[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 859 KB, 2970x2483, 1599521602668.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12096340 No.12096340[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How does /sci/ refute this image?

>> No.12096348

>>12096340
Scientists are cowardly midwits, and cowardly midwits are the most likely group to enter servitude with the god of this world.

>> No.12096369

as a scientist, i have been paid to say you're bullshit, and my overlords are prepared to humiliate you on television

>> No.12096372

>>12096340
Patchy poster pls

>> No.12096456
File: 1.31 MB, 2400x3229, 9 Most Common Myths About 7 Most Common Myths About Race.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12096456

>>12096340

>> No.12096498

>>12096456
>nothing in 5 disproves the claim
Except the direct comparison between poor whites and affluent blacks. Or the persistent IQ gap even in adoption studies.

Man, what a shit image.

>> No.12096510

>>12096340
CHIMPIN' AIN'T EASY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5cX521rs7ydO/

>> No.12096541

>>12096498
In addition, I have looked at the abstracts of the last two papers. They both support what the graphic claims. Assuming that in the full M something paper the origin is specified as Asia.
Furthermore, refusing scholarly work just for the source or where it was published is extremely poor form. We live in a time where whole careers can be cancelled for imagined racism. Of course a lot of controversial research will have to be published in off-stream sources.

To reiterate, what a shit image.

>> No.12096683
File: 221 KB, 769x939, It's interesting that Richard Lynn started as an anti-Irish bigot before moving on to the more familiar forms of racism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12096683

>>12096541
>Furthermore, refusing scholarly work just for the source or where it was published is extremely poor form. We live in a time where whole careers can be cancelled for imagined racism. Of course a lot of controversial research will have to be published in off-stream sources.
Or you just save yourself a lot of wasted time and effort

>> No.12096713

>>12096683
What a shit post, Anon.

1. If there are IQ differences due to genetic differences between populations, then the Irish can really have a low IQ compared to other populations. Calling him a bigot wouldn't change anything if he were right.
2. Eugenics is proven to work. Why are you surprised that somebody ponders the applications of it?

You do need to actually show where he is wrong.

>> No.12096754

>>12096340
I have successfully /thread'd many threads in this shitty website by using simple rethoric, this is one of them, I'm afraid.

Let's begin by a claim you can't refute. How is any research ever made? Who has money to spend on research? Who is more likely to invest money on a biased study about, say, making people believe that drinking alcohol is healthy ever? How many organizations or institutions would want to disprove any biased study? can those organizations contact the funder and ask for money so they don't release their results?

the world isn't such a pretty place, huh?

So... What kind of racis---*ahem* entity would fund race studies with the objective of "proving" any ethnicity is better than another? would these results be unbiased? would the method be correctly arranged?