/sci/ - Science & Math

Dont forget to lower your room CO2.

>sci still doesnt understand g and iq

>>12132296
Sure, and you can also train to be able to pass field sobriety tests when plastered.
No test is immune to cheating, but this really wasn't a thing with IQ tests (except perhaps in very few isolated cases) until the Internet age.

>>12132296
>98.9 to 107.1
>97 to 98.3
These are still within the same standard deviation.
Midwit is still midwit.

>>12132296
Years ago, I joined that site. During the evaluation test, my IQ was estimated above 140. In my free month, I advanced through every level. My final IQ was estimated above 150. The thing is, the exercises were a joke. I think there might be some value to them, but the patterns are so limited that you can figure out the answer at a glance. The site feels intended for children or adults with learning disabilities.

>>12132296
Where the fuck does the data from this graph even come from. I looked through all this dudes papers and can't find shit.

>>12132410
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/iq-boot-camp/201606/new-evidence-way-raise-your-iq

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27062159/

>>12132296
the only reason IQ matters is because sexually failed white basedboys need something to jerk off to in order to raise their self esteem.

>>12132417
Oh damn, thanks. I was looking through this Roche guys papers the entire time.

It's always been known that you can improve your IQ. However, the improvements have diminishing returns. At some point, you're better off doing something productive instead of worrying about an inconsequential test. That point is generally t=0.

They're making silly claims. Dual n-back for example is definitely not "proven" to enhance working memory. This is charlatanistic.

>>12132296
An increase in score is always possible. Just give people the answer sheets. It's also useless. Scores are only meaningful as proxies for latent ability, which we don't know how to raise or lower (besides genetics).
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00034/full

>>12132296
Not permanently. These gains always vanish after certain time.

>>12132425
kek
insecure nigger with inferiority complex spotted. You know it's not wypipo's fault that your race never invented a wheel.

>>12135061
All your race's achievements cause cancer. We will wipe the slate clean. And then you will have nothing to be proud of.

>>16388886
>That doesn't answer the question.
Sorry.

>Are you saying that a "survival element", as you called it, in the market would be the need for profit?
Yes

>>corporate social responsibility
>Stop. Get some help. Stop buying and pushing their lies. They don't have social responsibility, they pretend they do because it's better optics and therefore better business. Stop!
Chances that someone will do something for free are low.

>>16388874
Link to the relevant texts so I can expand my horizons and journey to the origin where it all began.

>>12135266
Sure buddy, go one day without white inventions and see how you like it

>>12132296
>IQ is measured by a test
>psychologists believe your IQ is fixed
>psychologists believe you cannot study for a test
>never studied for any tests as a psychology major
>90+ average test score
Everyone else has the same experience, right?

>>12135266
kek
You might actually achieve wiping the slate, but then it'll just be covered in shit.

>>12135380
Yes

>>12135384
Does that abomination on the right represent the future that you hope for?

>>12135384
lol @ shitlibs thinking this makes them look good

>>12135039
Not if you're doing it consistenly in your teenage/early 20s years.

>>12132356
Doesn't this prove that, for someone with an IQ as high as yours, the test would undoubtedly feel easy and limited, whereas someone who's below average, would have an incredibly hard time solving it? But i understand what you mean. If you do IQ tests long enough you will, of course, get better at them as you have a reference mark to solve them. It's always finding out patterns, and some patterns are very similar to others, regardless of the symbology you use. Finally, if you make a retarded person do 1000 IQ tests, he would eventually get good at them, so in a way you can cheat these fuckers by mere trial and error

>>12132327
Yeah but with a 107 IQ I can be a midwit who can quote logical fallacies to people!

>>12135349
Bro you know as well as i do that undergrad psych testing is a joke. Lab reports are what actually count for a mark

>>12137424
Even then. No childhood intervention program managed to permanently increase IQ.

>>12132296
you can find free versions of dual-n-back and other websites that train your brain, don't waste money on this

>>12135266
Yea because Nu-Africa 2.0 is definitely progress

>>12132296
you're still a retard, faggot.

>>12137667
>Doesn't this prove that, for someone with an IQ as high as yours
I don't know what my IQ is, and the way the site calculates IQ is by having you complete their quiz of syllogisms and then estimating IQ from that. The style of questions they use are so limited that you will quickly learn to identify the patterns, which will of course allow you to answer much more quickly. When you retake the test at the end of the trial, your estimated IQ will inevitably rise. There may be people out there who really do struggle with relational reasoning, so the program may actually work in their favor and provide real world results. The idea has some merit, but the difficulty levels off far too soon, which will limit the efficacy of the program for the majority of people. They could easily include more patterns and more information, which would ramp up the difficulty significantly.

>>12132296
You can’t raise your (actual, inherent) IQ but you can get better at IQ tests, look up the Flynn Effect

>>12132327
This, also beetween two iq test your results may vary by less than a standard deviation.
Call me when someone with an iq of 100 has trained to pass as someone with an iq of 125.

>tfw permanently lowered IQ with sleep deprivation

How accurate is mensa test? I should be 20 points higher than this

>>12135061
there probably 5 black poster on 4chan. not every who is against you is trans or black.

>>12135266
He typed, on the keyboard invented by whites, to send a message in a white language, over the internet invented by whites

>>12148503
None of this should have been invented.