PISS REACTOR MODERATOR

>> No.12254907

>>12254896
I mean according to you eating some soi is all it takes so...

>> No.12254916

>>12254181
We had an autism blow through here once who calculated all the bulk densities for a few dozen bipropellants, methalox worked out to ~850 kg/m^3 and sub-cooled propalox tied with kerolox for first place in the non-hypergolics with ~1080 kg/m^3. Then he had another column where he worked out the impulse density and sub-cooled propalox was the winner, being about as efficient as methalox and about as dense as kerolox.

>> No.12254921

>>12254208
They were thinking
>muh specific impulse
and that's about it

>> No.12254925
File: 104 KB, 557x596, raptor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254925

>https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1318708955628118025

>> No.12254926

>>12254212
They didn't paint the rocket to solve thermal problems; they had thermal problems because they painted the rocket.
They painted black areas for better visibility so that guys on the ground with spotting scopes could monitor the orientation and rate of roll of the vehicle as it launched.

>> No.12254927

single piece cast starship hulls when?

>> No.12254931

>>12254925
Wow, BIG WIN for team humanity! [°]0[°]

>> No.12254932
File: 358 KB, 720x546, 1506905228968.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254932

When was the last time SpaceX fucked up re landing a booster?

>> No.12254935

>>12254233
Tbh keeping the Booster still would get them ~200 to 250 tons to LEO and would reduce the pressure on the Raptor production line, but I get what you're saying. Even if Starship is totally expendable and flies up to three times a year it slam-dunks SLS so hard that there would be an angry silence on the car ride home with its parents.

>> No.12254937

>>12254932
This year when they tried landing during turbulent winds.

>> No.12254943

>>12254925
90 second burn times on the Raptors is why people need to temper their expectations for Starship in the near-term. Just because FFSC reuse works in theory doesn't mean they're anywhere close to actually achieving it yet.

>> No.12254944

>>12254937
how does one make launches more weather-resistant?

>> No.12254950

>>12254306
>whatever composite nonsense Spacex works with right now
SpaceX uses composites for the fairings on Falcon 9 and for the interstage, which Elon has said was a mistake. The rest of the vehicle is made of friction-stir-welded Al-Li alloy, a decent material but expensive and much closer to titanium than steel on the difficult-to-work-with scale.

>> No.12254952

>>12254944
launch them through a vacuum tube up to space

>> No.12254955

>>12254840
The Crowdsourced High Altitude Device (CHAD)

>> No.12254956

>>12254944
Use chunkier rockets that don't get blown off course as easily.

>> No.12254959

>>12254944
Landing on solid ground and landing with a sturdier booster, hopefully.

>> No.12254960

>>12254329
The D-T fuel cycle will power the first fusion reactors that will put energy into the electrical grid. It's the easiest fusion fuel there is.

>> No.12254962

>>12254943
they certainly can't be faulted for lacking ambition. But yes, FFSC is a bit of a gamble

>> No.12254967

>>12254347
That anon is a shit and knows nothing. Yes, you can do thrusters using D-T fusion. They won't be light and they won't have high thrust to weight ratio, but they'll probably beat electric engines in terms of thrust to weight and they'll certainly be the most efficient propulsion systems around the moment they come online.

>> No.12254969
File: 73 KB, 972x1422, 1575111362244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254969

>>12254956
I like this answer

>> No.12254974

>>12254349
>The thrust would be awful relative to the heat produced
Yeah, that's literally what high Isp means lmao
Just use dumb propellant (like water)to turn a good chunk of that heat into additional thrust, and refill on water every time you make a stop (because it's cheap and available everywhere).

>> No.12254977
File: 118 KB, 1080x765, Screenshot_20201021-033714~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12254977

Concern trolls btfo

>> No.12254978

>>12254944
Destroy the weather

>> No.12254979

>>12254943
What do you mean near term? Tomorrow? Expectations shouldnt matter for the next year or so. Atleast until after dozens of Starlink launches. for internal purposes

>> No.12254982

Raptor is a disaster. SpaceX is finished.

>> No.12254988

>>12254977
whats a nosecone mate

>> No.12254994

>>12254355
It's possible to imagine some kind of large open-ended magnetic mirror chamber thruster with a high enough Q factor that it can sustain a burning plasma being used as a decently high TWR engine. It would work by having the plasma bounce back and forth in a magnetic bottle where one end has a really strong magnetic field and the other has a weaker field that opens up to a magnetic nozzle on the other side. You'd fire this thing up to 300 million degrees, crush the plasma down with the field until a self sustaining fusion reaction started up, and then you'd flow in more and more fusion fuel until the pressure inside the plasma became great enough that it started to force its way out of the magnetic bottle and into the nozzle, generating thrust at ridiculously high Isp. You could either increase the fuel flow rate even more the get more thrust, or you could spray in water or hydrogen into the nozzle to act as additional reaction mass, less efficient in terms of mass but more more efficient in terms of energy, good if you have expensive fuel and cheaply available propellant options.

>> No.12254996

If tomorrow's Falcon 1 launch is another failure I think this Elon Musk guy might just close his business down lol

>> No.12254999

>>12254389
Pro
>feeds the ICBM industry
Con
>all performance metrics
there you go

>> No.12255001

>>12254988
*Tips fedora*

>> No.12255003

>>12254979
Near term as in all of Elon's dates that he has in mind where it's going to get human-rated by 2023 and do an unmanned Mars landing in 2024.

>> No.12255006

>>12254513
This is honestly the truth. Funnily enough cost actually scales with vehicle dry mass, not gross mass, and hydromeme fuel is THE worst option for minimizing dry mass.

>> No.12255007

>>12254988
where do you think all the nosecones in boca chica are coming from?

>> No.12255010

>>12254988
Nigga

>> No.12255011

>>12255007
Hunting wild deepwater mecha-Jews off the coast.

>> No.12255012

>>12255003
Elon isn't a time traveller, so all dates are estimates to being with. I don't see the issue with it. Unless you're talking people who claim "ELON PROMISED ME A PONY!!!!!!! TESLA SUCKSSSS"

>> No.12255023
File: 19 KB, 974x191, lockx.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255023

Oh NO NO NO dolphinsex bros we got way too cocky
https://www.investors.com/news/lockheed-earnings-q3-2020-lockheed-stock-lmt/

>> No.12255027

>>12254882
Future sounds ripe for the raping by literally any masculine society that pops up

>> No.12255030

>>12254927
Injection molded cast iron Starship hulls when?

>> No.12255037

>>12254943
>Just because FFSC reuse works in theory doesn't mean they're anywhere close to actually achieving it yet.
Duh, they ran it for a minute and a half at over 300 bar before 'encountering issues', which could mean a sensor went "Hey guys it's getting hot in here, throttle it back a notch". 300 bar is not something that the engine needs to run at 100% of the time, it's something that benefits the launch vehicle only during the first minute or so of the launch from Earth anyway.
It's not like Raptor can run at 300 bar for 90 seconds before it shits its metal guts out and dies.

>> No.12255044

>>12254982
Raptor is a master. SpaceX is based.
>>12254996
Hello Proxima centauri poster

>> No.12255066

>>12255037
Fuck man remember when Starhopper’s Raptor said “ARGHHHHHHHHHH” and started vaporizing itself?

>> No.12255069

>>12255066
That was crazy, the fact that it still landed successfully was even crazier. It came down with force too, punched its feet straight down through that concrete pad.

>> No.12255079

>>12255069
Take me back to December 2018. I want to watch Starhopper come to life (slowly) again

>> No.12255103

>>12254988

When you see that the mexican welders didn't make the cone flush with body and need to clang it in place.

>> No.12255109

So why are they painting the nosecone and why does it have a bunch of rust splotches?

>> No.12255113

do astronauts poop in their suits?

>> No.12255119

>>12255113
no, I poop in their suits

>> No.12255120

>>12255113
Astronauts don't poop.

>> No.12255121
File: 96 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255121

>>12255066
>Pictured: Raptor trying to stick the landing while everything around it vaporizes (2018 - Animed)

>> No.12255123

>>12255012
>Elon isn't a time traveller

Is that what he paid you to say?

>> No.12255129
File: 75 KB, 544x299, SameCHADlers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255129

>>12255121
>Pictured: SN5, SN6, SN9, SN10, SN11, SN12, and so forth await testing after construction (2020 - Anime'd)

>> No.12255130

>>12254925
>before encountering "issues"
wonder what this means, exactly

>>12255129
BOEING IS FINISHED

>> No.12255140

From its first launch in 2010, it took a decade for Falcon 9 to reach its full potential - and a booster still has yet to fly 10 times. With that logic, do y ok guys think it’ll take a few years for Starship to “finalize”

>> No.12255143

Will the 18m+ starships need this much testing or will they basically be able to hammer them out once it comes time for more cargo and crew space. I feel like they could make them pretty much instantly once they get 9m flying for a decade or two. Maybe by that point they will be working on a new engine?

>> No.12255152

>>12253207
All female astronauts should be induced to lactate and nurse the male astronauts while in orbit or during transit to mars in order to maintain bone density and protect against radiation cellular damages.

>> No.12255163

>>12254977
is he gonna fuck a nosecone or is he an australian that will manufacture a nosecone lololololololol roflxd

>> No.12255164

>>12255143
18m Starship will use fusion rockets.

>> No.12255168

>>12255113
no, poop is much more manageable, with a (carefully measurably)restricted and constipating diet you can easily spend up to a week without shitting and not even experiment discomfort

>> No.12255175

>>12255168
We can turn poop into food!

>> No.12255176

>>12255140
It will be like F9 (or basically any of Elon's projects) and get incremental upgrades until it's ready to retire. Raptor full thrust is gonna be sick.

>> No.12255177

>>12254531
clearly denial from elon

>> No.12255182

>>12255175
I'll turn you into food

>> No.12255186

>>12255130
>what does that mean exactly
FEED ME TURBOPUMPS

>> No.12255199

>>12253421
Ancient europeans and eurasians didn't eat insects

>> No.12255202

>>12255199
They didn’t have much edible bugs either

>> No.12255203

>>12253421
Beans are objectively better.

>> No.12255205

>>12255203
Except they’re not. Lol

>> No.12255211

>>12255205
Yes they are. Refried beans and rice is the most kino set of staple foods.

>> No.12255217

>>12254977
Dont say I didnt warn you

>> No.12255222

>>12255211
Beans are gross and make you become a woman. Real men eat flesh.

>> No.12255225

Not this shit again PLEASE shut the fuck up

>> No.12255226

>>12255222
The real redpill is beans, eggs, milk, and occasional chicken, rabbit and goat.

That's how the chad peasant eats.

>> No.12255234

>>12255163
Brooooo alstralians are upside down to ne honest

>> No.12255247

>>12255226
Eating anything but animals is not manly.
Except fungus that’s cool.

>> No.12255254

>>12255247
Potatoes are Burt Reynolds levels of manliness and you're a homo if you disagree.

Oatmeal too.

>> No.12255270
File: 118 KB, 1196x603, 1579008148607.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255270

>>12255140
yup. Same with the raptor. If it iterates anywhere as well as the merlin did it's going to easily be the best engine on the planet

>> No.12255271

>>12255254
The humble potato, cornerstone of empires. Mars would do well to have them.

>> No.12255275
File: 35 KB, 700x450, 1480412529559.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255275

>>12255254
>Potatoes are Burt Reynolds levels of manliness and you're a homo if you disagree.
based

>> No.12255289
File: 355 KB, 2048x1536, space_4_SNs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255289

Is there anything actually stopping the competition from copying Starship outright and just using shittier non-Raptor engines?

>> No.12255295

>>12255289
For US oldspace companies: their pride. And the lack of any fly back software whatsoever. But it'll be interesting to see if boeing tries. It would be the funniest thing ever. Also wonder if China will go for a SS/New Glenn hypergolic knockoff

>> No.12255298

>>12255289
None of them have any reusable engines or experience with retropropulsive landing.

>> No.12255299

>>12255289
Yes. Shittier non-Raptor engines wouldn't work.

>> No.12255300

>>12255289
if it's successful they'll try. China would just steal the blueprints

>> No.12255306

>>12255299
F1 worked and that was pretty shitty

>> No.12255318

>>12255289
Other than pride? There's lack of leadership.

>> No.12255322

>>12255295
>Boeing tries to build a Starship
>it ends up being made of carbon composite, using RS-25s, cost 100x as much, and puts less in orbit
>can't make LH2 refueling in orbit work so the entire thing was pointless

>> No.12255327

>>12255322
oh and I forgot
>5 segment SRBs

>> No.12255336

>>12255306
You son of a bitch you take that back right now.

>> No.12255340

>>12255336
F1 was hilariously bad at everything but sheer size, and the sheer size caused most of it's problems
>70 (seven zero) bar

>> No.12255345

>>12255322
>Nasa still pays billions of dollars per launch

>> No.12255346

>>12255340
Putting dozens of smaller engines didn't exactly work out well for the russians.

>> No.12255347

>>12255327
Stacking SRB segments to make a space elevator would have a larger payload to geosynchronous orbit than SLS.

>> No.12255349

>>12255346
Raptor > SSME > RD-170 > F-1, fight me

N1 failed because Korolev died and his subordinates were retarded, and because it couldn't be static fired. Not because loadsaengines is bad.

>> No.12255353

>>12255349
RD-170 > F1, sure. It was 20 years more advanced and ended up being easy to split into bite-sized chunks for smaller rockets. Raptor hasn't done shit yet and SSME was a great engine that couldn't save a horrible rocket design.

>> No.12255355

>>12255349
BE4 before or after F1?

>> No.12255358

>>12255353
>Raptor hasn't done shit
Highest chamber pressure of any engine that's been flown, first FFSC cycle engine to ever fly, first engine designed around ISRU from the start

>> No.12255363

>>12255355
BE4 hasn't demonstrated a working prototype much less flown

>> No.12255365

>>12255358
>ISRU
>durr u can make methane on mars
retard

>> No.12255367

>>12255365
>>ISRU
>>durr u can make methane on mars
Yes.

>> No.12255368

>>12255358
The ones that have flown haven't been hitting 300 bar. Pretty sure highest chamber pressure still belongs to the RD-170 senpai.

>> No.12255369

>>12255349
There is literally nothing right about the SSME, fight me

>> No.12255370

>>12255367
If you really believe that's why elon picked methane then you're a helpless retard. BE4 uses methane too and they aint goin to mars. you can also make hydrogen on mars

>> No.12255371
File: 34 KB, 392x685, long march x.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255371

>>12255295

>> No.12255372

>>12255370
>you can make hydrogen on Mars
But not keep it from boiling off for years at a time.

>> No.12255374

>>12255370
Elon *was* planning to make the Raptor a hydrolox engine for a while before he finally settled on a concept...

>> No.12255375

>>12255372
>thinks methane boil off has been solved
oh, sweetie

>> No.12255376

>>12255371
Oh hey it's everyone's first spaceplane.

>> No.12255377

>>12255369
It'd be a way better upper stage engine than the J-2 if Aerojew Shekeldyne didn't charge the entire GDP of a small European country for each engine.

>> No.12255378

>>12255371
is this real?

>> No.12255381

>>12255378
No lmao the translation literally says "china village killer"

>> No.12255386

>>12255381
it's also simply a rendering. nothing to fear, dear anon

>> No.12255390

>>12255377
I will admit it could be a halfway decent second stage engine (aside from costing more than an actual good rocket by itself) but that doesn't help when they keep insisting on throwing it on first stages and desperately trying to make up for gravity losses with SRBs

>> No.12255394

>>12255275
why does he have yerba mate if hes italian, thats from argentina/uruguay

>> No.12255408
File: 101 KB, 2048x1152, 1598397535344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255408

The 747 is hueg.

>> No.12255412

>>12255394
he has an irish flag

>> No.12255417

>>12255412
even worse

>> No.12255423

>>12254714
At least he got his company names right

>> No.12255428

>>12255370
lol retard go watch the 2016 ITS presentation they had a slide on this

>> No.12255446

>>12255225
>breastfeeds you in space
Nothing personal, kid.

>> No.12255447

>>12255365
You can make methane on Mars via the Sabatier process.

>> No.12255449

>>12255428
>Elon said it, I believe everything he says
Methane was chosen because it's cheap, end of story, you fucking brainlet.

>> No.12255454

>>12255449
>methane was chosen because of literally the least important factor unless you're working with really retarded propellants like hydrogen or syntin
Okay retard

>> No.12255455

>>12255449
Methane was chosen because it's the best compromise in all categories (density, efficiency, cleanliness), including its ability to be made on Mars. Why is that so difficult to understand?

>> No.12255456

>>12255408
Starliner on Atlas V somehow looks clunkier and more primitive than fucking Soyuz.

>> No.12255457

>>12255454
>NOT using syntin
bro

>> No.12255458

>>12255454
>retarded propellants are expensive to store
Yep, thanks for proving my point

>> No.12255459

>>12255449
Methane was chosen because that's what Elon's fetish at the time was.

>> No.12255462

>>12255455
what is cleaner than methane but worse in other regards?

>> No.12255463

>>12255370
methane is a mistake for BE-4. Subchilled propane does literally everything better except what Elon chose it for, Martian ISRU

>> No.12255465

>>12255455
density = lower tankage cost
efficiency = lower fuel cost
cleanliness = lower refurb cost

>> No.12255466

>>12255449
>two fuels, one is cheaper, denser, doesn't leak or cause embrittlement, and is also good for ISRU
>the other only has ISRU and ISP going for it
yeah methane was only chosen for one reason anon, sure
you can keep praying for your hydrogen economy too

>> No.12255467

>>12255458
No, dumb nigger. Listen fucking closely because you think you're smart but you're fucking stupid. Cost of propellant is literally the least important factor. See
>>12255455

>>12255465
mental acrobatics from a retard who refuses to be wrong

>> No.12255468

>>12255222
>believing meat industry propaganda

>> No.12255470

>>12255467
>Cost of propellant is literally the least important factor
Not when your vehicle is reusable and you want to launch it 3 times a day you braindead moron

>> No.12255471

Since space is weightless, are women able to pee standing up in orbit?

>> No.12255472

>>12255471
Women can pee standing up already, they just don't because they're too stupid to figure it out

>> No.12255474

>>12255468
>Believing soiboy fag plant industry propaganda

Plants are an inferior source of protein than meat. Unarguable fact.

>> No.12255480

>>12255474
Based. I've grown to like you, anon, especially your militaristic personality. I would breastfeed you on Mars, if you asked me to. Consent is key

>> No.12255481

>>12255472
Honestly how hard is it to carry a pack of kleenex or something with you in that giant purse? Congrats now you can piss outside like the rest of us, welcome to equality you were here all along.

>> No.12255482

>>12255480
I suppose a few feminine males to use as cumdumpsters are acceptable. The Romans did it, after all.

>> No.12255484

>>12255480
>t.food

>> No.12255489

What kind of diet has a greater effect on the poops of the female astronauts?
If they eat beans or meat, how does that effect the smell, consistency, or colour, and what type of diapers are best for each kind?
Should females be fed a special high-meat low-fibre diet to induce as many runny stinky poops as possible, or a special high-fibre plant-based diets to produce ultra-firm poops which can be used as durable and natural building materials? Should the first Martian habitats be made of female astronaut poops?
Serious replies only.

>> No.12255491

>>12255489
This must be how Freud felt.

>> No.12255495

>>12255474
>Turning a logical argument into an emotional one with memes and insults
I think the hormones in your meat is affecting your mood.

>> No.12255511
File: 6 KB, 256x256, benoz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255511

fuck Elon Musk and SpaceX

>> No.12255512

Subchilled propane is my god and I am its prophet

>> No.12255519

>>12255463
>>12255512
Doesn't BE-4 use a lower grade fuel than Raptor though? It might not be too far away from Propane.

>> No.12255522

>>12255495
Meat has more protein than gay plants. You cannot argue against that factual statement, so you lose lol

>> No.12255524

>>12255519
They say it runs regular natural gas but it's not like we've seen one fly

>> No.12255528

>>12255524
Tory Bruno has admitted on Twitter that the LNG branding is just for investors and that the BE-4 is regular methalox.

>> No.12255539
File: 407 KB, 2048x996, 0b5f4a6f9b811ea4352292dbeb45d9c4efe6dce64715cdb4e1bddb210a6d66e2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255539

Look at all the people excited for SLS! Not even Starship has attracted this size of crowd

>> No.12255540

>>12255528
Really begs the question why not propalox?

>> No.12255542

>>12255539
Those people with gray hair were fresh college graduates the last time an RS-25 broke the Karman line.

>>12255540
Probably because Aerojew Shekeldyne would charge too much money for propalox/kerolox. ULA doesn't build their own engines.

>> No.12255543

>>12255540
Board of Directors decided they’d get tired of the Hank Hill memes real quick

>> No.12255545

Syntin is the future.

>> No.12255546
File: 213 KB, 2600x1200, 731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255546

>>12252739
The most amazing thing about SLS is that it's impossible to cancel. On the bright side, I guess this means that Artemis is happening no matter what...

>> No.12255548

>>12255546
Funny that there’s basically zero chance Starships actually go there

>> No.12255553

>>12255522
>more protein
Not in terms of protein vs calories.

>> No.12255555

>>12255553
You need calories or you die.

>> No.12255561

>>12255555
Checked, big if true

>> No.12255565

>>12255489
>ywn be at a nasa affiliated research university and applying for grants to study these pressing questions with qt female grad/college student volunteers.

>> No.12255568

>>12255555
Can’t argue with those digits

>> No.12255569
File: 70 KB, 600x525, 0931957E-7F7E-49BD-9957-B488F2725D4A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255569

>>12255489
I hope sincerely that none of you faggots actually fall for the brap meme

>> No.12255574

>>12255548
But Elon said--

>> No.12255577
File: 143 KB, 1024x683, checkemzubrin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255577

>>12255555
CHECKED, BASED CALORIE BRO

>> No.12255583

>>12255555
Quint Of Fives Never Lies

>> No.12255586

>>12255555
bullshit i havent eaten anything in 10 years and im still alive

>> No.12255587
File: 1.30 MB, 1536x1091, retrospective.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255587

Found this old poster on the archive and thought I'd do a bit of a retrospective.

Red X = No launch / Delay
Green Check = Launched
Yellow O = Yet to launch / Still planned for 2020

I gave starship a big X for no orbital launch and a little check for hops

>> No.12255589

>>12255548
True, SpaceX will be on the nuclear ITS by then

>> No.12255591

>>12255589
No, antimatter

>> No.12255601

>>12255511
>*Hides away into his volcanic lair of another 6 months*

>> No.12255603

>>12255574
Starship doesn’t have the delta/v to reach Saturn. I guess it might have enough if it launched from Mars but it’s harder to find data on transfer delta/v costs between bodies other than earth

>> No.12255610

>BE-4 and Raptor still not finished

Did Americans forget how to develop engines? As far as I know BE-4 is a relatively conservative engine so it's not like BO is breaking new ground there. Although it's possible that they're stalling the development to screw over ULA with their tight schedule and dependence on military contracts.
But that aside, it's disappointing that Raptor seems to be in the "iterative" phase and not in the state where they polish it and give it finishing touches.

>> No.12255614

>>12255610
It’s getting better and better over time. Nothing wrong with that

>> No.12255620

>>12255610
>But that aside, it's disappointing that Raptor seems to be in the "iterative" phase and not in the state where they polish it and give it finishing touches.
It's literally the first FFSC methalox engine ever made and can already withstand over 300 bar. If it were just a matter of making an expendable engine it'd already be done.

>> No.12255621

>>12255603
unmanned tanker starship refueling ladders
t. solver of all delta v problems

>> No.12255622

>>12255610
>Do Americans really
Goddamn I hate euros or whatever the fuck you’re from. I don’t even think about your retarded nation ever. Go land someone on the moon and then we can talk but before then eat shit and die

>> No.12255623
File: 359 KB, 1598x1200, Screen-Shot-2018-09-08-at-10.02.00-AM-min.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255623

Will Starship enable modular recon sats or does USG not care about increasing visual capabilities

>> No.12255627

>>12255620
The funny thing about raptor is that’s it’s a tough goddamn engine. That one on SN5 survived being out in a hurricane and then lived to hop the damn thing. Imagine an RS-25 doing that, let alone an expendable engine like the RS-68

>> No.12255632

>>12255462
hydrogen

>> No.12255639
File: 38 KB, 592x412, msedge_Wvp0zZqida.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255639

>>12255620
withstand is a strong word

>> No.12255641

>>12255591
correct, no antimatter

>> No.12255644

>>12255639
Run literally any turbojet hard enough and it will an hero, Raptor just so happens to get to the biggest numbers before it pukes.

>> No.12255646

>>12255641
there is antimatter

>> No.12255650

>>12255623
I doubt it, spooks are getting way more interested in LEO constellation stuff instead of the big huge traditional spysats moving forward
plus current spysats are already pushing the limits with atmospheric distortion and can get resolutions down to a couple inches, so there's not a huge need for bigger mirrors for earth observation

>> No.12255651

>>12255644
>Run literally any turbojet hard enough and it will an hero
This happened to the Me-262 basically every flight, and that was subsonic.

>> No.12255656

>>12255651
it was a feature

>> No.12255658

>>12255651
>I don't understand this reusable aircraft meme . . .

>> No.12255669
File: 274 KB, 1280x983, 1280px-Messerschmitt_Me_163B_USAF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255669

propalox komet when?

>> No.12255670

>>12255650
and you can still have virtual apertures in a constellation that will be larger than a monolothic telescope

>> No.12255671
File: 2.06 MB, 1280x1039, mars polar lander.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255671

>Currently doing Martian research
>"Oh woah there was a NASA lander sent to the exact region I am studying? Cool I bet this has good data"
>Mars Polar Lander launched in 1999? Hmmm I've never heard of this one
>Turns out it fucking smacked into the surface because the engines didn't fire
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT IT WAS LITERALLY SUPPOSED TO LAND IN THE EXACT PLAIN I NEEDED. Now I have to fucking interpret all my data and it will take me a million years to search through papers. Can we PLEASE get fucking boots on Mars. A human will be able to do in a god damn hour what a rover does in years

>> No.12255674

>>12255650
>current spysats are already pushing the limits with atmospheric distortion
This. I'm pretty sure that the resolution of that sat image of the Iranian launch site leaked by Trump was determined to be pretty close to the limits of what's physically possible.

>> No.12255675

>>12255671
dabbed on

>> No.12255681

>>12255671
>Can we PLEASE get fucking boots on Mars
Don't worry, after Mars 2020 performs the vital task of putting some rocks in a box that astronauts may or may not retrieve in a few decades, the next mars rover will carry a space suit boot for environmental testing.

>> No.12255682

>>12255671
if it was such a good lander, why didnt they launch another? ;)

>> No.12255685

>>12255555
You die if you are killed.

>> No.12255688

>>12255681
Mars 2020 is such a joke. Seems like half of it's payload is a waste of everyone's time.
>MOXIE will prove you can make oxygen from co2
i thought we "proved" that centuries ago?
>pieces of space suit fabric
huh??
>we're gonna cache samples for a return in 15 years, maybe, we havent really figured out the return part
ok but you'll at least be able to identify microfossils right?
>no that's why we're returning them
OH FOR FUCKS SAKE

Only saving grace is that lil copter with the iphone cameras

>> No.12255691

>>12255681
dont worry bro airbus is gonna have the sample return spacecraft done real soon

>> No.12255695
File: 721 KB, 1800x1086, download (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255695

>>12255688
>inb4 the helicoper doesn't work/crashes

>> No.12255697

>>12255691
OH YEAH why the FUCK are we relying on ESA to help us??? they couldnt even finish their dinky ass rover by the mars launch window, delahing it for YEARS, and we trust them with the fetch rover???? WHYYYY

>> No.12255700

>>12254943
Do you realize that they don't need 300 bar Raptor to reach orbit? It can work perfect at 280-290 bar.

>> No.12255702

SLS wet dress rehearsal slipped to November. Would be a shame if they blew it up during pressurization......hehe

>> No.12255706

>>12255671
nO iTs DaNGerOus

>> No.12255722

>>12255688
>making O2 from CO2 on Mars
To be fair proving that the same chemical processes work on Mars as well as Earth is a necessary, although boring requirement to putting humans on another planet.

>> No.12255725

>>12255695
gets run over*

>> No.12255727
File: 734 KB, 1080x2400, Screenshot_20201020-225122_Twitter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255727

Oh no space drama bros, we got too cocky

>> No.12255731

>>12255722
Proving that the laws of physics are the same on Mars? Idk I find it silly since you can easily simulate the martian atmosphere on Earth, down to composition and pressure

>> No.12255736

>>12255539
Whats with the retarded stick figures?

>> No.12255738

>>12255688
Perseverance was the first mars rover I didn't lose sleep over after it cratered

>> No.12255739

>>12252141
New bread when?

>> No.12255742
File: 59 KB, 1200x1200, 5447a47ce3acf.image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255742

>>12255739
10 more images

>> No.12255743

>>12255738
>after it cratered
Are you from the future?

>> No.12255744

>>12255727
based zubrin

>> No.12255746

>>12255731
When you rely on a process that MUST work for humans to survive on Mars you test it no matter how silly and redundant it may seem

>> No.12255753
File: 43 KB, 1200x800, 869051378.jpg.0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255753

>>12255743
I have said too much

>> No.12255759

>>12255725
>rover lands
>the latching mechanism for the helicopter fails because the program for opening it freaks out in low gravity and crashes

>> No.12255760
File: 58 KB, 323x330, LhyenzQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12255760

>>12255746
>t. NASA

If you know the atmospheric composition of Mars and produce a chamber with same atmospheric composition to test equipment on earth then there is zero fucking need to waste a whole synod on this retarded shit.

>HOLD ON ELON YOU CAN'T LAUNCH FOR ANOTHER TWO YEARS, WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT MARTIAN CO2 SABATIERS THE SAME AS EARTH CO2

>> No.12255764

new:
>>12255763

>> No.12255814

>>12254620
Muh 50kg of payload mass!!!!!!!!

>> No.12255816

>>12254584
They are playing godzilla noises through the nozzle to scare old space.

>> No.12255940

>>12254220
It actualy predates the anerican space programm.
It's the same kind of paintjob used back in Peenemünde by the same engineers and scientists.