/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12054080
around lvl 25 they evolve I think

>>12054080
At the origin of eukaryotic cell.

>>12054080
If we assume that art needs consciousness to be created, we can look at the earliest known art created by humans and it is estimated to be 73,000 years old. Then we can assume humans gained consciousness at least 73,000 years ago.

We didn't. It's an emergent property that many creatures exhibit.

Consciousness isn't "a thing", and the view that it is "a thing" is wrong.

This doesn't mean your thoughts aren't real, it just means you are composite.

>>12054080
When energy came into existence

>>12054080
they never did
its all a simulation and everything is predetermined

>>12054123
>Humans
>Birth of the eukaryotic cell
Nice try, now go back to r/iam14andthis isdeep

>>12054136
Why would we assume art needs conciousness to be created? If it does then there are many animals that seem to create 'art', whatever that means, since before we have
>>12054161
Good deep but meaningless statement retard, try again

>>12054080
When god created them

>>12054178
>Good deep but meaningless statement retard, try again
You're going to have to elaborate.

>>12054080
You're still arguing about this? Instead of digging up tired and pointless debates, you should accomplish something real.
Be like me:
>Ph.D. in Math
>any job I want
>$300k starting

>>12054178
Why else would someone travel to dangerous caves to draw stuff on walls? The art clearly has special significance. And animals only create art when they are trained by humans