/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12195623
The neighborhood of infinity is not allowed.

Math isn’t real

The ride never ends.

>>12195665
I see you have opted for stupid criticism #8.

TIME CUBE

>>12195623
Ok, then give me a non negative zero of the zeta function that doesn't have the real part 1/2.

>>12197336
[math] z_0=0.52+i\big( \widehat\infty-\pi\big) \quad\implies\quad\zeta(z_0)=0 [/math]
Ok, now you do agree RH is not an open problem?

>>12197237
Time cube, as it is sometimes called.

Time cube: what Mochi calls a Hodge theater.

This post will remind me about the person stalking me in the lobby at my old hotel after I mentioned Mochi's faculty portrait.

Time cube: what Hairer just won $3M for calling a regularity structure.

What Weinstein calls Geometric Unity. What Wilczek calls time crystals. What very many other people call very many other things.

>>12195623
>>12195623
>RH is false
wrong . There is a reason tge zeta function works as a error correction on the general prime counting function. In order to account for the complexity of pinning down primes as we reach inf needs a complex variable to work.
Inf hermitian matrix is the only way to work through the problem

>>12195623
>2) The neighborhood of infinity is not allowed by the field axioms which did not exist until long after Hilbert's 1988 paper
I think Hilbert died long before 1988

>>12198149
>Inf hermitian matrix is the only way to work through the problem
This is actually something completely stupid as a way to criticize my solution because really it supports the concept of what I've done. Take the Hermitian matrix containing the hydrogenic energies of an electron. You have all the levels close to the ground state which give the ordinary spectral lines, but the [math]n[/math] quantum number can keep going up and way down toward the lower right you get what are called the Rydberg energies, but then eventually after an infinite number of bound states you eventually reach the ionization energy beyond which the electron states become Dirac delta functions. Are these eigenvalues of a Hermitian matrix? Indeed, they must be if the ordinary postulates of QM are to be upheld although there is some nuance to the concept of a "matrix" having uncountably many diagonal entries beyond a infinite number of discrete diagonal entries. In principle, if you consider the free energies to be in the matrix or not, all those delta function states that tell you, "The electron is no longer in a bound state," are like the zeros of zeta in the neighborhood of infinity that tell you, "There are an infinite number of primes smaller than a number in the neighborhood of infinity." The analogy is perfect: If an electron is in a free delta function state then there are an infinite number of different wavelength photons that it can emit to go into a bound state with a proton.

>>12198533
Should be 1899.

your proof incorrectly assumes that induction works for numbers in the neighbourhood of infinity, but this is clearly untrue as induction only works for the natural numbers, not their extension to the neighbourhood of intinity

>>12197566
why exactly 0.52?

If you proved it to be wrong, where’s your million?

>>12198751
I don't believe I made any reference to induction.

>>12198756
I chose 0.52 because it satisfied the condition of your request which, I assume, wanted a zero whose real part is not equal to 0.5. Do you agree that 0.52 is not equal to 0.5?

>>12198769
I don't have a million. If you want to know where Clay's million is, then you ought to ask them.

You are just nitpicking OP