/sci/ - Science & Math

Depends on what exactly you mean by eugenics and how you go about it. There are slippery slope arguments against any form of eugenics, but I find that position tedious for any subject.

Anything is ethical if it agrees to a particular ethics.

>>12196387
If you are going to create a monster then it would be better if it was never born.

ethics isn't real

No

>>12196387
It's extremely unethical and extremely effective

Make it optional and hope enough people opt-in when you offer them a nice enough reward for agreeing to not breed.

>>12196387
the real question is is (((dysgenics))) ethical

>>12196387
Yes.

How is such a body type possible?

Why is fat held in the thighs, hips, and butt, but not the stomach?

Biology is gay.

>>12196387
Whatever creates more women with bigger asses is ethical

>>12196387
it depends on the type and methods used, but in general I would say it is unethical but necessary and effective
It's the same situation with snib snabbing feral cats or other pets, on the one hand I think removing their ability to fulfill the most basic drive of all life without their consent is absolutely unethical, but on the other hand it's completely necessary. The alternative of leaving them free to reproduce benefits them in the short term, but in the long term it results in much more suffering as the population expands beyond what the environment can support and damages other species until starvation reduces the population to whatever the new ecosystem can support.
You could argue that that's just the natural course of things and everything should just be left to work out however it works out, but in my opinion problems that result from humans or human activity should be dealt with by humans to minimize the impact on the rest of the biosphere as much as possible. I don't think we should interfere with wild organisms causing damage to other wild organisms, but that humans or other organisms causing damages as a result of human activity should be cleaned up by humans.

>>12197766
Genetics + estrogen (which is mainly genetics)

>>12196387
I'm not sure if it is as effective as claimed. Gauss's parents were dirt farmers. Not that one anecdote is enough to disprove eugenics, but I think everyone would agree it would be best to maximize our potential with education before turning to eugenics.

>>12196387
ethics are cope for retarded people
we'll never progress humanity if we'll keep giving a fuck about pointless shit like ethics

>>12198191
Spoken like a true nazi.

>>12198205
spoken like a weak willed brainlet faggot

>oh look it's the stealthed /pol/ racism thread again!
Fuck off asshole