[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 347 KB, 1112x632, WAIS 3 question.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12169571 No.12169571 [Reply] [Original]

Here's a decent psychometric cognitive abilities test:
https://planning.e-psychometrics.com/test/icar60

What do you fags think of the psychometrics? Open to discussion.
Pic slightly related, it's an ok puzzle.
It's a bit long, but don't let that discourage you brainlets from wasting time on it.
Cronbach alpha = 0.93
Here's a little paper on it: https://icar-project.org/papers/ICAR2014.pdf

>> No.12169646

>>12169571
1 or 2 are the only options that make sense

t. high spatial IQ non-redditfag 145 swag

>> No.12169648

>>12169646
You're dumb.
t. 150 WAIS IV PRI

>> No.12169657
File: 43 KB, 1280x720, 1564122359856.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12169657

>>12169571
I am going to say this is a troll-image made in mspaint
the shapes are all over the place
>no overlapping
>no rotations
>dubious zooming due to wild variance in shapes
>no sensible parity/inside-outside counting
>single row so there is not really any making a rule and seeing if it applies

>> No.12169660

>>12169571
a dot for every crossing, 5

>> No.12169671

>>12169660
oh so this test is not about a progression?

>> No.12169710

>>12169671
It is, you are just stupid.

>> No.12169719

>>12169660
God damn it I scrolled down first a couple of posts right away like I always do and you spoiled it before I went back up.

>> No.12169722

>>12169571
5 = number of intersections

>> No.12169738
File: 60 KB, 1024x913, 1598938319901.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12169738

>>12169719
Its a dumb question anyway. A lot of cheap misdirection and a fairly simplistic deduction

>> No.12169748

>>12169571
Red dots count amount of intersections between the other shapes. Answer is 5

>> No.12169752

>>12169710
how is it a progression?

>> No.12169773

>>12169752
The pattern is that the intersections = the dots.
If you can't see this then you are dumb.
The only reason you were confused was because of the practice effect you have from looking at other question, idiot.

>> No.12169833
File: 109 KB, 681x692, 1601193911177.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12169833

>>12169773
and how is this relationship between dots and intersections progressing from one panel to the next, my esl friend?

>> No.12169897

>>12169833
IQ tests are not about progression, they are finding the pattern.
Not every IQ test question is a form of metamorphosis or movement, sometimes you are just finding the right answer in the answer field.
It's obvious that none of the other answers work.

>> No.12170009

>>12169897
But the entire strain of conversation was you saying its a progression, and its not, by your own admission.

>> No.12171583

>>12169657
>>12169648
This is the last matrix reasoning question on the WAIS III

>> No.12172971

>>12171583
It's really easy.
How is this possibly 19 scaled score?

>> No.12172992

>>12170009
Exactly. Its not a progression. Which makes him a stupid crawling piece of pajeet-tier fecal matter, staining the floor and breeding diseases.

>> No.12172993

>>12169571
Obviously 5. Points of intersection = number of balls

>> No.12173057

>>12169660
Nicely done, seems simple enough, but I didn't see it.

>> No.12173146

>>12169571
the red circles = the number of line intersections
>5 is the answer

>> No.12173167

>>12173146
Are you negros going to do the actual test I posted or are you just going to keep thinking you're intelligent for solving that 100 IQ question?

>> No.12173211

>>12173167
Aint nobody got time for your test nigga

>> No.12173255
File: 783 KB, 460x460, backpedal.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12173255

>>12172992
>backpedalling this hard

>> No.12173442

>>12173211
But you guys are no-lifes on 4chan, I'm sure you have LOTS of time.

>> No.12173450

>>12169897
Clearly this forces some people to overthink it. The first thing I noticed was the forth image having no dots or intersections. So if this was intended to be a trick question then good job but otherwise it's just a bad question.

>> No.12173468

>>12173450
No, it doesn't.
If you overthink it you're dumb and have been tainted with practice effect. Any true smart person would be able to see the similarities between the items and know the only correct answer can be 5.