[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 198 KB, 745x609, fc45530698508ed4d5b55b643c822001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11972367 No.11972367 [Reply] [Original]

I've reluctantly decided to read a bioethics book for entertainment and holy shit some of these people are fucking retarded and clueless about reality. There are some good ones, but most of them make me question whether or not 'Social Work' is truly the lowest IQ major. My guess is that there is some kind of survivorship bias where most people who are passionate about medicine/biology pursue those through stem, while (typically religious) people who oppose things like gene-editing are more likely to jump into bioethics to fuel their burning hatred. We can not let retards and boomer doctors control a large portion of discussion regarding potentially society transforming topics. This should only be reserved for the 140+ IQs. Most well known intelligent philosophers and scientists are in support of biomedical enhancement technologies while also understanding the caveats and considerations of them. Meanwhile religious & low IQ people instantly bash almost every aspect of them. At this point, we know who the winning team is and I am sick and tired of giving any sense of credence retards.

>> No.11972372

>>11972367
pasta

>> No.11972597

>>11972367
High IQ people are unironically too stupid to recognize the dangers of unbridled technological advancement.

>> No.11972641

>>11972367
>>11972597
This is the correct stance. IQ/Intelligence does not correlate to "wisdom" (or whatever you want to call it) as strongly as you think it does. There are plenty of high IQ people that make really fucking dumb decisions