[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 275 KB, 600x600, standard model.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12191196 No.12191196 [Reply] [Original]

I am not good at expressing the realizations I just had in words. I understand how to rebuild physics from the ground up using quantum physics and what we know from it to create quantum gravity. This is a theory of waves. That's the best way I can explain it right now. I simply want to say that in the next year or two, I'm going to try to sum this up in proper equations and simulations to prove this model of the universe that can explain general relativity in quantum terms. Everything is a wave, particles creating mass just bend and warp space with waves as well.

>> No.12191199 [DELETED] 

>>12191196
>hand waving intensifies

>> No.12191200

>>12191196
k gary

>> No.12191204
File: 66 KB, 714x528, Standard Model.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12191204

>>12191196
>hand waving intensifies.

>> No.12191444

>>12191196
I REALLY hate this representation of the Standard model
It's absolutely implying that everything falls under the control of the Higgs Boson when it is literally just 1% of the mass of the atom. God particle my ass

Gluon is where 99% of mass come from
What's more is that it establishes the idea that the model is already complete when we have yet to find the graviton - which should exist but its just too weak for current technology

>> No.12191469

>>12191204
>gluons are rotating on a basic circular axis
>photons are rotating on a visible, but non-spatial axis, causing an up and down motion.
>w bosons are rotating on a non-visible spatial dimension, causing an in and out "blinking" effect
>gravitons are rotating entirely within non-visible dimensions

>> No.12192101

>>12191196
>I am not good at expressing the realizations I just had in words.
No need for words. Just provide the mathematics.

>> No.12192570

>>12192101
OP here, I went to sleep and came back to check up on everything here.
That's what my goal is going to be, I'm basically going to be reworking and rebuilding general relativity from the ground up using the standard model and all that. Maybe not even the standard model entirely, but using the fact that everything is a fluctuation on a wave.

>> No.12192621

>>12191444
The Higgs Boson itself isn't all that cool or crazy, it's a result of the void space itself creating a particle. Noise in the Higgs Field is what creates mass and basically most of what we know, which is fascinating and amazing. What makes it so cool and important, is because when we proved its existence, it essentially confirmed the standard model.

And in a way, everything is kinda dependent on the Higgs Boson, or maybe just the Higgs Field, but still. Everything is created from the interactions of these particles, and most other particles are created from interacting with Higgs.

>> No.12193068

>>12192621
The subatomic particles, sure.
But gluon, photons, bosons, and gravitons couldn't care less about it. So why the fuck must everything revolve around the damn Higgs

>> No.12193106

>>12192621
Wanna know how I know that your only source of information is popsci drivel, and that you've never even picked up a QFT book?

>> No.12193157

>>12193106
I'd love to know, because I've been reading on QFT for months, trying to understand their concepts intuitively. My knowledge that I pull just from memory may not be completely accurate, but I do get what's going on.

Although I still have many questions.
Anyway yeah, why do you think that?

>> No.12193164

>>12193068
>bosons
wrong