[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 889 KB, 756x715, int.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

12227980

Virility augmentation Anonymous Tue, Oct 13, 2020 17:46:10 No.12227980 [Reply] [Original]

What is the current limit of the ability to keep a body part alive through science?

The reason I ask is because womb technology won't be able to fit inside an android, meaning that males are automatically more likely to create an apocalypse scenario, and I'm confident enough in my programming and design skills to get a decent human facade going. This makes me the new alpha male for our species, and pretty soon organ cloning will reach the point of being able to create a complete working human phallus. Personally, sex doesn't interest me all that much, but being ready to procreate is a priority since longevity technology tops out at around ~230 years old and memory decline is already known to start sooner.

So, what do we need? Has there been any headway on artificial blood? Which types of animal tissue will be compatible with our cellular metabolism? Are there easy ways to replace damaged tissue or does it require excellent healing abilities to start?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Oct 14, 2020 01:49:58 No.12229410 Or how about just artificial metabolism in general? Does it require a greater understanding of the cell than we have now?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Oct 14, 2020 02:00:48 No.12229436 >>12227980 >womb technology won't be able to fit inside an android Anon. You bink.

>>

Anonymous Wed, Oct 14, 2020 11:35:03 No.12230873

>>12229436
Hydraulics alone makes any artificial version of an organ larger than the real thing. A placenta is necessarily one of the hardest things to replace because of the sensitive nutrient transfer requirements. There are no shortcuts to replicating life.

>>	Anonymous Wed, Oct 14, 2020 17:53:46 No.12232224 Now that I think about it this is actually a pretty deranged field of study. There are no good ways to ask the relevant questions, yet it lays at the heart of regenerative medicine. Advancement will be slow regardless.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 15, 2020 06:55:43 No.12234149 Okay well which organs can we skillfully replace with functioning artificial versions?

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 15, 2020 07:13:28 No.12234189 >>12227980 Fapping to Akari is key to happiness, health, and longevity. It's scientifically proven.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 15, 2020 07:38:01 No.12234255 >>12230873 What if you truncated all the main arteries and veins going to the heart, bundled them at the termination points (supply and return) and installed a circulator pump?

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 15, 2020 17:11:12 No.12235971 File: 1.49 MB, 1049x1474, yus.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>12234189 Worth having evidence for.

>>	Anonymous Fri, Oct 16, 2020 00:20:40 No.12237249 >>12229410 Which forms of cellular interaction are least understood?

>>	Anonymous Fri, Oct 16, 2020 11:55:17 No.12238792 >>12237249 Okay, well, is there any form of cellular anatomy that we do feel we have a solid grasp of?

>>	Anonymous Fri, Oct 16, 2020 19:25:57 No.12240411 >>12234149 Which organs do we suspect can work independently of a specific set of other organs? Come on /sci/ do you even bother exploring your own bodies? How do you expect to achieve a true singularity without an intimate knowledge of biology?

>>	Anonymous Sat, Oct 17, 2020 11:44:29 No.12242106 >>12240411 Okay let's start with something simple. Which organs do we have the highest success rate in healing?

>>	Anonymous Sat, Oct 17, 2020 14:26:51 No.12242487 >>12242106 Human? The liver, without a doubt. Non-human? Plenty. That's the difference between wound healing and regeneration.

>>	Anonymous Sat, Oct 17, 2020 23:56:38 No.12244100 >>12238792 So CRISPR may as well be magic, is what I'm getting out of this. Modern medicine is incapable of healing.

>>	Anonymous Sun, Oct 18, 2020 14:40:59 No.12246219 >>12230873 Which means there's an endpoint to biomimicry. At some point not even nanites can create a decent synthetic animal.

>>	Anonymous Sun, Oct 18, 2020 22:36:20 No.12247780 Alright, let's try hard mode. If we can make a fully synthetic cell, what will it be made of?

>>

Anonymous Mon, Oct 19, 2020 00:56:19 No.12248197
File: 115 KB, 680x521, aputhink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>12227980
>>12229436

What do you mean by fitting a womb in an android? Is there any reason why artificial wombs would have to be attached to a body, rather than anything else?

>>

Anonymous Mon, Oct 19, 2020 13:07:52 No.12249546

>>12248197
Robots aren't androids, anon. Trying to put a dick on a robot won't make it suddenly fuckable. An android has to maintain a human appearance to qualify, so there's no easy way to do that in the case of a pregnant woman. Despite the tropes, it's an inherently gendered technology as a result. I'm just using it to restore male rights because I can appreciate the challenges involved.

>>	Anonymous Tue, Oct 20, 2020 03:09:17 No.12251895 >>12232224 There should also probably be a better use for it than this.

>>	Anonymous Tue, Oct 20, 2020 13:58:36 No.12253382 >>12247780 Will it be able to function next to organic cells? Why or why not?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Oct 21, 2020 02:13:39 No.12255784 >>12253382 Not even synthetic biology, /sci/?

>>	Anonymous Wed, Oct 21, 2020 14:43:35 No.12257328 >>12253382 Yes, by definition. If we haven't made it that far then there's no point calling it a cell.

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 22, 2020 05:31:15 No.12259548 >>12229410 >>12247780 Does a synthetic cell have a complete metabolism or is it better off being inert unless reacting?

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 22, 2020 13:22:09 No.12260727 >>12227980 Organoids

>>	Anonymous Thu, Oct 22, 2020 21:23:23 No.12262459 >>12260727 Excellent. This is going straight to my brain.

>>	Anonymous Fri, Oct 23, 2020 09:59:26 No.12264024 >>12249546 Why does it need to be an android and look human? Men fuck fleshlights now and they don't look human at all