/sci/ - Science & Math

I take it by your silence that you concede all of the eight points and their variations are properly labelled "stupid," and my ban immediately following my previous comment about how I enjoy having something to write in these threads obviously has nothing to do with anyone's disinclination to post here.

>>12132013
>1) Definitions 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 comprise a circle because the codomain of the Euclidean metric could be taken as R instead of N or Q, and despite the fact that the line being equipped with "a function" does not depend on the function's codomain, be it R, Q, N, or any other thing.
so you agree that the function's codomain is not R

Let's talk about the non-math stuff.

Are you diagnosed with any psychiatric conditions? Do you think you might have Capgras syndrome ("irrational belief that someone they know or recognize has been replaced by an imposter")?

What does your room look like? Is there trash scattered about everywhere?

Do you believe God speaks to you through signs and symbols?

>>12132793
he's homeless now iirc.
Also don't forget to sage schizo threads!

>>12132798
Wow is he posting all this stuff from libraries or homeless shelters all day?

It's a shame, because he's probably smarter than 99% of people here and could've put his mind to good use if it weren't riddled with psychosis

>>12132805
hard to say. obviously producing meaningful work requires a healthy mind and lifestyle. I don't romanticize the 'troubled genius' myth for a second. Still his work is non sense and I don't think hes had a proper exposure to even undergrad math based on his writing

>>12132818
I don't romanticize that myth either (though I do think a tiny bit of "crazy" can sometimes be a good thing if you're smart in other way)

I'm basing this on the fact that supposedly he actually was a gifted math student in university and received high acclaim from legit professors etc. (I forget where I saw this and am too lazy to dig it up, but I think it's legit and not just hearsay from him.)

He started declining somewhere around then, but I think before his symptoms fully developed his math work was probably pretty solid.

>>12132830
wow that's very interesting. I'd like to see some of his publications from before his mental decline. It's a shame.

>>12132013
>5) The Archimedes property of real numbers is not what Euclid said it is. It is what Rudin says it is.
The fuck did he mean by this?

>>12132783
Do you agree that the specification of the range or codomain is not relevant to Definition 2.1.2?

>>12133252
One of the common criticisms I receive, a stupid one, is that the numbers I discovered don't exhibit the Archimedes property of real numbers as it is given by Rudin, and cannot, therefore, be real numbers even though they do exhibit the Archimedes property as it is given by Euclid.

To all the agents of Helene in this thread, the agents of a foolish and unclean woman who worked for many years in the psychiatric industry and now uses psychiatric disease to besmirch anything she doesn't like: you are most unwise to espouse her memes in my thread.

I'm a bit of a newfag to this board, have seen these threads for awhile, generally just understand it as a schizoposter
But why the fuck does he put mecha shit in the OP pics? Is he a real /m/an?

>what did he mean by this

>>12132830
so actually i just googled his name and he's asked few questions on stackexchange. notably he asked why {1, 2, 3} is not a monoid under multiplication...
kinda casts some doubt on his innate mathematical ability.
Still I hope for the best for tooker. He reminds me of my own brother when he was going through psychotic episodes.

>>12133654
>kinda casts some doubt on his innate mathematical ability.
In what way? Are you suggesting that I lacked the innate knowledge that monoid is supposed to be closed? Lang did not mention it when he defined a monoid, and I think it speaks to my innate ability that I noticed what Lang wrote didn't make sense. Among the thousand people asking, "Is Lang a meme?," how many of them noticed that he didn't mention group closure?

I suppose you who insist on saying my problem is that I have a disease as opposed to my being in the very bad graces of the USA must all think that later I will make an inquiry to determine, "What did this person really mean when they posted the disease meme?," but it is overwhelmingly likely that I will arrive at blanket judgement against you having forgone any such inquiry. You and/or the bot controllers who give you disease-themed text strings to drop.

>>12133693
Ohhhh Is this why you think it’s okay to have your magic hat numbers not be closed under the field operations?

>>12133634
good one took

I don't understand any of the shit posted in this thread, what classes will I have to take to understand any of this stuff? Real Analysis? Complex? Is it Grad level stuff?

>>12133716
if by grad school you mean the mkultra chamber at guantanamo bay then yes

>>12133727
Obviously not talking about tookers Shizo shit, I'm talking about the knowledge required to refute it.

>>12133693
bruh lang almost certainly define a monoid as a map AxA -> A, which implies closure automatically. Mathematicians don't stumble on these things, i'm afraid.

>>12133729
its undergrad level reasoning to poke holes in tookers hallucinations

>>12133699
I see have you have pursued OP #4 and #2. Do you have anything to add?

>>12133716
If you are proficient in the theory of functions at the level of a USA middle school algebra course, you should be able to understand it.
Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237

>>12133727
strangely, this is also correct.

>>12133734
Yes, he did give that definition on the first line about monoids. It was that he did not explicitly state the closure property which confused me, and only given the closure through the set notation without some words to that effect as well.

>mathematicians always understand everything right away and they don't ask questions, and if you don't understand or if you ask a question then you have "stumbled"
ok.

Who's El Arcon? Never heard of him before.
I know a little bit of abstract algebra (mostly just group theory), differential equations, and a few other advanced math topics, can I get a rundown on what infinity hat is and how the riemann hypothesis is false?

>>12133777
Nice 777 Took

>>12133833
It's the title of the Governor of Jerusalem, who is the King of Judah, and also the King of Israel, and this king of many other things as well.

>>12133729
watch this kid

>>12132013
Def 2.1.1: a line is extending infinitely far in both direction
Def 2.3.1 a line segment is a line with endpoints

you're saying that all line segments need to be extending infinitely far in both direction.

>>12134641
Link the paper you're refuting.

>>12134757
https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0237

>>12134822
is the el arcon poster really tooker? is he really insane?

>>12134848
>is the el arcon poster really tooker?
yes
>is he really insane?
of course he is, just read the fucking paper

Time traveller Tooker? That guy?

>>12134870
wtf time travel? what do you mean? who is this guy

>>12134871
I think there was some connection to Titor. I read a fucked up pasta by this Took dude about being essentially gang stalked once but I can’t find it

>>12134641
>you're saying that all line segments need to be extending infinitely far in both direction.
the endpoints mark the line segment's extent on the line.

>>12134870
>>12134871
Hi, I am Jon Tooker: the inventor of the time circuit...
https://pastebin.com/uHZrB238
>Time Arrow Spinors for the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/1807.0454

Mundane events related to time travel.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1240030/pg1

John Titor, the Montauk Project, the e-Cat and Geometric Unity
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread966329/pg1

I am the anonymous physicist featured in the black hole article yesterday.
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ukbz6/i_am_the_anonymous_physicist_featured_in_the/

30 Tooker Papers
https://gofile.io/d/G26INQ
https://vixra.org/author/jonathan_w_tooker

Exide Docs
https://gofile.io/d/7IGyTl

The secret numbers at the end of the first Cicada puzzle were my DOB and SSN
>05211980
>600744301
as well as the viXra IDs of my earlier papers
https://vixra.org/author/jonathan_w_tooker

>>12134891
The connection is that I invented the time circuit and the Titor logo comes from my solution to RH around the north pole of the Riemann sphere: >>12133892

>>12132013
Even if your infinity hat idea is correct, it's trivial. You deserve the RH reward, sure, but this doesn't effect anything since the only math we can viably do is in the neighborhood of the origin.

>>12136000
>doesn't effect anything since the only math we can viably do is in the neighborhood of the origin.
This is profoundly stupid. The equation
[eqn]\left( \widehat\infty-1 \right)-\left( \widehat\infty-2 \right)= e^{2\pi i}[/eqn]
directly refutes your point. Furthermore, for prime numbers [math]p[/math], numbers of the form
[eqn]p'=\widehat\infty-p[/eqn] have the same distribution as the regular primes, but now we have new arithmetic tools for such numbers which might yield new results. Anything we could learn about the distribution of [math]p'[/math] would tell us about the distribution of ordinary primes. Furthermore, the well known connections between quantum theory and the RZF are in no way restricted to the neighborhood of the origin. Your claim is so stupid you might as well claim that the complex plane is of no interest because the only math we can viably do is on the real line.

>>12135969
>The secret numbers at the end of the first Cicada puzzle were my DOB and SSN
>>05211980
>>600744301
>as well as the viXra IDs of my earlier papers
So you're part of Cicada/organized it?

>>12136102
>Anything we could learn about the distribution of p would tell us about the distribution of ordinary primes

Okay... but I have seen no results of this type coming from you or anyone. I haven seen no proof that these results on the neighbourhood of infinity are of any interest. If you want your theory to be accepted then you better at least provide some applications for your theory.

>>12136310
It solves a millenium prize problem almost trivially, what else do you want dude lmao

>>12136413
But that is of no use. Tooker invented new numbers to solve an equation but that doesn't really tell us anything because the reality is that there are solutions in the neighborhood of the origin and their distribution says a lot.

>>12136265
No, that's not right. It was probably the hacker known as 4chan or one of his other relatives.

Bro reading Tooker threads is starting to give me schizophrenia.

This guy just won the $3M Millennium prize for ripping off my M3 operator.

If you got to arXiv, you'll notice from the time stamps that v1 of Hairer's paper has been deleted from the internet.

My suspicion is that Israeli and Kikeberg created the Millennium Prize shortly after I began publishing so as to promote those who would steal my research and/or conspire to cover it up. Hairer is one such example, and Polchinski is another such obvious example. The whole thing about "Complementarity vs Firewalls" was about hiding my research (should this complement the mainstream research or be hidden from it?), and Polchinski was a primary architect of that nonsense debate about the consequences or four unmotivated assumptions strung together. I can see how these two worked against me, but likely outside of field of vision, everyone who has gotten an Breakthrough Prize (not Millennium, oops) is onboard with telling the lie that my research is garbage.

>>12136554
Tooker, I am not going to argue the merit of your publications here but if you wanted to be taken seriously for an award such as Zuckerberg's prize you should have spent the past few years

>Actually finishing a Ph.D.
>Not raping grad students
>Not shitposting on 4chan using your real name
>Not shitposting on Reddit using your real name
>Not shitposting on graffiti using your real name
>Not harassing scientists via email
>Not harassing reviewers via email
>Not declaring that you'll murder and torture other scientists via email
>Not declaring that you'll murder and torture reviewers online
>Not claiming you are God everywhere you go

Just some tips.

They've got this interstellar bot fly maggot on Star Trek today.

>>12136554
>>12136608
Can you explain this to a layperson? It seems interesting but I don't understand the concepts being used.

>>12136748
When I was at the homeless shelter in fall 2018, I woke night to find Zuckerberg felating me. This was only one of the sexual batteries I endured at that shelter. I woke only long enough to feel the utter disgust and contempt, and then they turned my brain off with the Boeing "nose down" implant.

Namefag Anon, your family should have killed you to prevent you existing among them because now they are in bad graces due to the things you have written.

>>12136608
>[Submitted on 20 Mar 2013 (v1),
is this not the "real" v1? What do you mean that v1 of his paper was deleted? Do you have a copy? What was so important about it?

>>12136856
I would be happy to explain it to you. So as to avoid simply rewriting that which you didn't understand, can you tell me where you cease to understand? You can just specify the first, second, third, etc. sentence in pic related. Once you understand my description of M3, then I think you can get the gist of what Hairer just won $3M for rewriting into worse language without even wrapping up any of the loose ends which I had left to future work, literally nothing to my idea and only making it less understandable.

>>12136882
When I loaded that PDF, the TeX timestamp said 2019 even though the arXiv timestamp still said 2013. That looks dirty as fuck to me because, as i understand, the arXiv stamp gets printed onto the PDF at the time it is submitted. I don't have the original. I just looked at the paper when I heard he won that prize and I immediately recognized the M3 operation and what Hairer's colleague must have meant he said "the work was done by aliens." After I saw that version 1 of his paper was uploaded about six months after I published M3, I wanted to study how the revisions to his paper reflected his having stolen more and more from me as I continued to have new ideas in the years 2013-2020.

Pic related, you can see how Martin here uses the same "proofs are ignored and things are simplified" language that Ashtekar used when he was stealing my even earlier research for a publication in Nuclear Physics B, as I detailed here: >>12136917

Pic related, I am not in a cult and secrecy is detestable to me, and I don't like fancy clothes and jewelry either. Yet, somehow, I still easily recognize all the people in these photos. Even if I have some of their names wrong, which is possible for the two Josephs and Romero but not possible for the others, it is peculiar that I would recognize all of these cultists without myself being in their cult. Their cult was trying to fuck me out everything and the purpose of the Abrahamic religions is to undermine their attempt to do so.

>>12133777
>tooker doesnt understand functions
>doesnt know a function needs a predefined codomain
>doesnt know what AxA -> A means

>>If you are proficient in the theory of functions at the level of a USA middle school algebra course, you should be able to understand it.
pottery

>>12136868
>I woke night to find Zuckerberg fellating me

The guy already sucked you off and you still want him to award you more prizes? Come on, take what you can get Tooker. You are too greedy.

>>12136984
I do know that a function has to have a range. It is you who fails to understand (or more likely fully understands) that the a line being equipped with a function does not depend on the identity of the range, so the definition of R is not circular because it does not depend on the range need not necessarily be R in any case.

I know very well what AxA->A means. Furthermore, Lang called it a "mapping onto itself" and never clarified that the mapping attached to a monoid was also "onto itself." I didn't look it in depth since two years ago, but I believe there is a GIANT HOLE in Lang's definition of a monoid. Everyone gives him a pass on it, and instead they attack my work which has no holes in it. Pic related, Lang didn't say that the law of composition for G is "onto itself." If you can find where Lang says a monoid is closed, then please point it out. I don't recall seeing it. Here's the PDF:
https://gofile.io/d/E4xCsA

>>12133497
see Jon, this is proof you are a schizo. your mom isn’t a glowie or an adrenochromoholic

>>12137056
He didn't suck me off. He was hoping that the liars who say I am a faggot were telling the truth and that he would be able suck me off. What really happened is that they roused me from hypnosis with my dick in his mouth and then turned my brain right back off when the wave of contempt and disgust washed over me.

>>12137089
I don't believe Helene is my mom. That's a lie she told me, more likely. Maybe she is. I am eager to learn the truth of it.