[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 29 KB, 469x340, índice.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12127854 No.12127854 [Reply] [Original]

Which of the following pieces would allow the red dot to be the only one visible?
>You can rotate to any angle.

>> No.12127860 [DELETED] 

>>12127854
D

>> No.12127863
File: 10 KB, 536x412, ans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12127863

B

>> No.12127870

Why did you delete your post faggot

>> No.12127872

>>12127854
If any, probably D, but I'm not sure how the answers line up with the background.

>> No.12127891
File: 600 KB, 1280x688, 2zw3za.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12127891

>>12127872
>t.

>> No.12127916
File: 205 KB, 659x525, 848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12127916

>>12127854
C, you can rotate it to cover up everything except ALL the blue dots. No other shape can be applied to leave all of a single color visible.

>> No.12127957

>>12127916
You can't cover the green dots either if you can't cover the blue ones

>> No.12127964

>>12127957
Wrong rotate the object 180 degrees, the white red a green dots are all covered

>> No.12127983

>>12127916
but this is not the question?

>> No.12128002

>>12127983
What is the question?

>> No.12128008
File: 35 KB, 1152x648, D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12128008

>>12127854
Take D and put it vertically on top of the red dot. Then extend it to both sides, creating a "donut". Leaving only the red dot.

>> No.12128022
File: 106 KB, 937x937, 1600259954529.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12128022

>>12128008
>implying this is even remotely the same in terms of logical simplicity to my solution

>> No.12128043

>>12128022
Which one was yours?

>> No.12128063

>>12128043
Oh you weren't having a joke at my expense?

>>12127916

>> No.12128093

>>12128063
The thing is, we're supposed to make only 1 dot visible, the red.

Now the red one inhibits the #5 in the matrix

[
1, 2, 3
4, 5, 6
7, 8, 9
]

Now all other shapes, if put 2 dimensionally will cover the #5.

Therefore, if above assumption is correct, we need a 3 dimensional solution.

Here, D can provide that, assuming it's also still within the rules (probably not, and I most likely missed something)

Your solution >>12127916 is correct if 3 dimensions is not allowed (the part where no share can be applied)

We agree on the no shape can be applied due to above matrix argument, which you also pointed out first.

>> No.12128132
File: 815 KB, 680x682, 1600180600151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12128132

>>12128093
Oh, I didn't even read the instructions and I'm not convinced that OP didn't just make them up to troll us. IQ tests are typically purely visual to avoid cultural bias and I correctly guessed that the mechanism was covering up the dots with the shapes. So I stand by my answer. FWIW I don't find it convincing that you can just turn the shapes into donuts though, lol.

>> No.12128142

>>12128132
Yeah, I agree, don't think the donut is legal either, it was just apparent that no shape was viable, so I just tried to have a little fun.

>> No.12128717 [DELETED] 

D is the only answer I can think of.
Rotate 90 degrees to the right.
Make a 70-80ish degree angle with with the left side of the box,as in 2 planes.

>> No.12128884

What is the question....?

>> No.12128900
File: 419 KB, 599x599, 1600182549037.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12128900

>>12128132
As further evidence OP is messing with us, I must point out that there would be no reason to differentiate the dots in so many colors if the exercise was to leave the red one uncovered.

>> No.12129021

>>12127854
Answer: C

>IQ of 143 and i can visualize the answer